My SCUP | Log In  | Join | Donate
CART (0)
start typing to search www.scup.org
  • About
  • Membership
  • Regions
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Annual Fund
  • Awards
  • Achieving Our Vision
  • Leadership
  • Perry Chapman Prize
  • Staff
  • Strategic Plan (PDF)
  • About Membership
  • Membership Directory
  • New Members
  • Join
  • Renew
  • SCUP Member News
  • Volunteering
  • Mid-Atlantic
  • North Atlantic
  • North Central
  • Pacific
  • Southern
  • SCUP 2013 Mid-Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 North Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Central Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Pacific Symposium | November 1
  • SCUP 2014 Pacific Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Southern Regional Conference
  • Annual, International Conference
  • Calendar
  • Online Programs
  • Planning Institute
  • Regional Conferences
  • Books
  • Campus Facilities Inventory
  • Continuing Education Credits
  • Jobs
  • Mojo
  • Plans - Getty Higher Education
  • Plans - Higher Education Institutional
  • Planning for Higher Education Journal
  • RFPs and RFQs
  • Trends to Watch in Higher Education
Home Regions North Central 2009 North Central Regional Conference Home Proceedings
  • 2009 North Central Regional Conference
  • Conference Links
  • Conference Home
  • Final Program (PDF)
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Final List of Registrants (PDF)
  •  
  • Conference Corner
  • Presenters' Corner
  •  
  • SCUP Culture Guidelines
  • SCUP Home

Conference Proceedings

Monday, October 26, 2009, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(1002) Make Your College Campus Comfortable by Applying Urban Design Principles
Presented by: Corrie Meyer, Landscape Architect, Schmidt Associates

Sixty percent of college-bound students report visual environment as the most important factor in choosing a college. That’s why a first impression is so critical for visiting students and their families. This session explores results of a study applying urban design principles to college campuses to measure their comfort elements. The four necessities are: people, balance, convenience, and interaction; without one of the four, a space will never feel comfortable. (This workshop is also being presented at the SCUP national conference in July.)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Define urban design concepts from the text City Comforts, How to Build an Urban Village, by David Sucher (2003), and how those concepts apply to college campus planning.
  2. Describe how to include the four necessities for comfort (people, balance, convenience and interaction) into your campus planning or improvements.
  3. Review which campus amenities are most important to students, families, faculty and staff.
  4. Recognize how the "feel" of a campus contributes to that instant impression that influences the choice of a college.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (C09C1002)


Monday, October 26, 2009, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(1001) Sustaining the Marquette University Capital Construction Program in Turbulent Times
Presented by: Thomas P. Ganey, University Architect, Marquette University

Marquette University began planning a major capital construction program in 2006. The campus master plan was updated in 2007 and the fundraising and financing plan was moving along rapidly when the economic downturn hit. The university has needed to manage ambitions, funding and project schedules while keeping $130 million in construction projects moving forward.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe and relate how a well conceived campus master plan can provide a rudder to guide the institution when conditions change.
  2. Evaluate a collaborative effort involving members of the University Advancement, Office of Finance, the University Architect, and academic stakeholders; explain how working to overcome challenges and stay on course in tough times, benefits all.
  3. Evaluate the partnerships with outside consulting firms, along with contractors and the schedule for project planning.
  4. Learn how the university has managed funding and project schedules while keeping $130 million in construction projects moving forward.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (C09C1001)


Monday, October 26, 2009, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(1003) Identity Crisis: The Importance of University as Place
Presented by: Trevor Calarco, Architect & Senior Associate, Flad Architects; Thomas F Gieryn, Vice Provost, Faculty & Academic Affairs, Indiana University-Bloomington; Michael Haggans, Visiting Professor, Georgia Institute of Technology

What is a university when classroom content can be delivered asynchronously through a wide range of digital media? Is there any significance to these places, other than a quaint attachment of nostalgia? Are we all kidding ourselves in a world of “Universities of Phoenix?” The perspectives of a leading sociologist, architectural scholar and practicing academic architect are brought to this perplexing question.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe how one can identity a crisis within a traditional university.
  2. Explain how and recognize the meaning of place and campus to university identity.
  3. Discuss and translate knowledge of a crisis and place into action that re-balances the value proposition of the traditional campus/university.

