My SCUP | Log In  | Join | Donate
CART (0)
start typing to search www.scup.org
  • About
  • Membership
  • Regions
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Annual Fund
  • Awards
  • Achieving Our Vision
  • Leadership
  • Perry Chapman Prize
  • Staff
  • Strategic Plan (PDF)
  • About Membership
  • Membership Directory
  • New Members
  • Join
  • Renew
  • SCUP Member News
  • Volunteering
  • Mid-Atlantic
  • North Atlantic
  • North Central
  • Pacific
  • Southern
  • SCUP 2013 Mid-Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 North Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Central Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Pacific Symposium | November 1
  • SCUP 2014 Pacific Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Southern Regional Conference
  • Annual, International Conference
  • Calendar
  • Online Programs
  • Planning Institute
  • Regional Conferences
  • Books
  • Campus Facilities Inventory
  • Continuing Education Credits
  • Jobs
  • Mojo
  • Plans - Getty Higher Education
  • Plans - Higher Education Institutional
  • Planning for Higher Education Journal
  • RFPs and RFQs
  • Trends to Watch in Higher Education
Home Events SCUP's Annual, International Conference SCUP-46 SCUP-46 Conference Proceedings
  • Conference Links
  • Conference Home
  • Final List of Registrants (PDF)
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Conference Visibilty
    • Exhibit
      • Exhibitor Search
    • Sponsor

  • Conference Corners
  • Attendee Corner
  • Presenters Corner

  • Conference Committee

Conference Proceedings

Note: Conference proceedings are available to all members and conference attendees.

Sessions with a proceeding file will be linked to the session title.


NEW! Videos of the 3 Plenary Sessions!

You will need to login to view the videos.
(The login link is in the top right corner)


Plenary Sessions

Sunday, July 24, 2011, 5:30 PM–6:45 PM
(PL001) Shaping the University's Culture for the Future: Vision, Leadership, and Planning
Presented by: Freeman A. Hrabowski, President, University of Maryland-Baltimore County

Freeman A. Hrabowski, III, has served as President of UMBC (The University of Maryland, Baltimore County) since 1992. His research and publications focus on science and math education, with special emphasis on minority participation and performance. He chaired the National Academies committee that recently produced the report, “Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads.”

In 2008, he was named one of America’s Best Leaders by U.S. News & World Report, which in both 2009 and 2010 ranked UMBC the #1 “Up and Coming” university in the nation and among the top colleges and universities for commitment to undergraduate teaching. In 2009, TIME magazine named him one of America’s 10 Best College Presidents. In 2011, he received the TIAA-CREF Theodore M. Hesburgh Award for Leadership Excellence, recognized by many as the nation’s highest award among college and university presidents.
He serves as a consultant to the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the National Academies, and universities and school systems nationally. He also serves on the boards of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, France-Merrick Foundation, Marguerite Casey Foundation (Chair), and The Urban Institute. He also sits on the boards of Constellation Energy Group, McCormick & Company, and the Baltimore Equitable Society. He is a past member of the board of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and the Maryland Humanities Council (member and Chair).
Examples of other honors include election to the American Academy of Arts & Sciences and the American Philosophical Society; receiving the prestigious McGraw Prize in Education, the U.S. Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring, and the Columbia University Teachers College Medal for Distinguished Service; being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and Marylander of the Year by the editors of the Baltimore Sun; and being listed among Fast Company magazine’s first Fast 50 Champions of Innovation in business and technology. He also holds honorary degrees from more than 20 institutions – from Harvard, Princeton, and Duke to Johns Hopkins, Georgetown, and the University of Michigan.

With philanthropist Robert Meyerhoff, he co-founded the Meyerhoff Scholars Program in 1988 for high-achieving minority students committed to pursuing advanced degrees and research careers in science and engineering. The program has become a national model, and based on program outcomes, Hrabowski has authored numerous articles and co-authored two books, Beating the Odds and Overcoming the Odds (Oxford University Press), focusing on parenting and high-achieving African American males and females in science. Both books are used by universities, school systems, and community groups around the country.

A child-leader in the Civil Rights Movement, Hrabowski was prominently featured in Spike Lee’s 1997 documentary, Four Little Girls, on the racially motivated bombing in 1963 of Birmingham’s Sixteenth Street Baptist Church.

Born in 1950 in Birmingham, Alabama, Hrabowski graduated at 19 from Hampton Institute with highest honors in mathematics. At the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, he received his M.A. (mathematics) and four years later his Ph.D. (higher education administration/statistics) at age 24.

Learn more about President Hrabowski:

President Hrabowski in EDUCAUSE Review (November/December 2010)
"Reclaiming the Lead: Higher Education’s Future and Implications for Technology"

President Hrabowski Delivers AASCU President-to-Presidents Lecture (11/22/10)
(recording—file requires iTunes or other media player)

 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Change the culture of an institution by engaging the campus community and breaking through silos.
  2. Build campus technology to support active teaching and learning.
  3. Create a campus environment that encourages robust dialogue, supports understanding among all groups, and in which it's possible to make hard decisions about institutional priorities.
  4. Understand how the physical environment influences the quality of the academic experience.

TAGS: Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46P001)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 25, 2011, 8:30 AM–9:45 AM
(PL003) Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses -- Updated Findings From the CLA Longitudinal Study
Presented by: Richard Arum, Professor of Sociology and Education, New York University; Josipa Roksa, Assistant Professor, Sociology, University of Virginia-Main Campus

Co-Authors, Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses

Enrollment rates in college continue to increase, but almost no one asks the fundamental question posed by Academically Adrift: how much are undergraduates really learning once they get there? According to the findings documented in the book by Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa, a significant number of university students in the United States failed to develop any statistically significant improvement in Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) performance during the first two years of college. (CLA is measure of general collegiate skills, including critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and writing.) The authors studied 2,322 freshmen students between 2005 and 2009 who were enrolled at over 24 American institutions reflecting a “geographically and institutionally representative” cross-section of America’s institutions, ranging from large public universities, liberal arts colleges, and historically black and Hispanic-serving institutions. The book provokes necessary conversation about teaching and learning in higher education. Their key findings include:

  • 45% of the students included in the study “did not demonstrate any significant improvement in learning” during their first two years of college.
  • 36% of students “did not demonstrate any significant improvement in learning” after four years of college.
  • Students who study alone gain more knowledge, while those who spend more time studying in groups “see diminishing gains.”
  • Liberal arts students see “significantly higher gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and written skills” compared to other students.
  • A third of students were not taking courses, which required them to read more than 40 pages per week.
  • Students who were enrolled in classes, which required them to read more than 40 pages a week and more than 20 pages of writing a semester gained more than other students.

The research project that led to the book was organized by the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) as part of its collaborative partnership with the Pathways to College Network and is supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Ford, Lumina, and Teagle Foundations.

Continue the discussion! This plenary session will be followed by a concurrent session discussion panel, "An Interactive Discussion on Educational Quality." What constitutes educational quality, how do we assess it, and, most importantly, how do we improve it? 

Richard Arum
Professor of Sociology and Education
New York University

Richard Arum is professor in the Department of Sociology with a joint appointment in the Steinhardt School of Education at New York University. He is also director of the Education Research Program of the Social Science Research Council, where he oversaw the development of the Research Alliance for New York City Schools, a research consortium designed to conduct ongoing evaluation of the New York City public schools. He is the author of Judging School Discipline: The Crisis of Moral Authority in American Schools (Harvard University Press, 2003), and co-editor of a comparative study on expansion, differentiation and access to higher education in fifteen countries, Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study (Stanford University Press, 2007). Arum received a Masters of Education in Teaching and Curriculum from Harvard University, and a PhD in Sociology from the University of California, Berkeley.

Josipa Roksa
Assistant Professor of Sociology
University of Virginia

Josipa Roksa is assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Virginia (UVA), with a courtesy appointment in the Curry School of Education. She is also a Fellow of the National Forum on the Future of Liberal Education. Roksa’s primary research interests are in social stratification and higher education. Her research has been published in Social Forces, Sociology of Education, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Review of Higher Education, Research in Higher Education, Teachers College Record, and Social Science Research. She received her BA, summa cum laude, in Psychology from Mount Holyoke College, and PhD in Sociology from New York University (NYU).

For more information about Academically Adrift:

A perspective from The Chronicle of Higher Education

The Wall Street Journal Video Interview with Richard Arum

Excerpt from Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses (University of Chicago Press) in The Chronicle of Higher Education online.

Inside Higher Ed: Academically Adrift

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the extent to which students are improving their critical thinking, complex reasoning and writing skills at four year colleges and how this varies by social background and across colleges and universities.
  2. Understand how these learning outcomes vary with respect to college curriculum and instruction.
  3. Identify how recent college graduates are faring in the labor market and the extent to which they are demonstrating attitudes and dispositions associated with civic engagement.
  4. Identify proposed reforms at the system and institutional level that potentially could address the problems with limited learning on college campuses.

TAGS: Learning, Educational Quality, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46P003)NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 11:00 AM–12:15 PM
(PL002) Trends in Higher Education—A View from Washington
Presented by: Molly Corbett Broad, President, American Council on Education (ACE)

A leading spokesperson for American higher education, Molly Corbett Broad became the 12th president of the American Council on Education (ACE) in 2008. She is the first woman to lead the organization since its founding in 1918. Broad formerly served as president of the University of North Carolina (UNC) from 1997 to 2006, where she led UNC through a period of unprecedented enrollment growth. Due in large part to the success of the Focused Growth Initiative, minority enrollment at UNC grew at more than double the rate of the overall student body during her tenure. She also spearheaded the creation of a need-based financial aid program for in-state undergraduates and the creation of the College Foundation of North Carolina.

Broad held a number of administrative and executive positions at several universities prior to her tenure at UNC. At the California State University system, she served as senior vice chancellor for administration and finance from 1992–93, and as executive vice chancellor and chief operating officer from 1993 until her election as UNC president. Earlier in her career, Broad served as the chief executive officer for Arizona’s three-campus university system (1985–92) and in a succession of administrative posts at Syracuse University (1971–85).

Broad has written and spoken widely on strategic planning for higher education, K-16 partnerships, information technology, globalization, and biotechnology. She currently holds seats on the boards of PBS (the Public Broadcasting Service) and the Parsons Corporation. She is past chair of the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges (NASULGC), past chair of the Internet 2 board of trustees, and past president of the International Council for Distance Education.

