My SCUP | Log In  | Join | Donate
CART (0)
start typing to search www.scup.org
  • About
  • Membership
  • Regions
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Annual Fund
  • Awards
  • Achieving Our Vision
  • Leadership
  • Perry Chapman Prize
  • Staff
  • Strategic Plan (PDF)
  • About Membership
  • Membership Directory
  • New Members
  • Join
  • Renew
  • SCUP Member News
  • Volunteering
  • Mid-Atlantic
  • North Atlantic
  • North Central
  • Pacific
  • Southern
  • SCUP 2013 Mid-Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 North Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Central Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Pacific Symposium | November 1
  • SCUP 2014 Pacific Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Southern Regional Conference
  • Annual, International Conference
  • Calendar
  • Online Programs
  • Planning Institute
  • Regional Conferences
  • Books
  • Campus Facilities Inventory
  • Continuing Education Credits
  • Jobs
  • Mojo
  • Plans - Getty Higher Education
  • Plans - Higher Education Institutional
  • Planning for Higher Education Journal
  • RFPs and RFQs
  • Trends to Watch in Higher Education
Home Events SCUP's Annual, International Conference SCUP-47 SCUP-47 Concurrent Sessions
  • Conference Home
  • Final, Post-Conference Program (PDF)
  • List of Registrants (PDF)
    Note: If you are using IE right click on the link and choose "Save Link As"
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Registrant Search
  • Education
    • Session Search
    • Concurrent Sessions
    • Plenary Sessions
    • Poster Forums
    • Workshops
    • Tours
    • Continuing Education Units
  • Conference Visibilty
    • Exhibitor Search
    • Exhibit
    • Sponsor
    • Present a Vendor Session

  • Presenter's Corner
    • Audience Reviews
    • Audio Visual
    • FAQ
    • Interactivity
    • Learning Outcomes
    • Presentation Tips
  • Attendee Corner

  • Conference Committee

Concurrent Sessions


Continuing Education Updates: AICP, AIA, GBCI, and NASBA are available! See session descriptions for credit information. Learn more about these organizations and continuing education at SCUP.


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Grand B

"Planning From the Future Backward": Transformative Design for College and University Strategy

"Planning From the Future Backward": Transformative Design for College and University Strategy

"Planning From the Future Backward": Transformative Design for College and University Strategy

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

"Planning From the Future Backward": Transformative Design for College and University Strategy

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Robert Brodnick, Vice President for Strategy & Innovation, Strategic Initiatives, Inc.; Margaret Luu, Planning Analyst, University of the Pacific; Donald M. Norris, President and CEO, Strategic Initiatives, Inc.
Convened by: Edith T. Winterhalter, Director, Academic Budget Management, California State University-Northridge

"Planning from the future backward" deploys a transformative approach to strategic planning that enables continuing, expeditionary rethinking of vision, opportunities, solutions, value propositions, and strategies. This presentation reviews a design for University of the Pacific, highlighting how the highly customized process crafts and executes strategy and builds organizational capacity through four distinct phases of the process: design, divergent thinking, convergent planning, and alignment. It realigns community thinking through broad-based symposia/discussions on the future of work, life, professional practice, and opportunities.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Investigate the concept, process, and importance of "planning from the future backward" as a means to realign strategic thinking/planning processes.
  2. Acquire the capacity to engage in transformative, continuing, expeditionary rethinking of vision, opportunities, solutions, value propositions, and strategies.
  3. Explore and be able to craft a customized design of a strategic planning process for a university, capitalizing on opportunities in a rapidly changing environment, and consisting of four stages: design, divergence, convergence, and alignment and apply them to one's own planning processes.
  4. Discover how to leverage broadly participatory symposia and processes to realign community thinking about the future of work, life, and professional practice and future opportunities facing higher educational organizations.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Transformation, Engagement, integrated planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C266)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Columbus IJ

90-Degree Change: Integrating Planning and Operations While Decentralizing Responsibility

90-Degree Change: Integrating Planning and Operations While Decentralizing Responsibility

90-Degree Change: Integrating Planning and Operations While Decentralizing Responsibility

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

90-Degree Change: Integrating Planning and Operations While Decentralizing Responsibility

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Gregory Lampe, Provost & Vice Chancellor, University of Wisconsin Colleges; Steven Wildeck, Interim Vice President for Finance, University of Wisconsin-System Administration
Convened by: Tracy Molidor, Assistant Dean, University of California-Irvine

In 2007, the University of Wisconsin Colleges began the process of simultaneously planning and putting into operation a new decentralized business model that required integrating academic and financial planning across 13 campuses, as well as redefining responsibilities of the institutional office vis-a-vis the campus executive officers and academic departments. This session will describe the development of the model, lessons learned from executing it in phases, and findings at the conclusion of the first full year of implementation.

Extra Proceedings Files
Download the presentation with embedded movie clips here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the educational, fiscal, and political environments, and adapt institutional goals and strategies to create a new business model.
  2. Incorporate change into operational policies and procedures using a phased implementation process.
  3. Manage academic issues, governance, and personnel challenges.
  4. Direct multi-level institutional transformation, realigning system, state, and campus operations in a changing fiscal environment.

TAGS: System of Public Small Colleges, Academic Planning, Budget Planning, Resource Planning, integrated planning, Change Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C219)
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Columbus KL

A Conversation: Congress, the US Department of Education, and America's Colleges

A Conversation: Congress, the US Department of Education, and America's Colleges

A Conversation: Congress, the US Department of Education, and America's Colleges

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

A Conversation: Congress, the US Department of Education, and America's Colleges

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Terry W. Hartle, Senior Vice President, Division of Government and Public Affairs, American Council on Education (ACE)
Convened by: Lauren Theresa Russell, Graduate Student, Society for College and University Planning

This session will provide an update on the activities of the federal government—from budget cuts to new regulations—that will affect every college and university in the country. After a summary of pending action in the executive and legislative branches, there will be ample time for detailed discussion of issues on interest to attendees.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover and discuss the activities of the federal government that impact all US colleges and universities.

TAGS: Education Legislation, Strategic Planning, economy, government, institutional direction

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Grand C

A Phased Approach: Building Design and Construction As Funding Is Secured

A Phased Approach: Building Design and Construction As Funding Is Secured

A Phased Approach: Building Design and Construction As Funding Is Secured

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

A Phased Approach: Building Design and Construction As Funding Is Secured

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Paul Erb, Project Director, McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.; Teri Mathers, Senior Project Manager, University of California-Berkeley; Randy McGee, Principal, ZGF Architects LLP
Convened by: Clifford J. Carey, Associate, RATIO Architects, Inc.

With today's financial challenges, many university buildings must be funded with bonds, grants, donors, and private fundraising—all secured at different times—creating a complex stop-and-go environment that is incredibly challenging to building design and construction. A plan with deferred phases can efficiently sustain project momentum. The Li Ka Shing Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences at the University of California, Berkeley relied on this approach, utilizing an integrated project delivery model and strong communication between the owner, the contractor, and the architect.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify building challenges resulting from using multiple funding sources.
  2. Manage a phased approach to maximize building efficiency.
  3. Describe how an integrated project delivery model can keep communication open and honest.
  4. Apply lessons learned from building a research lab to other college and university facility building projects.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Facility Design_Health Sciences, Project Delivery, Learning Space Design, capital funding

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C122)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Columbus CD

AASHE and STARS: Advancing Campus Sustainability Through Comprehensive Assessment -- A Presentation by the 2012 SCUP K. C. Parsons Founders’ Award Recipient

AASHE and STARS: Advancing Campus Sustainability Through Comprehensive Assessment -- A Presentation by the 2012 SCUP K. C. Parsons Founders’ Award Recipient

AASHE and STARS: Advancing Campus Sustainability Through Comprehensive Assessment -- A Presentation by the 2012 SCUP K. C. Parsons Founders’ Award Recipient

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

AASHE and STARS: Advancing Campus Sustainability Through Comprehensive Assessment -- A Presentation by the 2012 SCUP K. C. Parsons Founders’ Award Recipient

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Paul Rowland, Executive Director, Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE)
Convened by: Diane S. Stephens, Associate Vice President, Academic Resources and Planning, California State University-Northridge

This year's 2012 recipient of the SCUP K. C. Parsons Founders' Award for Distinguished Achievement in Higher Education is The Association for Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE). Since 2005, the AASHE has been working with member institutions to advance higher education sustainability by providing invaluable resources and professional development opportunities. With the launch of the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating System (STARS), AASHE provided the higher education community with comprehensive metrics for defining and assessing campus sustainability.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover the major program efforts of AASHE that advance campus sustainability.
  2. Understand the nature of AASHE's STARS program.
  3. Identify the major areas of the STARS credits.
  4. Describe how STARS drives campus sustainability discussions.

TAGS: STARS, Sustainability, AASHE, assessment, rating

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP47C270)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
GBCI CE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Stakeholder Involvement in Innovation
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Grand A

Active Learning Classrooms—Enhanced Education With Integrated Technology

Active Learning Classrooms—Enhanced Education With Integrated Technology

Active Learning Classrooms—Enhanced Education With Integrated Technology

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Active Learning Classrooms—Enhanced Education With Integrated Technology

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Mark D. Decker, Co-Director, Biology Program, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities; Jeremy Todd, Director, Classroom Management, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities; Randy S. Tritz, Partner, Shen Milsom Wilke
Convened by: Kimberly D. Mallatratt, Business Development, KDM Marketing Services, LLC

The University of Minnesota (UMN) sought to enhance student learning experiences by integrating innovative teaching pedagogies, sustainable architecture, and technology. To accomplish this, UMN researched and implemented a prototype Active Learning Classroom (ALC) to study the interactive classroom approach with integrated and flexible technology. Encouraged by these results, the university commissioned the new Science Teaching & Student Services Center (STSS) with 10 ALCs. More than a year after opening, quantifiable results show how the faculty and students are reaping the benefits of a new, technology-rich teaching facility.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss recent pedagogical research that demonstrates significant learning improvements when students actively engage course content and work collaboratively with instructors and peers.
  2. Identify the key teaching, design, and technology elements in an active Learning Classroom (ALC) that enhance faculty/student interaction and integrate a technology-rich teaching pedagogy into the learning environment.
  3. Apply the principles introduced, while working collaboratively with a team of designers, consultants, departmental users, and university administrators, to help develop an ALC at your institution.
  4. Use faculty and student assessments collected by UMN that indicate these spaces improve teaching and learning to support the adoption of ALCs on your campus.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Learning Technology, Active Learning, Pedagogy, Learning Environments, Learning Space Design, Post-occupancy Research

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C043)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Columbus GH

Connecting Institutional Achievement to Demonstrate a Culture of Evidence

Connecting Institutional Achievement to Demonstrate a Culture of Evidence

Connecting Institutional Achievement to Demonstrate a Culture of Evidence

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Connecting Institutional Achievement to Demonstrate a Culture of Evidence

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Susan Paraska, Director, Institutional Effectiveness, Kennesaw State University
Convened by: Anna Addonisio, Associate Dean for Administration, SUNY at Binghamton

Institutions are under a continuous mandate to provide evidence that is responsive to state-mandated education requirements and supportive of federal and regional accreditation standards. Developing a collaborative approach to identify externally produced and internally available documentation such as policies, assessment documents, audit reports, and data warehouse reports can provide an overview of the state of an institution's culture of evidence. The result will be a matrix of requirements ownership matched with supporting evidence that may be used at any organizational level.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Use project management techniques to build a culture of evidence for your institution for meeting federal, state, or regional requirements.
  2. Construct a sample matrix to examine and discuss approaches for collaboration suitable for your institution.
  3. Identify gaps of evidence and ways to take action to fill those gaps at your institution.
  4. Determine the connectivity of evidence across your institution in order to build a network among those responsible for building and preserving the culture of evidence.

TAGS: Accreditation, Performance Measurement, Culture of evidence, assessment, compliance

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C005)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Columbus AB

Defining New Communities Within Blended Facilities

Defining New Communities Within Blended Facilities

Defining New Communities Within Blended Facilities

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Defining New Communities Within Blended Facilities

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Tana L. Hasart, Retired President, Pierce College Puyallup; Alec Holser, Partner, Opsis Architecture
Convened by: Larry Fournier, Principal, Rutherford & Chekene

Current funding realities push more institutions towards new and unusual blends of academic units under one roof. Fast-growing Pierce College needed to expand its nursing program while simultaneously completing a 65,000-square-foot facility for the performing and fine arts. The collaborative design process broke through traditional department barriers to define new learning opportunities, bringing together students from arts, music, and nursing. This session will demonstrate how a programming and design process focused on defining common ground and learning themes can become a framework for blended facilities.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Facilitate a collaborative cross-disciplinary programming and design process.
  2. Identify the benefits of a blended, hybrid academic facility using evidence from a post-occupancy evaluation (POE) study.
  3. Incorporate sustainable design into both building and curriculum.
  4. Use new teaching/learning technology to bring together non-traditional programs.

TAGS: Facility Design_Mixed Use, Learning Technology, Post-occupancy Research

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP47C035)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Grand F

Landscape Matters: Planning for One of Your Most Visible Assets

Landscape Matters: Planning for One of Your Most Visible Assets

Landscape Matters: Planning for One of Your Most Visible Assets

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Landscape Matters: Planning for One of Your Most Visible Assets

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Richard Bumstead, Associate Director for Campus Environment, University of Chicago; Mark Hough, Campus Landscape Architect, Duke University; Mary V. Hughes, University Landscape Architect, Office of the Architect, University of Virginia-Main Campus
Convened by: Mark J. Maves, Principal, Learning & Discovery

The campus landscape is a critical component of an institution's image and educational mission. Speakers from three major universities—public and private—will show how the landscape is not only a valuable aesthetic amenity, but also a means for promoting a sense of community, heritage preservation, and sustainability. Focus will be placed on the programs employed to foster cross-disciplinary dialogue and integrated planning solutions for the implementation of landscape projects.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Outline methods for managing, maintaining, and transforming historic campus landscapes to help fulfill educational and environmental missions.
  2. Utilize campus landscape enhancements to recruit and retain faculty, students, and staff.
  3. Describe innovative strategies both public and private institutions are using to fund and facilitate campus landscape initiatives.
  4. Analyze different organizational models universities have set up to maximize the effectiveness of in-house planning and design and the roles landscape architects play in the process.

TAGS: Landscape, Heritage Landscape, Sustainability, Funding for Landscape, Landscape and Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C217)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
GBCI CE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Project Surroundings and Public Outreach
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Grand D

Programming the New Interdisciplinary Lab

Programming the New Interdisciplinary Lab

Programming the New Interdisciplinary Lab

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Programming the New Interdisciplinary Lab

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Jorge De La Cal, Principal, CO Architects; Andrew Labov, Principal, CO Architects
Convened by: Steven Baumgartner, Associate, Buro Happold

The interdisciplinary laboratory building is evolving, making it harder to meet user expectations for permeability, transparency, and fluidity. Programming for unidentified interdisciplinary research teams creates additional challenges. This session will demonstrate a step-by-step process for matching science goals to team structure and space needs. The process involves careful exploration of the project vision and the definition of that vision's scientific capacity. Through benchmarking, scenario-building, and cost modeling, cost parameters are established and used to test-fit the vision to the budget.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Investigate the interdisciplinary drivers of change leading to an emphasis on permeability, transparency, and fluidity.
  2. Describe how "themes of research" define scientific capacity and affect programming.
  3. Define the project vision, then use that vision and its required scientific capacity to develop program scenarios.
  4. Apply cost-modeling tools to evaluate program scenarios and determine optimal results within established budgets.
     