 


Monday, October 26, 2009, 3:00 PM–4:00 PM
(1005) Creating a Student-Centered Environment Using a Collaborative Discovery Process
Presented by: Marguerite Dummer, Dean of Health Career and Science, Hennepin Technical College; Jeffrey S. Fenimore, Principal | Architect | Higher Education National Leader, DLR Group

To better prepare students for the new world economy and address decreasing budgets, colleges and universities are rethinking both educational and services delivery. DLR Group’s highly collaborative ‘deep-dive’ discovery process examines culture and identity, work methods and interactions between students, faculty and staff to uncover common themes, synergies, services delivery improvement and enhancements to the learning environment. This session explores the methodology of the ‘deep dive’ discovery process and how it was applied at Hennepin Technical College in Minnesota.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain and learn a model of a collaborative discovery process.
  2. Discuss the model of the collaborative process and learn how this model can illuminate and evaluate existing conditions and processes at your institution and identify possible areas of synergy and efficiencies in service as well as space.
  3. Describe how this model can impact an educational institutions evolution and maturation.
  4. Interpret and discuss how design environments can support institutional change.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (C09C1005)


Monday, October 26, 2009, 3:00 PM–4:00 PM
(1004) Exploring Indiana University’s Innovate Indiana Initiatives: Designing Campus/Community Laboratories
Presented by: Anthony Armstrong, Assistant Vice President, Office of the Vice President for Engagement, IU and President & CEO, IU Research and Technology Corporation, Indiana University-Bloomington; James B. Hill, Principal-in-charge, BSA LifeStructures Inc.

Indiana University is using its resources to further economic development in the Hoosier state. IU’s Innovate Indiana program provides start-up companies with the assistance they need to transform discoveries into marketable products and services and to survive tough economic conditions. As one of the program’s first major initiatives, the IU Incubator in Bloomington is providing the lab and support spaces start-ups need in an environment that enables networking and collaboration. Attendees - administrators, planners, architects, facility personnel– can learn from IU’s efforts.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the key factors influencing Indiana University's impact on the state’s economic development.
  2. Evaluate lessons learned through the process of design and development of an incubator building. Examine from the perspectives of the university and the targeted business entities from within the community for specific laboratory design.
  3. Recognize the positive educational and economic outcomes that have resulted from the project since its recent completion.
  4. Provide an appraisal, through discussions with the presenters, on this approach to design and funding for a facility.  In particular, ways in which the IU Incubator in Bloomington's model contributed to the success of the project by providing the lab and support spaces for start-ups that prosper through an environment that enables networking and collaboration.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (C09C1004)


Monday, October 26, 2009, 3:00 PM–4:00 PM
(1008) Carbon, Energy, and Water: Sustainable Planning Strategies at Indiana University
Presented by: Douglas R. Kozma, Principal, SmithGroupJJR; Robert Meadows, University Architect, Indiana University-Bloomington; Gregory A. Mella, Principal, SmithGroupJJR

Indiana University (IU) is re-aligning its physical resources for a sustainable future. This session will explore the integrated master plan for the Bloomington campus through the lens of energy and water resources. How will the university accommodate a projected 25% facility growth yet reduce its overall environmental footprint? The presentation will discuss achieving this goal using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies for an innovative Stormwater and Hydrology Plan and an unprecedented campus-wide Energy and Water Use Plan.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe both the quantitative and qualitative methodologies behind stormwater and hydrology planning. These planning tools are used to mimic natural systems and improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater.
  2. Describe and explain the strategies of an Energy and Water Use Plan, which is used to reduce comprehensive energy consumption.
  3. Discuss, explore, and explain the principles for sustainable planning and strategies for accommodating additional development with a net decrease in campus-wide imperviousness. This natural system analysis and the development of an environmental framework plan, serve as a foundation for establishing a future university land-use roadmap.
  4. Explain an Energy and Water Use Plan: greenhouse gas emissions and potable water consumption associated with the campus, predicts the energy and water use of the proposed development based on current campus building standards, and demonstrates how sustainable design strategies apply to all new development. Participants will explore the details of the IU Energy and Water Use plan. This plan used the American College & University Presidents Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) goal of reducing campus greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by the year 2050. 