She has served on the boards and executive committees of the Business-Higher Education Forum; Council on Competitiveness; National Association of University System Heads; and the Centenary Committee for Fudan University in Shanghai, China. Broad earned a General Motors Scholarship to Syracuse University, where she graduated Phi Beta Kappa with a baccalaureate degree in economics from the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs. She holds a master’s degree in the field from The Ohio State University.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify trends that are creating enormous change within higher education.
  2. Evaluate the likely effects of these trends on institutions of higher education in the next one to two years.
  3. Consider the leadership challenges and opportunities present in higher education.
  4. Discuss how campus planners can help their institutions thrive in a highly volatile environment.

 

TAGS: Institutional Direction, Environmental Scanning, Trends, Politics

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46P002)NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Concurrent Sessions

Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN242) An Interactive Discussion on Educational Quality (following Monday's plenary session)
Presented by: Peter T. Ewell, Vice President, National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS); Thomas C. Longin, Consultant, Association of Governing Boards, and 2011–2012 SCUP President; Carol Geary Schneider, President, Association of American Colleges and Universities

The book Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, prompts necessary conversation about teaching and learning in higher education. Join this lively panel discussion following Monday's plenary session to talk about what constitutes educational quality—how do we assess it, and, most importantly, how do we improve it?

Note: No proceedings available for this session.

TAGS: Student Learning, Assessment, Research, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN081) As The Globe Shrinks, The World of International Higher Education Expands!
Presented by: Majed Alnaqeeb, Past Chairman, Department of Biological Sciences, Kuwait University; Kenneth G. DeBoer, Principal, exp; A.J. Montero, Partner, NBBJ

Journey to the City of Sabah Al-Salem University in Kuwait, and on to Taiwan and Singapore, to learn how their leaders in higher education, who have long been witness to the evolution of top-notch institutions from around the world, are rising to the challenge to develop their ideal campuses from scratch. What are the elements they consider to be best-in-class, and how are they organizing these elements to fit their own cultures while continuing to raise the bar for higher education everywhere?

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review how The City of Sabah Al-Salem University brought six separate campuses together to form one university, building 3,000,000 SF of teaching and research space designed to serve a country for the next 100 years.
  2. Identify the elements in western higher education that international trailblazers are selecting to anchor their new campuses and lead them into a new and sustainable economy.
  3. Describe how universities in foreign nations are modifying the design and operation of their campuses to make these "anchor elements" more relevant for their own cultures and customs.
  4. Assess standard-setting planning approaches that will guide the next generation of higher education learning here at home and the around the world.

TAGS: International, New Campus

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C081)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN231) Commissioning Lessons Learned: Perspectives of a University and a Commissioning Consultant
Presented by: Kimball Ferguson, Senior Project Manager, MBP; John Gibbemeyer, Assistant Director, Facilities Management, Building Commissioning and Warranty, George Mason University; Jim Mascaro, Vice President and Director of Commissioning Services, MBP

Commissioning is a means to improve building systems' efficiency and energy consumption. This presentation will examine different perspectives regarding commissioning services for higher education institutions, including building commissioning for LEED accreditation. We will discuss lessons learned for commissioning services—from the design stage to project closeout—for higher education academic, research, and medical laboratories. We will also discuss decisions that impact air quality, thermal comfort, energy consumption, and constructability.

Extra Proceedings Files
Download the presentation with embedded movie clips here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify issues that owners and their construction representatives face when procuring commissioning services.
  2. Explain commissioning benefits to higher education customers.
  3. List ways commissioning can improve maintenance and operations.
  4. Evaluate how the commissioning process can improve communication within higher education facilities management.

TAGS: Facility Commissioning, Energy, Building Systems, Leed, Operating Efficiencies, Sustainability, Facility Design Engineering/Medical/Resarch

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP46C231)AICP CM 1.0 unitGBCI CE 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN236) Congress, the US Department of Education, and America's Colleges
Presented by: Terry W. Hartle, Senior Vice President, Division of Government and Public Affairs, American Council on Education (ACE)

This session will provide an update on the activities of the federal government—from budget cuts to new regulations—that will affect every college and university in the country. After a summary of pending action in the Executive and Legislative branches, there will be ample time for detailed discussion of issues on interest to attendees.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover and discuss the activities of the federal government that impact all US colleges and universities.

TAGS: Environmental Scanning, Politics, Trends, Us Politics, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN003) Cross-Institutional Collaboration and Learning Outcome Assessment: A Model
Presented by: Robert G. Boehmer, Interim President, East Georgia College; Susan Paraska, Director, Program Review & Accreditation, Georgia Institute of Technology; Felita T. Williams, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Academic Planning, Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

Higher education needs to meet the needs of learners while accountability demands surge and institutional effectiveness costs accelerate. A collaborative formed among 35 University System of Georgia institutions (ranging from two-year access colleges to research-extensive universities) created synergy in institutional effectiveness and accreditation by focusing on identifying student learning outcomes, assessment practices, accreditation compliance, quality enhancement, and public accountability. This session models institutional network creation, resource pooling, and policy improvement advocacy. It also covers what and how to assess, the creation and implementation of assessment protocols, and pilot results.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify strategies for building a collaborative environment that will enable a diverse group of universities to blend their expertise in a way that enables each institution to improve its practices in the areas of student learning outcome assessment and accreditation.
  2. Recognize critical steps that focus the efforts of that group on the specific strategic areas within student learning outcomes and accreditation that are likely to have the greatest positive impact on learning at those institutions.
  3. Communicate strategies that effectively convey the results of this collaboration to faculty, staff, and administrators.
  4. Apply important elements towards building an institutional effectiveness plan for your institution—from purpose and evaluation to continuous improvement.

TAGS: State System, Student Learning Outcomes, Slo, Student Assessment, Outcome Assessment, Accreditation, Institutional Effectiveness

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN153) LearnLab: Engaged Learning in Classroom Environments
Presented by: Amber Felicioni, Student, Grand Valley State University; Rob Frans, Adjunct Faculty, Grand Valley State University & Senior Consultant, Steelcase Inc.; David M. Taeyaerts, Director, Office of Campus Learning Environments, University of Illinois at Chicago

Partnering with Grand Valley State University (GVSU), Steelcase Inc. created the prototype LearnLab classroom. Designed to enable the instructor and engage the learner in a highly collaborative, technology-enhanced environment, the LearnLab helped the partners gain insight into 21st-century learning behaviors. GVSU faculty and students will share research findings, video ethnography, and lessons learned from the experience. A representative from the University of Illinois at Chicaco (UIC) will share design insights and measures from UIC's LearnLab environment.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess LearnLab's impact on learning outcomes.
  2. Identify practices that foster engagement and active learning in a classroom.
  3. Explore metrics that measure impacts of space and design on learning.
  4. Translate design ideas such as collaboration, sense of community, and flexibility into the built environment.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Student Learning, Technology, Space Assessment

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C153)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN176) More With Less: Expanding Your Institution When Budgets are Shrinking
Presented by: Howard C. Buxbaum, Vice President for Finance , Drew University; Pamela L. Rew, Partner, KSS Architects, LLP

Undertaking new capital projects when budgets are tightening is both challenging and a tough sell. However, institutions must continue to grow and serve their mission. The surge in student enrollment and competitive construction costs present unprecedented opportunities for institutions to build. Communication, financing, and a master plan are the tools needed to keep your institution competitive, address spending concerns, and gain the support of donors and stakeholders. Learn how Drew University recently kicked off two significant renovations through innovative but differing strategies.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Determine the vision and goals of a capital project in the context of an institution's overall master plan.
  2. Communicate salient points with university administration, trustees, and donors in a manner that generates and sustains stakeholder buy-in.
  3. Identify internal and external resources from which to seek short- and long-term financing.
  4. Appraise delivery methods to determine what is appropriate considering a project's objectives and the institution's master plan.

TAGS: Partnerships, Capital Financing, Master Planning, Facility Design University Center, Facility Design Science

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C176)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN136) Passing the Baton: From Sustainable Design to Sustainable Occupancy
Presented by: Michelle Jones, Energy Manager, Office of Facilities, Ithaca College; A. Quay Thompson, Principal Associate, HOLT Architects

Sustainable work is not necessarily complete when the building is turned over to the users. Success requires the integrated resources of the architects, engineers, facilities personnel, and occupants, not only in the design process, but through building occupancy and sustained energy management. We will use the Peggy Ryan Williams Center at Ithaca College to examine methods, both successful and unsuccessful, of metering building systems, communicating the measurements, and synthesizing solutions.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify occupant habits that inhibit a project's sustainable goals and discover strategies for overcoming them.
  2. Specify skills necessary for a facilities department to support a campus sustainability initiative.
  3. Calculate the value of the data obtained from modern sustainable buildings in terms of its ability to affect occupant behavior, improve system operations, and assure sustained energy management.
  4. Explore simple, user-focused design strategies that improve building performance and occupant satisfaction.

TAGS: Sustainability, Energy Efficiency, Sustainable Behavior

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP46C136)AICP CM 1.0 unitGBCI CE 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN026) Planning a 2020 Campus With 20/20 Vision
Presented by: Mariah Harris, Senior Planner, CUNY Central Office; William A. MacIntosh, Partner, Cooper, Robertson & Partners; Tomas D Morales, President, California State University-San Bernardino

The City University of New York's College of Staten Island Master Plan couples a 20/20 hindsight view of its original conversion from a state institution to a higher education campus, with a collaborative campus-wide planning approach to achieve its 2020 Campus Vision. The plan evolved during a time of acute economic uncertainty, and is now a model of how to blend existing campus facilities with select interdisciplinary, high-priority projects to meet a growing enrollment and the need for maximum return on campus investments.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess the effectiveness of an original master plan to convert the campus to higher education use, 20-years on.
  2. Investigate how facility constraints can impact pedagogy and curriculum.
  3. Describe how a master plan update can address multiple goals through a select number of projects to align institutional priorities with new economic realities.
  4. Analyze how a carefully considered and flexible planning approach can maximize future campus potential.

TAGS: Master Planning, Mission/Identity, Decision Making

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C026)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN015) Planning and Designing for Safer Campuses
Presented by: Elliot A. Boxerbaum, President & CEO, SRMC, Inc.; John R. Kleberg, Retired Assistant Vice President of Business & Finance, The Ohio State University, Consultant, Security Risk Management Consultants, Inc.

