SCUP
 

Learning Resources

Your Higher Education Planning Library

Combine search terms, filters, institution names, and tags to find the vital resources to help you and your team tackle today’s challenges and plan for the future. Get started below, or learn how the library works.

FOUND 1840 RESOURCES

REFINED BY:

  • Format: Planning for Higher Education Journalx

Clear All
ABSTRACT:  | 
SORT BY:  | 
Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
June 1, 2003

Featured Image

Learning Communities and First-Year Programs: Lessons for Planners

Bowling Green State University carried out a study of learning communities and first-year programs to determine their success in facilitating student success, increasing engagement, and promoting connections.

From Volume 31 Number 4 | June–August 2003

Abstract: Many institutions have developed learning communities and first year programs in order to facilitate student success, increase engagement and promote connections. Do we know if these outcomes are being accomplished? How should we go about finding out? Using multiple methods, one university carried out a comprehensive study of these efforts. Lessons were learned about both what works among learning communities and first year programs and how to best go about asking the question.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
June 1, 2003

Featured Image

Pricing and Enrollment Planning

This article holds that institutions maximize their long- run quality reputation through the accomplishments of their alumni. It presents a management model for pricing and enrollment planning which yields optimal pricing decisions relative to student fees and average scholarship, the institution’s financial ability to support students, and an average cost-pricing rule. The model reveals that pricing rules based on the theory of the firm are inappropriate for higher education.

From Volume 31 Number 4 | June–August 2003

Abstract: This paper contains a management model for pricing and enrollment planning. It is assumed that the institution maximizes its long run quality reputation through the accomplishments of its alumni. The model yields rules for optimal pricing decisions with respect to the “sticker price,” the average scholarship per student, and enrollment. It identifies the optimal mix between the sticker price and the average scholarship, a measure of the institution’s financial ability to support students, and an average cost pricing rule. The model also reveals that pricing rules based on the theory of the firm are inappropriate for higher education and can lead to financial distress.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
March 1, 2003

Featured Image

Energy Sustainability and the Green Campus

College and university planners, architects, and facilities managers can play a critical role in promoting environmental responsibility by developing a campus sustainable energy program.

From Volume 31 Number 3 | March–May 2003

Abstract: Campus energy consumption causes the largest environmental impacts. College and university planners, architects, and facilities managers are uniquely positioned to play a critical role promoting campus environmental responsibility by addressing the need for campus energy sustainability. Both demand- and supply-side strategies are required. On the demand side, an aggressive campus energy conservation program can reduce campus energy consumption by 30 percent or more. Addressing the supply side of the energy equation means shifting to clean, renewable, non-carbon-based energy resources and technologies. Developing campus energy policies, coping with the computer explosion, avoiding the pitfalls of electric deregulation, buying green power, and implementing green building design are all parts of the solution.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
March 1, 2003

Featured Image

Successful Strategies for Planning a Green Building

Green buildings offer many advantages over their conventional counterparts, but their development requires a set of clear environmental performance goals as well as involvement from a wide range of participants.

From Volume 31 Number 3 | March–May 2003

Abstract: Green buildings offer many compelling advantages over their conventional counterparts—increased educational performance, lower energy costs, and lower environmental impact, to name a few—so green buildings should be easier to develop. Unfortunately, that isn’t always the case. Several strategies are important to avoid a protracted process. Develop a set of clear environmental performance goals (buildings as pedagogical tools, climate-neutral operations, maximized human performance), use Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED™) as a gauge of performance, and use the project to reform the campus building process. All of these steps need to involve a range of participants—students, faculty, administration, and facilities staff—to achieve the best results.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
March 1, 2003

Featured Image

Building Better Buildings: Sustainable Building Activities in California Higher Education Systems

As major and influential owners of buildings, state governments can and should express a strong level of commitment and support for sustainable building.

From Volume 31 Number 3 | March–May 2003

Abstract: The State of California has initiated a number of policies and programs to integrate sustainable building practices into the state’s capital outlay process. Many of these efforts involve new levels of teamwork between diverse state programs and departments. The state’s higher education systems have begun to show a strong level of commitment to sustainable building and have implemented a number of sustainable building measures within their organizations. This article (1) outlines the activities and recommendations of the task force, (2) discusses sustainable building activities in California’s higher education systems, and (3) highlights key issues that California is grappling with in its implementation of sustainable building practices.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
March 1, 2003

Featured Image

Planning to Learn

From Volume 31 Number 3 | March–May 2003

Abstract: Can organizations that purport to advance learning themselves learn relative to the global ecological trends? We take great pride in equipping our students to do well-paying work in an unsustainable economy—the rough equivalent of preparing them for duty on the Titanic. There is, however, a general acknowledgment of the larger global environmental trends but without as yet much effort to adjust institutional behavior accordingly. Although there is no single formula, organizational learning requires mastery at seven levels. This article discusses those seven levels.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access