TAGS: Facility Design_Science, Space Utilization, Project Delivery

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C254)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 9, 2012, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM in Columbus EF

The Time Value of Campus Space

The Time Value of Campus Space

The Time Value of Campus Space

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

The Time Value of Campus Space

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Ira Fink, President, Ira Fink and Associates, Inc.
Convened by: Phyllis T. H. Grummon, Consultant, Higher Education Planning

Many types of space increase in value during periods of high demand and decrease in periods of low demand. Travel companies vary the cost of their space, whether it be a bedroom, a car, or an airline seat, depending upon demand. By contrast, higher education generally uses a one-size-fits-all method for pricing. This session explores the time value of campus space, including differential pricing for courses offered at low peak times, the value of closing buildings when there is no demand, reducing library hours, how to value/price a space based on its demand, and more.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess the relevance of new space concepts, including differential pricing for campus space and activities based on the time of use.
  2. Identify the changes in revenue that could result from time-based charges.
  3. Discover what other campuses are doing in regards to time-based value.
  4. Explore how your campus might start valuing time in its space costing.

TAGS: Space Utilization, Space Charging, Space Management, Space Costing

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C167)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Columbus IJ

Building Understanding Between People: Constructive Discussions of Physical Environments

Building Understanding Between People: Constructive Discussions of Physical Environments

Building Understanding Between People: Constructive Discussions of Physical Environments

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Building Understanding Between People: Constructive Discussions of Physical Environments

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Sally Augustin, Principal, Design With Science
Convened by: Tracy De Leuw, Director, Business Development, DPR Construction

Discussions of design and the physical environment can be difficult for participants. Personal, cultural, and physiological factors make it difficult for people to communicate clearly with each other about these topics. The material shared in this session shows why and how discussion disconnects can arise and ways they can be eliminated using tools and research from architectural and design psychology.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Summarize common personal factors that influence interactions with, and communication about, the physical environment.
  2. Examine cultural issues that influence interactions with, and communication about, the physical world.
  3. Identify physiological factors that affect interactions with, and communication about, the physical world.
  4. Master place-related communication strategies that respect and respond to personal, cultural, and physiological factors related to experience of the physical world.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Living/Learning Environments, Neuroscience and Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C061)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Grand F

Campus In the Digital Stream: More Clicks, Different Bricks

Campus In the Digital Stream: More Clicks, Different Bricks

Campus In the Digital Stream: More Clicks, Different Bricks

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Campus In the Digital Stream: More Clicks, Different Bricks

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Michael Haggans, Visiting Professor, Georgia Institute of Technology
Convened by: Randy S. Tritz, Partner, Shen Milsom Wilke

Reports of the death of the campus are an exaggeration, but a profound transformation is now underway. From office to classroom, library to laboratory, the academic experience of students and instructors is being ever fragmented by digital means that are only months old. The synchronous sharing of place and time is increasingly rare. The campus itself is becoming one of the only experiences shared by all...just not at the same time. This session is about what is happening, what elements of campuses are of lasting functionality and value, and why they will remain while being transformed by the digital stream in which they stand.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the implications of digital transformation for your institution.
  2. Recognize and defend places on your campus that are essential, but lack apparent functionality or importance.
  3. Plan for moving toward accommodation and away from conventional space allocation.
  4. Prepare for the increasingly transient nature of faculty and student experience on campus.

TAGS: Technology and Learning, Space Management, Space Utilization, Master Planning, Institutional Change and Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C090)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Columbus AB

Creating a More Honest Academic Environment

Creating a More Honest Academic Environment

Creating a More Honest Academic Environment

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Creating a More Honest Academic Environment

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Marilyn Abbott, Associate Provost, Lindenwood University
Convened by: Dana Dunn, Associate Professor, The University of Texas at Arlington

Academic honesty is the foundation of any educational institution, and students, professors, and administrators all have a responsibility to uphold the honor of the institution by acting honestly and truthfully in all situations. To that end, a task force of faculty members and administrators worked collaboratively to develop a policy of academic honesty and, after seven years of crafting and reshaping the program, we are confident that the steps taken have resulted in a more honest and ethical educational environment.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess the need for an applicable, workable, academic honesty program.
  2. Examine the reasons why students choose to act dishonestly.
  3. Construct an academic honesty policy using input from students, faculty, and administration.
  4. Analyze the level of participation among faculty members and the effect on student reports of dishonesty.

TAGS: Ethics, Academic Honesty, Academic Planning, Student Learning, Plagarism

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Columbus CD

Creating Science and Research Opportunities at An Historically Black University

Creating Science and Research Opportunities at An Historically Black University

Creating Science and Research Opportunities at An Historically Black University

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Creating Science and Research Opportunities at An Historically Black University

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Richard J. Farley, Principal and Director of Projects, KlingStubbins; Bradford White Fiske, Senior Principal, Director of Design, KlingStubbins; Ivory V. Nelson, Retired President, Lincoln University of Pennsylvania
Convened by: Michelle Gangel, Vice President, PGAV Architects

Lincoln University engaged in a decade-long process that upgraded the university's science and math learning environment. In the process, it practiced the essentials of strategic planning, design, and implementation that enabled the advancement of research in biology, physics, chemistry, math, and computer science programs. President Ivory Nelson championed a path that was followed to galvanize the science faculty, organize a master plan, secure funding, design and construct a new building, and realize the university's goals.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the essential ingredients in a campus strategic plan as they relate to the sciences. 
  2. Evaluate the role and importance of a project "champion" and stakeholder buy-in.
  3. Review resources outside of academia that can guide decisions relative to university science research facilities.
  4. Identify techniques for achieving sustainable results within tight economic budgets without compromising the vision for a science facility.

TAGS: Liberal Arts Historically Black College, HBCU, Facility Design_Science/Engineering

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C242)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Columbus GH

Integrating the Quality Functions: A New Approach to Effectiveness?

Integrating the Quality Functions: A New Approach to Effectiveness?

Integrating the Quality Functions: A New Approach to Effectiveness?

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Integrating the Quality Functions: A New Approach to Effectiveness?

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Christina Leimer, Vice President of Planning & Effectiveness, Ashford University
Convened by: Lisa Feola Toole, Assistant to the President for Planning, Johnson College

To meet demands for evidence-based decision making and continuous improvement, some institutions are taking a new tack. They are integrating institutional research, outcomes assessment, program review, strategic planning, and accreditation. This session highlights research on "integrated" offices at 19 colleges and universities across the US. Findings include how these offices are organized, responsibilities assigned, manager qualifications, and staffing. We will discuss why this approach is being attempted, its benefits and drawbacks, and advice from managers for developing such an office.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the influence of structure on evidence-based decision making.
  2. Identify who is leading culture-building efforts on one's own campus.
  3. Compare the integrated model to structures and processes on one's own campus.
  4. Weigh the pros and cons of implementing the integrated model on one's own campus.

TAGS: assessment, Institutional Research, Continuous Improvement, Integrated Planning Processes, Strategic Planning, Accrediation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C022)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Grand D

Leveraging Opportunities: Aligning College Priorities With Local Economic Development Strategies

Leveraging Opportunities: Aligning College Priorities With Local Economic Development Strategies

Leveraging Opportunities: Aligning College Priorities With Local Economic Development Strategies

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Leveraging Opportunities: Aligning College Priorities With Local Economic Development Strategies

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Eddie Garcia, Vice President, SmithGroupJJR; Eugene Giovannini, President, GateWay Community College (Arizona); Don Keuth, President, Phoenix Community Alliance
Convened by: Mary Ann La Fleur, Vice President, Institutional Effectiveness, Planning & Research, Institute for the Psychological Sciences

Leveraging campus growth with college priorities and local economic development strategies creates new partnerships, resources, and opportunities for teaching and learning. Community colleges need to start asking, "What can we do for you?" instead of telling the community what it can do for them. The many answers to this one question bring innovation to life through inventive collaborations, cost-sharing enterprises, and new uses for old facilities.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Integrate public and private funding to build new college facilities that create innovative partnerships and provide an outlet for new revenue generation.
  2. Recognize how facilities can drive the flow of a college campus and be used to leverage cost-sharing partnerships.
  3. Evaluate college programs that can complement local economic development initiatives and serve as a catalyst for growth.
  4. Analyze traditional classroom and lab space usage for multi-disciplinary learning opportunities that match 21st-century business demands.

TAGS: Community College, Economic Development, Public/Private Partnerships, Town/Gown, Business Incubators

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C046)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Grand C

Project Oasis: The Story of UIC’s Informal Learning Space Program

Project Oasis: The Story of UIC’s Informal Learning Space Program

Project Oasis: The Story of UIC’s Informal Learning Space Program

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Project Oasis: The Story of UIC’s Informal Learning Space Program

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Muhammad Furquan, Associate, University of Illinois at Chicago; Wendy M. Jeanes, Assistant Director, Office of Campus Learning Environments, University of Illinois of Chicago; David M. Taeyaerts, Director, Office of Campus Learning Environments, University of Illinois at Chicago
Convened by: Jill K. Morelli, Director of Facilities, University of Washington-Seattle Campus

Project Oasis, University of Illinois at Chicago's (UIC) informal learning space program, transforms underutilized spaces on campus into places where students can gather, interact, and study. Learn how one entrepreneur started the program and how a partnership with the development office and donors helped it mature. A student will share insights on the appeal and importance of the project. This session also will review the attributes used to make each "oasis" similar, yet unique, and how UIC is evaluating these learning spaces.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Create an informal learning space program that utilizes campus partnerships and donors to develop new spaces.
  2. Acquire student insights on the role informal learning spaces play in their collegiate experience.
  3. List the attributes used to create a common language in these informal learning spaces and how each design is tweaked to make it unique.
  4. Use metrics to measure the successfulness of informal learning spaces.

TAGS: Informal Learning Spaces, Learning Environments, Project Funding, Learning Space Performance Measurement

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C064)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Columbus KL

Succession Planning: Tapping Institutional Leadership Talent for Tomorrow’s Leadership Needs

Succession Planning: Tapping Institutional Leadership Talent for Tomorrow’s Leadership Needs

Succession Planning: Tapping Institutional Leadership Talent for Tomorrow’s Leadership Needs

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Succession Planning: Tapping Institutional Leadership Talent for Tomorrow’s Leadership Needs

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Gayle Davis, Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs, Grand Valley State University; Gregory Lucey, President, Association for Jesuit Colleges and Universities; Sharon McDade, Former Director, ACE Fellows Program, American Council on Education (ACE); Charles Middleton, President, Roosevelt University; Nicholas R. Santilli, Vice President, Academic & Student Affairs | Professor of Psychology, Notre Dame College
Convened by: Mary Doyle, Vice Chancellor, Information Technology, University of California-Santa Cruz

US higher education faces a tremendous turnover in senior leadership. Many institutions are preparing through succession planning to tap current institutional leadership talent, accelerate development of these rising leaders, and thus ensure readiness for tomorrow’s leadership needs. This session will highlight how presidents and provosts address succession planning with support from leadership development activities such as the American Council on Education's Fellows Program. Is your institution planning for leadership succession? Gain an understanding of issues, strategies, and vehicles available for leadership talent development.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify ways to link succession planning to overall strategic planning to ensure institutional readiness for future growth and leadership needs.
  2. Explore succession planning in relationship to institutional capacity building and talent pool expansion.
  3. Recognize ways to utilize leadership development for the enhancement of an institution’s administrative “bench strength.”
  4. Identify internal and external development activities and programs that can accelerate leadership readiness.

TAGS: Succession planning, Professional development, Leadership Training, ACE, American Council on Education

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C235)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Personnel/HR


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Columbus EF

The Darwinian Principle: Institutional Adaptation to External Change

The Darwinian Principle: Institutional Adaptation to External Change

The Darwinian Principle: Institutional Adaptation to External Change

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

The Darwinian Principle: Institutional Adaptation to External Change

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Jennifer Flatt, Associate Campus Dean; Associate Professor, English and Spanish, University of Wisconsin Colleges; Paula Langteau, Campus Executive Officer & Dean, University of Wisconsin Colleges; Kurt Willmann, Assistant Campus Dean, Administrative Services, University of Wisconsin Colleges
Convened by: Edith Finczak, Director, Academic Budget and Planning, University of Alberta

When institutions are faced with serious changes to their external environments that jeopardize their future, the situation poses leadership challenges that call for dramatic action, including a reassessment of strategy and a reorganization and redeployment of human and physical resources. This session focuses on the challenges faced by the University of Wisconsin's smallest campus and its response, which included launching innovative approaches that engaged faculty and staff in new and surprising ways.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess external campus challenges that threaten stability and growth.
  2. Assess internal processes that hamstring change.
  3. Identify and tap un- and under-utilized campus assets.
  4. Engage faculty and staff to organize and redeploy human and physical assets.

TAGS: Change Management, Budget/Finance, Academic Planning, Resource Planning, Faculty and Staff Engagement, System of Small Public Colleges

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C209)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Personnel/HR


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Grand A

The Emerging Public-Private Partnership in Higher Education

The Emerging Public-Private Partnership in Higher Education

The Emerging Public-Private Partnership in Higher Education

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

The Emerging Public-Private Partnership in Higher Education

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Steve Gunderson, President & Chief Executive Officer, Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities
Convened by: Ken Smith, Vice Provost, Resource Management and Institutional Effectiveness, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

We’re caught. We’re told that we need to provide eight to 23 million more workers with postsecondary education over the next decade. But public sector resources are being capped or cut at almost every turn. What do we do? If we were to design America’s postsecondary education system today, we’d be guided by culture and society.  We’d celebrate the diversity of postsecondary programming, students, and delivery. And the lines between public and private sectors would fade.  What will a public-private partnership mean for higher education?

Proceedings are not available for this session at this time.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Private-Sector, Public-Private Partnerships, economy, Students, institutional direction

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 9, 2012, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM in Grand B

The Future of Facilities Management: Leveraging Technology to Deliver BIM for Owners

The Future of Facilities Management: Leveraging Technology to Deliver BIM for Owners

The Future of Facilities Management: Leveraging Technology to Deliver BIM for Owners

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

The Future of Facilities Management: Leveraging Technology to Deliver BIM for Owners

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Will Mainor, Solutions Specialist, MEP, Microdesk; Tom Watson, BIM/VDC Director, Suffolk Construction
Convened by: Jennifer K. Krieger, Director of Budgets, Kentucky Community and Technical College System

Educational institutions nationwide are discovering how Building Information Modeling (BIM) reaches far beyond design and construction coordination. Today, owners are increasingly driving the use of BIM on their projects, both as a design and construction process and a deliverable for use in facilities management and operations and maintenance. Join us to discover how today's technologies enable construction managers to provide more intelligent virtual models to owners, and the innovative ways leading educational institutions are making use of them.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify what is driving the need for Facilities Management/Operations and Maintenance (FM/O&M)-ready BIM models for educational institutions.
  2. List the benefits of an FM/O&M-ready BIM model for educational institutions.
  3. Outline the innovative ways leading institutions, including the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, are leveraging BIM for operations and maintenance.
  4. Discover what technologies make it possible to deliver FM/O&M-ready BIM models today and what can be expected in the near future.