Personal safety and security on campuses is an increasingly important and visible issue for parents, students, faculty, and institutions. Recent incidents at Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois University have dramatically placed these concerns on the front page. In addition, campuses are challenged with combating more common incidents of assault and theft. This presentation will share real-world experiences and fundamental concepts designed to help mitigate these risks. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) and other concepts will be discussed.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify key crime data sources available to campus planners and institutions.
  2. Explain CPTED concepts and their application on campuses.
  3. Describe the relationship between space and safety.
  4. Apply an assessment and planning model that balances institutional policies, security technologies, campus resources, and organizational culture.

TAGS: Safety, Security, Design For Safety, Landscape Design, Campus Crime

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C015)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 25, 2011, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN241) The Challenges Ahead—A Presentation by the 2011 SCUP Founders (Casey) Award Recipient
Presented by: George Boggs, President & Chief Executive Officer Emeritus, American Association of Community Colleges (AACC)

2011 SCUP Founders (Casey) Award winner, George Boggs, will discuss domestic and global challenges and their implications for higher education institutions (in particular, community colleges) as these institutions are called upon to address them. Issues, including those presented at the October 2010 White House Summit, will be examined from the perspective of the values of the community college movement. Challenges needing the attention of educators and policy makers will be addressed. Boggs will conclude with lessons he has learned over a long career in higher education.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the unique values of the American Community College Movement and the contributions of these institutions.
  2. Predict emerging challenges and how higher education institutions will be affected by them.
  3. Describe how national associations advocate for higher education institutions and students and list some current advocacy issues.
  4. Identify the leadership competencies that have been endorsed by the American Association of Community Colleges.

TAGS: Founders Award, Casey Award, Community College, Society For College And University Planning, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN171) Building Consensus: Meeting the Challenges of Redefining The Juilliard School
Presented by: Peter Pesce, Associate, FXFOWLE Architects, LLP; Tricia Ross, Associate Vice President, Executive Projects, The Juilliard School

The Juilliard School redefined itself to address the needs of its students and faculty by expanding and renovating its facilities, and therefore its campus's connection to the city. How did the school test design ideas and coordinate construction logistics of its new space without interrupting its academic calendar? The Juilliard School's associate vice president for executive projects and the architect outline strategies and challenges associated with renovating and expanding a 1968 academic monument for the 21st century.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review innovative approaches that "open up" a monolithic and modern academic and performance building in order to reveal its program to a larger community.
  2. Sequence the range of logistical planning needed for the renovation and expansion of a specialized program without disrupting the operations of the building.
  3. Describe techniques developed to coordinate a complex consultant team, the school's building committee, external stakeholders, and the construction team.
  4. Recognize how the strengths of an existing structure can be reinvigorated to allow the fluid expression of new ideas and materials.

TAGS: Facility Design Music School, Strategic Planning, Renovation, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C171)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN039) Building Information Modeling and the Application to the Building Lifecycle
Presented by: Charles E. Mies, Business Development Manager, AEC Division, Autodesk, Inc.; Peter J. Strazdas, Associate Vice President, Facilities Management, Western Michigan University

As Building Information Modeling (BIM) becomes more prevalent, universities are asking about the benefit and use of the models after occupancy. But to harness the power of BIM through the building lifecycle, a better understanding of the process is needed. This presentation will provide a brief overview of BIM, and then proceed quickly into specific recommendations and observations, including an overview from Western Michigan University on their use of the technology after construction in managing an eight million square foot campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Understand the application of Building Information Modeling to lifecycle maintenance practices.
  2. Interpret the actions of a peer university and evaluate their application to your maintenance processes.
  3. Apply these understandings to your current contractual deliverables to look for areas of synergy and disconnect.
  4. Formulate a plan of attack to revise your current deliverables and allow your facility to benefit from the practices and recommendations in this session.

TAGS: Building Information Modeling, Building Lifecycle

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C039)NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN067) Crossing Cultures: Implementing a Values-Driven Process for Integrated Planning
Presented by: Zaid Ansari, Executive Director, Office of Institutional Research, American University in Cairo; Ann M. Boudinot-Amin, Executive Director, American University in Cairo; Brian MacDougall, Executive Vice President for Finance and Administration, American University in Cairo

One year after its move to a new campus, the American University in Cairo developed and implemented an innovative process that integrates planning, budgeting, and assessment and is based on a core set of planning values. The process transformed what was a relatively top-down, non-integrated approach to planning, budgeting, and assessment into a highly consultative, values-driven, integrated approach that takes into consideration the unique aspects of managing cultural change in a university in Egypt.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the key elements of an integrated planning process.
  2. Justify the importance of providing multiple channels of communication in introducing new processes and managing cultural change.
  3. Describe how cultures unique to an institution can have a profound impact on the success or failure of introducing new processes or cultural change.
  4. List ways to integrate community feedback to improve the planning process.

TAGS: Change Management, Values, Integrated Planning, Organizational Change, Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C067)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN177) Going Beyond the Individual Building to Achieve Campus-Wide Sustainability
Presented by: Jaime Van Mourik, Higher Education Sector Manager, US Green Building Council

Colleges and universities are embracing the challenge of climate change by adopting sustainability commitments and instituting green building policies. However, most activity still revolves around the shiny new buildings while existing facilities continue to suffer. Jamie Van Mourik from the US Green Building Council will discuss how to scale up efforts on campus and utilize the LEED green building rating system as a framework that can plan and implement sustainability initiatives for old and new infrastructure alike.

Resource: Visit The Center for Green Schools and download USGBC's guide to campus sustainability, Roadmap to a Green Campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify opportunities to expand sustainability efforts across the campus and methods that engage all campus stakeholders in the process.
  2. Discuss cost-saving mechanisms to "green" existing facilities.
  3. Assemble varied and effective strategies for implementing green policies and procedures that realize institutional efficiencies.
  4. Develop a clear strategy for implementing LEED on a shared site.

TAGS: Leed, Usgbc, Sustainability, Existing Facilities Leed, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP46C177)AICP CM 1.0 unitGBCI CE 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN208) Impacting Retention: Spotlighting Three Levels
Presented by: Don Sprowl, Assistant Provost, Institutional Research & Accreditation, Indiana Wesleyan University; Sherry Woosley, Director, Analytics and Research, EBI

By 2020, President Obama pledges, the United States will have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world. To meet this goal, more students need to be successful in college; therefore quick identification and support of at-risk students is vital. We will examine three hierarchical levels where campus professionals have impacted first-year student retention. We will discuss best practices associated with identifying at-risk students who need support and effective interventions, designing programs and policies to better support those students, and using assessment and research to inform programmatic and institutional discussion and decisions. This session will be simultaneously broadcast as a webcast to a virtual audience.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the overlap between supporting student retention and supporting student development.
  2. Recognize the issues confronted by front-line faculty and staff, specifically of identifying students who may be at-risk, staging appropriate interventions, and determining best practices for identification and intervention.
  3. Select key elements to move the next level up—thoughtfully designed programs and policies that contribute to student retention and basing those programs and policies on data.
  4. Predict how, at the highest level, assessment and research can inform institutional-level discussions related to student retention and success.

TAGS: Student Retention, Analytics, Student Learning, Student Success

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Personnel/HR


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN192) Knee Deep in Vision—Finding Clarity Amid Planning Complexity
Presented by: Matthew S. Holland, President, Utah Valley University; Linda Makin, Chief Planning, Budget & Policy Officer, Utah Valley University; Kyle Reyes, Special Assistant to the President, Utah Valley University

University communities invest tremendous energy in the development of multiple planning documents and materials. Unfortunately, few members of a campus community (including leaders) can identify the key planning themes. Learn how one university, during a leadership transition, synthesized these many documents into a simple story that guides planning and operational priorities and resource allocation.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Develop strategies to lead the synthesis of institutional guiding documents (mission, vision, values) into a concise institutional story.
  2. Identify tools that enable new leaders to understand institutional history, integrate into the campus culture, and establish the new leader's agenda, focus, and strategies.
  3. Utilize effective strategies for engaging leaders and developing campus-wide commitment to the institutional story.
  4. Integrate the institutional story into planning, resource allocation, assessment, and accreditation processes.

TAGS: Mission/Vision/Identity, Integrated Planning, Organizational Change, Planning Leadership, Leadership Transition, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C192)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN161) Leveraging Data in Integrated Strategic Planning
Presented by: Nicola C. Richmond, Executive Director, Planning & Institutional Research, Pima Community College

By utilizing data and an integrated approach to strategic planning, Pima Community College developed a new, fully-integrated 2011–2013 plan. Draft initiatives address diverse issues across the large, multi-campus college, including student success, leveraging physical resources, and the findings of a recent self-study visit. We will provide an overview of the planning process, the use of data to support planning, linkages with reaccreditation, and how the discussions impacted the new plan.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Investigate ways data can identify critical areas that need to be incorporated into a strategic plan.
  2. Link integrated planning with the reaccreditation process.
  3. Utilize technology to facilitate data analysis and to present results to diverse planning communities.
  4. Identify evaluation approaches that measure the effectiveness of strategic plan activities.

 

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Accreditation, Community College, Multi Campus Planning, Integrated Planning, Planning Data, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C161)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN121) Modernizing Greenfield Community College to Serve an Evolving Population
Presented by: Kenneth I. Fisher, Principal, Architecture Studio & Education Practice Area Leader, Gensler Boston, Gensler; Robert L. Pura, President, Greenfield Community College

Community colleges are being sought out by an increasingly diverse, growing population. Explore the process Greenfield Community College used to align the repurposing of its 40-year-old facility with the college's evolving mission to better serve its students and community in Franklin County–Massachusetts's poorest. We will evaluate the effectiveness of integrating technology, the arts, and environmental awareness into the daily experience of the student body by replanning the core of the college campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe the evolving role of the community college and the different ways this institution serves its population based on its respective state's educational structure.
  2. Investigate how a focus on the student experience can align a significant facilities modernization with the institutional mission.
  3. Discuss issues of universal access and their impact on the physical planning and renovation of a campus facility.
  4. Analyze cost-effective sustainable strategies that also support a college's educational mission.

TAGS: Community College, Renovation, Mission/Identify/Vision

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C121)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN024) Strategically Conducting Senior-level Leadership Searches to Ensure Successful Hires
Presented by: Jake Julia, Associate Vice President for Change Management & Associate Provost, Academic Initiatives, Northwestern University; Marianna Kepka, Assistant Provost for Academic Administration, Northwestern University

Learn how to conduct senior leadership (vice president or dean-level) searches in a way that engages the university/college community, attracts and recruits top-quality candidates, and ultimately positions new hires for success once they begin their tenure at the institution. The session will focus on developing a strategic approach to conducting senior leadership searches, from forming and facilitating search committees, to managing search firms, to recognizing the unique qualities of each search and maintaining appropriate flexibility.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Utilize the provided materials and leadership search process key points in order to effectively run a successful search.
  2. Identify the challenges and nuances involved in selecting and managing an outside search firm and developing, staffing, and facilitating an effective search committee.
  3. Recognize the importance of outreach and engagement within the university community, conduct outreach effectively, and incorporate the feedback of key constituents into the search process.
  4. Acquire strategies for recruiting the right candidate and positioning him/her for success at the institution.

