My SCUP | Log In  | Join | Donate
CART (0)
start typing to search www.scup.org
  • About
  • Membership
  • Regions
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Annual Fund
  • Awards
  • Achieving Our Vision
  • Leadership
  • Perry Chapman Prize
  • Staff
  • Strategic Plan (PDF)
  • About Membership
  • Membership Directory
  • New Members
  • Join
  • Renew
  • SCUP Member News
  • Volunteering
  • Mid-Atlantic
  • North Atlantic
  • North Central
  • Pacific
  • Southern
  • SCUP 2013 Mid-Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 North Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Central Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Pacific Symposium | November 1
  • SCUP 2014 Pacific Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Southern Regional Conference
  • Annual, International Conference
  • Calendar
  • Online Programs
  • Planning Institute
  • Regional Conferences
  • Books
  • Campus Facilities Inventory
  • Continuing Education Credits
  • Job Postings
  • Mojo
  • Plans - Getty Higher Education
  • Plans - Higher Education Institutional
  • Planning for Higher Education Journal
  • RFPs and RFQs
  • Trends to Watch in Higher Education
Home Events SCUP's Annual, International Conference SCUP-46 SCUP-46 Workshops
  • Conference Links
  • Conference Home
  • Final List of Registrants (PDF)
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Conference Visibilty
    • Exhibit
      • Exhibitor Search
    • Sponsor

  • Conference Corners
  • Attendee Corner
  • Presenters Corner

  • Conference Committee

Workshops


Friday


Friday, July 22, 2011, 8:00 AM–5:00 PM in Chesapeake J-K
Step II: Focused Knowledge for Integrated Planning Processes (2 day workshop)

Presented by: Dale Braun, Campus Planner, University of Wisconsin-River Falls; Paul A. Pusecker, Chief Administrative Officer, University of Delaware; Richard L. Winstanley, Assistant Provost, Institutional Effectiveness, New England Institute of Technology
Convened by: Dawit Teklu, Dean, Institutional Research, Assessment & Evaluation, Strayer University
Audience:
Planners who have become proficient in their main area of responsibility and need to learn the language and practices of other planning specialties to advance integrated planning on their campuses.

Abstract:

Prerequisite: Step I of the Planning Institute

The second in SCUP's three-step Planning Institute, Step II is a two-day workshop that uses the SCUP Walnut College case study as the basis for practicing an integrated planning process that results in a plan reflecting the collaboration of all functional areas at Walnut College. In the process of creating the plan, participants will gain a deeper understanding of the needs and issues confronting key functional areas on campus during a planning initiative. In particular, the intersection of academic, resource/budget, and facilities planning defines a nexus for learning specific planning tactics. Each phase of an integrated planning process is accompanied by the application of core content to Walnut College. Throughout the workshop, the role of assessment in each planning phase is highlighted as the extension of the principles of evidence-based planning presented in Step I. Prerequisite: Step I: Foundations of Planning in Higher Education.

Workshop is two full days. Participants must attend both days. Includes workbook, continental breakfast, lunch, and refreshments.

Cost: $1,195 USD (covers both days of workshop, including workbook, continental breakfast, lunch, and refreshments for Friday and Saturday)

For program details, please visit: www.scup.org/page/profdev/pi/step2

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Work in functional and cross-functional teams to identify significant planning priorities for Walnut College.
  2. Collaborate on the strategies Walnut College should pursue.
  3. Write a plan for Walnut College.
  4. Determine actions to incorporate integrated planning practices on their campuses.
*This event is also available on Saturday, July 23, from 8:00AM–5:00PM in Chesapeake J-K

TAGS: Budget Planning, Academic Planning, Resource Planning, Integrated Planning, Facilities Planning, Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 15.0 units (SCUPPI2000)
NASBA CPA CPE 1.75 units; Field of study: Administrative Practice
NASBA CPA CPE 2.0 units; Field of study: Finance
NASBA CPA CPE 3.0 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business
NASBA CPA CPE 8.0 units; Field of study: Communications


Saturday


Saturday, July 23, 2011, 8:00 AM–1:00 PM in Chesapeake G
Finance and Budget: Operating Models for Today's Funding Realities

