- Planning Types
Planning Types
Focus Areas
-
A framework that helps you develop more effective planning processes.
- Challenges
Challenges
Discussions and resources around the unresolved pain points affecting planning in higher education—both emergent and ongoing.
Common Challenges
- Learning Resources
Learning Resources
Featured Formats
Popular Topics
- Conferences & Programs
Conferences & Programs
Upcoming Events
- Community
Community
The SCUP community opens a whole world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise.
Get Connected
Give Back
-
Access a world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise-become a member!
- Planning Types
Planning Types
Focus Areas
-
A framework that helps you develop more effective planning processes.
- Challenges
Challenges
Discussions and resources around the unresolved pain points affecting planning in higher education—both emergent and ongoing.
Common Challenges
- Learning Resources
Learning Resources
Featured Formats
Popular Topics
- Conferences & Programs
Conferences & Programs
Upcoming Events
- Community
Community
The SCUP community opens a whole world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise.
Get Connected
Give Back
-
Access a world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise-become a member!
Planning for Higher Education Journal
The Future of Accreditation
Accreditation, the primary means of assuring and improving quality in U.S. higher education, is the oldest and most diverse quality review system in the world. During the 1950s, accreditation entered into a public-private partnership with the federal government, serving as the nation’s reliable authority on academic quality. While this partnership has been effective in many ways, it is now undergoing major change as the expanding governmental regulatory authority to judge quality eclipses accreditation’s collegial model of quality review. This shift challenges the core values of both accreditation and higher education and threatens heretofore successful practices such as the judging of quality by academics and institutional self-determination. While fully countering an expansion of governmental authority is unlikely, action from the academic community is essential to contain this expansion and preserve core academic values.
MEMBERS ONLY
Attention Members: Log in to access this item.Not a member? Join now> to access this article and all journal articles for free.