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (C09C1008)


Monday, October 26, 2009, 4:15 PM–5:15 PM
(1006) Simulation Center Advances Education in Indiana Through Creative Collaboration
Presented by: Todd M. Buerger, Principal-in-charge, BSA LifeStructures Inc.; Scott Engum, Associate Professor of Surgery, Indiana University-Bloomington

Indiana University's School of Medicine, School of Nursing and Clarian Health combined resources to create a shared facility that transcends traditional relationships and sparks innovation and advancements in education and patient care. The 30,000 square-foot, high-fidelity simulation center is one of the country's most advanced, with real-life environments for interdisciplinary training of thousands of doctors, nurses and technicians each year. Attendees, especially those with health education programs, will learn how these institutions worked together to raise the level of education and training they provide.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe how three institutions worked together to advance life sciences education and training.
  2. Discuss lessons learned from the shared facility, education and simulation center venture.
  3. Discuss the positive educational and economic outcomes, which have resulted from the project since its recent completion - best lessons learned.
  4. Discuss the overall session, along with answer questions in reference to the advance life sciences facilities.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (C09C1006)


Monday, October 26, 2009, 4:15 PM–5:15 PM
(1024) Training for Tomorrow’s Green Jobs in Alternative Energy Industries
Presented by: William K. Fleming, Design Group; Jerrold Hutton, Dean, Hocking College Energy Institute, Hocking College

The renewable energy industry will be a major creator of jobs over the next 10 years. The demand is rising for technicians trained to construct, install, modify, and test multiple types of alternative energy equipment. Hocking College is a forerunner in that educational delivery. Opening in August 2009, the Hocking College Energy Institute will utilize hands-on working labs with technology based technology-based learning designed for training on vehicular transportation technologies and equipment for solar, wind, and geothermal systems. Pursuing LEED Platinum.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover the flexibility and recognize the key design issues that must be addressed, and what is required in planning a building that houses for an ever-evolving technical program.
  2. Describe planning the first of multiple phases of a campus of the future where the next academic offerings are undefined, along with, propose the challenges of multiple design phases for a campus that does not have a defined set of academic offerings.
  3. Discuss the dynamic, and identify funding strategies that include the role of college leaders in leveraging a variety of grants of all sorts to support the program.
  4. Illustrate the sustainability principles that must be incorporated into buildings that are to be used for teaching students how to succeed in alternative energy jobs.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (C09C1024)


Monday, October 26, 2009, 4:15 PM–5:15 PM
(1013) IT Governance - Making the Right Project Choices Amongst Constrained Resources
Presented by: Kelly J. Block, Assistant Vice President for Portfolio & Process Management, University of Illinois University Administration; Michael H. Hites, Senior Associate Vice President of AITS and CIO, The University of Illinois

Four years after adopting an inclusive IT Governance and Prioritization process, we’ve completed 215 projects, spending $11M and expending 500,000 hours. We recently completed a major process review to strengthen and improve the governance process by addressing weaknesses and challenges in the process. We will describe the history of our governance, best practices in project prioritization, cultural concerns, and how the process has evolved to create a collegial and transparent method for project selection and prioritization.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the characteristics of an effective governance and prioritization model for university IT.
  2. Translate that model, which completed 215 projects and expended $11 M and 500,000 staff hours in four years, into its components.
  3. Identify the challenges and opportunities of a customer-focused process for prioritization.
  4. Describe the ways in which comprehensive monitoring, reporting, and controls allow feedback that promotes more effective decision-making and the strategic alignment of IT with overall business needs.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (C09C1013)


Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 8:15 AM–9:15 AM
(1018) IUPUI—Urban Campus as Community Connector
Presented by: Charles R. Bantz, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis; Mary Jukuri, Principal, SmithGroupJJR

The relationship of the urban campus and its adjacent community are complex and increasingly intertwined. In Indianapolis, IUPUI is proactively forging connections with the municipal, medical, cultural, and the bordering neighborhoods. This presentation will explore connectivity through innovation in academic and research programming, urban form, market demand models, transportation networks, and civic linkages. These strategies are strengthening IUPUI’s political, physical, and fiscal synergies, allowing for necessary growth, and positioning the institution as a great urban campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain how IUPUI established a broad campus and community stakeholder engagement program to strengthen their strategic vision, along with what mechanisms were employed for input and feedback.
  2. Describe how IUPUI campus provides an ideal platform for implementing/testing some of today’s compact urban design solutions. Specific topics include qualitative valuing of urban real estate, evaluating parking (quantity, location, and utilization), urban verticality and density benchmarking, and development concentrations.
  3. Explain the implementation strategies that IUPUI used, and how they vary from institution to institution. This presentation will discuss the identification and prioritization of projects to take advantage of federal infrastructure and transportation dollars.
  4. Discuss what were the relevant community and campus issues, and how competing priorities were balanced. Relevant presentation topics include consolidation of leased assets, shared research facilities for medical and academic uses, combined parking and transportation strategies, and employing third party mixed-use initiatives to advance joint civic-institutional-community goals.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (C09C1018)


Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 8:15 AM–9:15 AM
(1019) Integrated Project Delivery – A Catalyst for Collaboration/Planning
Presented by: Peter J. Heaslett, Architectural Engineer, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Jeff Madden, General Manager, Mortenson Construction; Rob Voss, Ballinger; Mike Whaley, TURIS Systems, LLC

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Virtual Design Construction (VDC) are the buzz of the A/E/C industry. This presentation will explore IPD including how it is implemented, contract structures, team arrangements, and processes. The UW-Madison Wisconsin Institute for Discovery | Morgridge Institute for Research (WID|MIR) will serve as a case study for exploration of the challenges and benefits of implementing IPD on projects. In addition, the role of VDC in facilitating the IPD process will be presented in detail.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain and define Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) including the various contract options available, and compare IPD to traditional delivery methods.
  2. Describe so that others understand how IPD has been implemented on WID | MIR and identify the benefits and challenges.
  3. Discuss and explain the role of Virtual Design & Construction (VDC) in IPD.
  4. Discuss UW-Madison Wisconsin Institute for Discovery | Morgridge Institute for Research (WID|MIR) a case study for exploration of the challenges and benefits of implementing IPD on projects. In addition, the role of VDC in facilitating the IPD process will be presented in detail.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (C09C1019)


Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 8:15 AM–9:15 AM
(1007) Maximizing Opportunities to Create an Innovative, Lasting Science Facility
Presented by: James W. Baird, Principal, Holabird & Root Architects; David Van Wylen, Associate Dean, Natural Science & Professor, Biology, St. Olaf College

Making the most of limited resources requires innovation. Planners must work closely with college administration and faculty to create interdisciplinary, flexible, and efficient facilities. James W. Baird and David Van Wylen discuss their successful planning and resource-saving strategies used for St. Olaf College’s new Regents Hall of Natural and Mathematical Sciences. Working as a team, they designed a building that provides generous instructional/research space, while reducing both the initial costs and operations costs of the new facility. The completed building is slated to achieve LEED Platinum.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain how shared resources and spaces based on research interests help mold a learning environment.
  2. Describe how incorporating public spaces into your facility will help celebrate informal learning.
  3. Describe and discuss why creating a sustainable building that that makes the best use of finite resources benefits all.
  4. Describe the process of planners working closely with college administration and faculty to create interdisciplinary, flexible, and efficient facilities, along with successful planning and resource-saving strategies used for St. Olaf College’s new Regents Hall of Natural and Mathematical Sciences.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (C09C1007)


Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 9:30 AM–10:30 AM
(1017) Creative Funding and Adaptive Reuse of the FSU Federal Building
Presented by: Thomas R. Mathison, Senior Principal, TowerPinkster; Ronald Staley, Senior Vice President, The Christman Company

Ferris State University is planning the acquisition and adaptive reuse of a historic urban building in downtown Grand Rapids to expand its campus' presence, cementing its connection to the community. This presentation will examine the new tax incentives, available as the result of the current economic crisis, and creative public-private partnership opportunities that will make this project feasible. Attendees will learn about the evolution of this project, inclusion of stakeholders, obstacles, solutions, and strategies for repeating this success elsewhere.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain the available tax incentives, public-private funding opportunities, and strategies for creating effective partnerships between colleges/universities, government agencies and the private sector.
  2. Describe the integration of strategic planning, campus master planning and urban revitalization.
  3. Explain  the creative design solutions for the adaptive reuse of a historic building to merge the needs and goals of the university with the vision for a revitalized downtown.
  4. Clarify the priorities for the reuse of a historical building.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (C09C1017)


Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 9:30 AM–10:30 AM
(1000) Project Delivery Methods - Strengths and Weaknesses from an Owner's Perspective
Presented by: Charlie Raubacher, Senior Vice President, Institutional Market Leader, Parsons Brinckerhoff

Institutional facility managers are faced with increasing challenges with developing and maintaining their capital assets. These challenges include aging facilities, limited funding, increasing enrollments, technology advancements, security, and sustainability.

