My SCUP | Log In  | Join | Donate
CART (0)
start typing to search www.scup.org
  • About
  • Membership
  • Regions
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Annual Fund
  • Awards
  • Achieving Our Vision
  • Leadership
  • Perry Chapman Prize
  • Staff
  • Strategic Plan (PDF)
  • About Membership
  • Membership Directory
  • New Members
  • Join
  • Renew
  • SCUP Member News
  • Volunteering
  • Mid-Atlantic
  • North Atlantic
  • North Central
  • Pacific
  • Southern
  • SCUP 2013 Mid-Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 North Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Central Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Pacific Symposium | November 1
  • SCUP 2014 Pacific Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Southern Regional Conference
  • Annual, International Conference
  • Calendar
  • Online Programs
  • Planning Institute
  • Regional Conferences
  • Books
  • Campus Facilities Inventory
  • Continuing Education Credits
  • Jobs
  • Mojo
  • Plans - Getty Higher Education
  • Plans - Higher Education Institutional
  • Planning for Higher Education Journal
  • RFPs and RFQs
  • Trends to Watch in Higher Education
Home Regions Pacific Pacific Regional 2010 Conference 2010 SCUP Pacific Regional Conference Concurrent Session Proceedings
  • 2010 Pacific Regional Conference
  • Conference Links
  • Conference Home
  • Final Program (PDF)
  • Final List of Registrants (PDF)
  • Conference Proceedings
  • 360 Newsletter
  • SCUP Culture Guidelines
  •  
  • Conference Corner
  • Presenters' Corner
  • SCUP Home

Conference Proceedings

Proceedings that have been received have been linked to their corresponding title.

Monday, April 5, 2010, 5:00 PM–6:15 PM
(PL039) Opportunities in a Period of Fiscal Stress
Presented by: Richard P West, Former Executive Vice Chancellor & Chief Financial Officer, California State University-Long Beach

The last two years have seen severe fiscal retrenchment in all aspects of higher education.  Is this another lull before good economic times return for our institutions or is there a “new normal” for higher education even when the economy regains strength?  What should be our action plan now?

 
 


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 7:30 AM–9:00 AM
(CS002) Breakfast Business Meeting with Pacific Regional Council

Enjoy a full breakfast with members of the SCUP Pacific Regional Council.

Hear the very latest about SCUP’s: new Presidents-Provost Initiative; Strategic Priorities; Membership Benefits; Professional Development; and the location of the 2011 Pacific Regional Conference.


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 9:15 AM–10:15 AM
(CN046) UC Merced: Integrating Sustainability Into Programming, Planning and Operations
Presented by: Thomas E. Lollini, Associate Vice Chancellor & Campus Architect, Physical Planning, Design & Construction, University of California-Merced; John O. White, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Capital Development, University of California-Merced
Approaching an age of uncertainty with a mood of abundance, UC Merced's Long Range Development Plan has already gained international recognition as a model of sustainable planning and design by outperforming its ambitious sustainability goals and creating a strong sense of community through integration of programming, planning, infrastructure and architecture into highly leveraged investment outcomes. This presentation will generate a dialogue on how these strategies can apply to other campuses enabling planners to achieve more with less.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss and describe how to leverage needs and resources to achieve higher performing facility outcomes.
  2. Evaluate strategies on how to engage faculty, students and staff in long range planning and capital priority setting.
  3. Interpret one campus' knowledge of how to integrate implementation of long range plans with scarce capital resources.
  4. Explore and evaluate innovative ways to finance a green agenda for campus development.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (P10C46)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 9:15 AM–10:15 AM
(CN024) Integrated Project Delivery – The Cronkite Experience
Presented by: Michael Jackson, Vice President, HDR, Inc.; Steven L. Nielsen, Assistant Vice President, University Real Estate Development, Arizona State University
A candid discussion of the integrated project delivery of this complex 225,000 SF facility, this session will review the process; successes and challenges. A public-public endeavor, the facility is designed to foster teaching responsible journalism in an evolving technology-based media landscape. Co-locating members of the Design-Build team defined a culture of collaboration right from the start. The project was completed on budget and on time, from award to occupancy, in 19 ½ months without a single change order.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate strategies on how to build a collaborative design team - how to create and maintain the collaborative environment necessary to manage a project's cost, schedule, quality and scope.
  2. Recognize creative ways to foster a Public-Public Partnership to gain funding for new higher education academic facilities.
  3. Manage and integrate the essential tools (including BIM) for fostering creativity and innovation with a holistic approach to design.
  4. Discover and understand the IPD process and be aware of potential challenges.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C24)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 9:15 AM–10:15 AM
(CN010) Mission vs. Architectural Context: Mills College Graduate School of Business
Presented by: Karen Fiene, Campus Architect, Mills College; Gregory Mottola, Principal, Bohlin Cywinski Jackson; Nancy Thornborrow, Dean, Lorry I. Lokey Graduate School of Business, Mills College
How can a building be designed so it communicates the future-looking goals of a new academic program while simultaneously respecting the historic context of a notable institution? How should an academic unit’s new objectives influence the design of a new structure that will stand for decades? Can a building be an integral and effective part of the academic program’s strategic marketing efforts? This case study examines how the marketing principle of differentiation affected a major academic building’s planning and design.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate and balance master planning objectives of a historic campus context with the strategic needs of a progressive academic program.
  2. Describe and quantify, organize and design for programmatic needs in a way that addresses pragmatic academic needs, engages the larger campus community, and attracts new students. 
  3. Assess an integrated approach to building a consensus of important stakeholders (ie., faculty, student representatives, college administration, trustees and donors, etc.) during planning, design and construction.
  4. Identify and effectively evaluate trade-offs in programs, sustainable and design features. during cost control reviews.
     