Presented by: Karen P. House, Associate Vice President for Finance and Planning, Keene State College; Jay V. Kahn, Vice President for Finance & Planning, Keene State College; Melissa S. Laughner, Finance and Budget Analyst, Keene State College
Convened by: David N. Cox, Executive Assistant to the President, University of Memphis

Abstract:

This workshop explores financial planning concepts and models within a strategic planning framework. Successful campuses build operating budgets to support long-term goals while achieving short-term results. Reaching equilibrium despite fiscal challenges should not preclude investing in the institution’s future. Especially in turbulent times, higher education leaders need a flexible tool to understand how budget decisions made today relate to the budget opportunities of tomorrow. Participants will investigate one Excel-based model in-depth through hands-on exercises and discuss their own tools. A laptop is required for this workshop.

Cost: $265 USD (includes workbook, continental breakfast, and refreshments)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the common components of any budget model and how they relate to long-term plans and strategies.
  2. Determine which aspects of the presented tool, or other tools shared by participants, would be of benefit to your campus while modeling revenue and expense fluctuations.
  3. Understand how the key components of your budget could be modeled to assist leadership in decision-making.
  4. Expand knowledge of strategies and ideas used by others to navigate turbulent times.

TAGS: Finance, Budget, Cost Savings, Revenue Enhancement, Funding

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 4.5 units (SCUP46W024)
AICP CM 4.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 4.5 units; Field of study: Finance


Saturday, July 23, 2011, 8:00 AM–5:00 PM in National Harbor 4
Step I: Foundations of Planning in Higher Education

Presented by: Salvador D. Aceves, Associate Vice President, Academic Financial Planning & Analysis, Fordham University
Convened by: Susan T. Whitmer, Research Lead, Education, Herman Miller, Inc.
Audience:
Individuals new to the field of higher education planning and those who wish to gain a deeper understanding of the higher education planning environment, and those interested in enrolling in SCUP's three-step Planning Institute.

Abstract:

Participants in this full-day workshop will acquire an understanding of the fundamentals of planning, including political considerations, within the college, university, and community college settings. The fundamentals include how the planning function may be organized and executed in a range of institutional types. Participants will gain insights into how strategic planning can help institutions mobilize for action, aid in the effective allocation of resources, and gain competitive advantage. Participants will leave Step I with an increased appreciation of the various issues and practical tactics associated with the successful implementation of a planning process in an institution of higher education. SCUP's Walnut College case study allows participants to apply new skills and knowledge acquired throughout the workshop to the problems and concerns of planning. This is Step I of SCUP's three-step Planning Institute, leading to a certificate of completion.

Cost: $295 USD (includes workbook, continental breakfast, lunch, and refreshments)

For program details, please visit: www.scup.org/page/profdev/pi/step1

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Define the basic elements of planning.
  2. Practice integrated planning in the context of higher education, using exercises and a case study.
  3. Discuss the social and political context of integrated planning within higher education.
  4. Analyze the value of evidence-based planning and leave prepared to apply evidence-based planning in a real-life context.

TAGS: Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 7.0 units (SCUPPI1000)
AICP CM 7.0 units
NASBA CPA CPE 1.75 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization
NASBA CPA CPE 2.0 units; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications
NASBA CPA CPE 3.5 units; Field of study: Administrative Practice


Saturday, July 23, 2011, 8:00 AM–5:00 PM in Chesapeake J-K
Step II: Focused Knowledge for Integrated Planning Processes (2 day workshop)

Presented by: Dale Braun, Campus Planner, University of Wisconsin-River Falls; Paul A. Pusecker, Chief Administrative Officer, University of Delaware; Richard L. Winstanley, Assistant Provost, Institutional Effectiveness, New England Institute of Technology
Convened by: Dawit Teklu, Dean, Institutional Research, Assessment & Evaluation, Strayer University
Audience:
Planners who have become proficient in their main area of responsibility and need to learn the language and practices of other planning specialties to advance integrated planning on their campuses.

