My SCUP | Log In  | Join | Donate
CART (0)
start typing to search www.scup.org
  • About
  • Membership
  • Regions
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Annual Fund
  • Awards
  • Achieving Our Vision
  • Leadership
  • Perry Chapman Prize
  • Staff
  • Strategic Plan (PDF)
  • About Membership
  • Membership Directory
  • New Members
  • Join
  • Renew
  • SCUP Member News
  • Volunteering
  • Mid-Atlantic
  • North Atlantic
  • North Central
  • Pacific
  • Southern
  • SCUP 2013 Mid-Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 North Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Central Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Pacific Symposium | November 1
  • SCUP 2014 Pacific Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Southern Regional Conference
  • Annual, International Conference
  • Calendar
  • Online Programs
  • Planning Institute
  • Regional Conferences
  • Books
  • Campus Facilities Inventory
  • Continuing Education Credits
  • Jobs
  • Mojo
  • Plans - Getty Higher Education
  • Plans - Higher Education Institutional
  • Planning for Higher Education Journal
  • RFPs and RFQs
  • Trends to Watch in Higher Education
Home Regions Mid-Atlantic 2011 SCUP Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference 2011 Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference Proceedings
  • Conference Links
  • Conference Home
  • Final Program (PDF)
  • Final List of Registrants (PDF)
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Hotel
  • Travel
  • Conference Corner
  • Presenters Corner

  • SCUP Culture Statement

  • 2011 Conference Chair
    Michelle Monnett
    michelle.monnett@aecom.com Associate Vice President, Business Development
    AECOM
    (703) 682-6114

    2011 Program Chair
    Paul Pusecker
    pusecker@udel.edu
    Executive Officer, Arts & Sciences
    University of Delaware
    (302) 831-2353

    Sponsorship Chair
    Beth Ann Resetco
    bresetco@wdgarch.com
    Director
    WDG Architecture, PLLC
    (202) 857-8301

    Sponsorship
    SCUP
    Betty Cobb
    betty.cobb@scup.org (734) 764-2004

    Online Form or Website Contact
    SCUP
    Michelle Pierson
    michelle.pierson@scup.org
    (734) 764-2013

Conference Proceedings

Conference proceedings are available to all SCUP members and conference attendees.

Please note: Not all sessions have proceedings available.

Sunday, March 6, 2011, 6:00 PM–7:00 PM
(PL003) Opening Presentation: "Change you can Believe in? Higher Education over the next Decade.”
Presented by: Michael Halleran, Provost, William & Mary, College of William and Mary

Location: Allen B. Miller Hall

Higher education is experiencing a period of intense change, comparable to that experienced during the mid-19th and mid-20th centuries. This change is part of fundamental shifts extending beyond higher education and having a great impact on it. To be able to plan in such an environment, one has to understand what forces are creating these changes at the global, national, and local levels, how they interact and how they affect higher education. With that understanding, it becomes possible to develop plans that can take root in a moving landscape.

 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify global, national, and local elements driving changes in higher education.
  2. Determine how these elements intersect.
  3. Describe the impact of these changes on campus planning.
  4. List strategies for planning in an environment of change.

TAGS: Environmental Scanning, Strategic Planning, Trends


Monday, March 7, 2011, 8:00 AM–8:15 AM
(PL006) Welcome
Presented by: Taylor Reveley, President, College of William and Mary

Taylor Reveley was sworn in as the 27th president of the College of William and Mary on September 5, 2008, after serving as interim president since February 2008. Before assuming his current post, he served as dean of William & Mary Law School for almost a decade, starting in August 1998. He is the John Stewart Bryan Professor of Jurisprudence.

Reveley received his A.B. from Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs in 1965. At Princeton, he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa and rowed on the lightweight crew for two years. Reveley went to law school at the University of Virginia, receiving his J.D. in 1968. During the United States Supreme Court's 1969 term, he clerked for Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.