TAGS: Senior Leadership Search, Institutional Change And Planning, Succession Planning, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C024)NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Personnel/HR


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN229) Very Different From Life Science: Interdisciplinary Engineering Research/Teaching Buildings
Presented by: Terry D. Brown, Laboratory Consultant, Research Facilities Design; Paul Lemestre, Director of Engineering , Research Facilities Design

Engineering applications for interdisciplinary research and teaching programs are too frequently lumped together with biomedical/life science applications, resulting in inappropriate laboratory building solutions. Critical planning issues, often unique in engineering, bioengineering, and nanotechnology facilities, must be addressed. In this forum you will see a presentation comparing recent interdisciplinary engineering laboratory facilities with their life science counterparts. Benchmarking will be used to illustrate why important issues can be mishandled if key differences are not known.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Predict when to expect "open" laboratory floor plan designs versus "cellular."
  2. Review how fume hoods are utilized in life science and engineering programs and assess how this affects density.
  3. Identify how technology and safety concerns are impacting the location of laboratory "write-up" space.
  4. Classify energy savings/monitoring for energy research buildings.

TAGS: Facility Design Engineering, Facility Design Life Sciences

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C229)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:45 PM–2:45 PM
(CN101) When Saving History Makes Cents
Presented by: John H. Cluver, Partner, Voith & Mactavish Architects; Bradley Randall, Principal, Bruce E. Brooks & Associates; Lauri Strimkovsky, Vice President, Financial Affairs, Chestnut Hill College

Our historic campus buildings have a reputation for having great character, but also carrying high financial demands. There are, however, improvement options which can bring noticeable use and comfort benefit to an historic building without being entirely dependent on donors. Examples in this presentation will explore options such as: the building as blended student and rental facility, community grant-funding opportunities, and a process for identifying simple improvements that can pay for themselves in energy savings.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explore and discuss options for non-donor based methods for funding maintenance and capital improvement projects.
  2. Create a method to objectively evaluate and compare the economic value of energy-saving improvements using computer modeling and basic financial analysis.
  3. Recognize alternatives to and concerns with expensive "industry standard" approaches to energy-saving improvements.
  4. Understand that a campus’s historic buildings offer unique funding and performance opportunities that can tap previously unrecognized resources.

TAGS: Historic Preservation, Energy Efficiency, Sustainability, Facility Funding, Mixed Use

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP46C101)AICP CM 1.0 unitGBCI CE 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN112) An Iterative Approach to Planning: Assess, Revise, Adjust, and Redirect
Presented by: Christy Cole, Director of Institutional Research, Sweet Briar College; Louise S. Zingaro, Vice President & Chief of Staff, Sweet Briar College

Designed to move quickly and focus on specific questions, Sweet Briar College's strategic planning process is informed by data and metrics and includes rapid implementation and iterative review. We will discuss the benefits and challenges of engaging in early pilot programs as part of the process. We will share how we approached and launched our process, including formation of study groups, communications and engagement efforts, and appropriate trustee involvement.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify a process to engage all constituencies and define the ends to which operational decisions will be made.
  2. Locate and utilize the power of data-driven decision-making.
  3. Recognize good ideas to pilot along the way.
  4. Link strategies and outcomes with activities and assessment measures.

TAGS: Small Private, Academic Planning, Strategic Planning, Data Integration, Institutional Effectiveness

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C112)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN156) Collaborating to Advance Engagement and Learning of Underrepresented Students
Presented by: Fanta Aw, Assistant Vice President, Campus Life, American University; Karen L. Froslid Jones, Director, Institutional Research & Assessment, American University

As the demographics of student bodies change, how can we plan academic and nonacademic opportunities that meet student needs? Through discussion and interaction, learn how to recognize the challenges that lower-income and domestic minority students often face when attending selective or predominately white institutions. We will give specific examples of how collaboration between institutional research, campus life, and faculty can advance student success, then discuss your best practices and develop action steps for your campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Integrate academic and nonacademic data and information to identify issues related to student success.
  2. Identify the basic challenges that underrepresented students often face at highly selective or predominately white institutions.
  3. Develop strategies for engaging faculty in the process of student success.
  4. Recognize the value and challenges associated with building collaborations across divisions.

TAGS: Student Learning, Student Retention, Student Success, Low Income Students, Minority Students

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN083) Economic Modeling-Fiscal Forecasting: The Essential Foundation for Academic Strategic Planning
Presented by: Brett Matteo, Managing Director, PFM Group; David Walker, Associate Vice President and Associate Treasurer, Dickinson College

Dickinson College (DC) has been able to respond expeditiously to the rapidly changing environment. DC is a model for leading colleges and universities as a business enterprise without sacrificing the values of the academy. DC established a fiscal planning platform built on clarity and enriched perspective, supporting informed decision making, while considering the impact of reality on our future position.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss the framework that encourages "information-rich" discussions about budgets and deepens the understanding of financial impacts when making strategic decisions.
  2. Demonstrate an effective strategy tool that couples academic planning with financial and non-financial resources to produce a comprehensive financial reflection of institutional goals while considering the realities of resource constraints.
  3. Discuss a handful of case studies of economic modeling and fiscal forecasting at Dickinson College.
  4. Offer a tool that illuminates risks and opportunities, shapes a sustainable future, and galvanizes understanding and support for strategic initiatives.

TAGS: Budget Planning, Fiscal Forecasting, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C083)NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Finance


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN180) Found In Space: Observational Evidence for Informal Gathering Spots
Presented by: Donald H. Clemmenson, Student Body President, Architecture Student, Keene State College; Jay V. Kahn, Vice President for Finance & Planning, Keene State College; Gordon B. King, Senior Director, Facilities Planning & Management, Suffolk University; Aislynn E. Sherry, Architecture Student, Keene State College; Heather Taylor, Associate Principal, Payette

For several years, campus design has emphasized informal, serendipitous spaces where students and faculty gather for casual, interactive learning and socializing. But how do we measure these spaces' effectiveness? Speakers representing a New England liberal arts college and an urban university will share observational and empirical evidence, while an architecture student will divulge outcomes of a directly relevant proprietary research project. An interactive portion will allow critique and discussion of what makes or breaks the value of informal campus spaces.

Note: No proceedings available for this session.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Compare a diversity of institutional and building types, considering individual perspectives on what works and what does not.
  2. Examine data from institutional research on the impact informal space has on culture, student success, and enrollment goals for specific programs.
  3. Discuss outcomes of a Keene State College student architecture project that tests the most- and least-effective study and gathering spaces from student and faculty perspectives.
  4. Develop ideas that can be applied back on home campuses.

TAGS: Public University, Learning Space Design, Learning Space Research, Informal/Open Space, Student Learning, Student Success

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.5 units (SCUP46C180)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN095) Getting Green Together: Campus-Community Collaborations on Sustainability
Presented by: Minakshi M. Amundsen, University Planner, Cornell University; Peter W. Bardaglio, Senior Fellow, Second Nature, Inc; Robert C. Hicks, Senior Project Manager, Symmes Maini & McKee Associates; Mark J. Zarrillo, Principal, Symmes Maini & McKee Associates

Higher education is at the forefront of the sustainability movement. However, campus sustainability planning efforts are often separate from those of their home communities. To achieve long-term goals of climate neutrality and true sustainability, institutions must work in partnership with their communities. Learn how communities and campuses can identify common goals and development outcomes, create innovative partnerships, and leverage a broad range of resources for a shared sustainable future.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain the types of sustainability goals shared by institutions of higher education and their local and regional communities.
  2. Identify challenges and potential areas of collaboration through the perspective of campus and community planners on green initiatives.
  3. Cite examples of institutions, processes, and outcomes of campus-community collaboration on sustainability.
  4. Discuss ways in which colleges and universities can work with their local communities to achieve quantifiable sustainability goals over the short- and long- term.

TAGS: Sustainability, Acupcc, American College And University Presidents Climate Commitment, Town/Gown

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.5 units (SCUP46C095)AICP CM 1.5 unitsGBCI CE 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Communications


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN050) Merging Campus and Community in College Towns
Presented by: Adam Ducker, Managing Director, RCLCO Real Estate Advisors; Frank Keel, Old Town Economic Development Manager, City of Rock Hill; Rebecca Masters, Assistant to the President for Public Affairs, Winthrop University; William Meyer, Planning & Development Director, City of Rock Hill, SC; Kevin W. Petersen, Architect, Ayers Saint Gross

The traditional separation between town and gown is fast disappearing. All over the country, civic and university leaders are realizing that a thriving off-campus environment is vital to attracting and retaining the brightest students and faculty. This panel will focus on the challenges, strategies, and outcomes of developing a College Town Action Plan for connecting campus to community. It will provide attendees with valuable lessons from such a plan for Winthrop University and the city of Rock Hill, South Carolina.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the goals, strategies, and potential outcomes of a College Town Action Plan in your community.
  2. Identify the critical elements of a College Town Action Plan, including real estate development potential, as well as facilities and services appropriate for relocation off-campus.
  3. Develop strategies for involving civic leaders and town stakeholders, including local businesses and neighborhood groups, so that the effort becomes a public process.
  4. Prepare for the challenges of managing the planning process, especially in cases where the relationship between the institution and local government has been difficult.

TAGS: Town/Gown, Master Planning, City Planning, Economic Development, Urban Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.5 units (SCUP46C050)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN240) Observations and Trends: SCUP Excellence in Planning, SCUP Excellence in Landscape Architecture, and SCUP/AIA-CAE Excellence in Architecture
Presented by: Carl Elefante, Principal & Director of Sustainability, Quinn Evans Architects; Jennifer Jones, Principal, Carol R. Johnson Associates Inc; Reed Kroloff, Jury Chair, SCUP Awards Committee; Director & Campus Architect, Cranbrook Academy of Art & Art Museum; Krisan Osterby, Director of Campus Planning, Perkins+Will

Awards programs are a way to not only recognize and applaud those individuals and organizations whose achievements exemplify excellence, but also to provide learning opportunities for everyone whose lives and passions involve higher education. The 2011 jurors will share observations and trends from this year's entries and award recipients. Certificates will be given to award recipients at the end of the program.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover how projects can articulate the mission of a college or university.
  2. Recognize innovations in planning, architecture, and landscape architecture.
  3. Discuss how the effective use of materials and aesthetic choices demonstrate the highest quality of design.
  4. Consider opportunities to apply new innovations on your own campus.

