My SCUP | Log In  | Join | Donate
CART (0)
start typing to search www.scup.org
  • About
  • Membership
  • Regions
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Annual Fund
  • Awards
  • Achieving Our Vision
  • Leadership
  • Perry Chapman Prize
  • Staff
  • Strategic Plan (PDF)
  • About Membership
  • Membership Directory
  • New Members
  • Join
  • Renew
  • SCUP Member News
  • Volunteering
  • Mid-Atlantic
  • North Atlantic
  • North Central
  • Pacific
  • Southern
  • SCUP 2013 Mid-Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 North Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Central Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Pacific Symposium | November 1
  • SCUP 2014 Pacific Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Southern Regional Conference
  • Annual, International Conference
  • Calendar
  • Online Programs
  • Planning Institute
  • Regional Conferences
  • Books
  • Campus Facilities Inventory
  • Continuing Education Credits
  • Jobs
  • Mojo
  • Plans - Getty Higher Education
  • Plans - Higher Education Institutional
  • Planning for Higher Education Journal
  • RFPs and RFQs
  • Trends to Watch in Higher Education
Home Regions Southern SCUP 2011 Southern Regional Conference - Surviving the Battle: Reshaping the Future SCUP 2011 Southern Regional Conference Proceedings


  • Conference Links
  • Conference Home
  • Final Program (PDF)
  • Conference Proceedings
  • NEW! Registrant Search
  • Registration and Deadlines
  • Program Information
    • Schedule at a Glance
    • Session Search
    • Sunday Agenda
    • Monday Agenda
    • Tuesday Agenda
    • Optional Tours
    • Preconference Workshops
  • Hotel
  • Travel
  • Conference Corner
  • Presenters Corner

  • Culture Statement

  • Conference Chair
    Michael S. Watson mwatson@wtsliollio.com
    Principal
    Watson Tate Savory Liollio Architecture
    (704) 749-5181

    Conference Co-Chair
    David Rea
    david.rea@austin.utexas.edu

    Director, Campus Planning
    University of Texas at Austin
    (512) 471-6475

    Program Chair
    Elsa Pena
    epena@westga.edu
    University Architect
    University of West Georgia
    (678) 839-6578

    Local Host Co-Chair
    Nancy Nusbaum nnusbaum@txstate.edu
    Associate Vice President, Finance & Support Services Planning
    Texas State University-San Marcos
    (512) 245-2244

    Local Host Co-Chair
    Doug Lipscomb doug.lipscomb@utsa.edu
    University Architect
    University of Texas-San Antonio
    (210) 458-4935

    Sponsorship Co-Chair
    Gita Hendessi gita@hendessiassociates.com
    President
    Gita Hendessi, Hendessi & Associates
    (404) 605-0093

    Online Form or Website Contact SCUP Michelle Pierson michelle.pierson@scup.org (734) 764-2013

Conference Proceedings

Conference proceedings are available to all SCUP members and conference attendees.

Please note: Not all sessions have proceedings available.


Sunday, October 2, 2011, 6:00 PM–7:00 PM
(PL002) Opening Plenary
Presented by: Ricardo Romo, President, The University of Texas at San Antonio


Monday, October 3, 2011, 8:30 AM–9:45 AM
(PL005) Plenary Session
Presented by: Diane Snyder, Vice Chancellor, Finance & Administration, Alamo Community College District Central Office

Colleges and universities are under unprecedented pressure to turn out more educated young people and adults—at a time when the money available to them, from public and other sources, is being slashed.  New attitudes, tools and strategies have emerged at Alamo Colleges in response to current threats and opportunities.  A paradigm shift is underway to change how this community college district’s five colleges operate – not only at an administrative and operational level, but in core areas such as instruction.

Alamo Colleges is an Achieving the Dream Leader College with over 5,000 employees, $560 million budget and 120,000 students annually in academic and workforce training.
 