Monday, March 7, 2011, 8:00 AM–10:00 AM
(PL005) SCUPopoly: What the Game Teaches Us About Campus Planning
Presented by: Trina Mace Learned, Director, Operations for Facilities Management & Planning, Wellesley College; Douglas Steele, Partner, H2L2 Architects and Planners

The game of Monopoly® taught us to acquire property, build buildings, invest in transportation and utilities, and manage money--all while avoiding common pitfalls that threaten our success. These are the same objectives of integrated funding and facilties campus planning. Using a customized version of Monopoly®, this session will “play” through many of the strategic moves of campus planning; including, prioritizing capital investments, balancing program needs, dealing with cycle and deferred maintenance burdens, and finding ways to fund it all.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify options for matching funding sources with master planning objectives.
  2. Consider methods for balancing deferred maintenance with new construction and program enhancements.
  3. Select strategies for handling the surprises that inevitably occur during implementation of a campus plan.
  4. Recognize priorities in campus planning.

TAGS: Benchmarks, Financing, Master Planning, Including Land Use., Facilities Funding: Project Costs, Development, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 2.0 units (M11P05)AICP CM 1.75 units


Monday, March 7, 2011, 10:15 AM–11:15 AM
(CN045) A Campus Without Faculty: Creating a Distance Learning Hub
Presented by: Wayne Nickles, Senior Associate, Stantec Inc.; Mark Safferstone, Executive Director, University of Mary Washington

The University of Mary Washington’s new Dahlgren Campus represents a new model in higher education: a facility that allows many institutions to come together to provide instruction in an under-served area. Through the programming and design process, and the involvement of partner institutions, what had been a loosely defined facility revealed itself as a magnet for distance learning. The facility director and architect will discuss how this process worked and the evolutionary path of this campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify best practices for the inclusion of many institutions in the programming and design process of a shared facility for distance learning.
  2. Recognize the importance of effective programming on the building design.
  3. Select strategies for dealing with loosely defined programmatic goals.
  4. Prepare to account for unknowns through a planned evolution in the design of a building.

TAGS: New Campus/School, Distance Education, Partnerships/Collaborations, Project Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 10:15 AM–11:15 AM
(CN009) Making Sustainable Decisions
Presented by: Carl Elefante, Principal & Director of Sustainability, Quinn Evans Architects; Michael R. Purcell, Assistant University Architect, American University; James Thompson, Associate, Quinn Evans Architects

Today, many institutions of higher education are strongly committed to sustainability on campus through a variety of programs and policies. Green building is a major focus of sustainable strategies on many campuses. With economic resources challenged in an uncertain economy, how can choices about investing in green building projects be made in the new economic context? Using the design and construction of the American University School of International Service (SIS) in Washington, DC, this session will assess the green building program in detail. Participants will assume stakeholder roles and become engaged in making design decisions. Decisions will be tracked to understand their implications on project expenditures, success meeting program goals, and achievement of green building objectives.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the strategies, design elements, and systems that comprised the green building program of a successful, real-world building project.
  2. Identify the competing interests that the green building program needs to satisfy in an integrated whole.
  3. Explore the technical and cost issues that arise in developing a green building.
  4. Develop specific knowledge of green building strategies, elements and systems.

TAGS: Sustainability, Facility International Service, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C09)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 10:15 AM–11:15 AM
(CN064) Quadruple Bypass Surgery: Maintaining Functionality During Master Plan Implementation
Presented by: David Capelli, Vice President, Stantec Inc.; Brian DeWitt, Vice President, The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company; Jack E. Nye, Vice President, Whitman, Requardt and Associates, LLP

Institutions of higher education have come to recognize the value of a master plan in identifying priorities and setting guidelines by which to achieve campus growth. But a master plan can’t describe the nitty-gritty details of what will happen along the way, especially when the transformation is occurring in the heart of your academic precinct. How do you maintain the viability of pedestrian circulation, vehicular circulation, service access, and utility infrastructure in the heart of a functioning university campus?

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate options for minimizing disruption while significant campus construction is underway.
  2. Create an implementation plan that balances building progress with inconvenience.
  3. Discuss successful methods for maintaining vehicular, pedestrian, and service access during multiple campus changes.
  4. Manage the expectations of your institutional population throughout the process.

