- Planning Types
Planning Types
Focus Areas
-
A framework that helps you develop more effective planning processes.
- Challenges
Challenges
Discussions and resources around the unresolved pain points affecting planning in higher education—both emergent and ongoing.
Common Challenges
- Learning Resources
Learning Resources
Featured Formats
Popular Topics
- Conferences & Programs
Conferences & Programs
Upcoming Events
- Community
Community
The SCUP community opens a whole world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise.
Get Connected
Give Back
-
Access a world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise-become a member!
- Planning Types
Planning Types
Focus Areas
-
A framework that helps you develop more effective planning processes.
- Challenges
Challenges
Discussions and resources around the unresolved pain points affecting planning in higher education—both emergent and ongoing.
Common Challenges
- Learning Resources
Learning Resources
Featured Formats
Popular Topics
- Conferences & Programs
Conferences & Programs
Upcoming Events
- Community
Community
The SCUP community opens a whole world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise.
Get Connected
Give Back
-
Access a world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise-become a member!
Planning for Higher Education Journal
Consortium Circuit Riders Help Invisible Colleges Improve Instruction…or, In New Hampshire, the Medium is not the Message (Educational Technology Profile 19)
From Volume 5 Number 3 | June 1976By Judith MurphyThis is the nineteenth in a series of profiles documenting the experiences of two dozen colleges and universities with the use of instructional technology. A look at what has been learned at these places may benefit others considering new ways to teach. This report describes instructional development activities conducted through a consortium. Collegiate consortia are certainly not new, nor is instructional development. The combination, however, is unique. In offering this story, we break one of the ground rules established for these profiles: to report on projects that have been in place long enough for the results to be in, so that readers may profit from their successes and failures. The program described herein is a fledging, but it is a concept so potentially useful to small, poor institutions that it merits setting aside that rule. The author of tis profile serves as associate director of the Commission on Instructional Technology, and also has written widely on education and the arts. The reports in this series are supported by a special grant to EFL from The Ford Foundation.
MEMBERS ONLY
Attention Members: Log in to access this item.Not a member? Join now> to access this article and all journal articles for free.