TAGS: BIM, Building Information Modeling, construction, facilities management, Operations and Maintenance, Design, Project Delivery

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C257)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus KL

Big Site, Small Classes, Smart Funding: Building Canada's Quest University

Big Site, Small Classes, Smart Funding: Building Canada's Quest University

Big Site, Small Classes, Smart Funding: Building Canada's Quest University

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Big Site, Small Classes, Smart Funding: Building Canada's Quest University

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Basil Davis, Consultant; John Bruce Haden, Principal, DIALOG; David J. Helfand, President, Quest University; Simon Richards, Partner, Cornerstone Planning Group
Convened by: Barbara J. Chance, President and Chief Executive Officer, CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc

Quest University is the first private, secular, non-profit post-secondary institution built in Canada. This session will review Quest’s development-based funding model, which is based on a donor purchase of 240 acres of land and the university’s seminar class structure, a block plan of three  half-week courses, and a 12:1 student to faculty ratio. The session also will review a facility program and design that responds to an extraordinary landscape and the organizational needs of the seminar class structure. The university president will comment on the how the design is working.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of a partnership between private funders, municipality, and academic institution for creating a development-based capital funding model, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of an academic institution acting as developers.
  2. Examine the importance of site-responsive urban design to create a strong sense of place that attracts students.
  3. Review facility programming techniques for a seminar-based academic model, then compare them with techniques for a more traditional academic model.
  4. Examine practices for sustainable site and building design, including ground source energy and micro-hydro power.

TAGS: Private 4-year Canada, New School, Master Planning, Real Estate, Collaborations/Partnerships, Sustainability

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.5 units (SCUP47C200)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus GH

Building a Learning Space Certification System

Building a Learning Space Certification System

Building a Learning Space Certification System

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Building a Learning Space Certification System

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Shirley Dugdale, Principal, Dugdale Strategy, LLC; Phillip D Long, Director, Centre for Educational Innovation & Technology, University of Queensland
Convened by: Ray Thompson, Partner, MGT of America

The Educause Learning Initiative has been developing a proposal for a rating and certification system to enhance the quality and performance of learning space across campuses. The intent is to create a system of measurable, performance-based criteria and prioritize them into a rating system to provide guidance to institutions. Join representatives of the core planning group for a briefing about the initiative and a work session on the draft designed to provide input to the process.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize how the system’s criteria can provide a framework for the planning and evaluation of learning space on your campus, and how to apply it.
  2. Identify the potential incentives of a rating system to encourage investment in improved learning space design.
  3. Contribute to the improvement of the system and its criteria with refinements to the draft, prioritization, and ranking of different types of criteria.
  4. Share knowledge about best practices for learning space planning from the planning stage to implementation.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Performance Measurement, Pre-occupancy Guidelines

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.5 units (SCUP47C250)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Grand F

Center for Sustainable Urban Living: A New Model for Student Success

Center for Sustainable Urban Living: A New Model for Student Success

Center for Sustainable Urban Living: A New Model for Student Success

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Center for Sustainable Urban Living: A New Model for Student Success

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Robert D. Kelly, Vice President, Student Development and Clinical Professor, Loyola University Chicago; Devon Patterson, Principal, Solomon Cordwell Buenz; Nancy C. Tuchman, Vice Provost and Founding Director, Center for Urban Environmental Research and Policy and Professor, Biology, Loyola University Chicago
Convened by: William A. Massey, Principal, Sasaki Associates

The Center for Sustainable Urban Living (CSUL) is the next step in the evolution of student housing. This inclusive project, at Loyola University-Chicago, fostered collaboration among interdisciplinary academics, student social groups, and the local community. CSUL combines student residential living spaces with experiential learning facilities linked with an innovative passive greenhouse learning space that engages students to live sustainably. The design integrates different program elements and high performance building systems, including a hybrid geothermal system, resulting in a net-zero-ready community.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Improve building energy efficiency with strategies that take advantage of the varied energy loads inherent in mixed-use projects.
  2. Integrate urban farming with a building’s sustainable strategies to contribute to a net-zero-ready community
  3. Engage and educate building occupants to participate in energy, water, and material conservation related to building operations.
  4. Predict outcomes for students, faculty, and the neighboring community from this type of project and its location on an urban residential campus.

TAGS: Sustainability, Energy Conservation, Sustainability Pedagogy, Net Zero, Environment, Facility Design_Student Residence, Living/Learning, Town/Gown

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.5 units (SCUP47C119)
AICP CM 1.5 units
GBCI CE 1.5 units; Field of study: Stakeholder Involvement in Innovation
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus IJ

Design Thinking Applied to Institutional Planning

Design Thinking Applied to Institutional Planning

Design Thinking Applied to Institutional Planning

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Design Thinking Applied to Institutional Planning

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Robert Brodnick, Vice President for Strategy & Innovation, Strategic Initiatives, Inc.
Convened by: Paul A. Pusecker, Chief Administrative Officer, University of Delaware

Higher education has a rich history of design thinking and application, but it is often constrained to master planning, architecture and building design, and the art and engineering departments. Now, authors and artisans are sharing their thinking in frameworks applicable to a broadening range of problems. Participants will be exposed to design thinking principles, apply their own campus issues using a new framework, and co-learn with others about the range of possibilities for applying design thinking to institutional planning.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review the history of design thinking, explain theories and approaches of current authors and practitioners, and outline the general stages of the design process.
  2. Apply a general stage model of the design process to a variety of institutional planning applications, many of which will be outside the traditionally thought of applications such as building, architecture, and campus master planning.
  3. Using a design-thinking template, re-frame an institutional issue as a design problem.
  4. Translate traditional analytical and intuitive thinking processes to a design-thinking orientation.

TAGS: Design Process, Theory and Applications, design thinking

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP47C001)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Grand C

Designing the Future at Georgia Tech Using Convergent Planning Methodologies

Designing the Future at Georgia Tech Using Convergent Planning Methodologies

Designing the Future at Georgia Tech Using Convergent Planning Methodologies

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Designing the Future at Georgia Tech Using Convergent Planning Methodologies

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Amir Rahnamay-Azar, Senior Vice President, Administration & Finance, Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus; Chester Warzynski, Executive Director, Organization Development, Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
Convened by: Yves Salomon-Fernandez, Dean, Institutional Planning, Research, and Assessment, Massachusetts Bay Community College

This presentation describes an interdisciplinary and collaborative approach to constructing a 25-year strategic vision and plan at Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) using convergent methodologies. The presentation will show how Georgia Tech applied four distinct but convergent methodologies to: (a) engage stakeholders; (b) objectify and validate strategies; (c) connect the plan to the institution's culture; and (d) develop a process for aligning and implementing the strategic plan.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Apply collaborative approaches for engaging stakeholders.
  2. Identify practical exercises for interdisciplinary and cross-functional collaboration and consensus decision-making.
  3. Evaluate a tool for connecting the strategic vision and plan to the organization's culture.
  4. Review an institutional alignment and integration process for implementing a strategic plan.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Engagement, integrated planning, vision

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP47C265)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus CD

IGEN—A Collaboration Model Transforming Planning, Education, and the Economy

IGEN—A Collaboration Model Transforming Planning, Education, and the Economy

IGEN—A Collaboration Model Transforming Planning, Education, and the Economy

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

IGEN—A Collaboration Model Transforming Planning, Education, and the Economy

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Edward Choklek, Director, Business Development, FGM Architects ; Julie Elzanati, Executive Director, Illinois Green Economy Network, Heartland Community College; Jerry W. Weber, President, College of Lake County; Robert D. Widmer, Vice President of Business Services, Heartland Community College
Convened by: Kathleen A. Kelly, Owner, Kreate, LLC

With the rapid emergence of green building innovations, the higher education sector must meet new demands to maintain a highly skilled and competitive workforce, both within their staff and in the delivery of relevant training for students. The Illinois Green Economy Network (IGEN) facilitates collaboration among Illinois community colleges and their partners to identify and implement sustainability projects and share best practices. Discover how this statewide initiative, led by Illinois community college presidents, is transforming planning, education, and the economy.

Extra Proceedings File
Download a movie clip here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the ways a president-led, multi-college collaborative sustainability initiative can transform college planning, development, and curriculum.
  2. Identify effective methods for sharing lessons learned and best practices around sustainability projects through open communication, ongoing cooperation, and innovative partnerships.
  3. Evaluate the ways in which higher education institutions, business and community leaders, state government, and non-academic organizations can partner together to produce new pathways to green careers and foster healthier communities.
  4. Review the positive effects a statewide network of sustainability professionals can have on campus operations, teaching pedagogies, workforce development training, and community outreach.

TAGS: Community College System, Sustainability, Job Training, Town/Gown, Carbon Neutral, Energy Conservation, Economic Development, Environment, Comprehensive Planning, green jobs

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.5 units (SCUP47C226)
AICP CM 1.5 units
GBCI CE 1.5 units; Field of study: Stakeholder Involvement in Innovation
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Grand A

Integrated Planning: Moving From Vision Through Implementation to Achievement

Integrated Planning: Moving From Vision Through Implementation to Achievement

Integrated Planning: Moving From Vision Through Implementation to Achievement

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Integrated Planning: Moving From Vision Through Implementation to Achievement

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Larry Goldstein, President, Campus Strategies, LLC
Convened by: Alexandria Roe, Associate Vice President, Capital Planning & Budget, University of Wisconsin-System Administration

Institutions can achieve improved overall effectiveness by addressing operational planning, resource allocation, and assessment in an integrated fashion that ensures appropriate attention to each process.  This session will focus on a comprehensive model that relies on both strategic and infrastructural planning to guide operational planning.  Instead of relying on the operating budget to serve as the de facto operating plan, these plans are developed with intentionality and then resourced appropriately and subjected to ongoing assessment.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Understand the need to engage in strategic and infrastructural planning as drivers of operational planning.
  2. Recognize the importance of integrating operational planning with resource allocation and assessment to achieve institutional objectives.
  3. Explore infrastructural plans for core programmatic areas and essential support areas relevant to your institution.
  4. Examine an organizational model to support integrated planning, resource allocation, and assessment.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Operational Planning, Stakeholder Engagement, Process Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP47C268)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus AB

National Security, Emerging Careers: Developing a Homeland Security Education Center

National Security, Emerging Careers: Developing a Homeland Security Education Center

National Security, Emerging Careers: Developing a Homeland Security Education Center

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

National Security, Emerging Careers: Developing a Homeland Security Education Center

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Steven Brubaker, Designer, Brubaker Design; Joe Cassidy, Dean, Continuing Education/Extended Learning, College of DuPage; Aleisha Jaeger, Senior Project Manager, College of DuPage; Jay Johnson, Project Manager, Legat Architects; Jeffrey Sronkoski, Principal, Higher Education, Legat Architects
Convened by: Bruce A. Manger, Senior Associate, Hord Coplan Macht, Inc.

With growing national security concerns and shifting job market projections, homeland security programs are emerging as lucrative options for higher education institutions. This session shares the vision behind, and execution of, the College of DuPage's Homeland Security Education Center, a new epicenter for first responder training. Administrators, law enforcement personnel, and architects will discuss the partnering, programming, design, and technology integration needed to achieve such a facility. Presenters will show applications of mock courtrooms, firearms simulation labs, and other unique facility components.

Extra Proceedings Files
Download the presentation with embedded movie clips here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate how job market projections for law enforcement, fire science, and other first responder fields impact your educational curriculum and campus, as well as regional employment.
  2. Examine strategies for establishing partnerships and collaborative dialog among administration, faculty, law enforcement agencies, fire departments, and architectural/engineering/construction professionals.
  3. Assess the programmatic makeup and emphasis on immersive instruction behind a model Homeland Security Education Center to determine applicability to your own institution's facilities vision.
  4. Explore key design components that support the programmatic and aesthetic elements of a homeland security facility, while also leveraging the institution's mission and vision.

TAGS: Facility Design_Security Training, Community College, Partnerships/Collaborations, Economic Development, Town/Gown

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.5 units (SCUP47C173)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus EF

Revolutions Happen: Using Crisis as Opportunity in Planning

Revolutions Happen: Using Crisis as Opportunity in Planning

Revolutions Happen: Using Crisis as Opportunity in Planning

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Revolutions Happen: Using Crisis as Opportunity in Planning

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Zaid Ansari, Executive Director, Office of Institutional Research, American University in Cairo; Ann M. Boudinot-Amin, Executive Director, American University in Cairo; Brian MacDougall, Executive Vice President for Finance and Administration, American University in Cairo
Convened by: Lisa Ryker, Director of Planning, WLC Architects, Inc.

Egypt’s 18-day revolution in 2011 created upheaval that dramatically affected—and continues to affect—the American University in Cairo (AUC) community. The immediate crisis required campus officials to address a rapidly changing situation with uncertain outcomes. The resulting turbulence, along with changing stakeholder expectations, impacted planning throughout the university. This interactive session reveals how AUC responded to the revolution and used the past year’s events to reinforce values, revise institutional priorities, and create opportunities in integrated planning and organizational learning.

Extra Proceedings Files
Download the presentation with embedded movie clips here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Name the key elements of effective crisis management.
  2. Analyze the impact of leadership when managing a crisis and determining its outcome.
  3. Recognize the critical aspects of communication management during a crisis.
  4. Distinguish ways to use crisis as a change agent that creates new opportunities for planning and organizational learning.

TAGS: Research Institution International, Egypt, Crisis Management, Change Management, integrated planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.5 units (SCUP47C169)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Communications


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Grand B

SCUP Excellence in Planning, SCUP Excellence in Landscape Architecture, and SCUP/AIA-CAE Excellence in Architecture Awards

SCUP Excellence in Planning, SCUP Excellence in Landscape Architecture, and SCUP/AIA-CAE Excellence in Architecture Awards

SCUP Excellence in Planning, SCUP Excellence in Landscape Architecture, and SCUP/AIA-CAE Excellence in Architecture Awards

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

SCUP Excellence in Planning, SCUP Excellence in Landscape Architecture, and SCUP/AIA-CAE Excellence in Architecture Awards

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Cathrine D. Blake, Associate Director, University Landscape Architect, Stanford University; Carl Elefante, Principal & Director of Sustainability, Quinn Evans Architects; James Goblirsch, Vice President, HGA Architects and Engineers; Victor E. Sidy, Head of School and Dean, Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture
Convened by: Philip G. Stack, Associate Vice President, Risk Management Services, University of Alberta

Awards programs are a way to not only recognize and applaud those individuals and organizations whose achievements exemplify excellence, but also to provide learning opportunities for everyone whose lives and passions involve higher education. The 2012 jurors will share observations and trends from this year's entries and award recipients. Certificates will be given to award recipients at the end of the program.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover how projects can articulate the mission of a college or university.
  2. Recognize innovations in planning, architecture, and landscape architecture.
  3. Discuss how the effective use of materials and aesthetic choices demonstrate the highest quality of design.
  4. Consider opportunities to apply new innovations on your own campus.

TAGS: Architecture, Planning, Landscape

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.5 units (SCUP47C271)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 9, 2012, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM in Grand D

The Student Voice: "What Makes Your Campus Green?"

The Student Voice: "What Makes Your Campus Green?"

The Student Voice: "What Makes Your Campus Green?"

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

The Student Voice: "What Makes Your Campus Green?"