TAGS: Master Planning, Transportation Planning, Infrastructure Planning, Change Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C64)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 11:30 AM–12:30 PM
(CN052) Achieving Signature Buildings; Evolution from Framework Plan to Design/Build
Presented by: Gary L. Brewer, Robert A.M. Stern Architects; Frances Halsband, Partner, Kliment Halsband Architects; Michael J. McCormick, Assistant Vice President, Planning, Design & Construction, Brown University; Ron Simoneau, Vice President, Shawmut Design and Construction

Our panel will describe a process for achieving a signature project, beginning with a framework plan through to the design/build process. Using the example of the new aquatics and fitness center at Brown University, the team will discuss the necessity of a flexible plan, issues of working in a challenging economic environment, implications involved with the design/build process, and the importance of team collaboration. We will conclude with audience presentations representing perspectives of architects, university staff, and builders.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Appraise how team flexibility helps to manage change within a project schedule.
  2. Recognize how broad-brush master plan goals can be executed to match schedule and cost parameters.
  3. Examine how to organize a project through the design/build delivery system with the goal of achieving high-quality design.
  4. Explore ways to achieve seamless team collaboration of the client, the architect, and the builder.

TAGS: Collaboration, Partnerships, Mergers, Master Planning, Land Use.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C52)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 11:30 AM–12:30 PM
(CN006) Becoming a Residential Campus
Presented by: Betsy Boykin, President, Core Studio Design; Robert Fenning, Vice President, Administration & Finance, Old Dominion University; Carole Henry, Exec Dir Housing & Residence Life, Old Dominion University

Old Dominion University decided ten years ago that it needed to become “an exciting place where students live, learn, work, and play.”  In the past five years, university-owned housing has more than doubled its capacity, as ODU makes the transition to a residential campus. Simultaneously, student life, academic, and other co-curricular initiatives were expanded. This transformation was accomplished by implementing a development strategy that accelerated design and construction, yet phased the process to ensure success. We will look at the overall build out of the campus, and focus on the development of a major new housing quad as an example of this development strategy.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Merge the institution’s master planning process with a strategy to become a successful residential campus.
  2. List the components of creating new facilities within the framework of a comprehensive housing system for residential students.
  3. Consider options in residential life programming that reflect the new housing and residential life model.
  4. Evaluate a model for accelerated design and construction within the context of an overall development strategy.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Master Planning, Facility Student Activities, Student Housing, Mission/Identity/Vision

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C06.)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 11:30 AM–12:30 PM
(CN018) On the Edge: Why Off-Campus Development is a Smart Move
Presented by: Edmund Klimek, Partner, KSS Architects LLP; Robert J. Rittenhouse, Partner, Aegis Property Group; John K. Ziegler, Director, Real Estate Development, Princeton University

As institutions strive to accommodate burgeoning enrollment figures and infrastructure needs in an environment of physical, financial, staffing, and schedule constraints, off-campus development can provide an ideal solution. Moving administration personnel and support services, such as storage, to off-campus facilities helped Princeton University preserve campus land for programming that directly supports its core mission, while still aligning with its guiding principles. When executed with the right team, off-campus development can also provide greater flexibility in design and financing.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Determine the viability of partnership opportunities by forming relationships with developers, property managers, design professionals, and other institutions.
  2. Identify campus programming that can be better served in off-campus spaces by evaluating their needs, functionality, and space requirements.
  3. Recognize and evaluate the positive and negative attributes of off-campus sites and properties.
  4. Create and help develop a change management process to relocate institutional staff on- or off-campus.

TAGS: Partnerships/Collaborations, Private Research University, Change Management, Space Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C18)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 11:30 AM–12:30 PM
(CN026) Sustainable Campus Building and Research Partnerships: A Case Study
Presented by: Rob Traver, Professor, Villanova University; Christopher Wood, Architect, SmithGroup

In today’s campus building projects, there are numerous barriers to collaboration between designers and the research interests within the institution. These conflicts can drive apart people who would otherwise be natural partners, with common goals. In this case study, we demonstrate how a well-managed partnership between a design team, a law school client, and environmental research engineers, at Villanova University, was able to deliver a project that benefited each interest through coordinated site stormwater features, research infrastructure, integrated learning tools, and additional LEED credits.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify opportunities for collaboration among design teams, facilities departments, students, and researchers in new campus building projects.
  2. Identify and overcome obstacles to research partnerships in building construction.
  3. Recognize that creating inter-departmental curriculum and other educational opportunities increases the value of the partnerships.
  4. Maximize the LEED credit potential of research and education components.

