SCUP
 

Learning Resources

Your Higher Education Planning Library

Combine search terms, filters, institution names, and tags to find the vital resources to help you and your team tackle today’s challenges and plan for the future. Get started below, or learn how the library works.
DISPLAYING 2864 RESOURCES

FOUND 2864 RESOURCES

Clear All
ABSTRACT:  | 
SORT BY:  | 
Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
March 1, 2001

Featured Image

Indicators of Quality

One study determined quality by surveying the perceptions of campus stakeholders.

From Volume 29 Number 3 | Spring 2001

Abstract: This discusses performance indicators within higher education via the querying of multiple college stakeholder groups associated with a single medium-sized community college. The data collected allowed the site institution to define quality through the eyes of its stakeholders. The findings from this investigation revealed that outcome measures were perceived to be more relevant and appropriate than input, process, or output measures in regard to defining institutional quality. Indicators related to customer/client satisfaction, student achievement, and student skill improvement were identified as the most relevant measures of quality at this institution. Finally, the use of indicators as a tool to promote institutional improvement was discussed.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
March 1, 2001

Featured Image

LSU’s Balancing Act

A policy analysis of changing admission standards shows the progress made at one institution—and the goals still to be met.

From Volume 29 Number 3 | Spring 2001

Abstract: Universities, like other organizations, are affected by many interrelated influences and systems. In the early 1980s, because of its below average freshmen-to-sophomore year retention rates for an institution of its type, large developmental enrollment, and poor graduation rates, Louisiana State University and A & M (LSU) did not compare to other major state universities in terms of student success rates. Using a systems theory approach to analyzing the affect of inputs on outputs, this article describes the efforts that were made to transform the quality and completion rates of undergraduate students at LSU by changing the criteria for the admission of new freshmen.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
March 1, 2001

Featured Image

Planning, Politics, Presidential Leadership

Planners, and the planning and management systems that they design and service, can be instrumental in supporting university presidents as they execute their leadership agendas.

From Volume 29 Number 3 | Spring 2001

Abstract: Institutions of higher education, and their leadership, are confronted with a “new reality” characterized by the influence of powerful external forces and stressful internal change. Planners, and the planning and management systems that they help design and service, can be instrumental in supporting university presidents as they execute their leadership agendas. Planners can enhance their effectiveness, and planning itself, by developing a deeper understanding of their institutions as complex organizations in general, and as political systems in particular. Also, by understanding planning as a political process and the role of the president as a political leader, planners can enhance their contributions to the institutions they serve.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
March 1, 2001

Featured Image

“Roads Scholars”

Faculty’s Role in Student Recruitment

In this innovative program, faculty members take an active role.

From Volume 29 Number 3 | Spring 2001

Abstract: Universities, like other organizations, are affected by many interrelated influences and systems. In the early 1980s, because of its below average freshmen-to-sophomore year retention rates for an institution of its type, large developmental enrollment, and poor graduation rates, Louisiana State University and A & M (LSU) did not compare to other major state universities in terms of student success rates. Using a systems theory approach to analyzing the affect of inputs on outputs, this article describes the efforts that were made to transform the quality and completion rates of undergraduate students at LSU by changing the criteria for the admission of new freshmen.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
March 1, 2001

Featured Image

Surviving the Digital Revolution

A risk assessment instrument helps predict whether colleges and universities will survive major changes in higher education.

From Volume 29 Number 3 | Spring 2001

Abstract: Many prognosticators see emerging digital technologies as resulting in the demise of a significant number of institutions of higher education. Institutions at greatest risk are those that do not identify and prepare to compete in clearly defined market niches. This article proposes several market niches and faculty roles within these niches. A risk assessment instrument is provided by which the leadership of an institution can judge the degree to which their institution is at risk.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access