Abstract:

Prerequisite: Step I of the Planning Institute

The second in SCUP's three-step Planning Institute, Step II is a two-day workshop that uses the SCUP Walnut College case study as the basis for practicing an integrated planning process that results in a plan reflecting the collaboration of all functional areas at Walnut College. In the process of creating the plan, participants will gain a deeper understanding of the needs and issues confronting key functional areas on campus during a planning initiative. In particular, the intersection of academic, resource/budget, and facilities planning defines a nexus for learning specific planning tactics. Each phase of an integrated planning process is accompanied by the application of core content to Walnut College. Throughout the workshop, the role of assessment in each planning phase is highlighted as the extension of the principles of evidence-based planning presented in Step I. Prerequisite: Step I: Foundations of Planning in Higher Education.

Workshop is two full days. Participants must attend both days. Includes workbook, continental breakfast, lunch, and refreshments.

Cost: $1,195 USD (covers both days of workshop, including workbook, continental breakfast, lunch, and refreshments for Friday and Saturday)

For program details, please visit: www.scup.org/page/profdev/pi/step2

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Work in functional and cross-functional teams to identify significant planning priorities for Walnut College.
  2. Collaborate on the strategies Walnut College should pursue.
  3. Write a plan for Walnut College.
  4. Determine actions to incorporate integrated planning practices on their campuses.
*This event is also available on Friday, July 22, from 8:00AM–5:00PM in Chesapeake J-K

TAGS: Budget Planning, Academic Planning, Resource Planning, Integrated Planning, Facilities Planning, Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 15.0 units (SCUPPI2000)
NASBA CPA CPE 1.75 units; Field of study: Administrative Practice
NASBA CPA CPE 2.0 units; Field of study: Finance
NASBA CPA CPE 3.0 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business
NASBA CPA CPE 8.0 units; Field of study: Communications


Saturday, July 23, 2011, 8:30 AM–5:00 PM in National Harbor 6
Integrating Sustainability and Climate Action Planning With the Comprehensive Master Plan

Presented by: Janne Corneil, Principal, Sasaki Associates, Inc.; Meredith Elbaum, Director, Sustainable Design, Sasaki Associates; Greg Havens, Principal, Sasaki Associates; Daniel R. Kenney, Principal & Director, Institutional Planning, Sasaki Associates, Inc.; Jason Schrieber, Principal, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associate; Mike Walters, Principal; Sustainable Market Leader, Affiliated Engineers, Inc.
Convened by: James J. Germida, Vice Provost, Faculty Relations, University of Saskatchewan
Audience:
Planners looking to integrate sustainability into the master planning process.

Abstract:

As the concept of sustainability gains momentum and many universities commit to measurable environmental goals, planners are exploring strategies for integrating sustainability into the master planning process. One of the key challenges is incorporating measurable goals at a planning level when much of the required information and data are not readily available. This workshop will review emerging methodologies for evaluating environmental performance indicators and for integrating sustainability into a comprehensive master plan, with an emphasis on energy and emissions planning. Formal presentations, team exercises, and hands-on case studies will be used to investigate how an integrated planning approach can be achieved.

Cost: $295 USD (includes workbook, continental breakfast, lunch, and refreshments)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify key elements of the organizational structure of a sustainable master plan.
  2. List the key metrics of a sustainable master plan.
  3. Recognize energy and emissions planning considerations and issues, and their relationship to a master plan.
  4. Apply the issues, metrics, and strategies to the development of a climate action plan in the context of a master plan.

TAGS: Sustainability, Master Planning, Energy Metrics, Emissions Metrics

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 7.0 units (SCUP46W009)
AICP CM 7.0 units
GBCI CE 7.0 units
NASBA CPA CPE 2.5 units; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications
NASBA CPA CPE 4.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Saturday, July 23, 2011, 8:30 AM–5:00 PM in National Harbor 7
Space Needs Planning: An Integrated Approach

Presented by: Lisa M. Keith, Principal, Ayers Saint Gross; Franklin A. Markley, Associate Principal, Paulien & Associates, Inc.
Convened by: Thomas P. Huf, Senior Education Facilities Planner, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Audience:
Those struggling with outdated space planning methods that do not align with the institution's broader vision and academic priorities.