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Erik Alskog, Student, University of Washington-Seattle Campus; Rachel Andrews, Student, Pensacola State College; Isaiah Branch-Boyle, Student, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Jeff A. Vredevoogd, Director, Herman Miller Education, Herman Miller, Inc.
Convened by: Kurt Steinberg, Vice President, Administration & Finance, Massachusetts College of Art and Design

In early 2012, during its third annual student video contest, Herman Miller asked college students, “What makes your campus green?” From bike commuting to school-wide recycling to LEED-certified buildings, students from across the United States and Canada shared what their campuses are doing to become sustainable. The top three students will present their winning videos and share insights on how initiatives at their schools have succeeded. Take this opportunity to learn about ideas you can implement on your campus.

Extra Proceedings Files
Download the presentation with embedded movie clips here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify key themes that emerged in the students' videos.
  2. Identify methods for capturing the student voice on campus and applying the insights.
  3. Identify methods for measuring the success of sustainability programs on campus.
  4. Implement proven sustainability programs.

TAGS: Sustainability, Student Engagement

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.5 units (SCUP47C253)
AICP CM 1.5 units
GBCI CE 1.5 units; Field of study: Project Surroundings and Public Outreach
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Marketing


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Columbus CD

A Partnership for Safety

A Partnership for Safety

A Partnership for Safety

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

A Partnership for Safety

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Jack P. Calareso, President, Anna Maria College; Robert Desrosiers, Chief of Police, Paxton Police Department; Andrew O. Klein, Vice President, Student Success | Dean of Rentention, Anna Maria College
Convened by: Krisan Osterby, Director of Campus Planning, Perkins+Will

Two critical issues facing nearly all colleges and universities are town/gown relations and resources. Through a creative and collaborative process, Anna Maria College partnered with the police department of the town of Paxton, MA. The town provides all security and safety programs for the college, thus expanding services, eliminating duplicate services, and increasing competency. The college and the town work hand-in-hand to serve the needs of the community on and off campus. This session will describe how this partnership was created, and report on the first year of implementation.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Examine a unique remedy for a town/gown point of contention in a small-town environment.
  2. Design a similar agreement on their own campuses using specific information from this example.
  3. Articulate the perspectives of both the college and the town concerning resource challenges and the possibility of new, alternative solutions.
  4. Organize a plan that is at once comprehensive, yet also allows for adjustments to address unforeseen circumstances.

TAGS: Town/Gown, Partnerships, Campus Security

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP47C036)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Grand A

Clarifying Intent During Design—Effective Planning to Avoid Design Detours

Clarifying Intent During Design—Effective Planning to Avoid Design Detours

Clarifying Intent During Design—Effective Planning to Avoid Design Detours

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Clarifying Intent During Design—Effective Planning to Avoid Design Detours

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Pamela Palmer Delphenich, Director, Campus Planning & Design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; David J. Neuman, Architect for the University, The University of Virginia; Judith Nitsch, Founding Principal & Chairman, Nitsch Engineering; Anna A. Wu, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Facilities Operations, Planning & Design | University Architect, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Convened by: Ned A. Collier, Principal and Director, Higher Education Practice, Icon Architecture, Inc

Implementing the strategic plan in the master plan (and subsequent design projects) is a dynamic process. Whether or not the university ultimately achieves design excellence is decided by many parties, each with subjective opinions, biases, and expectations. Capturing and synthesizing those expectations during the planning process can develop the best design for the project, but it requires timely and thoughtful inquiry. Sharing lessons learned, this panel will provide tools for owners and designers to get those ideas vetted by all.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Articulate and clarify the user's desired design outcomes.
  2. Resolve negative reactions to proposed design solutions.
  3. Prevent design disconnects by understand how and why they occur.
  4. Create better projects for users by understanding and using the power of design push/pull.

TAGS: Master Planning, Strategic Planning, Design, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP47C070)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Communications


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Columbus KL

Connecting Your IT Governance to Institutional Decision-Making

Connecting Your IT Governance to Institutional Decision-Making

Connecting Your IT Governance to Institutional Decision-Making

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Connecting Your IT Governance to Institutional Decision-Making

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Kelly J. Block, Assistant Vice President for Portfolio & Process Management, University of Illinois University Administration; Cynthia Cobb, Assistant Director, Portfolio Management, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Michael H. Hites, Senior Associate Vice President of AITS and CIO, The University of Illinois
Convened by: William Paraska, Director, Information Technology Business Support Services, Georgia State University

It's vital that Information Technology (IT) investment choices are guided by stakeholders, support enterprise strategies, and ensure mission-critical items receive the highest priority. IT governance (ITG) promotes the intelligent use of resources, providing a shared, rational, and transparent framework for the selection and prioritization of IT investments. This session focuses on the components, considerations, and challenges when implementing an ITG process. Utilizing hands-on activities, participants will use the building blocks of ITG to design a strategic governance process that fits their organization.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the opportunities of ITG for aligning investment to strategy, facilitating decision making, allocating limited resources, and measuring performance.
  2. Explore the components of an effective ITG model, including the purpose and scope, participants and roles, structure, decision points, and communication and operational issues.
  3. Identify strategies for ITG implementation to fit specific needs.
  4. Explain how portfolio management plays a critical role in facilitating ITG success.

TAGS: Information technology, it governance, IT Strategic Planning, integrated planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP47C106)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Columbus IJ

Emerging Forces That Drive the Need for Prioritization: What Campus Leaders Are Telling Us

Emerging Forces That Drive the Need for Prioritization: What Campus Leaders Are Telling Us

Emerging Forces That Drive the Need for Prioritization: What Campus Leaders Are Telling Us

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Emerging Forces That Drive the Need for Prioritization: What Campus Leaders Are Telling Us

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Robert C. Dickeson, President Emeritus, University of Northern Colorado
Convened by: Cameron K. Martin, Vice President, University Relations, Utah Valley University

More and more institutions across the country are beginning to focus on reallocating existing resources in addition to generating new resources. But such an initiative requires a systematic, academically responsible approach to ensure success. This highly interactive session will engage participants in the how and why of choosing criteria and assessing weights, avoiding pitfalls and anticipating likely push-back, and integrating this process with other institution-wide strategies. (This session will be followed by "A Conversation with Bob Dickeson" later in the program.)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover the key elements of priority-setting, including process, mission clarification, criteria, and leadership.
  2. Participate in an actual criteria and weight-setting exercise that can be used on your home campus.
  3. Engage with the presenter and your fellow participants in hands-on exercises that address your specific institutional issues.
  4. Think through your own institution’s readiness for prioritization based on real-life experiences of hundreds of campuses.

TAGS: Program Prioritization, Academic Planning, Resource Planning, Strategic Planning, institutional direction, consensus building

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP47C262)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Grand B

High-Impact Learning Environments: Measuring Success

High-Impact Learning Environments: Measuring Success

High-Impact Learning Environments: Measuring Success

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

High-Impact Learning Environments: Measuring Success

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Caryn A. Grape, Architectural Designer, Moore Ruble Yudell Architects & Planners; Jay V. Kahn, Vice President for Finance & Planning, Keene State College; Leila R. Kamal, Vice President, Design and Expertise, EYP; Jeanne L. Narum, Principal, Learning Spaces Collaboratory; Aislynn E. Sherry, Architecture Student, Keene State College
Convened by: Stacy L. Robben, Director of Client Development, Lawrence Group

This session brings together institutional, industry, and student leaders to discuss the definition, application, creation, and measured success of high-impact learning environments on our campuses. How are the principles of the Learning Spaces Collaboratory influencing emerging teaching pedagogies across a broad array of disciplines? What physical characteristics do these spaces require? How do we measure effectiveness? Students divulge outcomes of a directly-relevant proprietary research project. An interactive exercise engages participants and encourages dialog on these cutting-edge learning environments.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Draw on knowledge shared by industry leaders on the foundational theories and broad applications of high-impact learning spaces across disciplines.
  2. Examine empirical data from institutional research on the effect of high-impact learning spaces on educational quality.
  3. Dissect outcomes of Keene State College architecture students' research (survey and observational evidence) on the successful elements of high-impact learning spaces.
  4. Participate in an interactive, focused exercise and discussion to glean ideas that can be applied back to home campuses.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Learning Spaces Collaboratory, Public Masters/Comprehensive, Technology and Pedagogy, Post-occupancy Research

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.5 units (SCUP47C176)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Administrative Practice


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Grand D North

How Strategic Partnerships Are Advancing Campus Sustainability

How Strategic Partnerships Are Advancing Campus Sustainability

How Strategic Partnerships Are Advancing Campus Sustainability

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

How Strategic Partnerships Are Advancing Campus Sustainability

SOLD OUT
Presented by: David Bartlett, Vice President, IBM Smarter Buildings, IBM Corporation; Ilana Judah, Director of Sustainability, FXFOWLE Architects, LLP; Kenneth Schwartz, Dean and Favrot Professor of Architecture, Tulane University of Louisiana
Convened by: Karen M. Ruedinger, Coordinator, Planning & Market Understanding, Northwestern Michigan College

Tulane University has partnered with IBM's Smarter Buildings Initiative to implement a demonstration project for building performance optimization on campus. This session will explore Tulane's overall vision for campus sustainability, the opportunities provided by the industry partnership initiative, and the logistics of the project. Presenters will focus on how the partnership has helped to integrate cross-campus building operations, improve the efficacy of the facilities management process, and inspire new environmentally-responsible strategies for the renovation of Tulane's School of Architecture.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Examine the opportunities and challenges in establishing university and industry relationships.
  2. Investigate the logistics for implementing campus-wide sustainability initiatives.
  3. Explain how campus performance optimization impacts the structure and dynamics of facilities management.
  4. Summarize how a university-industry partnership influences sustainable building design and renovations.

TAGS: Private Research University, Partnerships/Collaboration, IT Infrastructure, Sustainability, Energy Conservation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.5 units (SCUP47C098)
AICP CM 1.5 units
GBCI CE 1.5 units; Field of study: Project Surroundings and Public Outreach
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Columbus GH

Renewing a Campus Housing System Through Integrated Planning

Renewing a Campus Housing System Through Integrated Planning

Renewing a Campus Housing System Through Integrated Planning

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Renewing a Campus Housing System Through Integrated Planning

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Thomas E. Goodhew, Architect & Planner, University of Colorado Boulder; Kambiz Khalili, Executive Director, Housing and Dining Services, University of Colorado Boulder; Philip Simpson, Assistant Director for Facilities Planning, University of Colorado Boulder
Convened by: Kevin Henning, Chicago Loop Office Manager, Graef USA

In 2005, housing and dining services at the University of Colorado-Boulder faced a daunting challenge. Three dining centers needed renovation. Residence halls, most over 40 years old, were obsolete. Enrollment growth required additional beds be built, but political support for traditional housing initiatives was non-existent. In the face of these challenges, the department developed a 20-year plan to renovate and expand its housing facilities without privatization or substantial rate increases. This session will share an integrated planning approach that changed not only residential life, but also student services and academics.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Outline the roles integrated planning attributes (strategic plans, academic planning, master plans, financial plans, implementation plans) play in renewing a housing system.
  2. Investigate how to renovate and expand a housing system without privatization.
  3. Examine tools to use in evaluating and planning renovations of housing systems.
  4. Explain the ways in which integrated planning can adapt to changing economic times.

TAGS: Student Residence Halls, Living/Learning Environments, integrated planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.5 units (SCUP47C085)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Grand F

Strategic Planning's Next Level: Internal and External Relationships, Partnerships, and Alliances

Strategic Planning's Next Level: Internal and External Relationships, Partnerships, and Alliances

Strategic Planning's Next Level: Internal and External Relationships, Partnerships, and Alliances

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Strategic Planning's Next Level: Internal and External Relationships, Partnerships, and Alliances

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Pedro Avila, Vice Chancellor, Institutional Effectiveness, West Hills Community College District; Frank Gornick, Chancellor, West Hills Community College District; Don Warkentin, President, West Hills College-Lemoore
Convened by: Annalisa S. Holcombe, Associate Provost for Integrative & Community Based Learning, Westminster College (Utah)

In today's environment, working smarter through strategic relationships can be the difference between success and failure. Institutions must find ways these relationships can enhance and multiply resources. Understanding the nuances of how to plan, develop, implement, and measure successful partnerships and alliances within your institution and with external stakeholders is an imperative skill for leaders and managers.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Outline the life stages of strategic relationships.
  2. Identify and prevent potential pitfalls while building strategic relationships.
  3. Explain how strong strategic relationships can influence outcomes.
  4. Investigate the cultural and personality elements of these relationships.

TAGS: Community College, integrated planning, Partnerships/Collaborations, Strategic Planning, Institutional Change and Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP47C065)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Communications


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Columbus EF

Student Diversity Index: Alternative Measures That Support Strategic and Functional Planning

Student Diversity Index: Alternative Measures That Support Strategic and Functional Planning

Student Diversity Index: Alternative Measures That Support Strategic and Functional Planning

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Student Diversity Index: Alternative Measures That Support Strategic and Functional Planning

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Husam Abu-Khadra, Assistant Professor of Accounting, Walter E. Heller College of Business, Roosevelt University; Josetta McLaughlin, Associate Professor, Roosevelt University; Gerald W. McLaughlin, Associate Vice President, Enrollment Management & Marketing, Planning Analytics, DePaul University
Convened by: David M. Moehring, Visiting Assistant Director, University of Illinois at Chicago

Measuring diversity used to mean single race/ethnicity counting, but now higher education must go beyond this traditional method. This session shares alternative approaches institutions can use to measure diversity. Based on recent research, these methods identify diversity measures, link those measures to institutional mission to support strategic and functional-level planning, and use categories and characteristics from IPEDS data to select peer institutions for benchmarking. Presenters will outline methods, share research findings, and lead attendees in exercises that demonstrate the effectiveness of alternative diversity measurements in strategic planning.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain how diversity can impact an institution’s mission statement and provide guidance in linking the measure to the mission.
  2. Demonstrate pertinent measures and metrics of diversity from biology and political science that go beyond traditional single race-count methodologies.
  3. Introduce appropriate, but seldom used, data sources to develop measures and metrics for assessing diversity.
  4. Link diversity attributes to strategic and functional-level institutional planning.

TAGS: Inclusion, Diversity, Student Demographics, Benchmarking, measurement

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP47C201)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Grand C

The Future of Accreditation

The Future of Accreditation

The Future of Accreditation

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

The Future of Accreditation

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Michael F. Middaugh, Higher Education Consultant; Elizabeth H. Sibolski, President, Middle States Commission on Higher Education; Stephen D. Spangehl, Vice President for Accreditation Relations, North Central Association of Colleges and Universities The Higher Learning Commission
Convened by: Adrian R. Clark, Executive Director, Institutional Planning & Assessment, Rocky Vista University

In his introduction to the recent issue of Planning for Higher Education, Michael Middaugh noted that quality assurance in higher education (in other words, accreditation) is predicated on a system of voluntary peer review to ensure that colleges and universities conform to standards that define excellence within postsecondary education. Since the mid twentieth century, as the US government has devoted ever greater sums of taxpayer dollars to higher education, it has also required increased compliance with regulation via accreditation. Presenters will examine the tensions between excellence/improvement and regulatory compliance as they play out in institutional planning and assessment practices as well as through the accreditation process.

Proceedings are not available for this session at this time.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the current tensions that exist in the US system of quality assurance in higher education.
  2. Consider how to promote, preserve, and protect the integrity of the peer-review process in quality assurance.
  3. Consider how to responsibly address the call for greater transparency and accountability in higher education.
  4. Focus on the use of planning and assessment as essential tools in the quality assurance/ accreditation process.

