- Planning Types
Planning Types
Focus Areas
-
A framework that helps you develop more effective planning processes.
- Challenges
Challenges
Discussions and resources around the unresolved pain points affecting planning in higher education—both emergent and ongoing.
Common Challenges
- Learning Resources
Learning Resources
Featured Formats
Popular Topics
- Conferences & Programs
Conferences & Programs
Upcoming Events
- Community
Community
The SCUP community opens a whole world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise.
Get Connected
Give Back
-
Access a world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise-become a member!
- Planning Types
Planning Types
Focus Areas
-
A framework that helps you develop more effective planning processes.
- Challenges
Challenges
Discussions and resources around the unresolved pain points affecting planning in higher education—both emergent and ongoing.
Common Challenges
- Learning Resources
Learning Resources
Featured Formats
Popular Topics
- Conferences & Programs
Conferences & Programs
Upcoming Events
- Community
Community
The SCUP community opens a whole world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise.
Get Connected
Give Back
-
Access a world of integrated planning resources, connections, and expertise-become a member!
Planning for Higher Education Journal
The Maryland Model of Community College Student Degree Progress
From Volume 41 Number 4 | July–September 2013By Craig A. ClagettTo meet enrollment management and accountability needs, Maryland’s 16 community colleges monitor the degree progress of their students through the Maryland Model of Community College Student Degree Progress. Implemented in 2005, the model addressed many of the flaws in the completion metrics in use at that time and incorporated developmental education status as a key variable. Using a behavioral definition of degree-seeking, the model also included interim measures of success to account for the slower pace dictated by the life circumstances of many community college students. Findings for seven cohorts are analyzed, and results are compared to graduation rates at four-year institutions. Reform efforts in developmental education prompted by the findings of the model are described.
MEMBERS ONLY
Attention Members: Log in to access this item.Not a member? Join now> to access this article and all journal articles for free.