Abstract:

Now, more than ever, understanding space usage and integrating space planning components with an institution's academic priorities is critical for continued success. Solid planning practices must capture what is happening outside of an institution through environmental scanning, as well as through strategic and academic planning processes. Space management policies and guidelines must change and adapt as institutions focus on changing technologies, new ways of learning, interdisciplinary and collaborative relationships, and expanded service models for student success. This workshop will examine a variety of space planning topics, such as: identifying and interpreting key processes and data sources; discussing space utilization and management issues; reviewing guidelines by space type and their relevancy; and interpreting space needs' outcomes. Examples from community colleges to research universities will be used to illustrate space planning pitfalls and practices. Attendees will be presented with multiple planning scenarios using case studies and interactive group activities.

Cost: $295 USD (includes workbook, continental breakfast, lunch, and refreshments)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify key steps and the institutional representatives that should be involved in the space planning process and how mission, vision, academic planning, and other pre-planning documents and studies should be integrated into the space planning process.
  2. Qualify, verify, and translate institutional data into meaningful information to establish a baseline for space planning, as well as projections for future space planning. This includes a review of the National Center for Educational Statistics' Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory and Classification Manual (FICM) space use codes to document existing facility use and space management.
  3. Interpret and adjust space guidelines based on modern learning environments and pedagogy, institutional mission, program mix, student services, and other strategic characteristics.
  4. Translate the space analysis outcomes into meaningful strategies for master planning, building renovations, and new construction, as contained in a capital improvement plan.  

TAGS: Space Management, Space Utilization, Space Assessment, Performance Measurement, Ficm, Nces Facilities Inventory Classification Manual

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 7.0 units (SCUP46W011)
AICP CM 7.0 units
NASBA CPA CPE 7.0 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Saturday, July 23, 2011, 1:00 PM–4:30 PM in National Harbor 5
Hands-On Introduction to an Integrated Balanced Scorecard Approach

Presented by: Claudine Keenan, Dean School of Education, The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey; Janet M. Wagner, Dean of Business, The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey
Convened by: Sarah Cantrell, Director, Integrated Resource Planning, York University
Audience:
Those looking to apply a strategic planning method that incorporates all the aspects of an integrated planning philosophy into a clear, easily-understandable, highly-measurable system of accountability.

Abstract:

Participants in this workshop will bring their own institutional mission and draft strategic vision, meet other participants from a variety of institutional settings, and learn how to build a basic Strategy Map® for a Balanced Scorecard® approach. Using this draft Strategy Map®, participants will be able to return to campus with recommendations for taking next steps to implement this approach.

Cost: $195 USD (includes workbook and refreshments)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the stages of planning, implementing, measuring, and reporting in a typical planning cycle and map those basic stages to the Balanced Scorecard® approach to planning.
  2. Discuss the differences between corporate and higher education uses of this approach and organize strategic directions from participants' home campuses into strategies.
  3. Define the four perspectives in a Balanced Scorecard® and use them to design a draft map of participants' own campus strategy, incorporating sample objectives for each strategic zone in their campus maps.
  4. Distinguish between leading/lagging and input/output/outcome performance indicators and apply the concepts from this workshop to a method participants can take back to their own campuses.

TAGS: Balanced Scorecard, Performance Measurement, Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 3.25 units (SCUP46W004)
AICP CM 3.25 units
NASBA CPA CPE 3.0 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Sunday


Sunday, July 24, 2011, 8:00 AM–1:00 PM in National Harbor 6
Planning for Science: Concepts, Issues, and Approaches

Presented by: Lisa H. Macklin, Principal, Comprehensive Facilities Planning, Inc.; Robert E. Nalls, President, Nalls Architecture, Inc.; Gregory L. Sibley, Associate Principal, R.G. Vanderweil Engineers
Convened by: James J. Germida, Vice Provost, Faculty Relations, University of Saskatchewan
Audience:
Those involved in science facility planning who need to move beyond basic issues and adopt a planning approach that integrates policy, design, and implementation.