TAGS: Sustainability, Master Planning, Partnerships/Collaboration, Academic Planning, Student Learning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C26)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN050) From Cars to Campus at the University of Delaware
Presented by: Luanne G. Greene, Principal, Ayers Saint Gross; Peter Krawchyk, University Architect and Campus Planner, University of Delaware

The University of Delaware’s acquisition of a former Chrysler assembly plant has been described as the Louisiana Purchase. The transit-friendly site offers the rare opportunity to redevelop 272 acres immediately adjacent to the existing campus and set a new direction at the university. This session invites the audience to strategize with planners and university staff and envision a future for this property. The process is intended to encourage participants to think about transforming their own real estate in fresh ways.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify how to make the most of real estate opportunities outside campus boundaries to benefit the university, the community and the region.
  2. Evaluate strategies for transforming an off-campus site based on an institutional vision for growth and prominence.
  3. Discuss the potential impact of building uses and density, open spaces, transit connections and outcomes of proposed planning strategies.
  4. Develop an integrated campus plan to support learning, research, and university partnerships with corporations and non-profit organizations.

TAGS: New Campus, Master Planning, Transportation Planning, Town/Gown, Redevelopment, Energy Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C50)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN037) Initiating and Sustaining a Faculty-Led Academic Master Planning Process
Presented by: Angela M. Bartoli, Professor of Psychology, Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania; Douglas E. Ensley, Professor of Mathematics , Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania; Christina M. Sax, Associate Provost & Dean, Academic Outreach & Innovation, Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania; Tracy Schoolcraft, Associate Provost & Dean, Graduate Studies, Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania

Shippensburg University faculty initiated and led a process for creating an academic master plan that was conceived, completed, and delivered in a two-year window by a task force composed of representatives from various stakeholders in academic affairs. This presentation will focus on the open process we used to create stakeholder buy-in and to solicit discussion on how we can connect this bottom-up momentum to the top-down implementation of new strategic initiatives on our campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the resources, infrastructure, and institutional culture need for engagement in an institution’s first strategic academic planning process.
  2. Design and conduct a collaborative planning process for the development of an institution’s first academic master plan; especially considering the existence a unionized faculty and a shared governance environment.
  3. Develop a sustainable process for the implementation and annual use of a newly created academic master plan.
  4. Evaluate an institution’s current academic planning, assessment, and reporting culture and facilitate its evolution towards one that is integrated and efficient.

TAGS: Academic Master Planning, Academic Planning, Change Management, Integrated Planning, Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C37)


Monday, March 7, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN027) Stand up and Cheer! New Identity for an Urban Campus.
Presented by: David Greenbaum, Vice President, SmithGroupJJR; Bill R. Jones, Principal, SmithGroupJJR

Community colleges recognize the need to include more amenities, like those traditionally provided at larger universities and colleges, for their student population. The campus environment is critical to the success of a college and contributes to how it relates to the student, and how it ensures that the community is an integral part of the learning process. With thoughtful master planning and reflective consideration of the built environment, community colleges can continue to provide excellent education and services to their students.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss the role of a sector master planning process in the development and clarification of goals for a project site within the campus. Consider how an individual building project could help further a campus framework by uniting two distinct campus sectors and creating a new campus identity.
  2. Describe the role of upfront planning in a construction project to maximize the potential of a new cultural arts center within a campus master plan.
  3. List reasons to leverage the site constraints and program to capitalize on project design goals. "Stealing" the opportunity to shape the student experience.
  4. Develop a tight functional plan to gain program flexibility- what contributions will the project add back to the campus.

TAGS: Community College, Facility Fine And Performing Arts, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C27)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN008) Telling Your Story: Using Planning and Assessment to Court Donors
Presented by: Jo Allen, President, Meredith College; Linda S. Durant, Senior Vice President, University Advancement, Widener University-Main Campus

We review the Widener University planning and implementation process, nationally recognized as a "best practice," that has led to unique collaborative conversations that are engaging donors in a comprehensive campaign. The conversations that staff, administrators, and faculty are having with donors are compelling because of the use of data and assessment results, set within the context of our strategic plan and campaign priorities. These strategies are replicable at any institution that participates in serious data collection and a “donor-friendly” campaign model.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the transitional phases between developing a plan, assessing its implementation and outcomes, and crafting a campaign plan.
  2. Explain how connections are made between the institution and potential donors.
  3. Recognize the significance of connections for preventing plans, priorities, and funding requests from orbiting in separate spheres.
  4. Connect strategic initiatives to data, and then to funding requests and stewardship.