TAGS: Architecture, Planning, Landscape

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C240)NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Production


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN232) Redefining Higher Education Practices—Programming, Designs, and Outcomes
Presented by: Karen A. Cribbins-Kuklin, Studio Director, Gensler; Niraj Dangoria, Associate Dean, Facilities Planning & Management, Stanford University; David Martin, Principal & Design Leader, Stantec Inc.; Leonard Oliver Rodrigues, Senior Principal, Stantec Inc.

The "flat world" of Thomas Friedman is upon us and global competition to innovate and create value is fierce. Higher education is under pressure to deliver results. Burgeoning public debt, deferred maintenance, zero-carbon initiatives, new technologies, and evolving pedagogues are forcing a redefinition of higher education delivery and facilities. We will examine how you can reframe "designing for learning" and discuss ideas for doing much more with less. We will present examples of how design approaches can and must transform in response to these rapidly evolving times and how the process of realizing university education and research projects is fundamentally changing. Through combining research initiatives with holistic, fully-integrated design, we arrive at design solutions that do more than meet the programmatic objectives. Instead, they provide synergistic environments for learning and discovery that leverage the project to contribute to the larger life-cycle budgetary issues in making a sustainable campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover our research and learning exemplars.
  2. Discuss the implications of learning spaces and delivery.
  3. Appraise whether cross client, discipline teaming plus a common vision produces success.
  4. Ascertain how fully integrated design approaches yield competitive and sustainable outcomes.

TAGS: Facility Design Process

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.5 units (SCUP46C232)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN182) Shifting Scale: System-Wide Planning and the Individual Institution
Presented by: Anthony P. Alfieri, Associate Principal, Perkins+Will; Nicole Conklin, Assistant Director, Long Term Planning, SUNY at Binghamton; Scott B. Page, Principal, Scott Blackwell Page Architect; Lachlan Squair, Program Manager, Program Management, State University Construction Fund

Against a backdrop of uncertainty, New York's State University Construction Fund is coordinating a system-wide facilities master planning process that involves all 32 four-year State University of New York (SUNY) institutions. To address increasing complexities, plans must fulfill each institution's strategic and academic missions while adhering to SUNY's system-wide strategic plan. This session outlines the facilities master planning process and presents a case study of the plan developed for Binghamton University, providing insight from the perspectives of the system, institution, and academic planning and facilities consultant.

Note: No proceedings available for this session.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Develop methods to plan your institution's future more holistically by integrating facilities and capital planning with strategic and academic planning.
  2. Identify the state, institution, and community stakeholders whose engagement will yield more comprehensive problem identification and generate solutions.
  3. Define new criteria for developing and evaluating facilities and capital plans that allow them to be nimble in the face of unknowns and future change.
  4. Appraise new tools used by the consultant to manage increased complexity throughout the planning process, and communicate that complexity with the client and institution.

TAGS: Master Planning, State System Master Planning, Project Delivery Models

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C182)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN179) The Middle East Branch Campus: Challenges, Solutions, and Navigating Turmoil
Presented by: Katherine Kilpatrick, Director of Budget, Texas A&M University in Qatar; Dottie Milligan Lewis, Campus Dean, New York Institute of Technology

A branch campus in the Middle East addresses the need for globalization in higher education institutions. There are several different models used to set up a branch, but still some campuses fail. What are the challenges that face these campuses and are there solutions? Is the result worth the effort? How has the recent political unrest affected these branch institutions? This presentation will discuss these challenges and the resulting compromises and alignments made to ensure the overseas operation meets the initial project mission.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Review different branch campus models operating in the Arabian Gulf, including Virginia Commonwealth University in Qatar, George Mason University in the United Arab Emirates, Texas A&M University in Qatar, and the New York Institute of Technology in Bahrain.
  2. Evaluate the balancing act required to deal with the often competing goals of the home campus, local partner, area accreditation agencies, ministries of education, and the local culture. What changes and compromises have been made as a result of this balancing act?
  3. Set up collaborations between sister campuses, government agencies, private industry, and local ministries, and value how these collaborations help the branch campus maintain sustainability and viability.
  4. Judge the concept of “steady state” as it applies to an overseas campus. Is it possible?

TAGS: International, Middle East Branch Campuses, Branch Campuses

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C179)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 25, 2011, 3:00 PM–4:30 PM
(CN099) You Can't Fool Mother Nature—The State of Preparedness on Our Campuses
Presented by: Nancy Aber Goshow, Managing Partner, Goshow Architects; Sue Henderson, President, New Jersey City University

Is your organization prepared when a disaster threatens the campus? Learn the metrics of national benchmarking research on campus emergency management planning. What percent of organizations have recent and/or functional emergency management plans? How do emergency management plans involve academic, facility, campus security, residential, and governmental entities? Who communicates to on-campus and off-campus audiences? Who has responsibility and who has authority? Session case study: Learn how Queens College dealt with an urban tornado in light of the benchmark study results.

Proceedings Files
Download the presentation with embedded movie clips here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Compare and contrast your emergency management plans to a national sample of peer organizations using key metrics.
  2. Evaluate Queens College’s emergency management plan—how it was prepared, updated, implemented, and how it functioned—against the national research and your institution's emergency plan.
  3. Identify at least three critical emergency planning details, including how to verify and fix the issues in your campus plans.
  4. Evaluate your institution's emergency management communications plan fundamentals to peer session participants’ plans.

 

TAGS: Emergency Preparedness, Crisis Management, Tornado, Research

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.5 units (SCUP46C099)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN244) Accreditation and Planning
Presented by: Barbara E Brittingham, President/Director of the Commission, New England Association of Schools and Colleges; Elizabeth H. Sibolski, President, Middle States Commission on Higher Education

Accreditation is the system of quality assurance and institutional improvement that has been adopted by the higher education community in the United States. Accreditation in the US is forward focused and represents an expression of confidence in an institution's mission and goals, its resources, and its performance. As such, it recognizes the importance of both planning and assessment of institutional effectiveness. Leaders from two regional accrediting agencies will share insights on accreditation, including federal regulatory aspects of the process.

 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the purpose and nature of regional accreditation in the US and as extended to international institutions.
  2. Gain an appreciation of the fundamental nature of planning and assessment in the accreditation process.
  3. Explore the self-study and peer review process, especially as it relates to institutional planning.
  4. Focus on planning as an essential tool for institutional improvement.

TAGS: Accreditation, Institutional Effectiveness, Strategic Planning, Planning, Assessment, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN013) Building the Future—The Grangegorman Masterplan for DIT in Ireland
Presented by: James M. O'Connor, Principal, Moore Ruble Yudell Architects & Planners; Noel O'Connor, Head, Campus Planning, Dublin Institute of Technology

The ambitious Grangegorman Master Plan project employed innovative strategies for campus planning and programming to achieve Dublin Institute of Technology's vision for the future. The master planner and campus client will discuss relevant campus programming and place-making methodologies, including: optimizing a consultative process with stakeholders, building consensus, addressing current technology and student needs, and linking the institution’s aspirations to the wider region and Ireland as a whole.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Optimize a consultative process (including participatory workshops) with the various campus and community stakeholders that assesses current and future priorities for the institution.
  2. Analyze how to develop and establish a set of Master Plan Design principles that achieve the strategic goals of the institution.
  3. Examine how current and future trends in learning, technology, architecture, and planning can merge to create optimal learning environments.
  4. Evaluate strategies to maximize the broader regional social, economic, and environmental benefits, by strengthening the synergistic relationship between the project and the wider community.

 

TAGS: Master Plan, International, Mixed Use, Consensus Building

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C013)NASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN227) Campus Housing Privatization: What, Why, and How
Presented by: Gregory Day, President, Duxbury Financial; Tom Livelli, Director, Clark Realty Capital; Stephen E. Roulac, CEO, Roulac Global Places LLC; Jeremy Small, Director, Clark Realty Capital

In the face of increasing competitive and financial pressures, colleges and universities must get creative about how to add, improve, or replace campus housing. A dynamic living-learning environment is more crucial than ever to a university's value proposition and competitive edge, and simultaneously more difficult than ever to achieve.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Judge whether the competitive pressures, disruptive learning innovation threats, rising expectations, constrained capital resources, and other realities make privatization for many colleges and universities not optional but necessary.
  2. Value privatization as a tool that can be employed to transform entire campuses.
  3. Assess the feasibility of a privatization approach by reviewing the critical questions to ask and issues to address: whether, why, how, and when to implement.
  4. Indicate methods that integrate privatization into your university's and college's strategic planning and campus master planning.

TAGS: Student Residences, Privatization, Facility Funding

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C227)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN004) Clouds in the Forecast: How Cloud Computing Impacts Campus Computing
Presented by: Colin Currie, Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, Princeton University

Many institutions have started replacing core IT systems and functions with cloud computing alternatives. This trend will grow significantly in the coming years and impact computing practices on our campuses, but how? Does higher education have an opportunity to come together on a multi-institutional level to direct the course of this wave of change and create better outcomes for our industry? We will look at the latest technological developments in cloud computing, review the development and adoption of new industry standards, examine the latest offerings, and discuss their impact on institutional planning, administration, teaching, learning, and beyond.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Define cloud computing and review its latest technological advances and methods of employment.
  2. Appraise cloud computing's benefits against possible challenges and drawbacks.
  3. Predict how cloud computing will continue to impact our campuses.
  4. Discuss how to position ourselves to gain the most from this technical transformation.

TAGS: Cloud Computing, Information Technology, It Services, Virtualization, It Standards

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C004)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN243) Emerging Forces That Drive the Need for Prioritization: What Campus Leaders Are Telling Us
Presented by: Robert C. Dickeson, President Emeritus, University of Northern Colorado; Author: Prioritizing Academic Programs and Services (2nd ed., 2010), Co-Founder, Lumina Foundation

More and more institutions across the country are beginning to focus on reallocating existing resources in addition to generating new resources. But such an initiative requires a systematic, academically responsible approach to ensure success. This highly interactive session will engage participants in the how and why of choosing criteria and assessing weights, avoiding pitfalls and anticipating likely push-back, and integrating this process with other institution-wide strategies. (This session will be followed by "A Conversation with Bob Dickeson" later in the program.)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover the key elements of priority-setting, including process, mission clarification, criteria, and leadership.
  2. Participate in an actual criteria and weight-setting exercise that can be used on your home campus.
  3. Engage with the presenter and your fellow participants in hands-on exercises that address your specific institutional issues.
  4. Think through your own institution’s readiness for prioritization, based on real-life experiences of hundreds of campuses.