Abstract:

This evolving workshop explores tools for the planning, programming, and design of academic science facilities. Topics include: new pedagogical methods, lab utilization, lab formulas and calculations, lab components, impacts on infrastructure, sustainability, codes, and cost models. Three integrated planning exercises using theoretical projects will form the basis for the workshop. The first will focus on science teaching spaces. The second will emphasize science research space. The third will look at balancing programmatic needs with energy demands. Supplemental materials including definitions and guidelines will be supplied. Laptops are required for this workshop.

Cost: $265 USD (includes workbook, continental breakfast, and refreshments)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Determine the data required to assess the utilization and space needs for science teaching and research labs.
  2. Consider the ways in which teaching and research trends and issues influence the science environment.
  3. Recognize methods and implementation strategies for integrating sustainability without compromising safety.
  4. Use the planning tools provided (fictitious case studies) to apply data through roundtable discussions during a comprehensive planning exercise.

TAGS: Facility Science/Engineering, Learning Space Design, Space Utilization, Student Learning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 4.5 units (SCUP46W003)
AICP CM 4.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 4.5 units; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Sunday, July 24, 2011, 8:00 AM–1:00 PM in National Harbor 5
Planning Learning Spaces for Nurturing Innovative Thinkers, Practitioners, and Leaders

Presented by: Susan L. Elrod, Dean, College of Science & Mathematics, California State University-Fresno; Jeanne L. Narum, Director, PKAL Learning Spaces Collaboratory; Susan T. Whitmer, Research Lead, Education, Herman Miller, Inc.
Convened by: Joseph T. Isaac, President, African Methodist Episcopal University
Audience:
Those ready to plan learning spaces that embrace contemporary theories and practices of how students learn and satisfy societal expectations of what students need to know.

Abstract:

Workshop participants will engage in iterative discussions and exercises designed to explore how the concept of innovation can drive planning of 21st-century undergraduate learning spaces. We will connect the dots between: (1) what is known, from cognitive science research, about preparing today’s students as tomorrow’s innovators; (2) what is known, from theory and practice, about spaces that nurture such innovators; and (3) what we know and need to know about innovative approaches to planning such spaces. Attention will be given to language by which planning teams shape and communicate mental images of innovation spaces. Discussions will consider the characteristics of the creative thinker, practitioner, and leader—as learner as well as a member of a learning spaces planning team. The intent is to model and critique throughout the workshop innovative approaches for planning creative, collaborative, problem-solving spaces that are as innovative as the learners they serve.

Cost: $265 USD (includes workbook, continental breakfast, and refreshments)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Link the process of planning 21st century learning spaces to contemporary theories of learning and to expected learning outcomes.
  2. Establish rubrics and strategies for institutional teams charged with imagining and planning spaces designed to nurture the innovative spirit of undergraduate students.
  3. Review the steps in a template for engaging in an institutional "innovation" audit.
  4. Identify specific actions for applying steps in learning design process in your own organization—imagining, planning, and renewing an "innovation" learning environment.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Learning Trends, Student Learning, Pedagogy, Theory Application, Learning Technology

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 4.5 units (SCUP46W012)
AICP CM 4.5 units
NASBA CPA CPE 4.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Sunday, July 24, 2011, 8:30 AM–12:00 PM in National Harbor 13
Getting Green Together—Campus-Community Collaborations on Sustainability

Presented by: Minakshi M. Amundsen, University Planner, Cornell University; Peter W. Bardaglio, Senior Fellow, Second Nature, Inc; Robert C. Hicks, Senior Project Manager, Symmes Maini & McKee Associates; Mark J. Zarrillo, Principal, Symmes Maini & McKee Associates
Convened by: Ellen Stanton Milstone, Senior Strategic Planning & Budget Officer, Arizona State University Foundation
Audience:
Planners charged with achieving campus sustainability goals and looking to partner with surrounding communities to develop an integrated sustainability plan by sharing expertise, stretching resources, overcoming obstacles, and creating opportunities.

Abstract:

Higher education is at the forefront of the sustainability movement. However, campus sustainability planning efforts are often separate from those of their home communities. To achieve long-term goals of climate neutrality and true sustainability, institutions must work in partnership with their communities. Learn how communities and campuses can identify common goals and development outcomes, create innovative partnerships, and leverage a broad range of resources for a shared sustainable future.

