- Planning Types
Planning Types
Focus Areas
-
A framework that helps you develop more effective planning processes.
- Challenges
Challenges
Discussions and resources around the unresolved pain points affecting planning in higher education—both emergent and ongoing.
Common Challenges
- Learning Resources
Learning Resources
Featured Formats
Popular Topics
- Conferences & Programs
Conferences & Programs
Upcoming Events
- Community
Community
The SCUP community opens a whole world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise.
Get Connected
Give Back
-
Access a world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise-become a member!
- Planning Types
Planning Types
Focus Areas
-
A framework that helps you develop more effective planning processes.
- Challenges
Challenges
Discussions and resources around the unresolved pain points affecting planning in higher education—both emergent and ongoing.
Common Challenges
- Learning Resources
Learning Resources
Featured Formats
Popular Topics
- Conferences & Programs
Conferences & Programs
Upcoming Events
- Community
Community
The SCUP community opens a whole world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise.
Get Connected
Give Back
-
Access a world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise-become a member!
Planning for Higher Education Journal
Planning for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Retention
Understanding the Implications of the Theory of Planned BehaviorFrom Volume 43 Number 4 | July–September 2015By Laura G. Foltz, Charles B. Foltz, Stephanie L. KirschmannChallenges: Student Success, Retention, and GraduationThis study uses the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) in explaining the intent to graduate of students in introductory chemistry courses. Retention studies focus on interactional theories and high-impact practices such as student integration, student engagement through research experiences, student-faculty mentor relationships, and peer tutoring; however, these studies fail to provide a theoretical model to explain and predict student behavior. Findings echo the importance of relationships with peers, faculty, and staff and suggest that subjective norms (positive peer pressure) influence student intentions. Perceived behavioral control and attitudes play a less significant role, but may be part of a STEM retention strategy. This framework assists planners in examining current programs for improvement opportunities and identifying other initiatives to help retain STEM students. Future studies should examine the use of this model for predicting retention and staging interventions to retain STEM students.
MEMBERS ONLY
Attention Members: Log in to access this item.Not a member? Join now> to access this article and all journal articles for free.