TAGS: Academic Planning, Program Review, Program Prioritization, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C243)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN201) Future of the Library? Turning Conflicting Pressures Into Compelling Opportunities
Presented by: Shirley Dugdale, Director, Learning Environments, DEGW North America; Ludmilla D. Pavlova-Gillham, Senior Facilities Planner, University of Massachusetts Amherst; Jay Schafer, Director of Libraries, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Many institutions are scrutinizing library space as a potential space bank in times of tight capital resources, while librarians are seeking ways to shift lesser-used collections into storage, create more user space, and improve services. Accomplishing these tasks at University of Massachusetts Amherst's Du Bois Library, a 26-story tower, posed a particular challenge. The library's master plan needed to explore compatible uses, partners for integrated services, and identify opportunities to repurpose space for university needs as well as the library's future vision.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize functions compatible with future libraries and their mission.
  2. Identify forces prompting change in research libraries and resulting space implications for new facilities.
  3. Compare short- and long-term stewardship demands on campus planning.
  4. Explore attitude disparity concerning change in libraries, from staff to faculty and users.

TAGS: Public Research Intensive, Facility Design Library, Renovation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.5 units (SCUP46C201)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN235) How Technological Trends are Changing the Physical Environments of our University Campus Models Today
Presented by: Donald P. Archiable, National Practice Area Leader, Content Media Facilities, URS Corporation; Scott G. Griffin, Principal and Vice President of Engineering and Technology, The Systems Group

With emerging technologies changing almost every aspect of how we live our everyday lives, there has been significant impact on how university campuses connect with American higher education and international partnerships. We will share case study samples of what others are planning with these technological innovations, discuss what may fit your university operation, and offer an overview of where we think these changes will move forward in our society.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain how emerging technology can expand university courseware beyond the physical campus.
  2. Identify how mobile applications, wireless, and related technologies redefine the modern campus.
  3. Recognize how content-casting and other global social networks create partnering opportunities for university programs.
  4. Discuss how new degree programs are growing from this emerging technological advancement.

TAGS: Technology, It Trends, Distance Learning, Social Media, Mobile Apps

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C235)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN087) Planning and Implementing Financially Responsible Climate Action
Presented by: Robert N. Belyea, Principle Program Manager, Constellation Energy; Richard J. Martin, Principal Sustainability Analyst, Syracuse University; Sarah McCoubrey , Associate, Syracuse University; Timothy Sweet, Director, Energy & Computing Management, Syracuse University

Syracuse University is committed to becoming climate neutral by 2040. Our plan is based on currently available technologies, is self-funding by 2023, and generates savings (net to all program costs) to the university by 2030. This session will describe the planning process and models used, the implementation methods currently underway, the level of campus user involvement required, and the management necessary to develop and implement the plan.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explain how Syracuse University's climate action plan is atypical and why.
  2. Determine whether a similar climate action planning initiative can succeed on your campus.
  3. Justify climate action planning and implementation to sceptical financial managers.
  4. Estimate financial impacts of climate action projects to achieve long-term financial sustainability.

TAGS: Climate Neutral, Energy Audits, Climate Action Plan, Return On Green Investment, Sustainability

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.5 units (SCUP46C087)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN125) Real Time Planning and Implementation of Transportation Improvements—NOW!
Presented by: Josh Cantor, Director, Parking and Transportation, George Mason University; Christopher R. Conklin, Principal, VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.; Rosemary Ryan, Senior Legislative Aide, Braddock District Supervisor, Fairfax County; Cathy Wolfe, Director, Campus Planning, George Mason University

One of the fastest growing universities in the country, George Mason University's (GMU) campus and regional transportation system must keep pace with this growth and increasing system demands. We will explore the collaborative transportation master planning process currently underway for GMU's Fairfax campus with a focus on the implementation of transportation improvements (even before completing the plan), programming of medium- and long-term projects, and the formation of partnerships with regional stakeholders.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the linkage between campus growth and campus/regional transportation needs.
  2. Evaluate the benefits and challenges of engaging in an extensive internal/external stakeholder process focused on campus and regional transportation when time is of the essence.
  3. Describe the innovative approach of developing a transportation improvement program for a rapidly growing university campus within the context of an existing master plan.
  4. Discuss the challenges, benefits, and limitations of tactical and operational measures used to rapidly implement plan recommendations.

TAGS: Transportation Master Plan, Walkable Campus, Parking, Town/Gown, Master Planning, Partnerships

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C125)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN224) Space Management for the 21st Century Campus
Presented by: Phillip J. Rouble, Facilities Planning Specialist, Algonquin College

If higher education is to remain affordable, accessible, and relevant, the new reality for traditional institutions may lie in a paradigm shift from bricks-and-mortar campuses with online curriculum into virtual campuses with physical assets. Algonquin College has actualized this paradigm shift with a proven space management model that has optimized capacity within its physical campus. This presentation reviews our space-mining processes to extract capacity from physical space and our exploration to date into building capacity in virtual space.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Construct a roadmap to implement a successful space management model.
  2. Review an effective and efficient space cost allocation model.
  3. Assemble a toolkit of space-mining techniques for further investigation.
  4. Evaluate a transformative model for a virtual college fabric.

TAGS: Community College, International, Canada, Space Management, Space Planning, Technology, Virtual Space

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C224)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:30 AM
(CN151) Tinker. Twist. Intertwine: The Reinvention of Project Delivery Methods
Presented by: Pamela P. Delphenich, Director, Campus Planning & Design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Rebekah Gladson, President, RG Group; Michael J. McCormick, Assistant Vice President, Planning Design & Construction, Brown University; Ron Simoneau, Vice President, Shawmut Design and Construction

The traditional design-bid-build method of delivery has made way for new and evolving methods that better meet institutional needs for flexibility. Attendees will work in teams to analyze one of three project cases and put forth recommendations to the panelists for project execution under a known or hybrid delivery method. Teams will explain the role, if any, of integrated design process or lean design, and present the benefits and drawbacks of their suggested method.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize how and why delivery methods are being modified and the benefits these new approaches bring.
  2. Evaluate how an appetite for risk plays a role in selecting a delivery method.
  3. Identify project perimeters and align the delivery method(s) that will bring optimal value to their institutions.
  4. Relate how small changes in process can have a big impact on project success.

TAGS: Project Delivery Models, Facility Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (SCUP46C151)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN237) Building Leadership for US Colleges and Universities: A Look at Leadership, and the ACE Fellows Program
Presented by: Sharon McDade, Former Director, ACE Fellows Program, American Council on Education (ACE); Nicholas R. Santilli, Vice President, Academic & Student Affairs | Professor of Psychology, Notre Dame College

In the coming decade, the turnover of leadership positions in higher education may be the largest in the history of US higher education. The good news is that, in that turnover, there will be ample opportunity for new people to rise to the challenge of senior leadership positions in colleges and universities. How many people are ready to step into those roles? How many institutions have consciously developed a depth of leadership talent among its faculty, staff, and administrators who are poised to step into new leadership challenges as these emerge in their institutions? Interweaving themes of personal leadership development and institutional capacity building, this session will look at the role of leadership development programs in creating the administrative talent pool of the future for higher education.Using examples such as the ACE Fellows Program, the session will seek to lay out issues and considerations for individual and institutional leadership capacity building.

RESOURCE: ACE online toolkit for leadership development

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Understand and track leadership development for individual benefit.
  2. Recognize ways to utilize leadership development for the enhancement of an institution’s administrative “bench strength.”
  3. Consider ways to think about leadership development in relationship to career development.
  4. Explore ways to consider leadership development for institutional capacity building and talent pool expansion.

TAGS: Leadership Development, American Council On Education, Ace, Ace Fellows, Institutional Direction

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Personal Development


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN203) Community Colleges as Urban, Mixed-Use Catalysts
Presented by: George Copa, Professor, Oregon State University; Dennis Haskell, Principal, SRG Partnership Inc.; Jane Hendricks, Principal, SRG Partnership

Skyrocketing enrollment at community colleges across the country impelled them to promote a wide range of student goals and diverse learning objectives. These learning centers no longer function as isolated compounds. As urban living evolves, community colleges are integrating into the local fabric to better serve the community and become centers for 24/7 mixed-use lifestyles. Expanding activities, they are sharing important amenities, such as libraries and childcare, and serving as positive models for diversity and sustainable living.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize how community colleges promote urban density, health, safety, and sustainability.
  2. Investigate models that integrate college facilities into neighborhoods.
  3. Assess how community colleges improve community engagement.
  4. Value community colleges as contributors to vital urban centers.

TAGS: Community College, Town/Gown, Master Planning, Adaptation/Redevelopment

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP46C203)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN036) Connecting Assessment With Practice: Moving Information From Interesting to Valuable
Presented by: Brian Johnston, Assistant Vice President, Planning, Institutional Research, Student Learning Outcomes Assessment, Catholic University of America; Darlena Jones, Director of Education & Program Development, EBI

Ever wonder why you have so many assessment reports sitting on your bookshelf collecting dust? This presentation focuses on the importance of moving assessments from merely interesting data to enlightening information that can directly impact student retention and learning. Using concrete examples, participants will gain a good understanding of the types of information that is useful to various audiences and how to design effective reporting to ensure that assessment efforts directly impact practice.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Define the goal of an assessment project.
  2. Identify the various key stakeholders of assessment projects.
  3. Assess the range of reporting methods, including positives and negatives associated with them.
  4. Evaluate the links between effective reporting methods and these key stakeholders, then discuss how effective reporting spurs changes in practice.

TAGS: Student Learning Outcomes, Assessment, Assessment Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN008) Enterprise Risk Management and Achieving Your Institution’s Academic Priorities
Presented by: Andrew Leitch, Manager, Communications & Project Planning, University of Alberta; Philip G. Stack, Associate Vice President, Risk Management Services, University of Alberta

In today’s rapidly changing environment, an organization cannot expect to reach its goals without a strategic approach to managing risk. Post-secondary institutions must have both an integrated planning and budgeting process and a commitment to enterprise risk management to thrive in this complex and competitive sector. Learn about the structures, relationships, and processes that constitute the University of Alberta’s enterprise risk management framework and how the framework integrates with the university’s core institutional planning and budgeting processes.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Define enterprise risk management in the context of higher education.
  2. Justify the importance of linking enterprise risk management to planning and budgeting processes.
  3. Discuss the kinds of enterprise risk management structures and processes that work within higher education.
  4. Avoid some of the common pitfalls with implementing a risk management strategy at a university.