TAGS: Organizational Effectiveness, Campaign Development, Performance Measurement, Collaboration/Partnerships

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C08)


Monday, March 7, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:00 PM
(CN060) A Community College Campus – Reinvented, Not Just Relocated
Presented by: Kimberly A. Beatty, Dean, Tidewater Community College; Terry Jones, Provost, Portsmouth Campus; John Knickmeyer, Principal, Stantec Inc.; John Massey, Marketing, RRMM Architects

The new Portsmouth Campus of Tidewater Community College (TCC) represents a landmark initiative undertaken by the City of Portsmouth and the college to relocate its founding campus in the City of Suffolk to an underutilized site closer to the city's underserved population. By transplanting and reinventing their campus, TCC adopted the idea of the “learning college” that informed the development of new academic programs and student services, and ultimately, the transformational vision of the new campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Investigate a list of topics to address when participating in a partnership venture with public or private entities.
  2. Describe how to incorporate "learning college" principles into the design of academic programs and spaces.
  3. Relate design procedures and concepts to new academic and student services programming for multiple academic departments and student services.
  4. Evaluate the success of the relocation based on a comparison of enrollment increases, feedback from faculty and administration, and student surveys.

TAGS: Academic Planning, New Campus, Master Planning, Town/Gown, Community College

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C60.)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:00 PM
(CN030) Collaborating to Create a Living Master Plan
Presented by: David J. Rodd, University Architect, Rice University; Thomas P Rowe, Principal, Michael Graves & Associates

This session will focus on the development of a master plan for Rice University, in Houston, the first to be formally adopted since the Cram Goodhue Plan of 1913, and its subsequent realization and alterations. Specifically, we will address issues of: increased student and staff population; expanding academic mission, including an increased emphasis on collaborative scientific research programs; connecting and responding to the surrounding neighborhoods and institutions; sustainability; and the maintaiing and reinforcing of the campus culture and physical character.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Consider the factors involved in adapting and expanding an historically significant campus with a distinctive and idiosyncratic architectural style, to meet the requirements of the university’s mission.
  2. Explain how a master plan with a strong tradition and vision can be flexible enough to adapt to, and help facilitate, significant changes to the university’s vision and policies.
  3. Evaluate an existing campus plan, with a strong internal organization, in order to extend it and  encourage connections with the surrounding institutions and urban infrastructure.
  4. Describe the role of planning as an aid in reinforcing the current [and traditional] student culture centered around the residential colleges, while providing more opportunities to a more diverse campus population.

TAGS: Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C30)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:00 PM
(CN047) Planning Campus Growth with Neighborhood Collaboration
Presented by: Daniel Kayser, Associate, SaylorGregg Architects; Christopher T. Mendel, Senior Landscape Architect, Andropogon Associates, Ltd; Lauri Strimkovsky, Vice President, Financial Affairs, Chestnut Hill College

Chestnut Hill College completed a master plan that proposed large-scale development at the confluence of a residential neighborhood and an environmentally-sensitive watershed basin. The college was keenly aware that the scale of their master plan would meet significant public scrutiny, and to proceed with any promotion or fundraising, the college needed assurances that their plan would be supported by the community. This session will explore the management of a collaborative, community-planning process utilized to achieve harmony with the impassioned opposition.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess planning strategies for the synthesis of a major facilities expansion and the environmental stewardship of that expansion, while keeping in accordance with ever more restrictive zoning codes and environmental regulations, as well as community scrutiny.
  2. Evaluate when to engage an impassioned community in a public planning process conducive to producing consensus and garnering public support.
  3. Acquire planning tools that offer assurances to community groups, while limiting their demand for, and control of, planning and design details.
  4. Determine best practices for managing public relations and controlling public misinformation during the community review and public agency approvals process for a sensitive watershed.

TAGS: Town/Gown, Master Planning, Local Ordinance Compliance

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C47)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Monday, March 7, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:00 PM
(CN059) Planning for International Education: University of Richmond's Story
Presented by: Lori Snyder Garrett, Senior Principal, Director of Higher Education Studio, Glave & Holmes Architecture; John R. Gass, Associate, Glave & Holmes Architecture; John H. Hoogakker, Executive Director of University Facilities, Washington and Lee University

The impacts of globalization are seen in the faces of our students and faculty, in our pedagogy, and in our buildings’ form. The University of Richmond was faced with an enviable situation: a growing international studies program with strong university support and a legacy donor willing to sponsor a new building. This presentation focuses on how strategic planning informed the process of creating a central, iconic, International Studies Center.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Analyze a campus masterplan to locate a new academic building to be in congruence with the institution's vision of globalization.
  2. Interpret multicultural references into a building project as a bridge for international learning.
  3. Recognize the impacts of, and opportunities afforded by, globalization in higher education.
  4. Manage multiple visions of an international academic program’s integration into the university.

