SCUP
 

Learning Resources

Your Higher Education Planning Library

Combine search terms, filters, institution names, and tags to find the vital resources to help you and your team tackle today’s challenges and plan for the future. Get started below, or learn how the library works.

FOUND 1835 RESOURCES

REFINED BY:

  • Format: Planning for Higher Education Journalx

Clear All
ABSTRACT:  | 
SORT BY:  | 
Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
April 1, 2015

Featured Image

SCUP At 50

Some Thoughts from a Charter Member

My hope is that this narrative will be both a meaningful contribution to the society’s 50th anniversary celebration and the beginning of a tradition that will create a personal, as well as an official, history of the society.

From Volume 43 Number 3 | April–June 2015

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
April 1, 2015

Featured Image

SCUP 50th Anniversary Interviews

Mike Moss, Jim Young, and Claire Turcotte

What follows is a conversation with the “new kids on the block.” Meet Mike Moss, President of SCUP, and Jim Young, Chief Learning Officer.

From Volume 43 Number 3 | April–June 2015

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
January 1, 2015

Featured Image

Postsecondary Play

The Role of Games and Social Media in Higher Education

From Volume 43 Number 2 | January–March 2015

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
January 1, 2015

Featured Image

Changing the Landscape at the University of Southern Indiana Through a Locally Developed, Customized Environmental Scanning Process

This exercise proved to be successful in presenting a new lens through which USI can look to position itself for both the short and long term.

From Volume 43 Number 2 | January–March 2015

Abstract: The University of Southern Indiana (USI) embarked on a unique, customized environmental scanning process different from those found in the literature and in practice. We thoroughly detail our process with an emphasis on a trend analysis of five overarching themes (demographics, business, science and technology, governance, and higher education). The results of the trend analysis were integrated with the organization’s prioritized strengths through a series of qualitative interviews with internal and external stakeholders. Finally, we summarize the outcomes associated with disseminating this work throughout our campus and describe how it will inform the next iteration of our strategic plan.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
January 1, 2015

Featured Image

Postsecondary Preparatory Programs for Veterans

A Federal Reporting Chasm

A very wide gap exists in the ability of institutions to not only collect data and report on outcomes for enrolled veterans, but also to identify them in the first place.

From Volume 43 Number 2 | January–March 2015

Abstract: Military veterans have received federal support to better prepare for success in higher education for nearly five decades. One such federal program, Veterans Upward Bound, has existed since the Johnson administration with a goal to increase veterans’ postsecondary education completion rates. Although there is clearly a demonstrated need for such efforts, the question remains whether these support programs are successful. This article explores federal reporting of programs designed to prepare veterans for the postsecondary learning environment in terms of goal achievement. Findings suggest inconsistent internal data collection methods, nonexistent outcome reporting, and conflicting data on veterans’ postsecondary success rates from non-government agencies.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
January 1, 2015

Featured Image

Placing Academics at the Heart of Higher Education Planning

Academic programs should serve as the centrifugal force, informing and driving the accomplishment of all other institutional plans.

From Volume 43 Number 2 | January–March 2015

Abstract: Academic programs should be the centrifugal force informing and driving the accomplishment of all other institutional plans. While financial, capital, and enrollment management plans are critical to institutional success, each is secondary to academic programs as a driving force. Institutions should simultaneously move toward “integrated planning” while developing a hierarchy of plans, with the academic program portfolio as primary. Undertaking more effective planning will require attention to several elements: operationalizing the mission, confronting the real issues, integrating resources into the plan, staying within institutional scope, quitting some programs and services, focusing on implementation and assessment, and maintaining a planning database for management purposes. The primacy of academic programs in the development of higher education plans will presage their success.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access

Planning for Higher Education Journal

Published
January 1, 2015

Featured Image

Reimagining the Ronald E. McNair Scholars Program Through the Lens of Intellectual Entrepreneurship

Given a certain amount of flexibility, institutions can use programs and partnerships like the IE Consortium as models for expanding the boundaries of the McNair program.

From Volume 43 Number 2 | January–March 2015

Abstract: Despite the fact that U.S. federal TRIO programs, like the Ronald E. McNair Scholars Program, aim to enrich academic spaces for underrepresented students, there are many challenges that minority students face as they move through the program pipeline. This article provides insight into programming efforts by the McNair program at the University of Texas-Austin through interviews with current and past McNair scholars. Furthermore, areas of improvement in planning and integration for local and national application are discussed using the example of UT-Austin’s Intellectual Entrepreneurship Consortium.

Member Price:
Free  | Login

Member-only Resource

Join now to have access