Monday, October 3, 2011, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN030) Built for Speed and Survival: Fast Track Lessons Learned
Presented by: Thomas Fisher, Vice President, Southwest District Manager, Hensel Phelps Construction Co.; Stephen Harris, Regional Program Manager, The University of Texas System Office; David Reese, Associate, HOK

When donor funds became available to finance a new research facility, specific provisions of the gift appeared feasible: deliver a complex, pediatric research facility with an unknown user-group, to be built on city-owned land requiring specific design criteria. There's just one catch—completion in 28 months! Presenters will share how it was done successfully for The Dell Pediatric Research Institute, The University of Texas at Austin. Through a highly-collaborative process, the team was able to overcome enormous project challenges and deliver a functional and flexible research facility.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Apply advanced planning principles with project officials to achieve success: clear understanding of the client's expectations, definitions of roles and responsibilities, identification of key deliverables, and development of the criteria for success.
  2. Interpret and use industry benchmarks to supplement incomplete and/or unavailable user information to move the project forward.
  3. Develop an agreed-upon project vision with project leadership, then formulate an effective communications strategy to engage all stakeholder groups.
  4. Leverage key attributes of the integrated project delivery process "relationship building" through shared ideas, experiences, and project goals.

TAGS: Facility Design: Research, Public 4 Year Research, Project Management, Project Delivery

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C30)


Monday, October 3, 2011, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN028) Private University Serves as Planning Catalyst for Community Partnership
Presented by: Sean K. Garman, Architect, Perkins+Will; Stan Love, University Architect, Baylor University; Richard M. Miller, Principal, Perkins+Will

Baylor University's goal of achieving "tier-one" research status among national and international universities and to serve its surrounding communities and industries catalyzed the creation of a strategic vision for strengthening the region's economic future. Join us for an in-depth look at the planning issues and process that shaped the vision, resulting in the creation of the Central Texas Research & Technology Park (CTTRP), a not-for-profit corporation, and its first project, the Baylor Research and Innovation Collaborative (BRIC).

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover how a private university's goal of becoming a tier-one research institution set in motion a course that benefits an entire community and region.
  2. Recognize how conducting a visioning and branding session leads to a clear vision of a university, technical college, and community's current and future strengths.
  3. Assess how clear communication and shared traditional values entice community stakeholder involvement to rally behind a common economic goal.
  4. Review the method employed to conduct an existing condition assessment of the Iconic General Tire Building, confirming its relevancy for adaptive re-use into a high technology research environment.

TAGS: Adaptive Re Use

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C28)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, October 3, 2011, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN031) Utilizing Liquidity Strategies to Make Infrastructure Improvements for Tulane University
Presented by: Jean Paul Hymel, North American Business Development Director, Performance Based Infrastructure, Johnson Controls Inc; Sylvester Johnson, Senior Associate Vice President of Facilities, Tulane University; Wayne O'Neill, CEO, Wayne O'Neill & Associates, LLC; Richard L. Schointuch, Vice President for Facilities Management and Campus Development, Tulane University of Louisiana; Jim Simpson, Director, Higher Education/Solutions America's Building Efficiency, Johnson Controls
A case study of how Johnson Controls' liquidity strategies were able to help Tulane University after Hurricane Katrina. Tulane's situation may seem unique - recovering from a natural disaster- but, in today's climate, higher education is constantly facing similar crises such as the economic downturn, reduced state budgets, and tighter capital markets. Tulane's response strategy to unexpected challenges can be utilized by other higher education institutions in the face of today's demanding economic landscape.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Learn how to create and leverage operations savings, monetizing assets and energy savings to create liquidity.
  2. How performance contracting can help any institution (Public and Private)
  3. Ways to reduce energy and operational costs over the long term
  4. A better idea of how liquidity creating firms can help your institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C31)


Monday, October 3, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN018) Georgia Gwinnett College - Managing Explosive Growth
Presented by: Eddie Beauchamp, Vice President for Facilities & Operations, Georgia Gwinnett College; Maurice Blount, Director of Facilities, Georgia Gwinnett College; Rex Kizzort, Program Manager, Georgia Gwinnett College