TAGS: Globalization, Internationalizing Curriculum, Facility International Studies

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C59)


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN039) Assessing Campus Facilities for the New Reality
Presented by: Benjamin Dutton , Vice President, Faithful + Gould; Darrell Scott Jones, Director of Facilities Design & Construction, Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

Georgia Tech’s Atlanta campus comprises over 125 buildings, including classrooms, laboratories, dormitories, apartments, athletic venues, and utility infrastructure. What innovative tools and techniques are being used to manage this physical plant? How do the new methods aid capital planning and budgeting? How does this enable the university to address its need to keep facilities maintained/improved to accomplish the constantly evolving academic and research missions? These questions will be answered throughout our presentation.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Establish strategies for prioritizing capital improvement projects across a portfolio of options.
  2. Describe the benefits of having one central data location for physical attributes, physical condition, capital project records and capital project construction documents.
  3. Evaluate the usefulness of facilities planning metrics that are updated in real time for making decisions on whether to repair, renovate or replace an asset.
  4. Assess the benefits to the institution of having an easily accessible database for stakeholders responsible for the efficiency, economy, usage, and planning of campus physical assets.

TAGS: Space Management, Facilities Databases, Space Utilization, Decision Making

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C39)


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN029) Creating and Integrating a Culture of Sustainability at Rider University
Presented by: Jason Kliwinski, Director, Sustainable Design, Spiezle Architectural Group, Inc. ; Thomas S. Perrino, Principal, Spiezle Architectural Group, Inc. ; Michael F. Reca, Assistant Vice President, Rider University

As a signatory of the American College and University President's Climate Commitment, Rider University must eliminate its carbon footprint, while managing growth. Spiezle Architectural Group and Rider University have worked together to develop the blueprint for campus sustainability that comprises completed residence buildings, a planned academic building, and master plan updating, among other aspects of campus life. We will discuss the methods and strategies that Rider University utilizes in its academic and social programs to fit within the larger goal of carbon neutrality.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Detail LEED's role in meeting goals of the President's Climate Commitment (ACUPCC).
  2. Integrate cost-effective solutions into LEED designed building projects.
  3. Identify triple bottom line (economy, equity, and ecology) impacts of a sustainable campus.
  4. Evaluate synergies from carbon reduction and operating costs, while discussing financial options for implementation.

TAGS: Sustainability, Master Planning, Acupcc, American College And University Presidents Climate Commitment, Financial/Budget Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C29)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN053) Dancing With an Octopus: Building and Implementing an Institutional-Level Planning Process in a Small College Environment
Presented by: Leslie T. Lambert, Provost & Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs, Ferrum College; Christine Stinson, Ferrum College

The aim of this presentation is to provide an overview of how a small, residential, private college developed and implemented a planning, assessment and budgeting process from scratch. Participants will learn about mobilizing faculty and staff for change, aligning processes and poliicies in order to create vertical and horizontal participatory decision-making structures, and how the many "pockets of zeal" have been brought together to bring a sharper focus to the institution.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the steps in building and implementing an integrated planning process and model.
  2. Consider how to apply these steps within one's own institution or existing planning process.
  3. Evaluate the change concepts and strategies used.
  4. Determine how concepts from managing change may help in framing strategies for one's own institution.

TAGS: Change Management, Academic Planning, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C53)


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 8:30 AM–10:45 AM
(CN048) Lean Thinking: A Proven Approach to Tackle Institutional Planning Challenges
Presented by: Melissa M. McEwen, Senior Vice President, Institutions Practice Leader, Haley & Aldrich, Inc.; Kelly C. Meade, Client Director / Lean Practitioner, Haley & Aldrich, Inc.; Helen T. Schneider, Associate Vice President, Facilities & Campus Services, Loyola University Maryland

NOTE: This is a two-hour concurrent session from 8:30 AM to 10:45 AM.

"Lean" is a proven approach commonly used in manufacturing to increase customer value and reduce waste. Innovative institutions, planners, and design professionals who seek new approaches to effective collaboration and consensus building are now applying this results-oriented approach. In this session, the audience will participate in portions of a simulated “Kaizen” (rapid improvement event) to learn and practice applying lean principles and tools to find better ways to tackle a common planning challenge faced by Loyola University.