TAGS: Risk Management, Integrated Planning, Enterprise Risk Management, Budget Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN066) Faculty Contributions to Mission: Sine Qua Non
Presented by: Michael F. McGoff, Vice Provost, Strategic & Fiscal Planning, Binghamton University, State University of New York

Precious few universities formally collect and analyze indicators of faculty output to inform and advance their mission. In fact, many campuses turn to incomplete and even anecdotal descriptions of their curricular, scholarly, and service production. Discover how one campus has, in cooperation with faculty, implemented a web-based standardized collection database of faculty activity. The resultant report is used to inform discussions with academic programs about how their contributions are integral to the university's mission and strategic aspirations.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess how one university used a required annual faculty report to capture and standardize data on faculty productivity.
  2. Discover how data on faculty productivity can be used to measure progress at the unit level and effect the advancement of the university's strategic objectives.
  3. Discuss how a faculty contributions-to-mission report—in combination with a program dashboard—can inform discussions leading to resource deployment and allocation.
  4. Distinguish what data are important to the various constituencies involved with faculty contributions to mission.

TAGS: Faculty Productivity, Data Systems, Dashboard, Academic Planning, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Personnel/HR


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN238) From Fences to Engagement: A Ten-Year Retrospective of Widener University’s Journey to Reclaim its Soul and Fulfill its Mission as a Leading Metropolitan University
Presented by: Jo Allen, President, Meredith College; Joseph J. Baker, Senior Vice President, Administration & Finance, Widener University-Main Campus; Linda S. Durant, Senior Vice President, University Advancement, Widener University-Main Campus; James T. Harris, President, Widener University-Main Campus; Marcine Pickron-Davis, Assistant to the President for Community Engagement and Diversity Initiatives, Widener University-Main Campus

Over the past decade, Widener University has transformed itself through an integrated strategic planning, assessment, and budgeting process that has helped the university gain national recognition for its inclusiveness and ability to achieve the stated goals identified in the university's planning process titled Vision 2015. Members of the university's executive team, including the president, will discuss the transformation and share lessons learned.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize how a focus on teamwork at the president's executive team level influenced the outcomes of the strategic plan.
  2. Assess the success of a long-term strategic vision.
  3. Discuss how broad participation in the preparation and implementation of the plan influenced its success.
  4. Prepare for meetings and strategic planning discussions to ensure the ultimate success of the vision.

TAGS: Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN233) How Can Collaborative Efforts Make for a More Efficiently Built Facility?
Presented by: Michael S. Dorman, Senior Managing Partner, Southeast Region, Multivista Construction Documentation; David Mayhew, Director of Architecture, Engineering & Construction, Towson University

There is a growing trend in universities to leverage digital documentation to provide a cost savings in both construction and facility management. Documenting a project from start to finish reduces risk and operations and maintenance costs, while improving construction quality. Digital documentation provides a permanent and accurate record of the project, allowing costs of future renovations and facility planning to be optimized. A digital documentation platform provides the ultimate management tool for collaborative efforts from all team members to achieve the goals of all stakeholders.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess a collaboration tool that allows construction and management teams to conduct virtual meetings, as well as an exact-built photo set of their facility that shows exactly what is behind the building's floors, walls, and ceilings.
  2. Identify areas of concern and resolve disputes during and after construction utilizing perfect memory of all pre-existing conditions as well as progression during construction.
  3. Create a final record of the project using data captured throughout the construction process, in progressions as well as post-inspection, thereby eliminating any unforeseen conditions on future projects or renovations.
  4. Prepare for future planning of facility expansions by digitally documenting the initial utilization.

TAGS: Technology, Digital Documentation, Theory Into Practice, Virtual Collaboration

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP46C233)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN190) Integrated Planning to Support Health Sciences Education
Presented by: Jonathan Kanda, Associate Principal, CO Architects; Nancy Tierney, Associate Dean, Facilities & Planning, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix

Academic health sciences centers are challenged to keep pace with curricular innovations, expanding programs, and community engagement, all while faced with reduced funding. This session illustrates how the Phoenix Biomedical Campus (PBC) is surmounting that challenge. We will discuss how factors like multi-institutional partnerships, team-based learning environments, and utilization analysis for sharing resources enabled the creation of PBC's leading-edge facility that will support an interprofessional education model for the next generation of healthcare providers.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the key issues and trends that drive interprofessional learning models in health sciences education.
  2. Evaluate the impact of emerging interprofessional and team-based curricula on health sciences learning environments.
  3. Analyze the design and planning metrics for leading-edge health sciences learning spaces, including clinical skills, simulation, and classrooms.
  4. Demonstrate how space utilization and scheduling models can provide objective, quantifiable information to help right-size the building program and optimize the sharing of space.

TAGS: Facility Design Biomedical, Medical/Allied Health, Space Utilization, Partnerships, Public University, Facility Funding

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C190)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN239) Presentation of the 2011 SCUP Award for Institutional Innovation and Integration—The One Ohio State Framework Plan
Presented by: Julie Anstine, Special Assistant to the Senior Vice President, Ohio State University-Main Campus; Michael J. Boehm, Vice Provost for Academic Planning, Office of Academic Affairs, Ohio State University-Main Campus; Amanda Hoffsis, Senior Space Planner, Ohio State University-Main Campus

The One Ohio State Framework is a structure for guiding change in the physical environment that is more comprehensive, integrated, and dynamic than ever before.  The bold vision and guiding principles have already positively influenced several significant capital investments.  Participants will learn how Ohio State is shifting its culture toward collaborative, data-driven planning using an innovative decision support system to consider academic, strategic, financial, and physical issues in an integrated way. 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Create a framework that aligns all stakeholders toward one common vision.
  2. Organize a planning process that drives culture change towards collaboration and flexibility.
  3. Identify products and outcomes needed to support agile, integrated, data-driven planning.
  4. Use metrics to inform planning decisions that integrate academic, strategic, financial, and physical considerations.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Innovation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C239)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN048) Retooling on the Fly: A New Approach to Implementation Planning
Presented by: Douglas Bencks, University Architect & Director/Campus Planning, University of New Hampshire; Sherry L. Vellucci, Professor and Dean, University Libraries, University of New Hampshire-Main Campus; David Zenk, Associate Principal, Gund Partnership

Responding to uncertainty in capital funding, University of New Hampshire pursued a different methodology for Dimond Library planning. Our team took a global view of project goals, parameters, and organizational challenges, and developed a quick and quantitative understanding of the proposed initiatives and a roadmap for implementing changes as resources become available. Panelists will describe how to structure an integrated planning process in two months that creates a multi-phase, multi-year plan to assess, envision, and implement changes.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover how to structure a "proto-feasibility" study.
  2. Acquire strategies for keeping your vision grounded in reality and within your project's means.
  3. Assess how to best orchestrate cost, logistics, engineering, and other critical issues alongside your program and space-design focus.
  4. Analyze creative and custom-tailored methods of collecting input and generating buy-in from your stakeholder groups.

TAGS: Facility Library, Project Management, Funding, Student Learning Technology

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C048)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 10:45 AM–11:45 AM
(CN228) Transformation From Community College to Four-Year Residential College
Presented by: Valerie Hepburn, President, College of Coastal Georgia; Aaron B. Schwarz, Principal and Executive Director, Perkins Eastman

In 2008, the state of Georgia required the College of Coastal Georgia to transform from a community college into a four-year residential college. In less than two years, the college president developed a strategic plan that dramatically changed the college's organization, curriculum, and physical environment. Now the college has doubled its enrollment and plans to double in size again. We will track the actions taken to make this successful change, with particular focus on integrated planning that intertwines the physical resolution with the institution's strategic mission and brand.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Express how strategy and brand can be integrated into the physical planning process, and why it should be.
  2. Engage the larger community into the strategic planning process.
  3. Prepare to make large-scale change happen quickly and effectively.
  4. Relate how to transform a 1960's commuter campus into a vibrant new residential college.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Community College To 4 Year Residential, Facility Science, Facility Student Center, Facility Student Residences, Town/Gown, Master Planning, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C228)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN246) A Conversation with Bob Dickeson
Presented by: Robert C. Dickeson, President Emeritus, University of Northern Colorado; Author: Prioritizing Academic Programs and Services (2nd ed., 2010)

Join an unstructured, informal conversation with a leader in American higher education. Dickeson has been a university president, business CEO, co-founder of Lumina Foundation for Education, chief of staff to governors in two states, and consultant to over 700 colleges and universities. Come with your questions and issues and engage Bob Dickeson and your fellow participants in exploring solutions.

Note: No proceedings available for this session.

TAGS: Institutional Direction, Academic Planning, Resource Planning


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN217) Demanding Laboratory Plans
Presented by: Couper G. Gardiner, Principal, BHDP Architecture; George Kemper, Laboratory Planner, BHDP Architecture; Jerry Mundell, Manager, Freshman Chemistry Program; Freshman Chemistry Committee Chair, Cleveland State University; Peter Psarras, Senior Graduate Student, Department of Chemistry, Cleveland State University

NEW! Download this recording of the Cleveland State University virtual tour!

Laboratories make tangible the impact of important trends in attraction, choice, economy, community, and retraining. Laboratories are complex physical systems for teaching and research that prove their exceptional value in social, economic, and environmental outcomes. By focusing in detail on four operational approaches that have worked, we see connections, from observing how people use space and instruments productively, to exploring behavioral and physical models that unite laboratories for efficient use of resources. This session includes a virtual tour of 21st-century chemistry teaching labs at Cleveland State University. This suite of labs delivers fresh, new design and functionality that transforms traditional labs into multifunctional spaces that promote engagement and interaction of students while utilizing the latest teaching technology.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Plan laboratories using an economic approach that responds to energy cost-push and government grant-pull.
  2. Adapt laboratories based on demand, customizing and extrapolating from observed needs.
  3. Create technology-rich laboratory plans for efficient knowledge transfer, practice, and feedback.
  4. Design inviting environments that communicate the laboratory's brand as a campus connector.