College and University systems have struggled for years with determining how to balance these needs within their design and construction procurement process. As a result, many systems have enacted legislation for the use of alternative delivery methods. These delivery methods bring with them subtleties relative to best project usage and contracting.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain risk and control contracting strategies.
  2. Describe the differences between delivery method.
  3. Review the differences between strengths and weaknesses of each delivery method from an owner’s perspective.
  4. Explain the challenges of capital assess, such as, aging facilities, limited funding, increasing enrollments, technology advancements, security, and sustainability, and how these assets determine how to balance these needs within their design and construction procurement process. As a result, many systems have enacted legislation for the use of alternative delivery methods. These delivery methods bring with them subtleties relative to best project usage and contracting.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (C09C1000)


Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 9:30 AM–10:30 AM
(1020) Urban Regeneration: Carving a Campus out of an Urban Jungle
Presented by: Russell L. Butler, Principal, studioINSITE; Daniel Post, Senior Vice President Ambulatory Programs and System Services, Loyola University Health System; Gregory Weykamp, Principal, AECOM Design + Planning

Many urban campuses face the issues of too much surface parking and two little open space resulting in a poor public image. This lack of image and character affects the ability of the institution to attract and retain top students and faculty. The Loyola University Medical Center (LUMC) is taking a bold step forward to sustainably re-invent its campus and reposition itself to attract the best and brightest in these challenging economic times.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe how a very automobile dominated, urban campus can be transformed into a pleasant pedestrian environment. Ideas that can also be applied to any campus in need of an image and character make-over.
  2. Relate as a case-study how one campus in need of an image and character make-over applied sustainable design to urban campus.
  3. Explore how to incorporate sustainable planning and design principals in an urban setting.
  4. Discover how to bring together key individuals into the planning process.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (C09C1020)


Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(1021) Challenge as Opportunity
Presented by: George Acock, President, Acock Associates Architects; Bernie Costantino, University Architect, The Ohio State University; Graham Gund, President, GUND Partnership.com; Jennifer Kuehn, Head, Interlibrary Services, Ohio State University-Main Campus

The Ohio State University’s recently completed Thompson Library renovation and expansion demonstrates how an inclusive planning process helped secure resources and political support, benefited design development, and ultimately led to the project’s success. This capital-intensive project was strategically navigated through planning, design and construction during a period of shrinking resources. Leaders from the university and architect teams will describe the integrated planning process and creative methods of building support, engaging stakeholders and fundraising, and how these techniques informed the design approach.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe integrated planning methods that involve an entire campus community.
  2. Discuss strategies for positioning a project within a state’s and university’s funding structure.
  3. Explain sensitive planning techniques that respond to the needs of multiple stakeholders.
  4. Discuss with leaders from the university and architect teams how an integrated planning process and creative methods of building support, engaging stakeholders and fund raising.

 

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (C09C1021)


Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(1015) A BIM Collaborative Process – An Introduction to Virtual Design in Construction (VDC) and a Case Study of Research Complex II
Presented by: Peter Rumpf, Sr. Integrated Construction Coordinator, Mortenson

This presentation will demonstrate effective collaboration in a traditional CM/GC at-risk contract scenario using Virtual Design and Construction services beginning at the onset of design and through construction completion. Research Complex II is a $200 million, 540,000–square-foot, bio-medical research building at the University of Colorado in Denver. Mortenson Construction leveraged the use of BIM and VDC practices to increase team collaboration, reduce rework, optimize project schedule and deliver a successful project to the owner. Based on research data from a University of Colorado graduate student, we will show measured results and direct return of investment due to the integration of VDC during the project lifecycle.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain what BIM is and how VDC used it on a project.
  2. Discuss how increased team collaboration – assisted in the design, construction and owner teams.
  3. Discuss and explain the return on investment with the use of VDC.
  4. Describe best learned practices in the design of a new facility.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (C09C1015)


Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(1023) Training Today's Health Care Students for Tomorrow's Realities
Presented by: Susan Bower, Principal, NBBJ; Sandy Robinson, Associate Dean, Health Careers/Science Western Campus, Cuyahoga Community College District

In today's economy, more job seekers are turning to careers in healthcare for the answers to improve their marketability. It is the best prepared students who will be the most successful. Cuyahoga Community College’s (Tri-C) new Health Technologies Center was envisioned to be a real-world learning environment using simulation, scenario-based teaching, and collaborative teaming to accomplish this training challenge.

This presentation will describe how facilities can support this innovative approach to learning and the realistic setting combined to transform the Tri-C Health Sciences program into a leading program for allied health students.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe how an appropriately designed facility can enhance new learning techniques that create better prepared well-prepared allied health students.
  2. Evaluate the ways in which simulation and scenario-based team training develop improved confidence and skills more better than traditional teaching methods.
  3. Identify and explain the key elements of a physical learning environment that support the basic planning principles of successful simulation learning environments.
  4. Describe the benefits of a learning environment that mimic the health care environment, one that is based on traditional learning models.