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (P10C10)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN013) Certainty in an Uncertain Time: Coordinated Project Delivery at LMU
Presented by: Paul Danna, Principal, AECOM; Stephen Engblom, Senior Vice President & Principal, AECOM; Anthony Mason, Project Management Consultant, Loyola Marymount University; Lynne Scarboro, Senior Vice President, Administration, Loyola Marymount University

Against a backdrop of educational evolution, increased physical space demands, and today’s economic challenges, administrators, planning directors, and consultants are faced with heightened conflicts for resource prioritization. This session will demonstrate how Loyola Marymount University transformed its standard project delivery methodology into an integrated “project management–planning–design approach.” This approach enabled LMU to fast track a sweeping package of campus projects—a New Master Plan, a New Library, and a Campus Amphitheater—all completed within 36 months.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Coordinate comprehensive campus master planning with the design/construction of a campus building to maximize short-term success and long-term value (phasing strategy).
  2. Use innovative project management to ensure optimum outcomes and maximize value for the University, especially with complex teams, short timeframes, and tight budgets.
  3. Integrate campus buildings and open space networks to enhance user experience.
  4. Discuss hot to maintain and deliver a strong campus vision throughout the process.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (P10C13)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN042) Successful Long Range Development Planning in an Economic Crunch
Presented by: Roger J. Baalman, Director of Facilities Planning, University of Wyoming; Daniel S. Iacofano, Principal, MIG, Inc.; Jason R. Renkens, Director of Urban Planning Services, MIG, Inc.; Robert S. Sena, Principal, Robert Sena Campus Planning & Design
In a time of economic uncertainty and budget constraints it proves evermore essential to take a long-range look at the programmatic and physical development of the campus. Cost cutting measures today can preclude an institution from realizing its larger vision years down the road. At the University of Wyoming, a Long Range Development Plan and the process of creating that plan, have established the big picture vision and is helping to guide day-to-day decision making for incremental, yet effective change.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess an institution’s multifaceted, and sometimes disjointed, approach to planning and design to develop a comprehensive, integrated planning process and final Long Range Development Plan.
  2. Demonstrate and defend the benefits of a long-term, big picture approach to campus development in a time of economic hardship and budget constraints
  3. Facilitate synergy, energy, and on-time product delivery using a tightly integrated planning team; focused project manager; key student, faculty, and staff stakeholders; and meaningful oversight committees.
  4. Explain how to create the organizational and procedural infrastructure to ensure that the University is prepared for short and long-term implementation when the plan is completed.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C42)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN020) Strategies to Reuse Historic Space into High Performance Education Space
Presented by: Brian J. Chase, Director, Facilities Management, Colorado State University-Fort Collins; Jennifer Cordes, Partner, SLATERPAULL Architects, Inc.; Gerhard Petri, Principal, SLATERPAULL Architects, Inc.