Georgia Gwinnett College's (GGC) vision sees a premier 21st-century liberal arts college where learning will take place continuously in and beyond the confines of the traditional classroom. For that strategic target, GGC is building facilities to support over 75% growth in its student population over the past three years.  Bolstering its planning, the GGC Foundation provides support and guidance for the campus's capital project delivery models, which include state-funding and PPV's. College and facilities leadership selects the appropriate approach for new facilities.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Prepare for campus growth by predicting space requirements within an adaptive master plan.
  2. Formulate a master plan that supports the diverse needs of a campus, including housing, classrooms, faculty offices, and support spaces.
  3. Evaluate project delivery cost models.
  4. Collaborate with users, owners, designers, and contractors towards the completion of a master plan that realizes the institution's vision.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C18)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, October 3, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN034) Research Valley Biocorridor: Reshaping Campus and Community
Presented by: Stephen B. Coulston, Vice President, Broaddus Planning, LLC

The Research Valley Biocorridor Concept Master Plan is the first step in establishing a 3,500-acre leading-edge international biotechnology zone in the Bryan-College Station, Texas, area. Through a collaborative joint initiative among the Texas A&M University System, Texas A&M University, both cities, Brazos County, and the Research Valley Partnership, this unique planning process engaged academics, the business community, city leaders, and others to craft a plan that reflects the dynamic economic synergies that can be realized when stakeholders align around a shared vision.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review the process used to elicit buy-in from all campus and community stakeholders.
  2. Evaluate the planning strategies for implementation, including management and funding approaches and priority infrastructure investment.
  3. Consider the advantages of leveraging the multitude of existing resources located within the community to create an ideal atmosphere for a mixed-use town-gown development.
  4. Describe the new and future cutting-edge developments within the new biomedical and pharmaceutical manufacturing zone.

TAGS: Master Planning, Town/Gown, Biomedical Research, Large Public Research, Comprehensive Planning, Economic Development

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C34)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, October 3, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN014) Stretching Your Construction Dollar: Residence Hall Renovation vs Building New
Presented by: John W. Greene, Campus Planning & Sustainability Director, Trinity University; William M. Reeves, Partner, Marmon Mok Architecture
Utilizing Trinity University's residence hall program as a case study, participants will learn the method that the owner and A/E team developed to evaluate the pros and cons and costs of renovation versus new construction. The panel will explain Trinity's Red Bricks/Green Campus policy, student expectations and trends in university residence halls and how these were accommodated with a renovation program. Finally, the implementation program and summer construction schedule will be reviewed and how the first residence hall construction project has achieved LEED Silver certification.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate renovation versus new construction options in the context of getting the "most bang for the buck," while still maintaining the university's sustainability policy.
  2. Apply one method for evaluating existing residence halls to determine whether renovation or new construction is the best alternative, in light of the university's values regarding sustainability, cost, and user goals.
  3. Review student expectations and trends in residence hall design that can be incorporated into such projects.
  4. List the challenges and lessons learned with a fast-track summer construction schedule.

TAGS: Facility Design: Residence Hall, Sustainability, Leed Silver, Project Delivery Models, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C14)AICP CM 1.0 unitGBCI CE 1.0 unit


Monday, October 3, 2011, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(CN024) Focusing on What Really Matters: A Gathering of Perspectives
Presented by: Kimberly Hickson, Firmwide Education & Culture Practice Area Leader, Gensler

This session shares the results of a series of roundtables focused on learning that were held in various cities all over the world. Viewpoints of the students, administrators, and facility planners were all collected during these sessions. Are these stakeholders all on the same page, or do they have different ideas about learning environments? What are the likely changes that we must attend to around learning spaces?