Cost: $195 USD (includes workbook, continental breakfast, and refreshments)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the types of sustainability goals shared by institutions of higher education and their local/regional communities.
  2. Identify challenges and potential areas of collaboration through the perspectives of campus and community planners.
  3. Identify examples of institutions, processes, and outcomes of campus-community collaboration on sustainability.
  4. List ways in which institutions can work with their local communities to achieve quantifiable sustainability goals over the short- and long-term.

TAGS: Sustainability, Carbon Neutrality, Town/Gown, Performance Measurement

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 3.25 units (SCUP46W017)
AICP CM 3.25 units
GBCI CE 3.0 units
NASBA CPA CPE 3.0 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Sunday, July 24, 2011, 8:30 AM–12:00 PM in National Harbor 15
Integrated Planning: Models for Implementation and Innovation

Presented by: Connie Foster, Consultant, Connie Foster Facilitation and Consulting LLC
Convened by: Sarah Cantrell, Director, Integrated Resource Planning, York University

Abstract:

Note: This workshop only open to SCUP Planning Institute Graduates.

Integrated planning processes require cultural and operational changes on a campus. Each campus is unique in how it adapts its existing planning process to a more integrated model. Implementation can take a number of different paths, but needs to consider the organizational structure, the metrics for assessing decisions, and a consistent focus on communication. As higher education continues to evolve, integrated planning can help prepare a campus to be more innovative. This session addresses the use of innovation within the context of implementing an integrated planning process.

Cost: $100 USD (includes workbook, continental breakfast, and refreshments)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the key operational changes needed on your campus for implementing an integrated planning process.
  2. Identify the drivers and barriers to implementation and how to best address them.
  3. Determine options for how to start and sustain an integrated planning process.
  4. Employ a planning process that benefits from and helps drive innovation on your campus.

TAGS: Innovation, Planning Implementation, Planning Processes, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 3.25 units (SCUP46W021)
AICP CM 3.25 units
NASBA CPA CPE 3.0 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Sunday, July 24, 2011, 8:30 AM–12:00 PM in National Harbor 7
Mastering the Dollars and Sense of Capital Program Management

Presented by: Jay V. Kahn, Vice President for Finance & Planning, Keene State College; Trina M. Learned, Director of Facilities, Northfield Mount Hermon School; Douglas Steele, Principal, NELSON H2L2
Convened by: Thomas P. Huf, Senior Education Facilities Planner, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Audience:
Those responsible for facilities management looking to maximize their resources with effective, strategic capital program management.

Abstract:

Financial and facilities managers are often confronted with the impossible task of managing facilities with inadequate resources. With endowment funds in decline, stretched donor pledge schedules, and the competitive pressures to minimize tuition increases, the traditional sources of paying for capital projects are increasingly compromised. Yet, buildings and infrastructure age, new programs and initiatives need space, competition for incoming students stiffens, code compliance can't be ignored, and you are constantly expected to do more with less. How do you know what capital work needs to be done and in what order? How do you pay for it? And how do you fold cycle maintenance planning, deferred maintenance phase-out, new construction, modernization and upgrades, and so on, into your prioritization? Then, how do you make your case to trustees, donors, lenders, government agencies, and other funders? And where do sustainability, historic preservation, information technology, and other complicating factors fit into your plan? This workshop will provide strategies and answers for effective capital program management.

Cost: $195 USD (includes workbook, continental breakfast, and refreshments)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify options for matching scarce institutional resources with the mission.
  2. Use tools for quantifying and qualifying capital needs and wants.
  3. Practice making your case at the trustee and funding tables.
  4. Evaluate the sequence of steps in the process of capital project fundraising.

TAGS: Capital Projects, Funding, Deferred Maintenance

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 3.25 units (SCUP46W006)
AICP CM 3.25 units
NASBA CPA CPE 3.0 units; Field of study: Finance


Document Links

This printed page contains links to other web pages. Each link has a numerical indicator which corresponds to one of the URLs below.