After 11 years and 3.5 phases, the unified University Center for the Arts was completed – a reuse of an 80-year building into a sustainable, high performance space. This session will cover the cost savings and sustainable benefits of reusing an existing building, tips will be discussed to uncover the best use for an existing building, to prepare a flexible phasing plan to accommodate the higher education funding stream and to design an education space in historic building.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Interpret the preparation of  a flexible phasing plan, to accommodate the "ever-changing" higher education funding stream.
  2. Describe and discuss the design process of turning a historic building, into an education space.
  3. Explain the design of a high performing facility in an 80-year old historic building.
  4. Discover cost savings and recognize sustainable benefits of reusing an existing building.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (P10C20)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 11:30 AM–1:00 PM
(PL037) Lunch and Plenary Session-Creating a new Relationship With the State –Government Reform in Colorado
Presented by: Kelly Fox, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, University of Colorado System Office

Colorado has been ranked 48th in country in state funding for Higher Education for many years.  In the early 2000's, the University of Colorado began forging a new relationship with state government.  This new relationship is built upon accountability measures and more flexibility from state processes and procedures.  This presentation willexplore how higher education in Colorado is evolving and what changes are being explored as higher education is facing even greater cuts in
state funding today.
 


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(CN034) Visioning Greatness - Campus Environment as Catalyst to Academic Excellence
Presented by: Roberta Jorgensen, Principal, Communitas, LLC; Joel Neel, Director, Facilities Planning and Capital Projects, California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo
Cal Poly has been reinventing campus planning by a "visioning" approach, starting with a President's Planning Charrette to define how the physical campus exterior environment can be re-visioned as a catalyst in advancing academic excellence. The resulting Campus Aesthetic Consistency Plan progressed to a Vision Plan including a mixed-use neighborhood with opportunities for non-State funding. Presenters will demonstrate how the jumping-off activity was choreographed, and how the momentum has continued through small studies compatible with the existing Campus Master Plan.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify how to develop innovative and affordable campus upgrades with a long term perspective.
  2. Discover an approach to gain the attention and support of University executive leadership for a planning vision.
  3. Recognize how to continue planning within an approved campus master plan to define future vision.
  4. Manage strategies for incremental planning within limited funding.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C34)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(CN014) Data-Driven Planning: Utilizing Technology and Information in Strategic Planning
Presented by: Nicola C. Richmond, Executive Director, Planning & Institutional Research, Pima Community College

Pima Community College, the eighth-largest multi-campus college in the US, has developed a series of reports giving insights into the current status of the College in a wide range of areas. The data feed into the college-wide strategic planning process and are used to support improvements and developments. The presentation will provide an overview of the data, the software used to develop the reports, and how they support college planning. Key focus areas will include the importance of disaggregating data and fully embracing technology.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize and explain the importance of disaggregating data, beyond gender or ethnicity comparisons, and how it supports planning
  2. Discover how to effectively communicate complex data with senior leadership and other populations who guide planning.
  3. Utilize technology to maximize ability to analyze and report diverse data.
  4. Develop research programs that support planning and day-to-day college operations.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C14)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(CN039) Innovative Energy and Water Strategies Spur Design and Engineering Solutions
Presented by: Joseph A. Collins, Partner, ZGF Architects LLP; Craig F. Johnson, Senior Mechanical Engineer in the Facilities Design and Construction, UCSD; Martin Poirier, Vice-President, Spurlock Poirier
With architectural design well underway on a new 190,000 gsf biomedical research lab at the University of California, San Diego, the team needed to revisit the School of Medicine’s planning and design standards, which were established prior to the current California state budget crisis and the severe water shortage in San Diego County. Learn about the collaborative sustainable design process that resulted in the use of new design technologies for an ultra-high performance research building and site design to save both energy and water.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss the typically high energy and water consumption levels of lab buildings and traditional landscape planting and learn how new high performance technologies can greatly reduce consumption of both.
  2. Study and interpret the process whereby the team revisited earlier planning assumptions in the context of powerful financial and environmental change, while maintaining functional and qualitative aspects of the previous campus neighborhood plan, design standards and building program.
  3. Review a positive process for review of campus plans and design standards, to align function and physical development with decreasing operations budgets.
  4. Learn how both institutional commitments to sustainability and increasing scarcity of operational resources can be a catalyst for creative design and engineering solutions.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (P10C39)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 2:30 PM–3:30 PM
(CN025) Impact, Status, and Analysis of California's Twelve (12) New Stem Cell Research Facilities
Presented by: Niraj Dangoria, Associate Dean, Facilities Planning & Management, Stanford University; Christopher Shay, Director, Facilities & Capital Planning, Stanford University

On November 2, 2004 California tax payers approved proposition 71 which provided $3Billion for stem cell research. The proposition language allowed for 10% to be spent on stem cell research facilities.