Wednesday, October 28, 2009, 8:15 AM–9:15 AM
(1022) Setback or Setup? Readiness for Change Stimulus
Presented by: Couper G. Gardiner, Founder, m.Arch

Set back for years by reduced federal research funding, some institutions are still set up well for stimulus opportunities; others less so. A test for change-readiness has been the recent NCRR/NIH offer of $1.0 B for translational research. While keying on sustainable research practices and job creation, this session aims at broader planning themes, readiness for change and strategies for organizational health that center on people. Specifically, this session offers new ways that several universities are accelerating change and competing.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe how coping skills in a down economy can be transformed by engaging stakeholders in strategic planning methods that offer real results.
  2. Practice using one planning tool through a quick interactive exercise to understand its effectiveness in promoting change in space and work process.
  3. Evaluate the benefits of change planning techniques through university case studies, what impact they have had and their value for the new economy.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (C09C1022)


Wednesday, October 28, 2009, 8:15 AM–9:15 AM
(1014) Bringing Technical Education into the 21st Century
Presented by: Avi Lothan, Principal, DeStefano + Partners; Gavin Tun, Senior Project Manager for Capital Projects, University of Chicago

The session reviews the planning and design of the Technical Education Center at the College of DuPage. Centralizing the programs establishes opportunities such as 1) facilitating computers as a central role in contemporary technical education and 2) creating an environment that fosters interdisciplinary education between trades as well as the vertical skill sets of individual disciplines. The Center serves as a teaching tool that provides modern infrastructure for technical education and as an example of the collaboration that is central to 21st Century technical practice.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. The case study will reveal a process by which the requirements of 8 individual programs can be brought together to form a facility that is more than the sum of its parts. The building embraces a view that technical education is not just about welding or auto mechanics but how these and related trades can support shared goals in social as well as technical innovation.
  2. How facility design can support updated Green curriculum that incorporates civic and environmental responsibility into technical education programs.
  3. Cost and design strategies for LEED certifying a building that houses specialized programs such as welding and auto mechanics that must meet stringent exhaust requirements.
  4. Tips and suggestions for translating complex client goals and careful planning into a successful building project.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (C09C1014)


Wednesday, October 28, 2009, 9:30 AM–10:30 AM
(1025) The Urban Research University as Catalyst: A Case Study in Research Growth and Partnerships at the University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee
Presented by: Christopher Gluesing, Senior Architect, Capital Planning & Budget, University of Wisconsin-System Administration; Lora A. Strigens, Senior Associate, Architect & Planner, HGA Architects, Engineers & Planners; Kate Sullivan, Director, Facilities Planning, University of Wisconsin-System Administration

The University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee is engaged in a master planning process designed to guide the future of campus development and to support the University’s mission of ACCESS and RESEARCH. As an urban research institution, UWM is committed to positively impacting contributing to the economic vitality of the region and to advancing the knowledge economy in the State of Wisconsin. This session will focus on the specific strategies developed through by the master planning process to achieve UWM’s their aggressive research goals through targeted partnerships and the identification and development at of ‘opportunity sites’.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Transformation into an Interdisciplinary Research Model: Participants will gain an understanding of how the master planning team aligned the emerging research areas with supporting research environments at strategic locations. The presentation will also, evaluate outline tools and processes used needed during the master planning process to develop a map of key interdisciplinary research clusters that can then be used to, and define corresponding space needs, adjacencies, and infrastructure requirements.
  2. Interactive Master Planning Process: The presentation will discuss how an effective master planning process must involve the complex structure of shared governance at the university in order to build consensus, develop, and strengthen support by the physical master plan of the academic and research plans to support the physical master plan.
  3. Overview how integrated campus sites are woven into the Urban Environment: The university’s strategy of investment at multiple opportunity sites to fulfill the research and assess the mission will be discussed. The master plan’s response to this strategy will be presented, along with an overview of the campus planning principles that were established to guide the development of each campus site. Identify the components of a master plan that allows investment at multiple sites as the best way to fulfill the research and assess missions of an urban campus.
  4. Evaluate the planning principles that were established to guide the development of each campus site.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (C09C1025)


Document Links

This printed page contains links to other web pages. Each link has a numerical indicator which corresponds to one of the URLs below.