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review the environmental trends affecting higher education today.
  2. Assess how changes in pedagogy affect learning space design.
  3. Identify the most important factors in 'space making'.
  4. Compare the ways that students, faculty, and administrators view learning spaces.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Student Demographics

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C24)


Monday, October 3, 2011, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(CN004) Right-Sizing Your Institution
Presented by: Thomas Bowen, Principal Partner, Comprehensive Facilities Planning, Inc.
What is institutional capacity? What things impact institutional capacity? How is institutional capacity measured or determined? This session will define and explain the elements used to determine how efficiently and effectively an institution operates. Once existing operational capacity is fully explained and described, the session will offer suggestions and alternatives to modify existing operations that will improve capacity and to manage and prepare for future changes in an institution's size.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review the components of operational capacity for an institution.
  2. Identify the elements that have a significant impact on institutional capacity.
  3. Apply strategies for measuring existing institutional capacity.
  4. Consider ways to reshape the operational capacity to meet future changes in institution size.

TAGS: Operations Planning, Institutional Physical Plant Capacity, Operational Measure

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C04)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, October 3, 2011, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(CN023) The Westminster College Extended Campus - A Future for Campuses and Communities
Presented by: Annalisa S. Holcombe, Associate Provost for Integrative & Community Based Learning, Westminster College (Utah); Nelson Scott Smith, Principal, Artichoke Design Company

Westminster College faces significant economic constraints, and needs sustainable growth. The neighboring Sugar House community recognizes the benefits of the College’s "extended campus" as it affects the central business district. Westminster’s master plan, in a unique community partnership, establishes principles for an invigorated campus/community relationship through an increased presence and commitment to the Sugar House neighborhood. This session describes an integrated planning process for College and neighborhood engagement, principles for the extended campus, and early outcomes benefiting both parties.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review the pluses and minuses of creating an extended campus.
  2. Assess the ways in which shared values and benefits for the college and the Sugar House Community helped overcome historic divides.
  3. Discuss how integrated planning strategies for engagement enabled the college/community collaboration to be successful.
  4. Evaluate the usefulness of collaborations for economic success and academic achievement.

TAGS: Town/Gown, Master Planning, Economic Development, Partnerships, Mixed Use, Comprehensive Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C23)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, October 3, 2011, 2:30 PM–3:30 PM
(CN010) Georgia Tech's Courageous Leadership in Capital Project Development and IPD
Presented by: F. Chip Bullock, Vice President, Managing Principal, HDR, Inc.; Paul Stewart, Project Manager, Gilbane, Inc.; Howard S. Wertheimer, Director, Capital Planning & Space Management, Georgia Institute of Technology

When the global economic downturn threatened the Georgia Institute of Technology's capital plans for the world's first Pilot Scale Carbon-Neutral/Net-Zero Energy Solutions Research Laboratory, its leadership created new strategies to overcome overwhelming barriers that would have killed the project. Georgia Tech courageously moved forward to remove all the institutional barriers to make the project thrive, engage alternative funding sources, seek programs capable of landing sponsor/grant resources, create new federal agency partnerships with the National Institute of Standards and technology (NIST) and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), and reinvent the project.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the strategies used to secure alternate funding sources for a sustainability research laboratory.
  2. Identify flexible project delivery methods when goals must change.
  3. Apply methods for maintaining cohesion and collaboration on a diverse project team.
  4. Review a new model of owner-driven Integrated Project Delivery (IPD).

TAGS: Sustainability, Environment, Applied Research, Facility Design: Science/Engineering, Funding Models, Green Communities, Climate

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C10)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, October 3, 2011, 2:30 PM–3:30 PM
(CN019) Gray to Green
Presented by: Trent Rush, Principal, TBG Partners; John H. Russell, Director of Project Administration, Texas Tech University System Administration
The concept of transforming college and university campuses from “gray to green” has become increasingly popular in higher education, yet many questions remain: Is it really green? What are the benefits? Campuses often struggle with removing centrally located parking and paved areas, but the resulting improvements and opportunities are extensive. We’ll examine the issues and explore two significant transformations, at the University of St. Thomas and Texas State University, and analyze empirical evidence about the return on investment.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identifying opportunities to add green space on campus
  2. Approaches for achieving gray to green transformations
  3. Ecological benefits from developing higher-performing campuses
  4. Fiscal benefits from improved recruitment and retention