The State oversight authority (CIRM) required the projects be complete by July 2010. This allowed each institution only two years to plan, design, bid, permit, construct and occupy a major new research facility. We are currently three months from this deadline and it is time to review where these projects stand.

This presentation will provide an in depth look at all 12 major facilities grant projects, giving an assessment of their current status, discussing their impacts on each campus, determining lessons learned, and providing a high level understanding of this investment for the state of California.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the current status of CIRM related facilities projects in the State of California.
  2. Develop a strategy to marry your institutions program needs with sudden, one-time, funding opportunities.
  3. Identify successful strategies employed by CIRM funded institutions to execute projects that met institutional goals and external funding organization requirements.
  4. Apply tested strategies to upcoming American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding opportunities.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (P10C25)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 2:30 PM–3:30 PM
(CN048) Reaching out with Concise Educational Master Planning
Presented by: Pedro Avila, Vice Chancellor, Institutional Effectiveness, West Hills Community College District; Suzie Chock Hunt, Director, Educational Planning, gkkworks; Frank Gornick, Chancellor, West Hills Community College District; Marsha Perry Park, Senior Educational Planner, Vanir Construction Management
Often planning documents for a college are large, text-filled, to ensure each component of planning is covered. Yet, in a collaborative environment serving the technology savvy this has become counter-productive to implementation of the plan. Today the use of technology in the creation and dissemination of the plan is critical for implementation. West Hills CCD created a concise and engaging master plan to ensure it would be read by all, and implemented, and will share keys to successful planning.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate past and current institutional and community data and objectively present in the planning documents.
  2. Identify and assess current needs based on institutional and community data in order to formulate enhanced and specific learning objectives.
  3. Construct key findings and effective strategies for implementation of planning documents; developing concise task oriented and measurable assignments and functions.
  4. Utilize available tools for outreach and summarize processes to recognize how it can be used to efficiently and flexibly to define needs in order to support student learning.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C48)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 2:30 PM–3:30 PM
(CN032) CSU-Northridge: Better Design Tools for Better Designs
Presented by: Eric J. Apolenis, Vice President, Rolf Jensen & Associates; Nathaniel S. Wilson, Campus Architect, California State University-Northridge

California State University Northridge (CSUN) is constructing two projects, the Student Recreation Center (SRC) and Performing Arts Center which will make the campus a destination for learning. CSUN harnessed the latest design tools in the realization of these projects. The VPAC is the first CSU project to use BIM technology, CFD modeling for HVAC, and performance-based design of fire-resistance for structural steel. The SRC went further to meet new code requirements resulting in an outstanding example of integrated design.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the tangible and intangible benefits along with actual costs and savings associated with the use of new computer building design applications on two major capital projects.
  2. Manage strategies that help to plan for the changes in their current contracts and procedures that these new design tools will precipitate.
  3. Formulate questions and provide answers, for A/E Design Firms for RFQs/interviews regarding BIM, CFD applications and the firm’s approach to the use of software design tools.
  4. Interpret the process, involving, CM Construction firms for RFPs and interviews regarding their ability to use BIM and other software applications in construction.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (P10C32)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 3:45 PM–4:45 PM
(CN022) Creative Project Funding When Your State is Strapped for Cash
Presented by: Ann A. Jurgens, Principal, THA Architecture; Ysabel D. Trinidad, Vice President, Finance & Administration, California State University-Channel Islands
In 2007, the University of Washington Tacoma Campus began planning Phase 3 of its expansion, anticipating $60M in state funding. Three projects were identified to accommodate 600 additional students, and the designs were well underway when the State's budget crisis resulted in a reduction in funding allocations for the project. This session will review how the Campus and design team analyzed the priorities for the expansion plans, and the creative methods UWT implemented to restore project funding