TAGS: Accreditation, Strategic Planning, Resource Planning, Institutional Effectiveness, integrated planning

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM in Columbus AB

The International Value of Integrated Planning at the Universidad Javeriana

The International Value of Integrated Planning at the Universidad Javeriana

The International Value of Integrated Planning at the Universidad Javeriana

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

The International Value of Integrated Planning at the Universidad Javeriana

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Javier Forero, Director de Recursos Físicos, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; Roberto Enrique Montoya, Vice President for Administration and Finance, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; Mario A. Noriega, Principal, Mario Noriega & Asociados Arquitectos Urbanistas; Charles Alyn Pruett, Principal, Campus + Community Strategies; Silvia E Vargas, Senior Associate/Community Planner, Wallace Roberts & Todd
Convened by: Nancy K. Nusbaum, Associate Vice President, Finance & Support Services Planning, Texas State University-San Marcos

The master plan for Universidad Javeriana is the result of an integrated process that brought together experts from Colombia and the United States to address academic priorities, growth, and complex phasing issues. All participants—administrators, professors, students and consultants—benefited from the international team's complementary experience and expertise. This session will demonstrate how the process led to a compelling plan that is not a traditional architectural vision, but a dynamic model for making decisions and guiding campus growth.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate methods for integrated planning in an international setting.
  2. Identify and select planning tools that respond to a rapidly growing university with limited resources.
  3. Create a compelling master plan that is also flexible over time.
  4. Describe ways the campus master plan can be strengthened through an effective planning process.

TAGS: International Private Research, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP47C236)
AICP CM 1.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Grand F

"Abelard to Apple": The Fate of American Colleges and Universities

"Abelard to Apple": The Fate of American Colleges and Universities

"Abelard to Apple": The Fate of American Colleges and Universities

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

"Abelard to Apple": The Fate of American Colleges and Universities

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Richard DeMillo, Distinguished Professor & Director, Center for 21st Century Universities, Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
Convened by: Ann M. Boudinot-Amin, Executive Director, American University in Cairo

The vast majority of American college students attend two thousand or so private and public institutions that might be described as the Middle--reputable educational institutions, but not considered equal to the elite and entrenched upper echelon of the Ivy League and other prestigious schools. Richard DeMillo has a warning for these colleges and universities in the Middle: If you do not change, you are heading for irrelevance and marginalization. In Abelard to Apple, DeMillo argues that these institutions, clinging precariously to a centuries-old model of higher education, are ignoring the social, historical, and economic forces at work in today's world. In the age of iTunes, open source software, and for-profit online universities, there are new rules for higher education.

Proceedings are not available for this session.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Create a structured, on-going assessment process that can bring about positive change at your organization.
  2. Conduct a comprehensive self-study of your operations to identify opportunities for improvement and implement strategies and plans for the future.
  3. Assess and integrate customer needs and satisfaction data to organize planning and improve services.
  4. Identify the potential benefits of a continuous improvement process to your organization.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Technology, institutional direction, economy, teaching

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C273)
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Columbus IJ

A Comprehensive Approach to Planning for Deferred Maintenance

A Comprehensive Approach to Planning for Deferred Maintenance

A Comprehensive Approach to Planning for Deferred Maintenance

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

A Comprehensive Approach to Planning for Deferred Maintenance

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Todd Griffith, Program Area Manager - Higher Education, URS Corporation; Steven Varelmann, College Architect, Oberlin College
Convened by: Pamela Gibbons-Mahler, Capital Program Manager, State University Construction Fund

The amount of deferred maintenance overwhelms many institutions and is often underestimated in the annual budgeting process. Oberlin College (Oberlin) has adopted a process that successfully manages deferred maintenance. This session examines how Oberlin systematizes the annual cycle of identifying projects, budgeting over the near and long term, and executing multiple, diverse projects over the summer construction season. This session will also explain how to transform long-term, comprehensive needs into manageable budget cycles.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Collect and inventory outstanding deferred maintenance items and other facility deficiencies.
  2. Prioritize projects for best allocation of resources according to life/safety, critical systems, ADA, finishes, and program changes.
  3. Translate priorities into short- and long-term budgets, then maximize value by using various approaches to contract the work, including project delivery methods and bidding strategies.
  4. Execute projects with maximum efficiency by generating reports that allow you to use lessons learned in each cycle to feed the information forward, enriching the process.

TAGS: Small Private Liberal Arts, Resource Planning, Planning Systems, deferred maintenance

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C030)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Grand B

Administrative Program Review: Blending Assessment, Planning, and Continuous Improvement

Administrative Program Review: Blending Assessment, Planning, and Continuous Improvement

Administrative Program Review: Blending Assessment, Planning, and Continuous Improvement

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Administrative Program Review: Blending Assessment, Planning, and Continuous Improvement

SOLD OUT
Presented by: P. Michael Jednak, Director, Facilities Services, Boston College; Michael V. Pimental, Director, Strategic Services, Boston College
Convened by: Susan Paraska, Director, Institutional Effectiveness, Kennesaw State University

This session is targeted at planning professionals who want to create positive change in their organizations. Boston College's Administrative Program Review (APR) is an innovative, five-step, developmental process that involves on-going assessment, planning, and continuous improvement. It is designed to help departments examine current operations, make adjustments, and establish strategies and plans for the future. The process integrates gathering customer feedback, studying internal and external environments, and seeking the advice of peer reviewers. Session participants will learn how to adapt the process to their institutions.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Create a structured, on-going assessment process that can bring about positive change at your organization.
  2. Conduct a comprehensive self-study of your operations to identify opportunities for improvement and implement strategies and plans for the future.
  3. Assess and integrate customer needs and satisfaction data to organize planning and improve services.
  4. Identify the potential benefits of a continuous improvement process to your organization.

TAGS: Continuous Improvement, Administrative Program Review, Operations Evaluation, Performance Measurement

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C037)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Administrative Practice


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Grand C

Collaborative Space: How Can Our Physical Environment Promote Scientific Breakthroughs?

Collaborative Space: How Can Our Physical Environment Promote Scientific Breakthroughs?

Collaborative Space: How Can Our Physical Environment Promote Scientific Breakthroughs?

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Collaborative Space: How Can Our Physical Environment Promote Scientific Breakthroughs?

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Mary Jo Olenick, Principal, The S/L/A/M Collaborative; P. Dean Surbey, Executive Associate Dean, Administration & Finance, Emory University-Rollins School of Public Health; Sidney Powell Ward, Architect & Principal, The S/L/A/M Collaborative
Convened by: Lisa H. Macklin, Principal, Comprehensive Facilities Planning, Inc.

As collaboration continues to be a point of emphasis, universities need to make sure that spaces developed to promote collaborative work are yielding results. In addition to determining how to measure the effectiveness of collaborative space, we will provide a quantitative and qualitative analysis of a variety of these environments—both those that yield the greatest benefit and those that aren't as successful—in three health science facilities. Our analysis will help institutions understand which types of spaces really make a difference.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the types of metrics that can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of collaborative space.
  2. Describe the qualitative properties of the types of spaces that best foster effective collaboration.
  3. Recognize quantitative aspects of effective collaborative space, like appropriate balance of space types, space size, location, etc.
  4. Evaluate which types of spaces might best suit your institution, informing your decision about how to invest financial resources.

TAGS: Facility Design_Science/Engineering, Research Laboratories, Collaborative Research Space

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C210)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Columbus CD

Digital Assessment: A Non-Curricular-Based Tool for Improvement—Presentation of the 2012 SCUP Award for Institutional Innovation and Integration

Digital Assessment: A Non-Curricular-Based Tool for Improvement—Presentation of the 2012 SCUP Award for Institutional Innovation and Integration

Digital Assessment: A Non-Curricular-Based Tool for Improvement—Presentation of the 2012 SCUP Award for Institutional Innovation and Integration

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Digital Assessment: A Non-Curricular-Based Tool for Improvement—Presentation of the 2012 SCUP Award for Institutional Innovation and Integration

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Michael W. Jackson, Director, Effectiveness and Accreditation, Vanderbilt University; Jacci L. Rodgers, Chair, Accounting & IT; Faculty Liaison for Assessment, Oklahoma City University
Convened by: Beverly G. Barrington, Director, University Planning, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University

Dissatisfied with vague survey responses, Oklahoma City University (OCU) created a new way to solicit feedback—digital assessment. By asking faculty, staff, and students to take and submit "good" and "bad" pictures of the university, OCU engages the entire campus community to identify strengths and opportunities in non-curricular areas. With accurate documentation of the nature and scope of campus issues, OCU plans in a more integrated fashion, uses resources more efficiently, and more effectively carries out the institutional mission.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Adapt this technique for use on your campuses.
  2. Prioritize strengths and opportunities for improvement based on digital assessment results.
  3. Engage the entire campus in the assessment process.
  4. Use the technique to bridge budgeting, planning, and assessment initiatives.
     

TAGS: assessment, Resource allocation, Non-Curricular Assessment, Photo Assessment, Campus Engagement, Qualitative Assessment

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C269)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Columbus KL

Integrated Planning and Resource Allocation to Meet Changing Fiscal Realities

Integrated Planning and Resource Allocation to Meet Changing Fiscal Realities

Integrated Planning and Resource Allocation to Meet Changing Fiscal Realities

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Integrated Planning and Resource Allocation to Meet Changing Fiscal Realities

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Valarie L. Avalone, Director of Institutional Planning, Monroe Community College; Darrell Jachim-Moore, Assistant Vice President, Administrative Services, Monroe Community College; Heze Simmons, Chief Financial Officer & Vice President, Administrative Services, Monroe Community College
Convened by: Ken Snowdon, President, Snowdon & Associates, Inc

In the face of increasing competition and financial constraints, institutions must be systematic, creative, and responsible in the use of their resources. Successful integrated planning and resource allocation require cultural and operational changes, and new realities now demand a more inclusive approach to institutional effectiveness. Monroe Community College (MCC) has a long history of effectively integrating its planning and budgeting processes. This session focuses on MCC's collaborative planning techniques and outlines a framework for integration and implementation that may be replicated at institutions of any type.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Engage the campus community in an open and transparent planning process.
  2. Implement an institutional effectiveness model which incorporates an integrated and college-wide resource allocation process.
  3. Create and manage a "big-table" (i.e., broad and multi-level participation) approach to resource allocation in which all stakeholders are represented, and varied, sometimes divergent perspectives can be heard.
  4. Explore strategies for prioritizing resources in response to changing fiscal conditions.

TAGS: Change Management, Budget/Resource Planning, Academic Planning, Strategic Planning, Community College, integrated planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C025)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Grand D North

Road Map For Making the Most Rather Than Making Do

Road Map For Making the Most Rather Than Making Do

Road Map For Making the Most Rather Than Making Do

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Road Map For Making the Most Rather Than Making Do

SOLD OUT
Presented by: David R. Moore, Architect, McMillan Pazdan Smith Architecture; Kay Wall, Dean of Libraries, Clemson University
Convened by: Melissa B. Bennett, Building Services Group Leader, Dewberry

After a university-led master plan recommended an unrealistic $70 million underground addition to their 180,000 square-foot main library, Clemson University's dean of libraries took a different avenue. The dean worked with the project architect to craft a "road map" plan—a phased approach that optimized the library, increasing its capacity, efficiency, and functionality without adding a single square foot. By making the most rather than just making do, the library is poised for both current and future use.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Organize "creative inquiry teams" comprised of students, faculty, and administration officials to solicit valuable and relevant information that will define a facility's direction.
  2. Differentiate between the "road map" approach and the traditional master plan approach to planning and implement a facility-specific "road map" plan.
  3. Unlock additional, underutilized space in buildings, identify common mistakes that lead to inefficiencies, and eliminate those inefficiencies.
  4. Assess if off-site repository strategies make sense for a library and/or campus and if such an approach will benefit the physical qualities of their on-campus library.

TAGS: Public Research, Facility Design_Library, Space Utilization

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP47C093)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
GBCI CE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Project Surroundings and Public Outreach
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Columbus EF

The Challenge to Foster Inclusion in Campus Community

The Challenge to Foster Inclusion in Campus Community

The Challenge to Foster Inclusion in Campus Community

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

The Challenge to Foster Inclusion in Campus Community

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Raymond Crossman, President, Adler School of Professional Psychology; Trung Le, Principal, Cannon Design; Sarah Malin, Ethnographer, Cannon Design; Ashley Marsh, Architect, Cannon Design
Convened by: Brian Karasick, Senior Campus Planner, McGill University

How do we design dynamic, holistic places that nurture healthy, engaged communities? As we strive to design places of learning with compelling identities that unite individuals into a community, we look for ways to holistically appeal to inhabitants. At the Adler School of Professional Psychology, client and design team worked together to manifest Adler's mission in its campus design. This session will discuss the methods and processes used by this successful collaboration and analyze how a commitment to community can define and reinforce pedagogy.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Outline strategies to develop holistic, spatially-just campus community environments.
  2. Summarize progressive spatial research methods that engage higher education communities.
  3. Apply varied approaches to engage campuses in design processes and post-occupancy evaluation (POE) efforts.
  4. Employ strategies for early development of, adherence to, and successful analysis of design drivers in campus contexts.

TAGS: Private Graduate Institution, Post-occupancy Research, POE, New Campus, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C141)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Columbus GH

Using For-Profit Leadership Principles to Improve Nonprofit Institutions

Using For-Profit Leadership Principles to Improve Nonprofit Institutions

Using For-Profit Leadership Principles to Improve Nonprofit Institutions

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Using For-Profit Leadership Principles to Improve Nonprofit Institutions

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Neil Trotta, Director, Continuing Education Operations, Fisher College; Alex Wagner, Director, Institutional Research and Planning, Fisher College
Convened by: Jennifer Swann, Professor, Biological Sciences, Lehigh University

By adopting principles applied in successful for-profit organizations, senior-level executives at not-for-profit institutions can answer today's tough questions: What should we keep in mind while running a non-profit college in today's economy? How do we satisfy increasing, expensive technological and programmatic demands while maintaining a healthy surplus? How do we navigate the "accreditation minefield" and plan around associated unknowns, like approval outcomes and timelines? Institutions of higher education must remain nimble and innovative in today's environment by responding as a for-profit would to competitive threats, governmental regulation, and areas of opportunity.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify and apply for-profit operational strategies to the not-for-profit educational environment, and determine how to drive the strategic planning process with data-driven decision making, ensuring accountability through operational planning.
  2. Employ appropriate tools and analytics to support strategic planning methods and identify strategies for responding quickly in today's competitive environment utilizing cross-functional teams and cross-departmental collaboration.
  3. Evaluate how program proposals, or changes/delays in accreditation approval, will impact operating budget and competitive position.
  4. Establish (and apply) a framework based on for-profit principles for your own strategic planning process.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Finance/Budgeting, Accreditation, Business Systems

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C143)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Columbus AB

Utilizing Documentation for a Stronger Infrastructure

Utilizing Documentation for a Stronger Infrastructure

Utilizing Documentation for a Stronger Infrastructure

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Utilizing Documentation for a Stronger Infrastructure

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Michael Harvey, Chief Sales Officer, Multivista Construction Documentation
Convened by: Richard Minturn, Senior Academic Facility Planner, The University of Virginia

Planning, designing, and constructing higher education facilities can be complex and ever-changing. Recent studies show that the construction industry has yet to take full advantage of available technology and progressive business practices to boost productivity and lower cost in the design and construction of buildings. Leveraging digital documentation can provide a cost savings in both construction and facility management. By documenting a project from start to finish, there is reduced risk, lower costs of operations and maintenance, and improved quality.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Utilize a digital documentation platform as the collaboration tool for all members of the construction team while providing the ultimate facilities management tool for the lifecycle of your building.
  2. Mitigate construction delays, resolve disputes, and eliminate the need for destructive verification.
  3. Describe how digital documentation can provide a permanent record for the optimization of future renovations and facility expansions.
  4. Establish how to achieve a 10:1 return on investment (ROI) by minimizing quality issues, unscheduled delays, change orders, warranty claims, and by resolving disputes.

