Learning Resources

Abstract: In the continuing environment of accountability, we have created false distinctions between reducing costs and improving productivity as opposed to examining the quality of the product produced and the work completed. The policy discussion has focused on completion and graduation, with little emphasis on the quality of learning. New assessments move quality to the center of the conversation. Accreditation is making evidence of student learning quality a priority.

Abstract: Accreditation, the primary means of assuring and improving quality in U.S. higher education, is the oldest and most diverse quality review system in the world. During the 1950s, accreditation entered into a public-private partnership with the federal government, serving as the nation’s reliable authority on academic quality. While this partnership has been effective in many ways, it is now undergoing major change as the expanding governmental regulatory authority to judge quality eclipses accreditation’s collegial model of quality review. This shift challenges the core values of both accreditation and higher education and threatens heretofore successful practices such as the judging of quality by academics and institutional self-determination. While fully countering an expansion of governmental authority is unlikely, action from the academic community is essential to contain this expansion and preserve core academic values.