Monday, October 3, 2011, 2:30 PM–3:30 PM
(CN008) Space Management Strategies that Support Student Retention
Presented by: K. Watson Harris, Director, Academic Technology Planning & Projects ADA Campus Coordinator, Middle Tennessee State University

This presentation provides successful space management strategies employed at one public institution. The state has not funded capital projects in several years. It is also mandating a change in the state appropriations funding formula. The formula is changing from an enrollment-based to a retention/graduation percentage with a special emphasis on graduate students. Besides the expected retention strategies, there are several space management strategies that will support the institution’s efforts to increase retention in existing space.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Gain a comprehensive understanding about ways space management can support student retention strategies.
  2. Discover a variety of reports to create without special software.
  3. Identify strategies for integrating and stabilizing course schedules to benefit students.
  4. Recognize how current policies and practices can be modified to support retention efforts.

TAGS: State Policy Changes, Space Management, Enrollment Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C08)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN020) Come Together: How PPPs Help Realize Health Science Centers
Presented by: John M. Farrell, Senior Principal, FKP Architects; Whitney Fuessel, Project Planner, FKP Architects; Roderick E. McCallum, Vice President for Academic Affairs, Texas A & M Health Science Center

Private partnerships are key in accessing new funding for today's health science centers. Bryan, Texas donated 200 acres for the new Texas A&M Health Science Center campus, anticipating $1 billion in economic impact. The campus plan offers private development opportunities and the first two buildings' focus as inter-professional education sites where medical professions train together, cultivating collaborative practices and patient-centered care, provides immediate returns. Presenters will discuss the process of bringing public/private partners together for sound education and economic outcomes.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review the strategies used to envision a new health sciences campus.
  2. Explore methods for bringing multiple parties together to pursue one goal.
  3. Demonstrate ways a master plan can serve as a roadmap for campus investments and development.
  4. Discover how combining academic programs can save space and maximize investment.

TAGS: Public/Private Partnerships, Facility Design: Health Sciences, New Campus, Large Public Research, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C20)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN016) Designing the Future at Georgia Tech Using Convergent Planning Methodologies
Presented by: Amir Rahnamay-Azar, Senior Vice President, Administration & Finance, Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus; Chester Warzynski, Executive Director, Organization Development, Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

This presentation describes an interdisciplinary and collaborative approach to constructing a 25-year strategic vision and plan at Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) using convergent methodologies. The presentation will show how Georgia Tech applied four distinct but convergent methodologies to: (a) engage stakeholders; (b) objectify and validate strategies; (c) connect the plan to the institution's culture; and (d) develop a process for aligning and implementing the strategic plan.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Apply collaborative approaches for engaging stakeholders.
  2. Identify practical exercises for interdisciplinary and cross functional collaboration and consensus decision-making.
  3. Evaluate a tool for connecting the strategic vision and plan to the organization’s culture.
  4. Review an institutional alignment and integration process for implementing a strategic plan.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Mission/Identify/Vision, Strategic Plan Implementation, Aligned

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C16)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN006) Maximizing Resources - The UTSA Multi-Campus Master Plan
Presented by: Carl L Gromatzky, Principal, BGK Architects, Inc.; James Douglas Lipscomb, University Architect, The University of Texas at San Antonio

Established in 1969, the University of Texas-San Antonio (UTSA) began with a compact plan based on the 1573 Law of the Indiesa grand outdoor space with paseos radiating out in cardinal directions. As enrollment grew, this urban concept gave way to inefficiencies akin to suburban sprawl. Promoting a return to density, the new plan proposes a mixed-use “Collegetown” district with retail, commercial, and residential amenities. The recently acquired Park West Campus also offers new opportunities for public/private partnerships and shared facilities that will maximize return on investment.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review the factors that contribute to planning inefficiencies on urban campuses.
  2. Identify strategies for reversing the inefficiencies of previous planning decisions.
  3. Create a common vision that aligns campus needs with partnership opportunities.
  4. List ways to maximize the return-on-investment through public/private partnerships and shared facilities.