TAGS: Design, Documentation, Operations and Maintenance, construction, Cost savings

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C259)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM in Grand A

Zero Net Energy on College Campuses—Realistic or a Sustainable Pipe Dream?

Zero Net Energy on College Campuses—Realistic or a Sustainable Pipe Dream?

Zero Net Energy on College Campuses—Realistic or a Sustainable Pipe Dream?

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Zero Net Energy on College Campuses—Realistic or a Sustainable Pipe Dream?

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Steven Baumgartner, Associate, Buro Happold; William A. Massey, Principal, Sasaki Associates
Convened by: Cathrine D. Blake, Associate Director, University Landscape Architect, Stanford University

Which sustainable options make sense for large, heavily used buildings on your campus? Using a hypothetical 100,000 square-foot recreation center, the presenters tested a wide variety of sustainable strategies. This presentation shares the results from this case study, evaluating each strategy's appropriateness, applicability, sustainable benefit, and cost. Some strategies are easily attainable at little-to-no cost, while others are extreme and potentially costly, but with big benefits and the potential for strong energy-saving returns. Attendees will examine the costs and benefits of each strategy and identify which strategies make the most sense for their campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the environmental impacts of a large and heavily used campus building and minimize them through various sustainable strategies.
  2. Compare a wide range of sustainable design methods, both cutting-edge and simple, many of which are affordable and easily achievable.
  3. Appreciate and prioritize sustainable design strategies and how they may benefit or compromise current and future programmatic needs, in this case, for a campus recreation facility.
  4. Demonstrate some of the latest green design strategies, their costs, and whether they live up to their expectations.

TAGS: Sustainability, Energy Conservation, Facility Design_Recreation Center, Environment

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP47C014)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
GBCI CE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Project Surroundings and Public Outreach
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM in Grand D North

"A Conversation with Bob Dickeson"

"A Conversation with Bob Dickeson"

"A Conversation with Bob Dickeson"

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

"A Conversation with Bob Dickeson"

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Robert C. Dickeson, President Emeritus, University of Northern Colorado
Convened by: Sue Henderson, President, New Jersey City University

Join an unstructured, informal conversation with a leader in American higher education. Dickeson has been a university president, business CEO, co-founder of Lumina Foundation for Education, chief of staff to governors in two states, and consultant to more than 700 colleges and universities. Come with your questions and issues and engage Bob Dickeson and your fellow participants in exploring solutions.

Proceedings are not available for this session.

TAGS: Program Prioritization, Academic Planning, Resource Planning, Strategic Planning, institutional direction


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM in Grand B

A New Approach to Solving Difficult Campus/Community Real Estate Problems

A New Approach to Solving Difficult Campus/Community Real Estate Problems

A New Approach to Solving Difficult Campus/Community Real Estate Problems

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

A New Approach to Solving Difficult Campus/Community Real Estate Problems

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Paul T. Chiles, President, Chiles & Company, Inc.; P. Barton DeLacy, Director, Valuation and Advisory Services, National Energy Practice, CBRE; Sue Carlson Weinberg, Director, Real Estate Office, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Convened by: Jack E. Nye, Vice President, Whitman, Requardt and Associates, LLP

With budgets under pressure, more issues are raised during effectively planning for land usage, facilities, development, and community real estate, and it is more challenging to determine their solutions. Several colleges and universities partnered with volunteer teams of high-level real estate advisors from a professional association, The Counselors of Real Estate (CRE), to tackle the complex property problems impacting their institutions. Together, they conserved budgets, engaged specialized expertise, and uncovered solutions that earlier seemed elusive and impossibly unaffordable.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Outline strategies to monetize property assets by creating revenue streams from unused or underutilized land.
  2. Appraise the potential of real estate assets to advance the mission, strategic plan, or master plan of the institution.
  3. Develop strategies to ensure that off-campus housing in proximity to the university or college is safe, desirable, and well-maintained.
  4. Build or improve community engagement and acceptance of college- or university-owned real estate redevelopment with a market-driven and achievable action plan.

TAGS: Real Estate, Real Estate Planning, capital funding, Town/Gown, Partnerships/Collaborations, Economic Development

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C168)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM in Grand C

Designing a 21st Century Higher Education System for 21st Century Students: Are We Up to the Challenge?

Designing a 21st Century Higher Education System for 21st Century Students: Are We Up to the Challenge?

Designing a 21st Century Higher Education System for 21st Century Students: Are We Up to the Challenge?

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Designing a 21st Century Higher Education System for 21st Century Students: Are We Up to the Challenge?

SOLD OUT
Presented by: James L. Applegate, Vice President, Program Development, Lumina Foundation for Education
Convened by: Clover Hall, Vice President, Academic Planning & Institutional Research, St John's University-New York

The US has fallen to 15th in the world in the education of its young workforce. By 2018, almost two-thirds of jobs will require some college. Income inequality that threatens our democracy is largely due to education inequality. Seventy-nine percent of wealthy students have degrees while only 11 percent of poorer students do. The Lumina Foundation, the nation's largest foundation focused solely on college attainment, has outlined the strategic response required to meet this challenge and is working across the country to advance that plan. Jim Applegate, who leads the foundation’s grant-making, will outline the strategic response needed from higher education.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Acquire the data and scenarios necessary to make the case for the changes needed on campuses to dramatically increase student success, especially for underserved students.
  2. Learn strategies for increasing campuses' ability to better serve more students with flat or declining resources (i.e., increase productivity).
  3. Identify opportunities for partnerships that produce collaborations with collective impact.
  4. Frame strategies to open up the conversation about "quality" degrees tied to defining transparent learning accessible to 21st century students aligned with 21st century demands.

TAGS: Access, Productivity, Accountability

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Personnel/HR


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM in Grand F

Getting IT to the Strategic Planning Table

Getting IT to the Strategic Planning Table

Getting IT to the Strategic Planning Table

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Getting IT to the Strategic Planning Table

SOLD OUT
Presented by: William Paraska, Director, Information Technology Business Support Services, Georgia State University
Convened by: Alan Brian Colyer, Principal, Gensler

IT can enable your institution to meet its goals, and therefore deserves a seat at the strategic planning table. Unfortunately, IT is often regarded as an after-thought, largely because of a tendency to represent themselves with arcane job titles, rather than the customer-facing services they can provide. To take advantage of IT's strengths, you have to understand what IT can provide and how to get it. This presentation will present results from the Georgia State University four year development of service catalog and budgeting transparency that clarified IT's role in strategic planning, bringing IT to the table.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Clarify what IT provides, not just what it does.
  2. Specify what IT is already providing and what it costs.
  3. List what IT can provide as a strategic enabler.
  4. Assess whether what you want IT to do is more important than what they are already doing.

TAGS: IT Strategic Planning, Budget Planning, Information technology, it, it governance

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C010)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM in Columbus EF

Jobs Jobs Jobs: Strategies for Planning a Workforce Development Center

Jobs Jobs Jobs: Strategies for Planning a Workforce Development Center

Jobs Jobs Jobs: Strategies for Planning a Workforce Development Center

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Jobs Jobs Jobs: Strategies for Planning a Workforce Development Center

SOLD OUT
Presented by: William H. Gary, Vice President, Workforce Development Division, Northern Virginia Community College; Sam Hill, Provost, Woodbridge Campus, Northern Virginia Community College; Anthony J. Lucarelli, Principal, Higher Education, Grimm + Parker Architects
Convened by: Steven Schonberger, Higher Education Practice Leader, gkkworks

Northern Virginia Community College (NVCC) is the largest college in Virginia, encompassing six campuses and offering many critical workforce programs. The college recently completed a new "prototype" facility exclusively devoted to workforce development at NVCC and focused on supporting an incumbent workforce. The college vice president for workforce development, the Woodbridge Campus provost, and the architect will reveal how the project became a priority for capital funding, was defined by the demand-driven priorities of business, government, and college stakeholders, and was planned and designed with the integral involvement of those stakeholders.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate and reconcile the diverse workforce development priorities and perspectives that exist among government, businesses, and community colleges, then identify strategies that leverage common interests to build momentum for funding.
  2. Discuss and assess the balance between "social equity" priorities (displaced workers) and the "business growth" priorities at play in planning a workforce development center.
  3. Generate a program of functions that meets the specific needs of local business while addressing the college's long-term need for revenue generation and flexibility.
  4. Assess the design and its effectiveness in creating a community presence, a user-friendly organization of spaces customized for function with flexibility, and an appropriate image for a "business-focused" collegiate building.

TAGS: Community College, workforce development, Public/Private Partnerships, Economic Development, Facility Design_Workforce Training

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C076)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Personnel/HR


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM in Grand A

Renovation Strategies That Inform Design Approaches for New Buildings

Renovation Strategies That Inform Design Approaches for New Buildings

Renovation Strategies That Inform Design Approaches for New Buildings

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Renovation Strategies That Inform Design Approaches for New Buildings

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Aric J. Lasher, President, HBRA Architects
Convened by: Darlene Callahan, Director, Office of Space Management & Planning, University of North Texas

The reuse of existing campus buildings presents obstacles, but also unique benefits, when considered with regard to long-term institutional interests, programming innovations, and institutional identity. This session will illustrate a variety of renovation approaches, their combinations, and possible outcomes with examples ranging from modest interventions within historic buildings to preservation and gut renovations. Using these case studies, the presenter will demonstrate renovation strategies that also can inform approaches for the design of new campus buildings and additions.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify approaches to renovate of campus architecture within a broader institutional framework.
  2. Recognize the benefits of design strategies that allow for long-term utility and future flexibility in both renovation and new construction.
  3. Compare approaches by which new programmatic models can inhabit existing campus buildings.
  4. Assess opportunities and methods that exploit existing and new architecture to reinforce institutional identity.

TAGS: Renovation, Project Management, Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP47C258)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
GBCI CE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Stakeholder Involvement in Innovation
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM in Columbus KL

Student Works: Integrating Student Multi-Media Content Into Educational Spaces

Student Works: Integrating Student Multi-Media Content Into Educational Spaces

Student Works: Integrating Student Multi-Media Content Into Educational Spaces

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Student Works: Integrating Student Multi-Media Content Into Educational Spaces

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Denette Anthony, Owner, ACT Associates; Leila R. Kamal, Vice President, Design and Expertise, EYP; Jamie Lausch Vander Broek, Digital Learning Services Librarian, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
Convened by: Don Bush, Principal, Lord, Aeck & Sargent Architecture

No longer simply a collection of posters and pictures, modern student presentations have evolved into multimedia events, requiring more than just wall space. To respond to this need, the University of Michigan (U of M) sought to create a high-technology, multipurpose space that responds to current and future trends in student presentations. This interactive discussion, exploring the U of M's North Quad campus, will reveal a process model for supplying student needs for digital display venues while accommodating 21st century presentation demands.

Extra Proceedings Files
Download the presentation with embedded movie clips here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Breakdown multimedia infrastructure and how to integrate it into a campus setting.
  2. Evaluate recent trends in student presentation needs and how to adapt them into your campus environment.
  3. Explore real-world examples and lessons learned from successful multimedia presentations.
  4. Prepare for pedagogical trends and managing these technology demands.

TAGS: Technology and Learning, Learning Space Design, Student Learning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C103)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM in Columbus AB

System and Institution: Meeting Their Differing Needs Concurrently

System and Institution: Meeting Their Differing Needs Concurrently

System and Institution: Meeting Their Differing Needs Concurrently

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

System and Institution: Meeting Their Differing Needs Concurrently

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Barbara D. Chernow, Senior Vice President for Administration , Stony Brook University; Pamela Gibbons-Mahler, Capital Program Manager, State University Construction Fund; David McGregor, Managing Director, Cooper, Robertson & Partners
Convened by: Brian MacDougall, Executive Vice President for Finance and Administration, American University in Cairo

Working together, New York State University Construction Fund and Stony Brook University created a facilities master plan for Stony Brook's unique future that employed the Construction Fund's master plan format—standard at all 32 of its campuses. During plan development, the two institutions integrated state and local academic priorities as well as physical and budget considerations. This session shares best practices from this planning process, including joint administrative entities, concurrent ten-year and long-range strategies, and joint use of a mutually selected consultant team.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Devise administrative arrangements that effectuate collaboration between two higher education entities with different missions, goals, and needs.
  2. Plan simultaneously for the more specific near-term while retaining flexibility for the longer term.
  3. Synchronize facilities plans with strategic academic plans so both proceed effectively.
  4. Prepare the institution's facilities staff to carry out the plans after the departure of the consultants.

TAGS: State System, Master Planning, Public Research University, Partnerships/Collaboration, Parking and Transportation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C068)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM in Columbus IJ

The Cutting Edge of Health Care Training: A Public-Private Collaboration

The Cutting Edge of Health Care Training: A Public-Private Collaboration

The Cutting Edge of Health Care Training: A Public-Private Collaboration

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

The Cutting Edge of Health Care Training: A Public-Private Collaboration

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Todd Drake, Associate Principal, Ballinger; Thomas S. Riles, Executive Director, New York Simulation for the Health Sciences; Frank C. Spencer Professor of Surgery; Associate Dean for Medical Education & Technology, New York University; Iris Weinshall, Vice Chancellor, Facilities Planning, Construction & Management, CUNY Central Office
Convened by: Kris Smith, Associate Provost, Institutional Research & Reporting, George Mason University

The City University of New York (CUNY) and the New York University (NYU) Medical Center collaborated to create the New York Simulation Center for the Health Sciences, a cutting-edge learning environment that trains health care students and faculty. At this session, attendees can try simulation equipment used at the center. Using this hands-on experience to illustrate motivations behind project decisions, the center's leadership will share how the center was planned, designed, and built, plus lessons learned after the first year of operations at one of the largest urban training centers in the US.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Formulate creative partnerships that address long-term economic uncertainties by leveraging public and private funds.
  2. Identify equipment requirements and resources for a technology-driven learning environment.
  3. Develop collaborative processes across institutions and disciplines to create new learning paradigms.
  4. Assess diverse programmatic goals to meet expectations among multiple constituencies while increasing space flexibility and utilization.

TAGS: Public Research, Partnerships/Collaborations, Facility Design_Health Sciences, Learning Space Design, Simulations

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C123)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM in Columbus CD

Town Hall: Recommendations From SCUP's Governance Task Force

Town Hall: Recommendations From SCUP's Governance Task Force

Town Hall: Recommendations From SCUP's Governance Task Force

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Town Hall: Recommendations From SCUP's Governance Task Force

SOLD OUT
Moderated by: Niraj Dangoria, Associate Dean, Facilities Planning & Management, Stanford University; Thomas C. Longin, Senior Fellow & Consultant, Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges (AGB)

Join Tom Longin, SCUP's 2011-12 President, and Niraj Dangoria, SCUP's President-Elect, for a discussion and Q&A about the recommendations from SCUP's Governance Task Force. 