 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the benefits of using lean principles from manufacturing on campuses. In particular, the concept of identifying "value vs. waste" in campus planning can be universally applied to strategy, planning, and implementation challenges at any level of a system.
  2. Discover and begin using a new approach for effectively engaging stakeholders in seeing the "big picture" as a way to build consensus and support for planning programs.
  3. List the ways in which Value Stream Mapping (a lean tool) can be used to help all stakeholders with systems thinking and the identification of underlying issues.
  4. Solve a challenge in real-time through collaboration with other participants.

TAGS: Performance Measurement, Lean Systems, Planning Processes, Integrated Planning, Operations

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C48)AICP CM 2.0 units


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN020) Old Growth Meets New Town: The Bowie State University Plan
Presented by: John Hammond, Senior Project Manager, Bowie State University; Bruce A. Manger, Senior Associate, Hord Coplan Macht, Inc.

Bowie State University faced a number of constraints. Land-bound on all sides, its commuter and residential populations growing, and  aging buildings and space deficits. Overcoming these barriers led Bowie State University to a partnership with the local planning agency. The jointly planned for facilities/campus growth and a 219-acre new-town development, adjacent to the university. Through the illustrative and narrative historical development of both projects, the planners will show how the separate and coordinated planning processes for the campus and the town provided a framework for addressing the university’s and county’s needs.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the planning goals of the university and the county, highlighting the unique and shared objectives for each.
  2. Compare planning processes of a university and a county planning agency and identify the ways in which they can strengthen each other.
  3. Recognize the ways in which the physical and fiscal resource limitations of the university and the county for capital development provided a unique opportunity for partnership.
  4. Assess the plans’ potential to accommodate the needs and forecasted growth of the university and the county.

TAGS: Master Planning, Town/Gown, Partnerships/Collaborations

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C20)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN034) Selecting a Site for a New Building: A Rational Process
Presented by: Melissa L. DelVecchio, Partner, Robert A.M. Stern Architects; Anna B. Martin, Vice President, Administration, College of William and Mary; Stuart Williams, Emeritus Professor of the Mason School of Business, College of William and Mary; Graham S. Wyatt, Partner, Robert A.M. Stern Architects

Robert A.M. Stern Architects collaborated with the College of William and Mary and its Mason School of Business to select a site for a new business school building. The team developed, weighted and scored appropriate evaluation criteria; used triage and sensitivity analysis; and narrowed 19 potential sites to a single recommendation. This session will engage teams of participants in a simulation: establishing their own criteria, weighting, scoring, and developing a site recommendation. Will they choose the actual project site?

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Define project-appropriate criteria for new building site selection within existing academic campuses.
  2. Weigh the relative importance of each criterion from the perspective of each project stakeholder.
  3. Apply weighting, triage, and sensitivity analysis methods to differentiate between primary selection criteria and secondary or tertiary criteria.
  4. Build consensus among various stakeholders around a single site recommendation.

TAGS: Facility Business School, Master Planning, Site Selection

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C34)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN044) Arts Facilities that Deliver: Reputation, Enrollment, Profit
Presented by: Mark Reimer, Director of Music, Christopher Newport University; Robert V. Reis, Principal, Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + Company

Arts facilities are some of the most expensive campus structrues to build and maintain. Often, they are considered an embellishment, rather than a necessity. Yet, data prove arts project can produce return-on-investment (ROI), build pride, enrollment, reputation, life-time loyalties, and become a revenue source, rather than a budget drain. In its seventh year, the Ferguson Center for the Arts demostrates the relationship between design, nimble budget strategies, and creative programming to positively affect the university's mission and bottom line.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Analyze the impact of facility placement and design on campus vitality, student learning outcomes, and fund-raising potential.
  2. Consider the factors that allow new facilities to attract better students, faculty, and patrons that enhance an institution's academic reputation.
  3. List ways to make an arts facility a major public relations vehicle for the campus in the community.
  4. Develop strategies to ensure the facility turns a profit, including advertising, fund-raising, budgeting, and market analysis.

