Learning Resources

Abstract: Participating in the STARS sustainability tracking system can provide campuses with opportunities to do integrated analysis and planning. Campus operating decisions are often made to achieve narrow, localized optimization. More integrated analysis and planning can identify opportunities for greater financial savings and more sustainable operations by identifying impacts and interactions beyond normal planning boundaries. This article provides four specific scenarios as examples of the potential for more global optimization.

Abstract: The past decade’s growth of campus sustainability planning has created a cadre of new planners. As exemplified by Richard J. Martin’s article in this issue of Planning for Higher Education, the work of higher education planners is enhanced by the new Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating System (STARS). STARS is a boon for those who wish to see more comprehensive, integrated planning on college and university campuses.

Abstract: Before the recession, planning offices were the workhorses supporting institutional growth strategies by translating the ambitions of senior administrators into action. However, the recession derailed many institutional ambitions; austerity suddenly supplanted growth. The future role of planners seems uncertain beyond operationalizing short-term damage control. Yet this article asserts that planners are uniquely positioned to assume an essential role in colleges and universities: sensemakers and sensegivers. Through sensemaking and sensegiving, planners can focus institutional dialogue on the meaning of austerity. Instead of accepting resource constraints as a ubiquitous rationale for retrenchment, planners can guide institutional dialogue toward acknowledging that new constraints merely discipline earlier ambitions within new parameters.