TAGS: Master Planning, Campus Planning, Urban Campus, Town/Gown, Partnerships, Hispanic Serving Institution, Comprehensive Planning, Economic Development, Revitalization

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C06)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN003) The Use of Dispute Resolution Boards at the University of Washington
Presented by: Douglas J. Holen, President - Region One (US and Canada), Dispute Resolution Board Foundation

The University of Washington began using Dispute Resolution Boards (DRBs) in 1993. The Claims and Dispute Resolution section of the Washington State General Conditions contained an Arbitration provision. The University Administration became alarmed at the cost of these proceedings on University contracts and directed Counsel to prepare a Modification for the General Conditions incorporating a DRB process. A Dispute Resolution Board is a three member panel of industry professionals who are chosen by the University and the Contractor and are paneled at the beginning of construction. If a dispute arises that the Parties are unable to resolve in negotiations, it is referred to the DRB. The DRB conducts an informal hearing and issues a non-binding recommendation to assist the Parties in resolving the matter before more formal proceedings are initiated. The University has used the DRB process on all contracts over $10M since 1993. Over 60 contracts totaling approximately $6.0B have been completed and all issues have been resolved without subsequent legal proceedings. The cost of a DRB on a typical University project is less than 0.1% of construction cost.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review the Dispute Resolution Board (DRB) process and evaluate its success in resolving disputes arising out of work for construction nationwide.
  2. Consider the value of standard contract language found in consensus documents and other construction contract templates.
  3. List the steps in implementing a DRB Process.
  4. Identify the steps in the DRB process, including procedures for preparing position papers, conducting hearings, etc.

TAGS: Dispute Resolution Board, Partnerships, Project Management, Financial Management, Capital Projects, Large Public Research, Law

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C03)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN022) University-Community Sense of Place: Anchor Institution’s Strategies for Success
Presented by: David N. Cox, Executive Assistant to the President, University of Memphis; Teresa Hartnett, Director, Administration & Business Analysis, University of Memphis; Andrew J. Trippel, Community Liaison, Division of Business and Finance, University of Memphis

Creating authentic place can drive economic growth, improve quality of life, restore investment in a community and generate recruitment, retention, and fundraising gains for an anchor institution in the host community. The University of Memphis focuses on creating the optimal for-profit investment environment by aligning partner interests, creating effective community revitalization tools, and for focusing on realistic and implementable planning efforts. This session explores how the university encourages renewed investment in place and discusses techniques for leveraging institutions for university-community success.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate one urban institution’s approach to the strategic challenge of developing a sense of place on the campus edge.
  2. Review the planning processes utilized by one community-institutional partnership to facilitate and align partner interests.
  3. Assess the development tools deployed by one community-institutional partnership to create the optimal environment for private sector development.
  4. Identify specific techniques for leveraging institutions for university-community success through group discussion.

TAGS: Town/Gown, Facility Funding, Public 4 Year, Partnerships, Economic Development, Revitalization

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C22)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN032) Weathering the Storms: Using Technology to Respond to Natural Disasters – Successes and Lessons Learned
Presented by: Lynda Alexander, Facilities Information Manager, The University of Texas Medical Branch; Marshall King, Senior Solutions Manager, Business Resource Group; Alan Neill, Vice President of Sales, Business Resource Group

In recent years, several natural disasters have had major impacts on university facilities, including partial or total shutdown of buildings and even entire campuses. This panel discussion will focus on how technology has been used to respond to the challenges faced by university space planners and administrators after a natural disaster, and ways in which technology could have been better used to deal with the crisis. The emphasis of the session will be on knowing what tools and information are essential to prepare for, and respond to, physical emergencies and disasters.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the ways in which technology can help staff respond to disasters affecting university space and infrastructure.
  2. Discuss the challenges faced by university planners and facility managers when disasters occur.
  3. Identify common gaps in technology and/or data that could impact a planner's ability to mediate disasters.
  4. Describe ways to prepare your technology infrastructure for disasters and how to maintain backup and/or redundant systems.

