Learning Resources

Abstract: Few presidents leave under "normal" expected circumstances. Quite often this void left must be filled with an interim appointment. What the interim is expected to do, length of service, and ramification of the choice of interim are issues a governing body must consider before the need becomes reality.

Abstract: Calls for a reexamination of the way in which higher education institutions select their leaders. The prevalence of the "lame-duck" syndrome, exacerbated by resignations up to a year in advance and the appointment of interim leaders to serve while searches for permanent leaders take place, has repercussions throughout the institution in terms of willingness to take risk and to implement substantive change. Proposes some possible alternatives to the current system of recruitment and replacement as a means of facilitating strong leadership on campus.

Abstract: Book review: Presidential Leadership: Making a Difference, by James Fisher and James Koch. ACE/ Oryx Press, 1996. 421 pages. ISBN 1-573656-020-0.

Abstract: Book Review: Redesign Collegiate Leadership: TEams and Teamwork in Higher Euducation, by Estela Mara Bensimon and Anna Neumann. Johns Hopskins University Press, 1993. 182 pages. ISBN 0-8018-4561-0 How Academic Leadership Works: Understanding Success and Failure in College Presidency, by Robert Birnbaum. Jossey-Bass, 1992. ISBN 1-55542-466-X.

Abstract: In this article, we discuss a method for developing and writing scenarios for a college or university. We begin by reviewing the general literature on scenarios; we then detail a scenario development project at Arizona State University. This project, conducted in 1988–89, was Arizona State University's first institution-wide, futures-based planning and scenario development effort. The focus of the project for Arizona State University was planning and programming for affirmative action. An outside consultant facilitated the group-process portion of the project and instructed university staff in scenario development. Staff in the university's Office of Institutional Analysis then developed and wrote a set of three scenarios to guide the university's affirmative action programming and planning during the decade of the nineties.