Proceedings are not available for this session.


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Grand A

A New Resource Allocation Model—Development, Implementation, and the Politics of Change

A New Resource Allocation Model—Development, Implementation, and the Politics of Change

A New Resource Allocation Model—Development, Implementation, and the Politics of Change

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

A New Resource Allocation Model—Development, Implementation, and the Politics of Change

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Brett Fairbairn, Provost & Vice President, Academic, University of Saskatchewan; Pauline M. Melis, Assistant Provost, Institutional Planning & Assessment, University of Saskatchewan
Convened by: Nancy McKinney, Vice President, Administrative Services, South Puget Sound Community College

In 2009, the University of Saskatchewan began developing and implementing a new, activity-based resource allocation process to replace the traditional, historic-based process. This work resulted in the Transparent, Activity-Based Budgeting System (TABBS), a model that aligns college and unit budgets with activities in a more transparent, comprehensive, and systematic way, links budgets to cycles of integrated planning, ensures resources are put behind strategic priorities, and places responsibility for budgets at the appropriate college/unit and university levels. This session will discuss the model, its development, and its implementation.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Develop a budgeting system that is more responsive and transparent than traditional budgeting processes.
  2. Outline actions and sequence them in a timeline to create a new budget system.
  3. Communicate with stakeholders so there is consensus and understanding about what is changing, when the change will take place, and why the change is necessary.
  4. Support your efforts using political skills and strategies that apply to any type of change management or integrated planning.

TAGS: Public Research University Canada, Finance/Budget, Budget Model, Activity-based Resource Allocation, integrated planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C154)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Grand B

Appreciative Inquiry In Support of Institutional Planning and Effectiveness

Appreciative Inquiry In Support of Institutional Planning and Effectiveness

Appreciative Inquiry In Support of Institutional Planning and Effectiveness

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Appreciative Inquiry In Support of Institutional Planning and Effectiveness

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Kevin Lamb, Managing Partner, Keystone Global Consulting Group
Convened by: Christina Leimer, Vice President of Planning & Effectiveness, Ashford University

Calls for accountability can diminish the energy needed for innovation and improvement. Appreciative Inquiry (AI) is a strengths-based methodology that can identify and leverage positive attributes and resources that already exist, then use these to create demonstrably effective educational programs and practices. This session provides an overview of AI, its origins and key tenets, and includes an interactive exercise to demonstrate the potential of AI as a tool for planners, institutional research professionals, and anyone trying to effect positive change in higher education.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Summarize the origins and research-supported tenets of Appreciative Inquiry (AI).
  2. Outline and apply or adapt the four-stage process of AI.
  3. Rediscover overlooked or under-appreciated strengths within your university environment, culture, and community.
  4. Verify how these strengths can be leveraged to great effect, especially when dealing with organizational change.

TAGS: Appreciative Inquiry, AI, Change Management, Organizational change

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C208)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Grand D North

Concessioning University Parking for 50 Years: Implications for Campus Planning

Concessioning University Parking for 50 Years: Implications for Campus Planning

Concessioning University Parking for 50 Years: Implications for Campus Planning

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Concessioning University Parking for 50 Years: Implications for Campus Planning

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Sarah Blouch, Executive Director, Transportation & Parking, Ohio State University-Main Campus; Barbara J. Chance, President and Chief Executive Officer, CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc; Robert Furniss, Senior Operations Consultant, CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc
Convened by: Dana Perzynski, Associate, Ayers Saint Gross

The Ohio State University is deciding whether to concession parking garages and surface lots to an investment group for the next 50 years. The outcome of transferring the control of more than 35,000 parking spaces not only affects the campus community with regard to customer service and rates, it also has significant implications for campus planning. Parking lots and garages are typically "land banks" for academic building expansion or renewed green space. What are the issues when this land changes hands for 50 years?

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss infrastructure concessions and why they might be coming to your campus in the future.
  2. Evaluate the implications of transferring parking land and facilities to private control for a period of 50 years, both in terms of services for the campus community and the use of land for further growth and development.
  3. Describe the changes in working relationships and processes that need to be considered when the planning and operating departments must work out changes in a paid, private environment rather than within the university community.
  4. Identify the ways in which planning and operations may change as universities use public-private partnerships to raise funds and perform functions.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Transportation, Parking, Public/Private Partnerships, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C244)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus EF

Concise Device Advice, or, Mobile Computing's Impact on Campus Computing

Concise Device Advice, or, Mobile Computing's Impact on Campus Computing

Concise Device Advice, or, Mobile Computing's Impact on Campus Computing

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Concise Device Advice, or, Mobile Computing's Impact on Campus Computing

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Colin K. Currie, Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, Princeton University
Convened by: Lori Snyder Garrett, Senior Principal, Director of Higher Education Studio, Glave & Holmes Architecture

Increasingly, mobile computing impacts university system access, application design, and data security concerns. Initially it was just students, but now faculty and staff also look at iPhones, iPads, Droids, Blackberries, and other mobile devices as a preferred interface for accessing and working with university data. What are the implications of this growing trend, and what do we need to do to prepare ourselves for its continued growth?

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain what mobile computing is and how it differs from traditional campus computing.
  2. Discuss why the adoption of these of mobile platforms as a legitimate computing platform is inevitable for higher education and how soon that inevitability will arrive.
  3. Identify potential issues with mobile computing, include data vulnerability, necessary changes to applications, and possible changes to business processes.
  4. Position your institution now to take the best advantage of mobile computing's opportunities while protecting your institution from potential drawbacks.

TAGS: Mobile Computing, it, Technology and Learning, Computer Security, Pedagogy

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C058)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus GH

Eat, Sleep, Soundcheck—Integrating Performing Arts With Student Life

Eat, Sleep, Soundcheck—Integrating Performing Arts With Student Life

Eat, Sleep, Soundcheck—Integrating Performing Arts With Student Life

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Eat, Sleep, Soundcheck—Integrating Performing Arts With Student Life

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Ross Cameron, Senior Associate, Elkus Manfredi Architects; Margaret A. Ings, Associate Vice President, Government and Community Relations, Emerson College; Robert J. Orchard, Executive Director for the Arts, Emerson College
Convened by: Jeff Fullerton, Supervisory Consultant, Architectural Acoustics, Acentech

In a region of education giants, Emerson College quietly invested millions relocating its campus to Boston's Theater District and has emerged a major player on the national scene of performing arts schools. This session explores how the Paramount Center, Emerson's latest building, integrates performance, learning, and living environments while engaging Boston's theater community with its ArtsEmerson program, which brings international performance artists to Boston. We will assess the success of the Paramount vision, planning, and community impact two years post completion.

Extra Proceedings Files
Download the presentation with embedded movie clips here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe the benefits of integrating a business enterprise, such as the production company ArtsEmerson, into the higher education academic context.
  2. Identify the challenges and solutions of integrating multiple and disparate program elements to create a vibrant live/work/perform building.
  3. Navigate the often-complex municipal, historical, state, federal, and legislative processes and agencies encountered during project procurement in an urban environment.
  4. Demonstrate how the integration of higher education performing arts centers with their communities can benefit both students and the community.

TAGS: Small Private, Facility Design_Performing Arts, Living/Learning, Town/Gown, Partnerships/Collaborations

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C158)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Grand C

From Lab Bench to Park Bench: Shared Resources in Science Buildings

From Lab Bench to Park Bench: Shared Resources in Science Buildings

From Lab Bench to Park Bench: Shared Resources in Science Buildings

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

From Lab Bench to Park Bench: Shared Resources in Science Buildings

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Steve Mahler, Principal, Ellenzweig; James M. May, Senior Project Development Manager, Campus Planning & Design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Dominick Roveto, Principal, Ellenzweig
Convened by: Lisa Ryker, Director of Planning, WLC Architects, Inc.

The concept of shared spaces and resources need not be restricted to sunny corner breakout lounges or efficient lab equipment corridors.  New typologies are emerging for how and where faculty and students can share and collaborate, begetting buildings that are more efficient to construct, operate, and maintain. Facilities like Massachusetts Institute of Technology's (MIT) new David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research could not exist without these shared resources, which are growing as science becomes more interdisciplinary and equipment becomes increasingly expensive.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify spaces and resources in any given building that can be shared.
  2. Place shared spaces within a building to maximize their use and effectiveness.
  3. Recognize design elements that help shared spaces become successful.
  4. Design special interior and exterior spaces as amenities (and fundraising opportunities) for the surrounding college, university, and/or community.

TAGS: Facility Design_Science, Public Research, Learning Space Design, Space Management, Collaboration, Shared Resources, Space Utilization

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C256)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Grand F

Inclusive Spaces: Designing Science Facilities That Support a Diverse Student Population

Inclusive Spaces: Designing Science Facilities That Support a Diverse Student Population

Inclusive Spaces: Designing Science Facilities That Support a Diverse Student Population

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Inclusive Spaces: Designing Science Facilities That Support a Diverse Student Population

SOLD OUT
Presented by: James Baird, Design Principal, Holabird & Root ; Jim E. Swartz, Director, Center for Science and the Liberal Arts and Interim Associate Vice President for Analytic Support and Institutional Research, Grinnell College
Convened by: Sharon C. Black, Director of Planning, Harvard Business School

The award-winning Grinnell Science Project addresses barriers to success in science for students of color, women, and first-generation college students. Grinnell College, the institution that developed this program, responded to these barriers with successful curricular and pedagogical changes. Then, these changes were translated into the design of Grinnell’s science complex, which has become a national model for science facilities. Presenters from the school and the architectural firm will discuss Grinnell's successful, integrated approach to a pressing issue.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify barriers to success for students of color, women, and first-generation college students.
  2. Examine successful curricular and pedagogical changes that lead to achievement for traditionally underrepresented students in the sciences.
  3. Analyze how renovating or adding to facilities can support and promote changes in pedagogy.
  4. Explore how specific spaces can create a more inclusive environment.

TAGS: Small Private Liberal Arts, STEM Pedagogy, Underrepresented Populations in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, Facility Design_Science Education

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C032)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus CD

LEED Version 4: What to Expect

LEED Version 4: What to Expect

LEED Version 4: What to Expect

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

LEED Version 4: What to Expect

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Kristin Ferguson, Higher Ed Associate, The Center for Green Schools at the U.S. Green Building Council; Chrissy Macken, Manager, LEED Technical Development, U.S. Green Building Council
Convened by: Renee Driscoll, Business Development Manager, Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc.

With the U.S. Green Building Council due to release a new version of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design rating system next summer, this session will provide an overview of what changes to expect and what will remain the same. Learn how to stay ahead of the curve and apply anticipated changes to your campus plans in advance of the release.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Articulate the environmental priorities of LEEDv4 development.
  2. Understand the key changes from LEED 2009 to LEEDv4.
  3. Understand changes in design approach that will help improve LEED rating.
  4. Demonstrate key areas where campus application has improved in LEEDv4.

TAGS: LEED, Sustainability, LEED Rating, Design, U. S. Green Building Council

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP47C276)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
GBCI CE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Synergistic Opportunities and LEED Application Process
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus AB

Pathways to Leadership for Aspiring Professionals in a Global Society

Pathways to Leadership for Aspiring Professionals in a Global Society

Pathways to Leadership for Aspiring Professionals in a Global Society

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Pathways to Leadership for Aspiring Professionals in a Global Society

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Tod Hisaji Gushiken, Graduate Student, University of Hawaii at Manoa; Aaron Hyland, Principal, Architectural Resources Group; Kody K. Kato, Graduate Student, University of Hawaii at Manoa; Joyce M. Noe, Associate Professor, School of Architecture, University of Hawaii at Manoa; Reynaldo Royo, Associate, Architecture International
Convened by: Valarie L. Avalone, Director of Institutional Planning, Monroe Community College

Institutions and practitioners with innovative approaches to preparing aspiring leaders attract the best and brightest. The University of Hawaii, collaborating with Asian universities, offers a unique doctorate of architecture with a specific focus on placing students directly into real-world "classrooms" within practicum firms throughout the Pacific Rim and the world. This roundtable discussion will explore—with perspectives from two students, an alumnus, an educator, a practitioner, and you—what we can do to provide more opportunities for aspiring leaders.

Extra Proceedings Files
Download the presentation with embedded movie clips here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Collaborate to identify what more our organizations can be doing to provide better leadership opportunities for students and emerging professionals.
  2. Explain how the global focus has changed how students are prepared for the real world.
  3. From the students' and alumnus' perspectives, discuss how this practicum program differs from other internship programs, creating better leadership opportunities at a global level.
  4. Formulate a new vision of how higher education can provide leadership opportunities for students and aspiring professionals.

TAGS: Teaching and Learning, Collaborations, Architecture, Students, International, Emerging Leaders

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C172)
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Personnel/HR


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus IJ

Quality Through Learning—Implementing a Post-Occupancy Program at Michigan State University

Quality Through Learning—Implementing a Post-Occupancy Program at Michigan State University

Quality Through Learning—Implementing a Post-Occupancy Program at Michigan State University

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Quality Through Learning—Implementing a Post-Occupancy Program at Michigan State University

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Tim Mrozowski, Professor of Construction Management, School of Planning, Design and Construction; and Co-Director, Construction Industry Research and Education Center (CIREC), Michigan State University; Chad Stirrett, Building Process Analyst, Michigan State University
Convened by: Anthony P. LoBello, Senior Associate, Gensler

Michigan State University (MSU) developed its Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) program as a lean construction technique to tightly couple learning with action, emphasizing quality and value through a continuous learning cycle of capital project delivery. This approach integrates the quantitative results of the project delivery process with the qualitative and functional aspects of the building to produce a comprehensive retrospective view of the project's success. The integration of input from all levels and organizations involved has become a best practice at MSU that will be used during future projects to achieve maximum return on investment.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain how the Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) program at MSU has helped to deliver higher quality projects.
  2. Predict the cost savings that can be realized through the POE process.
  3. Prepare for the cultural challenges that act as barriers to program implementation.
  4. Discuss how the POE process originated, the pilot projects at MSU, and the key methodologies of the program.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Post-occupancy Research, Project Delivery, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C139)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Administrative Practice


Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM in Columbus KL

Shared Campuses—More Than the Sum of Their Parts

Shared Campuses—More Than the Sum of Their Parts

Shared Campuses—More Than the Sum of Their Parts

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Shared Campuses—More Than the Sum of Their Parts

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Jeff Stamper, Assistant Vice President, Operations and Services, Auraria Higher Education Center; Cary Weatherford, Senior Institutional Planner, University of Colorado at Denver; Barb Weiske, Executive Vice President, Administration, Auraria Higher Education Center
Convened by: Minakshi Mani Amundsen, University Planner, Cornell University

Academic and political leaders are increasingly considering the creation of shared campuses to drive collaboration across disciplines and institutional boundaries and achieve economies of scale in non-academic services. This session will reference the case study of the Auraria Higher Education Center to explore the challenges, opportunities, and promise of these collaborative environments. The Auraria Campus, comprised of three separate public institutions of higher education and managed by a forth entity, is a single contiguous campus that pioneered and continues to refine the concept of institutional collaboration and shared services.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify and quantify the potential benefits of a shared campus, including efficiencies in non-academic services and increased collaboration among faculty and students.
  2. Assess the pros and cons of such an arrangement, including how to maintain institutional identities in a shared setting.
  3. Recognize and prepare for the challenges on the road to creating a shared campus.
  4. Consider various models for shared organizations, including shared physical campuses and consolidated support services.