TAGS: Town/Gown, Student Learning, Mission/Identify/Vision, Performance Measurement, Facility Performing Arts

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C44)


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN031) Attracting Students to Science (STEM) Education at Community Colleges
Presented by: David Benn, Principal, Cho Benn Holback & Associates; Sandra Lee Filippi, Campus Planner, Office of Central Facilities, Montgomery College; Katherine Michaelian, Dean of the Business, Science, Mathematics, and Technology, Montgomery College; Brian Oster, Associate, Cho Benn Holback & Associates

Community colleges have been working to increase student success in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines through programs like Project Kaleidoscope. Changing pedagogy, with its hands-on, interactive teaching styles is changing class sizes, layouts, furnishings, and the desire for visibility inside and outside the classroom. What are the impacts of addressing lab needs that can vary from highly disciplinary specific to interdisciplinary in flexible labs and related programs? Can the design of a STEM building aid in creating interest in these programs by also providing comfortable space for commuters and others?  This session discusses these questions in the context of a project for a sustainable STEM teaching facility, one where the costs and benefits of achieving a LEED certification were weighed against 'best practices' as an approach. All these factors will be described, along with the challenges of getting funding support from the county, state, and others.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review how varied student learning needs translate into STEM facilities.
  2. Identify building designs that encourage student access.
  3. Analyze lab approaches and layouts that create a collaborative atmosphere.
  4. Compare sustainability with LEED vs equivalent treatments for a STEM facility.

TAGS: Facility Science/Engineering, Community College, Student Learning, Learning Space Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C31)


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN035) Integrating Classroom Planning into Institutional Policies and Practices
Presented by: Kathryn Monday, Vice President for Information Services, University of Richmond; Jeanne L. Narum, Principal, Learning Spaces Collaboratory

Classroom planning is part of the larger institutional effort to meet increasing demands to do more with less, enable more engaged learning, accommodate increasingly sophisticated media resources, and be environmentally responsible. This requires formal policies and practices that inform and involve the community at each stage of the process of planning, developing, and assessing learning spaces. This session presents the University of Richmond as a case study for integrated classroom planning and invites participants to share their experiences and expertise.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify effective strategies for creating an institutional infrastructure for formal, ongoing attention to classroom planning.
  2. Gather and analyze critical information and data to inform classroom planning.
  3. Review models for exploring and prototyping different classroom types.
  4. Consider options for building campus-wide awareness of the importance of attention to the physical environment for learning.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Institutional Change

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C35)


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM
(CN036) Learning from the Navy: Campus Appearance Plans
Presented by: Robert C. Allen, Studio Lead, Higher Education, AECOM; Stephanie R. Campbell, Facilities Management Director, Naval Support Activity Bethesda; Dennis B. Carmichael, Principal and Vice President, AECOM

Navy higher education institutions, like their private counterparts, compete for candidates with their campus appearance. Similar to other colleges, these campuses are composed of architectural and landscape elements of diverse function, style, quality, and age. Working with limited budgets, learn how the Navy develops strategies to weave these diverse elements into a whole, including: • Sustainable design • Landscape architecture • Architectural improvements Examples will include the Naval Academy, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, and Marine Corps University.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify discordant elements in campus facilities and the strategies to minimize their impact.
  2. Recognize components of clear sustainability guidelines that can be implemented over time for campus improvements that achieve overall sustainability goals.
  3. Consider the ways in which limited budgets, applied judiciously, can generate outstanding outcomes in overall campus appearance.
  4. Examine case studies of how appearance plans are applied to specific Navy installations with university functions to unify the campus fabric.

TAGS: Sustainability, Master Planning, Landscaping, Adaptive Reuse

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (M11C36)AICP CM 1.0 unit


Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 12:15 PM–2:00 PM
(PL004) Closing Plenary and Lunch: Transformational Leadership - Building a Great Public Liberal Arts University for America
Presented by: Paul S Trible, President, Christopher Newport University

President Trible represented the Commonwealth of Virginia in the US Senate from 1983 to 1989 and the US House of Representatives from 1977 to 1983. Following his term in the Senate, Trible was a Teaching Fellow at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

Under Trible’s leadership, Christopher Newport University has
become a university of choice for high ability students from throughout Virginia and beyond. Applications have exploded by more than 700 percent, the average SAT of entering freshmen has increased by 240 points, and the campus has been transformed by more than $500 million in capital construction.


Document Links

This printed page contains links to other web pages. Each link has a numerical indicator which corresponds to one of the URLs below.