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss a broader look at the campus’s physical resources.
  2. Evaluate and discover techniques for keeping your campus planning nimble.
  3. Discuss the steps taken when a budget crunch takes over the plan.
  4. Discuss and explore out of the box funding sources for your building projects.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C22)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 3:45 PM–4:45 PM
(CN038) Greening Up the Bottom Line: Strategies to Improve Facility Performance
Presented by: Karl Derrah, Design Principal, DLR Group; Eric Hafner, Principal, DLR Group; John Morgan, Associate Dean, Yavapai College; Prem Sundharam, Senior Associate, DLR Group
Every facility has room to improve their operational budget by developing a high performance facility plan. This may include integrating no-cost, low-cost or smart investment strategies. A post-occupancy case study will highlight opportunities for improving performance. Find out how the newest technology in design can affect your bottom line. All attendees will receive a free Energy Usage Comparison Tool to compare similar energy usage to other similar buildings in the region.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify key elements of a sustainable facility developed by the U.S. Green Building Council.
  2. Discover three levels of sustainable strategies ranging from low-cost to smart-investment strategies.
  3. Define lessons learned from a post-occupancy energy use assessment.
  4. Calculate your facility energy usage to compare to similar buildings with an Energy Comparison Tool.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (P10C38)


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 3:45 PM–4:45 PM
(CN044) New Strategies for City/University Partnerships in Economic Development and University Growth
Presented by: Janne Carmen Corneil, Principal & Owner, Corneil Collaborative; Elizabeth Foster, Senior Planner & Urban Designer, BMS Design Group; Mark Gregory, Associate Vice President, Finance & Administration, Portland State University
The fastest growing university in the state, Portland State University is experiencing pressure to expand and severe cutbacks in funding. Located in downtown Portland, the university is significantly challenged in accommodating growth due to the cost of land. To overcome this, PSU has creatively partnered with the City of Portland to develop a strategy for realizing mutually beneficial, sustainable development. The plan expresses the aligned interests of the university, city agencies, other institutions, and private developers and identifies creative financing strategies that capitalize on these partnerships.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Apply new strategies for economic development and university funding through innovative city/university partnerships, including tools such as tax increment financing and zoning incentives.
  2. Integrate sustainability objectives through an ecodistrict approach to infrastructure, mobility, storm drainage, and energy.
  3. Employ new strategies for urban campus growth that can enhance university development opportunities through partnerships with other institutions and private developers.
  4. Utilize shared resources through joint City/University planning for achieving an integrated university district development plan.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (P10C44)


Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN037) Charting a New Course to Excellence in Uncertain Economic Times
Presented by: Steve Tatge, Senior Project Manager, Capital Projects Office, University of Washington-Seattle Campus; Tim Williams, Associate Partner, ZGF Architects LLP
The University of Washington began planning a major new science facility on its central campus prior to the economic downturn. Despite the loss of state financing, an erratic construction market and unprecedented changes in funding and resource allocation, the project broke ground in the fall of 2009. How was this achieved? Presenters will share innovative design and funding strategies that allowed the University to maximize opportunities while maintaining its commitment to both academic and design excellence.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Demonstrate how early and aggressive pursuit of alternative funding and grant opportunities can help gain necessary support and financing.
  2. Discover how to incorporate maximum flexibility into building design, enabling the project team to respond quickly to capitalize on market swings and rapidly changing construction and material costs.
  3. Discuss hot to maintain and advocate openness to new ideas and approaches during planning and design, which can lead to new solutions and a better overall outcome.
  4. Learn and discuss how to apply new tools and processes to maintain overall building financing despite changing funding sources and priorities.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (P10C37)


Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN040) Integrated Planning Using a Project Specific Pattern Language Approach
Presented by: R. Gary Black, President, Integrated Structures, Inc.; Cullen Burda, Vice President, Integrated Structures, Inc.; James Maguire, Vice Chancellor for Administrative Services, University of North Texas System
A project specific pattern language for the new College of Business and Economics Building (COBE) at Boise State University coalesced the user committee and directed the design team, to produce ONE schematic design which was approved at the first presentation significantly shortening the schematic design time and saving money. This unique process is presented as a case study for innovative and integrated planning which can be implemented in university projects ranging from campus master plans to individual buildings.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover and understand how a pattern language approach can help you solve your most difficult planning problems.
  2. Identify and explain which planning projects would most benefit from a Pattern Language planning approach.
  3. Review and analyze cost benefits between alternative planning methodologies.
  4. Define and prepare a proposal for user groups and university administrators.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C40)


Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN047) Meeting Campus Strategic Initiatives Through Partnerships and Leveraging Resources
Presented by: Patricia Charlton, Senior Vice President, Finance & Facilities, College of Southern Nevada; Gregory Gammon, Chief, Las Vegas Fire & Rescue
Across the spectrum, institutions of higher education are finding resources waning but student demand and community needs increasing. Looking for external partners to address institutional strategic objectives has become more critical. Through an innovative partnership between the College of Southern Nevada and the City of Las Vegas Fire & Rescue, CSN is able to address strategic initiatives for academic programs, capital and campus infrastructure.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss how the College of Southern Nevada and Las Vegas Fire & Rescue have developed an effective and mutually beneficial collaboration.
  2. Discover strategies and gain insight into how one community college and a local municipality developed a win-win partnership for capital development.
  3. Review and discuss examples of how this partnership has enabled the College to address academic program enhancement and expansion, meet the College’s need for specialized qualified teaching faculty, and how this relationship leverages additional partnerships, including K-12.
  4. Explain the leverages and scarce resources that enable both agencies to meet increased demand for services, expand facilities, improve academic programming and content, and to provide opportunity for degree completion for first responders.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (P10C47)


Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN035) Planning for Dollars: Alternate Strategies for Long-Term Planning
Presented by: Marc Fisher, Senior Associate Vice Chancellor, Administrative Services & Campus Architect, University of California-Santa Barbara; Jean Marie Gath, Principal, Pfeiffer Partners Architects; Brian Nichols, Associate, Pfeiffer Partners Architects; Joseph Sugg, Assistant Vice President, University Operations, Santa Clara University
This session will explore strategies that private universities, public institutions and architects use today to plan facilities in an era where the timing of funding and implementation is uncertain. Preliminary plans, renderings and cost estimates are required to secure funding, sometimes years before the building itself will ever be realized. Between the time concepts are submitted and the dollars become available, significant changes in faculty, students, users and technology occur – making both the plans and space program obsolete.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize and interpret the need to accommodate significant changes to space programs and concept designs between the time of initial conceptualization and when funds become available for design and construction.
  2. Identify methods and materials beyond programming efforts and renderings that can be used to create a compelling vision for project fundraising.
  3. Discuss how scenario planning can replace or supplement the traditional programming/pre-design process.
  4. Compare application of these methods in a private versus public institution.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C35)


Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN041) Cutting Edge Design Tools: Virtual Reality in Campus Design
Presented by: Tom Kennedy, Chief of Architecture & Engineering, CSU Office of the Chancellor; Gary Nellesen, Director of Facilities, Planning and Management, Mt San Antonio College; Kevin O'Brien, Principal, Pfeiffer Partners Architects; David Rova, Design Principal, HMC Architects
Cutting edge technology now allows users to walk through a life-size digital model in the early stages of design. What if that experience could be measured and used to inform design choices? Researchers at the California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology (Calit2) at UC San Diego and HMC Architects have joined together to pose this question. Early research of case studies from three institutions will be discussed with a panel to provide insight into this tool’s potential for the future.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Determine how to use virtual reality technology in design and planning of future campus facilities.
  2. Predict how new advances in available technology can impact future facility planning and design processes.
  3. Discuss how early and better understanding of design features can engage design teams and provide better outcomes.
  4. Discover how to use virtual reality technology in research to define how the built environment can improve learning, health and human performance.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C41)


Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN006) Incorporating Seismic Performance Into the Campus Planning Process
Presented by: Harry Jones, Principal, DCI Engineers
This presentation will highlight key aspects of Stanford Universities campus planning process as it pertains to mitgation of sesimic risk on campus. It will also show how to develop and manage seismic guidelines to ensure that existing buildings are renovated in a constent manner and that money is being well spent.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss and define seismic risk and address it in campus master plans.
  2. Integrate seismic renovation into campus planning.
  3. Describe how to develop and implement standardized seismic performance guidelines.
  4. Review one case study, and it's strategies for tracking and controlling, building seismic renovation costs.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (P10C06)


Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN023) The Campus Master Plan as a Tool for Institutional Change
Presented by: Robert Boyd, Director, Facilities Management, California State University, Fresno; Paddy Tillett, Principal & Urban Design, Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Architects, LLP
Fresno State’s master planning effort helped propel its transition from a traditional State university to an institution of excellence in higher learning and research. In the course of 80 meetings with the many constituencies that make up the University, institutional change was ignited. Understand how the planning process, as much as the resulting master plan document , helped move faculty and others out of established ways of doing things into the realms of what might be possible.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Understand how a master plan can establish a framework for guiding University decisions and priorities with acuity and certainty.
  2. Learn what can be accomplished in a time of grim financial realities faced by many colleges and universities today, despite dwindling funding sources and global financial strain.
  3. Learn how Fresno State was able to move forward with funding for new research programs in a contracting economy
  4. Study about the benefits of integrating a landscape master plan with facilities planning.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C23)


Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN004) The Evolving Strategic Plan: Managing Transitions In Implementation
Presented by: Jo Allen, President, Meredith College; Joseph J. Baker, Senior Vice President, Administration & Finance, Widener University-Main Campus

We have designed transitional phases to help pace the implementation and accountability for a strategic plan, giving the plan both structure and flexibility as it evolves. Doing so, has kept the plan fresh and at the forefront of our critical processes (e.g., budgeting, re-accreditation, assessment, and a comprehensive campaign). In addition, we have found the transitional phases to be key to transparency and inclusiveness, along with accountability, as we have made needed adjustments.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Translate the strategic planning and implementation process as an evolution of transitional phases.
  2. Explain and help others, understand, an approach to dealing with cautionary issues surrounding transitions, including the implication that the plan will change.
  3. Study different kinds of issues that typically plague planning processes from the different perspective of seeing rather discrete transitions, in an evolving plan.
  4. Lessons learned, from the conceptual framework.  Case study will be reviewed, focusing on the transition and strategies.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (P10C04)


Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN021) Visions and Reality: Do Flexible Learning Environments Really Work?
Presented by: Becca Cavell, Principal, THA Architecture
The University of Oregon’s College of Education’s $36M project to renovate existing buildings and construct the new 65,000 SF HEDCO building was completed in 2009. The design solution includes highly flexible furniture systems and cutting edge audio-visual systems. This session will review the development of the College’s vision for its teaching and learning spaces and will provide detailed feedback on the actual performance of the spaces in their first year of operation including candid assessments from faculty and students

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss and assess - candid user feedback on the actual performance of newly built and renovated learning environments.
  2. Review the challenges of moving from a traditional to an audio-visual intensive learning environment.
  3. Describe the steps one should take before committing to significant expenditure on new AV and furniture systems.
  4. Acquire and assess, new insights to help you prioritize your spending to match your goals.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (P10C21)


Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 12:00 PM–1:30 PM
(PL038) Lunch and Closing Plenary - Delivering on a Sustainable Future: Financial, Cultural, and Environmental Partnerships at UC Davis New Front Door
Presented by: Roger Boulton, Professor Stephen Sinclair Scott Endowed Chair in Enology, University of California-Davis; Andrew Cunningham, Principal, Flad Architects; Randy McGee, Principal, ZGF Architects LLP; Julianne Nola, Design & Construction Management, UC Davis - Design and Construction Management; Robert B. Segar, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Campus Planning & Community Resources, University of California-Davis

Over the last 10 years, UC Davis has transformed the major public entrance to the university by master planning and building high visibility programs at its new front door.  These projects have built a stronger presence for the university, strengthened each program, and launched successful fund raising programs to attain new university goals. This presentation shares the story of the financial, cultural, and environmental partnerships of one important complex of buildings in this new university entry—the Robert Mondavi Institute for Wine and Food Science.

Through multiple scale academic and social interaction spaces, the recently completed Robert Mondavi Institute for Wine and Food Science and the Beer, Wine and Food Pilot Facility serve as a gateway between UC Davis and a broad community of scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, policy makers, and industry professionals engaged in all dimensions of beer, wine and food science-related activities. The guiding principles of partnerships, community building and sustainability resulted from a collaborative process that included cross departmental faculty, private industry partners and community stakeholders, and will serve as a model for future campus buildings and landscape as outlined in the UC Davis Physical Design Framework Plan.
 


Document Links

This printed page contains links to other web pages. Each link has a numerical indicator which corresponds to one of the URLs below.