TAGS: Natural Disasters, Technology, Space Management, Facilities Management, Disaster Resistance

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C32)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN025) Community Partnerships Builds Upon Vision to Fund Innovative Future
Presented by: Melissa Crispin, Project Manager, Perkins+Will; Truell Hyde, Vice Provost for Research, Professor of Physics, Baylor University

Utilizing the vision established in the Baylor Research and Innovation Collaborative Strategic Plan, we will share the challenging funding roadmap traveled. Understand how the vision of the plan was strengthened through collaboration among a private university, public technical college, local industry, and the local municipality. The partnerships created allowed everyone to  accomplish the common goal of cultivating strong research, industrial growth, workforce training, and technology development that enhanced the economic advancement for the region.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe the ways an institution can translate a clear strategic vision into funding opportunities.
  2. Evaluate the importance of shared values among various state and local organizations as a method for identifying funding opportunities that will benefit everyone.
  3. Select options for planning and programming a facility that follows the strategic vision and balances the needs of a diverse set of stakeholders.
  4. Identify the use of public/private partnerships that promote higher education and research for economic development.

TAGS: Facility Design: Science/Engineering, Town/Gown, Partnerships, Economic Development

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C25)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN015) Reaching for the STARS
Presented by: Trent Rush, Principal, TBG Partners; Morgan Stinson, Senior Project Manager, EEA Consulting Engineers
As colleges and universities battle for their survival in this challenging time, many institutions have banded together to ensure their viability—through the commitment to sustainable initiatives that benefit all campus community members and the environment. The Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE), comprised of colleges and universities, seeks to empower higher education to lead the sustainability transformation. The use of the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating System (STARS) program is making the dream a reality.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review the key components of the STARS program.
  2. Evaluate the operational and maintenance benefits of high-performing buildings/campuses.
  3. Recognize the ways in which sustainability aids recruitment and retention on a campus.
  4. Apply a method of calculating the return-on-investment for sustainable initiatives.

TAGS: Sustainability, Stars, Aashe, Sustainability Tracking, Assessment And Rating System, Sustainability Measures, Environment, Climate, Green Communities

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C15)AICP CM 1.0 unitGBCI CE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN005) The Hispanic Population Dilemma: The University of Texas System's Response
Presented by: Cathy Delgado, Institutional Research Analyst, The University of Texas System Office; Gerard Dizinno, Associate Professor, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Stephanie A. Huie, Director, Office of Strategic Initiatives, The University of Texas System Office; Roy Mathew, Associate Vice President, Center for Institutional Evaluation, Research & Planning, The University of Texas at El Paso
The convergence of rapid population growth, lower educational attainment, and high poverty levels for Texas Hispanics prompted The University of Texas System – in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, the P-16 School System and other Texas institutions of higher education – to develop initiatives to increase Hispanic access and success. This panel explores The University of Texas System’s progress over the last decade and ongoing promising practices to improve Hispanic access, degree production, and graduation/post graduation success.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize Hispanic population dynamics in Texas and their impact on higher education.
  2. Review strategies to analyze, visually represent, and interpret comparative data on Hispanic student access and success.
  3. Examine campus practices and policies that UT System academic institutions have successfully implemented and their effect on access and success of Hispanic students.
  4. Discuss challenges in increasing access and success of Hispanic students and the feasibility of possible future solutions.

TAGS: Hispanic Serving Institutions, Demographics, Student Access, Student Success, Enrollment Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUPS11C05)


Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 12:00 PM–2:00 PM
(PL004) Higher Education: Good for All of Us
Presented by: Denise M Trauth, President, Texas State University-San Marcos

Denise M. Trauth has been the ninth president of Texas State University-San Marcos since August 2002.  Authorized by the Texas Legislature in 1899, Texas State has grown into a major research doctoral-granting institution with more than 33,000 students.  In response to the needs of the state, the university has recently added such programs as electrical engineering, geographic information science, nursing, math education, and water resources.


Document Links

This printed page contains links to other web pages. Each link has a numerical indicator which corresponds to one of the URLs below.