TAGS: Shared Campus, Service Delivery, Institutional Change, Institutional collaboration, shared space, Case Studies

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C225)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM in Grand A

Around the World in 60 Minutes—The World's Best University Architecture

Around the World in 60 Minutes—The World's Best University Architecture

Around the World in 60 Minutes—The World's Best University Architecture

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Around the World in 60 Minutes—The World's Best University Architecture

SOLD OUT
Presented by: W. Alan Simms, vue partners
Convened by: Robert C. Hicks, Senior Project Manager, Symmes Maini & McKee Associates

Building on the success of last year's presentation, "Does Building Consensus Compromise Creativity," presenters offer an exciting and thought-provoking visual tour of the world's most innovative and dramatic university architecture. How are architects realizing, in a creative way, the new paradigm of cross-disciplinary collaboration combined with budget cuts? Through interviews with university administrators, architects, and project managers, this vivid, visual journey highlights the ways architects and administrators work together to commission enlivened and exciting projects.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Compare your capital projects to leading-edge examples worldwide.
  2. Assess best practices in cutting-edge design and apply to your work.
  3. Implement new and innovative design ideas in your own institution.
  4. Explain why innovative design and historical tradition may not be mutually exclusive.

TAGS: Design, International, Innovative Design, Learning Environments, Facility Design_Science

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C049)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM in Grand F

Icon or Eyesore: Resolving the Mid-Century Modern Campus Dilemma

Icon or Eyesore: Resolving the Mid-Century Modern Campus Dilemma

Icon or Eyesore: Resolving the Mid-Century Modern Campus Dilemma

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Icon or Eyesore: Resolving the Mid-Century Modern Campus Dilemma

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Leland D. Cott, Principal, Bruner/Cott & Associates, Inc.; Henry Moss, Principal, Bruner/Cott & Associates, Inc.; Paul J. Rinaldi, Assistant Vice President, Planning & Design, Boston University
Convened by: David J. Neuman, Architect for the University, The University of Virginia

How can a generation of mid-century modern academic buildings support campus planning initiatives while responding to the evolving needs of student life and learning environments, even as these buildings approach what may appear to be the end of their useful life? Focusing on the plans for repair and expansion at the Boston University School of Law, this session will present design approaches based on emerging ideas within preservation philosophy specific to mid-century modern campus configurations and building types.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess the value and renovation potential of modern period campus buildings.
  2. Identify and evaluate the most common, predictable problems in this building age group, then learn how to manage them.
  3. Measure the success of mid-century building project outcomes, examining specific features in terms of pedagogy, student life, energy consumption, maintenance, and flexibility.
  4. Explore how university facilities departments prioritize and administer ongoing problems specific to this building group.

TAGS: Renovation, Historic Preservation, Mid-Century Modern

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP47C062)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
GBCI CE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Acquisition, Installation, and Management of Project Materials
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM in Columbus G-J

Integrating Academic Program Review With Planning and Budgeting

Integrating Academic Program Review With Planning and Budgeting

Integrating Academic Program Review With Planning and Budgeting

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Integrating Academic Program Review With Planning and Budgeting

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Margaret Kasimatis, Associate Provost, Strategic Planning and Educational Effectiveness, Loyola Marymount University
Convened by: Kristen Hendrickson, Director, Planning, Research & Policy Analysis, Illinois State University

Traditional academic program reviews typically focus on inputs and processes. At Loyola Marymount University, we have revised our academic program review guidelines to focus more on outcomes and be more evidence-based, including evidence of student learning. This session describes our new process and explains how the use of evidence, as well as the culminating memorandum of understanding, facilitates the integration of program review with academic planning and budgeting.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Distinguish between traditional academic program review and outcomes-based program review in order to improve program review processes.
  2. Identify types of evidence that would be useful in outcomes-based program review.
  3. Analyze the alignment between evidence and program goals and broader institutional goals in order to facilitate the connection to planning.
  4. Develop strategies and processes for aligning academic program review with budgeting.

TAGS: Small Private Liberal Arts, Academic Planning, Performance Measures, Budget Planning, Program review, integrated planning, assessment

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM in Grand B

Meeting the Community College Mission While Adding Bachelor's Degrees

Meeting the Community College Mission While Adding Bachelor's Degrees

Meeting the Community College Mission While Adding Bachelor's Degrees

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Meeting the Community College Mission While Adding Bachelor's Degrees

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Meeta Goel, Vice President, Institutional Effectiveness, Colorado Mountain College
Convened by: Kyla A. Shea, Strategic Planning & Projects Officer, Institutional Planning and Assessment, University of Saskatchewan

Challenging times require us to exist successfully within our communities and simultaneously contribute to the greater good. Colorado Mountain College (CMC) is addressing its communities' needs by developing and offering four-year degrees, while still retaining its two-year mission. This session outlines a framework for successfully achieving this undertaking. It also will discuss what CMC learned from successes and areas for improvement, as well as related audience opinions and experience.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Develop processes that add bachelor's degrees to a community college's academic offerings.
  2. Implement bachelor's degrees while continuing to support two-year programs.
  3. Evaluate the development and implementation of bachelor's degrees at a community college.
  4. Discuss and share lessons learned from such implementations.

TAGS: Community College, Bachelor's Degrees at Community Colleges, Academic Planning, Institutional Change, Economic Development, Town/Gown

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM in Columbus C-F

Putting Pedagogy, Planning, and Architecture to the Test Through Post-Occupancy Evaluation

Putting Pedagogy, Planning, and Architecture to the Test Through Post-Occupancy Evaluation

Putting Pedagogy, Planning, and Architecture to the Test Through Post-Occupancy Evaluation

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Putting Pedagogy, Planning, and Architecture to the Test Through Post-Occupancy Evaluation

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Christopher Baylow, Associate Principal, Payette; Dorothy F. Chappell, Dean of Natural and Social Sciences and Professor of Biology, Wheaton College; Joseph Chronister, Vice President & Director, Higher Education, FGM Architects
Convened by: Jenelle Kelsch, Education Marketing Lead, Herman Miller, Inc.

This session will uncover the successful (and sometimes unsuccessful) aspects of the recently completed LEED Gold Wheaton College Science Center through the lens of a post-occupancy evaluation. The presenters will use this case study to critique how pedagogy and planning translates into an interdisciplinary research and teaching facility, the impact the building has on enrollment and recruitment of faculty, lessons learned, and how the science center will inform future campus planning efforts and future teaching and research facilities.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Translate pedagogy and research practices into the design of an interdisciplinary science center through a collaborative process between owner and design team.
  2. Analyze and measure post-occupancy feedback from college leadership, faculty, students, and facilities personnel. Consider how this information will improve the performance of the science center.
  3. Discuss return on investment of constructing a new science center and developing a new campus precinct for science with respect to increased student enrollment, faculty recruitment, and community engagement.
  4. Explain how to leverage the results of a post-occupancy evaluation to positively affect future campus planning and building projects.

TAGS: Small Private Liberal Arts, POE, Facility Design_Science Teaching, Learning Space Design, Post-occupancy evaluation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C246)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM in Columbus C-F

Interprofessional Education: At the Intersection of Vision, Pedagogy, and Architecture

Interprofessional Education: At the Intersection of Vision, Pedagogy, and Architecture

Interprofessional Education: At the Intersection of Vision, Pedagogy, and Architecture

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Interprofessional Education: At the Intersection of Vision, Pedagogy, and Architecture

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Stuart Elgie, Principal, Stantec Inc.; Mitchell Hall, Principal, Kuwabara Payne McKenna Blumberg Architects; Lorie Shekter-Wolfson, Assistant Vice President, Waterfront Development and Dean, Community Services and Health Sciences, George Brown College
Convened by: Joanne Dyer, Director, Office of the Vice-President (Administration), University of Manitoba

Health care delivery across North America is undergoing systemic change, moving toward a more integrated care model. Interprofessional education (IPE), where two or more professions learn about, from, and with each other, is essential to preparing a collaborative, practice-ready workforce. George Brown College embarked on a major initiative to envision and facilitate a new health sciences campus that supports the new, integrated health care model. By uniting four faculties and over 17 professional programs, this campus is specifically designed to nurture the IPE pedagogy and prepare the next generation of health care providers.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Acquire strategies to identify systematic and pedagogical change, determine strategic response, and build financial and political support for a new facility.
  2. Transform the academic/learning vision into a building design vision that positively reinforces design resolution at the city, campus, and student scales.
  3. Identify how architectural design can contribute new opportunities for academic program delivery.
  4. Prepare and plan for the reactions and challenges to systematic/pedagogical change by developing a change management plan.

TAGS: Facility Design_Health Education, Interprofessional Education, IPE

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C023)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM in Grand B

Presentation by Jeanne Gang, 2011 MacArthur Fellow: Architecture and Absorption: Buildings and Environments for Better Learning

Presentation by Jeanne Gang, 2011 MacArthur Fellow: Architecture and Absorption: Buildings and Environments for Better Learning

Presentation by Jeanne Gang, 2011 MacArthur Fellow: Architecture and Absorption: Buildings and Environments for Better Learning

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Presentation by Jeanne Gang, 2011 MacArthur Fellow: Architecture and Absorption: Buildings and Environments for Better Learning

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Jeanne Gang, Founder & Principal, Studio Gang Architects
Convened by: Judith Nitsch, Founding Principal & Chairman, Nitsch Engineering

Through a review of the firm’s higher education buildings and natural environments, founder and principal Jeanne Gang will discuss design’s potential to intensify the way we see and understand the world. Selected projects to be discussed include the Columbia College Chicago Media Production Center, the University of Chicago's Harper Library, the Arcus Center for Social Justice Leadership at Kalamazoo College, and the Nature Board Walk at Lincoln Park Zoo—all designed with attentiveness to the ways architecture can augment learning. Gang was awarded the MacArthur Grant in 2011. She is the architect behind one of the most distinctive new features in the Chicago skyline—the 82-story condominium called the Aqua Tower, ringed by wave-like balconies, no two alike. It contains a hotel, apartments, condominiums, parking, offices, and one of Chicago’s largest green roofs.

Proceedings are not available for this session at this time.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss design strategies employed for collaborative learning environments in libraries and in creative learning environments for arts education spaces and theaters.
  2. Explore an experiential, hands-on learning environment (Nature Board Walk at Lincoln Park Zoo), and consider the latest green infrastructure sustainable strategies applicable to campuses.
  3. Discuss how design attention to physical accessibility, low carbon materials, and building function can be synthesized to achieve sustainable outcomes and strong architectural identity for educational programs.
  4. Investigate new ideas about ways learning environments can be improved. 

TAGS: Architecture, Sustainable design, Site Use

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C274)
AICP CM 1.0 unit


Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM in Columbus G-J

Starting From Scratch: From Mission Statement to Complete Strategic Plan

Starting From Scratch: From Mission Statement to Complete Strategic Plan

Starting From Scratch: From Mission Statement to Complete Strategic Plan

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Starting From Scratch: From Mission Statement to Complete Strategic Plan

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Joan B. McGee, Executive Director Campus Administration, College of Southern Nevada
Convened by: Graham Morrison, Syndicate Secretary, University of Cambridge

In two years, the College of Southern Nevada (CSN) revised its mission, values, and vision, then completed a new institutional strategic plan. CSN navigated these changes efficiently thanks to an inclusive, step-by-step process. The core themes, mandated by CSN's accrediting agency, the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU), were derived from the one-sentence mission statement. Goals, objectives, strategies, data sources, and timelines were defined and created through forums, open discussions, and community involvement. To keep the process on track, software sends out automatic reminders of due dates for the annual status report. CSN's process can be duplicated and could spark ideas for your institution's planning process.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Acquire methods of obtaining comprehensive input for the planning process at your institution.
  2. Identify the simple link between mission statement and core themes, defined uniquely at any institution.
  3. Analyze and adopt program evaluation and review technique (PERT) charts and other visual aids to facilitate the planning process.
  4. Evaluate this process for suitability and reproduction at your institution.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Evaluation of Planning Processes, Program evaluation, Mission/Vision/Identity

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP47C028)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM in Grand F

Strategy Recombining Pedagogy, Technology, and Space Into the Non-College College

Strategy Recombining Pedagogy, Technology, and Space Into the Non-College College

Strategy Recombining Pedagogy, Technology, and Space Into the Non-College College

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Strategy Recombining Pedagogy, Technology, and Space Into the Non-College College

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Michael J. Olesen, Director, Information Technology, Bioscience & Research, University of Minnesota-Rochester; Lennie Scott-Webber, Director, Educational Environments, Steelcase Inc.
Convened by: Cindy Radecki, Associate, Lord, Aeck & Sargent Architecture

University of Minnesota Rochester (UMR) has no departments, no lecture halls, no fraternities, and no library. The university is implementing a new approach to higher education based on these words from first chancellor Stephen Lehmkuhle: "[We're] going to build an institution that's focused on learning...We want students to learn though understanding, not to memorize to learn." Using evidence-based research from the Steelcase Education Solutions that connects pedagogy, technology, and space, UMR transformed the active learning paradigm into a new kind of college.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Analyze an active learning paradigm model illustrating the connections between pedagogy, technology, and space.
  2. Identify how an evidence-based design research program inspires a new kind of college.
  3. Discuss the efforts required to "rethink" relative to pedagogy, technology, and space, and if these efforts are necessary to reach the desired goals.
  4. Review University of Minnesota-Rochester's finished campus and assess the benefits this active-learning model may bring to your institution.

TAGS: Active Learning, Learning Space Design, Student Learning, Evidence-Based Design, Large Public Research, Pedagogy, Technology and Learning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP47C048)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM in Grand A

Sustainability Strategic Planning and Performance Measurement

Sustainability Strategic Planning and Performance Measurement

Sustainability Strategic Planning and Performance Measurement

SOLD OUT (Wait List Available)

Sustainability Strategic Planning and Performance Measurement

SOLD OUT
Presented by: Ilsa Flanagan, Director, Office of Sustainability, University of Chicago; Alicia Murasaki, Executive Director, Planning and Design, University of Chicago
Convened by: Joan Racki, Policy & Operations Officer, Board of Regents, State of Iowa

The University of Chicago is establishing clear parameters around what it means to be sustainable. Our multi-year strategic plan includes a robust performance and causal measurement system to evaluate trends and guide decision-making. Linking program results to institutional performance outcomes such as fundraising, alumni development, and student recruitment demonstrates value beyond environmental impact. This system brings sustainability into focus for the campus, allowing us to advance new concepts and technologies to reduce our impact on the natural world.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify strategies that obtain leadership approval for creating your own sustainability model.
  2. Evaluate whether your sustainability programs are effectively connected to broader institution goals.
  3. Discover the power and utility of the causal measurement system to track and guide implementation decisions across time.
  4. Assess the University of Chicago sustainability benchmarking measurement system and the feasibility and value of its potential application at your institution.

TAGS: Private Research, Sustainability, Sustainability Master Plan, Strategic Planning, Environment, integrated planning, measurement

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP47C191)
AICP CM 1.0 unit
GBCI CE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Project Surroundings and Public Outreach
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Document Links

This printed page contains links to other web pages. Each link has a numerical indicator which corresponds to one of the URLs below.