SCUP
 

Learning Resources

Your Higher Education Planning Library

Combine search terms, filters, institution names, and tags to find the vital resources to help you and your team tackle today’s challenges and plan for the future. Get started below, or learn how the library works.

FOUND 74 RESOURCES

REFINED BY:

  • Challenge: Funding Uncertaintyx

Clear All
ABSTRACT:  | 
SORT BY:  | 
Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
July 1, 2018

Featured Image

Institutional Expenditures and State Economic Factors Influencing 2012–2014 Public University Graduation Rates

A better understanding of how to allocate different types of institutional expenditures for maximum return on investment may positively influence six-year graduation rates.

From Volume 46 Number 4 | July–September 2018

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Trends for Higher Education

Published
February 15, 2018

Featured Image

Evolution of Higher Education | Spring 2018

This edition focuses broadly on change in higher education.
Abstract: From demographics and social change to politics and technology, many trends impact planning in higher education. SCUP’s Trends for Higher Education is designed to help you and your institution make sense of the most significant evolutionary forces.

This edition focuses broadly on change in higher education. We look through an array of different lenses to gain some perspective on issues and opportunities that appear to be on the horizon—or at our doors.

Member Price:
Free

Non-Member Price:
Free

Trends for Higher Education

Published
September 15, 2017

Featured Image

Member Price:
Free

Non-Member Price:
Free

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
April 1, 2017

Featured Image

Integrating Board, System, and University Planning and Performance During a Period of Rapidly Declining State Funding Commitment

Even in the most difficult financial times, integrating planning and budgeting throughout the organization creates opportunities for success.

From Volume 45 Number 3 | April–June 2017

Abstract: In 2009 the Arizona University System (supporting over 130,000 enrollments) through its Board of Regents directed its board president and the presidents of Arizona State University, University of Arizona, and Northern Arizona University to create an operational plan that reflected the board’s vision, goals, and strategic directions. A primary objective was to transform the system (or enterprise) vision into concrete goals and outcomes that would directly connect to financial decision making at the system and university level. The backdrop for higher education planning and budgeting expectations included the continuation of severe reductions in state funding, rapidly increasing student tuition and fees, and a call for greater accountability. The planning processes were characterized by the integration of board and presidential discussions, inclusion of constituent debate, identification of strategic choices, and approval of outcomes focused on measuring performance. The integration ran across and within three organizations or levels that included the Arizona Board of Regents, its system administration, and the three universities.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Trends for Higher Education

Published
February 1, 2017

Featured Image

Member Price:
Free

Non-Member Price:
Free

Trends for Higher Education

Published
September 15, 2016

Featured Image

Member Price:
Free

Non-Member Price:
Free

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
July 1, 2016

Featured Image

An Analysis of Closed Colleges and Universities

If administrators can identify warning signs early, it is hoped that they will be able to take informed and beneficial action to save their institution.

From Volume 44 Number 4 | July–September 2016

Abstract: This research aims to identify factors related to university closures. While other studies have examined internal factors, few have investigated the impact that external factors, such as demographics, have on school survival. First, this research identifies 96 private baccalaureate and higher-level colleges and universities that have closed since 2000. Next, the closed schools are compared to a sample of 1,793 schools that remained operational over the same time period. Geographic and statistical analysis was completed to identify significant factors that differentiate closed schools. Economic and demographic census data were used to analyze the area around each school, and financial data were used to evaluate the financial health of the school itself. Many articles point to a trend away from rural colleges as the main reason for closure, but this research shows no significant difference in population density in the areas around schools that closed and schools that remained open. Internal factors like enrollment and expenses proved more significant.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Trends for Higher Education

Published
March 15, 2016

Featured Image

Member Price:
Free

Non-Member Price:
Free

Trends for Higher Education

Published
October 1, 2015

Featured Image

Member Price:
Free

Non-Member Price:
Free

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
April 1, 2014

Featured Image

Strategic Planning and Assessment in an Outcomes-based Funding Environment

In an era of more scrutiny and less funding, higher education must be adaptive to the changing environment while also demonstrating accountability.

From Volume 42 Number 3 | April–June 2014

Abstract: The passing of the Complete College Tennessee Act (CCTA) was a watershed moment in how the state’s institutions of higher education operated and would be funded. Under the act, state policy shifted to focus on degree production, efficiency, resourcefulness, and economic growth. This article examines how one public institution prepared itself in a fluctuating leadership climate to navigate a quickly evolving and complex planning environment. It discusses the background and fundamentals of CCTA as they relate to higher education funding, the implications for strategic planning and assessment at the university, and the promises and challenges of new accountability formulas for quality improvement in higher education.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access