TAGS: Laboratory Design, Facility Design Engineering

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C217)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN230) Design Visualization: Transformation of Architectural Design Processes Through Real-Time Collaboration
Presented by: Philip A. Jabour, Associate Vice President, Planning, Design & Construction, Southern Methodist University; Steve Springer, Project Manager, The Beck Group; Sean Studzinski, Principal, KSQ Architects, PC

Photo-realistic still renderings. Cinematic animations. These are visual tools we use today to communicate design intent to the client. However, this paradigm is quickly changing. With recent advancements in cloud computing and high-end graphics cards, we will see significant change in the way design decisions are made as they shift from a review-comment-refine process, often involving many iterations, to real-time collaboration allowing decisions to be made on the fly in client meetings.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Sequence visualization workflow for exploration in the office.
  2. Describe visualization collaboration in client meetings.
  3. Appraise visualization tools available for use in this type of collaboration.
  4. Identify technology requirements for real-time collaboration.

TAGS: Technology, Facility Design Software, Collaboration, Architectural Practice, Client Relations

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C230)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN105) Ensure Your Vision Is 20/20
Presented by: Jillian Kavanagh, Planning Analyst, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland

Today, most higher education institutions have a vision statement as part of their strategic plan. Whether short and pithy or long and comprehensive, there is often little evidence of how the vision statement permeates through the institution and its stakeholders, or how it influences the strategic planning process. Learn how the Fisheries and Marine Institute of Memorial University of Newfoundland utilized pictures and vignettes inspired by the institution's vision as purposeful and practical tools to both build the strategic plan and to garner support throughout the institution and with its stakeholders.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Augment your vision statement with graphics that capture the essence of the message.
  2. Translate the outcomes of achieving the vision into vignettes.
  3. Develop graphics and pictures to illustrate key strategies and reflect major goals or milestones.
  4. Identify best practices to utilize pictures and vignettes inspired by the institution's vision as purposeful and practical tools in the strategic planning process.

TAGS: International, Canada, Marine Institute, Strategic Planning, Innovative Planning Practice, Mission/Vision

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C105)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN089) Integrated Strategic Planning: Using Shared Software to Manage, Communicate, and Implement Planning
Presented by: Crystal M. Braden, Director of Institutional Planning, Policy & Effectiveness, Angelo State University; John H. Russell, Director of Project Administration, Texas Tech University System Administration

Angelo State University has coordinated all its components of planning—the strategic plan, operations plan, facilities master plan, enrollment management plan, institutional effectiveness data, budgeting, resource allocation, and strategic priorities—into one integrated network, Strategic Planning Online, that now serves the university on a daily basis. This session will answer three basic questions: How did the university engage campus support? What kind of behind the scenes work was needed to implement the software? Has it met expectations? This session will be simultaneously broadcast as a webcast to a virtual audience.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate campus planning structure regarding its capability for integration of planning functions.
  2. Design an audit that identifies deficiencies in current planning cycles.
  3. Identify the necessary components needed for integrated planning.
  4. Develop an action plan towards an integrated planning environment.

TAGS: Large Public University, Integrated Planning, Online Planning Tools, It, Technology Planning Tools, Change Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C089)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN174) Partnerships for Growth in Facilities and Programs
Presented by: James D. Brown, Senior Consultant, HDR, Inc.; Steven Gates, Senior Vice President for Advancement, Northwest Arkansas Community College

As their role rapidly expands, innovative community colleges are learning to utilize partnerships with private development entities, the local business community, other public agencies, and non-profits to deliver the campus facilities needed to accommodate growth and the changing educational landscape. Additionally, these partnerships efficiently maintain and grow programs while saving cost. Learn how Northwest Arkansas Community College pursues and utilizes partnerships to implement its main campus master plan and planned expansion through a new satellite campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Define different types of partnerships, such as public-private, interagency, and nonprofit, and assess how they can be utilized to deliver facilities.
  2. Value synergistic partnerships that augment program provision and supply efficiencies.
  3. Explain the process for identifying partnership potential and forging partnerships.
  4. Prepare a strategy to pursue partnerships with your institution.

TAGS: Community College, Public/Private Partnerships, Town/Gown, Master Planning, New Campus

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C174)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN245) Shared Futures: General Education for Global Learning
Presented by: Kevin Hovland, Director, Global Learning and Curricular Change, Association of American Colleges and Universities

The challenges our graduates will face with growing urgency are increasingly defined as global problems: environment and technology, health and disease, conflict and insecurity, poverty and development. Similarly, the goals of democracy, equity, justice, and peace encompass the globe and demand deep understanding from multiple perspectives. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) is working with 32 colleges and universities to translate research and expertise into practices that help align general education curricula with expectations for educating students who can thrive in a global economy and become socially responsible and civically engaged leaders at home and abroad. This presentation will highlight promising practices of curricular integration from the project.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Examine current definitions of global learning.
  2. Explore the links between global learning and essential student learning outcomes for liberal education.
  3. Discover general education models that are both horizontally and vertically integrated.
  4. Identify strategies for faculty development and assessment around global learning goals.

TAGS: Institutional Direction, Academic Planning, Learning, Civic Engagement, Global

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN019) Student Health and Wellness: Improving Student Success
Presented by: Emil Rodolfa, Director, University of California-Davis; John A. Ruffo, Partner, WRNS Studio, LLP

Psychological and physical pressures on college students have intensified greatly during the past decade and the demand for environments that serve their multifaceted needs has grown. Universities are now expected to be supportive communities that ease these pressures and improve student success by fostering holistic well-being. This presentation will use the Student Health and Wellness Center at University of California, Davis as a case study to explore the role of student health and wellness within this support system.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explore issues and trends in student health and wellness with an emphasis on mental health.
  2. Develop an understanding of the role of the student health and wellness center within the college community’s support system and its implications for the built environment.
  3. Examine the development of new programs and services designed for outreach to students who would otherwise not make use of traditional health clinics and counseling center resources, and implications for improving student success.
  4. Assess the ways in which student health centers—an often overlooked component of the healthcare continuum—play a crucial role in supporting the broader shift within healthcare toward health promotion.

TAGS: Facility Design Student Health Center, Student Retention, Health And Wellness, Student Services

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C019)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN045) Sustainable Student Residence Halls—The Inclusive Process at Pomona College
Presented by: Miriam Feldblum, Vice President and Dean of Students, Pomona College; Charles W. Oakley, Principal, Ehrlich Architects; Derek Schaible, Alumnus, Class of 2011, Pomona College

Pomona College's North Campus Residence Halls Project embodies the collective aspirations of the entire campus community—students, staff, faculty, administration and trustees—in its form, character, and function. Demonstrating that now is the time for sustainable design, the project made college community input crucial to the design, from early programming through occupancy and beyond, but not without controversy. The presentation discusses the key points in the "How" of developing this LEED Platinum student housing project, with lessons learned for others pursuing such an ambitious undertaking in sustainability, campus stewardship, and changing societal attitudes.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss the benefit of thorough programming, moving from conceptual master plan to specific project goals.
  2. Consider advantages and potential pitfalls of an inclusive programming and design process.
  3. Recognize the necessary administrative commitment to support an inclusive process.
  4. Discover the issues connected to changing lifestyle patterns for students, faculty, and staff.

TAGS: Sustainability, Small Private Liberal Arts, Student Residence, Leed, Leed Platinum, Sustainable Behavior, Living/Learning, Learning Space Design, Student Demographics

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP46C045)AICP CM 1.0 unitGBCI CE 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN060) Using Predictive Analytics to Impact Retention: A Practical Use of Research Methodologies
Presented by: Darlena Jones, Director of Education & Program Development, EBI; Sherry Woosley, Director, Analytics and Research, EBI

Predictive analytics offers a proven way to identify students at risk, enabling timely interventions and measurable impacts on retention. We will discuss one group's predictive analytic efforts and the evolution of those efforts, from basic statistics and complex reporting to complicated models and simple reporting. You will discover—through hands-on examples—some of the lessons we have learned, specifically the need for and power of good data, the complexity of student behaviors, and the importance of well-designed reporting based on research.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess the potential role of predictive analytics, including the commonly used data elements, the strengths and weaknesses of different types of data, and the complexities associated with various data elements.
  2. Observe the evolution of a predictive analytic effort—how one project began, changed, and grew in terms of the overall purpose, the questions being answered, and the methodological sophistication used.
  3. Explore how predictive analytics often move from a statistical/research project to an action/retention initiative and how that move changes the nature of the work.
  4. Discover how to create actionable items from the results of a predictive analytic research project.

TAGS: Predictive Analytics, Student Learning, Data, Student Retention, Research

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN247) Winning the Future: A Vision for Education
Presented by: Michael Blake, Associate Director, White House Office of Public Engagement and Deputy Associate Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs, White House (USA)

A high-quality education is no longer just a pathway to opportunity – it is a prerequisite to success. Because economic progress and educational achievement are linked, educating every American student to graduate from high school prepared for college and for a career is a national imperative. Gain an overview of President Obama's Winning the Future initiative, and the vision that it has for higher education to improve affordability, access, and to build a more rigorous academic experience. Restoring the United States to a global leadership position in higher education will take educational reform. We'll discuss the current initiatives that impact higher education, and the partnership opportunities it holds for colleges and universities.

Note: No proceedings available for this session.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Understand the Winning the Future initiative, and the vision for improving American education through investments that are focused on responsibility, reform, and results.
  2. Articulate ideas and strategies for next steps on how higher education can partner with the Federal government.

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN197) A Village Creates a Building—The UCSF Neurosciences 19A Story
Presented by: Victoria Fong, Project Development Director, University of California-San Francisco; Danielle McGuire, Project Manager, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP

The success of University of California, San Francisco's (UCSF) Neurosciences and Clinical Research Building 19A is the story of collaboration. The design-build, public-private partnership financed project, led by Real Estate Services, was executed simultaneously as the design and construction of infrastructure work surrounding the site, led by UCSF's Capital Projects and Facilities Management. Then, UCSF brought together three diverse departments to occupy the new structure. This session will address how Real Estate Services worked within university constituencies and how the architecture enhances the interaction between the three departmental occupants.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize how alternative delivery methods and interdepartmental collaboration can potentially allow a project to move forward in a difficult funding environment.
  2. Predict potential roadblocks from stakeholder groups and formulate a plan to create collaborative solutions.
  3. Translate the abstract notion of "collaboration" into viable building forms.
  4. Conclude if developer-led public-private partnership projects make sense for your campus and your next project.

TAGS: Public University Research Intensive, Facility Design Neuroscience, Public/Private Partnerships

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C197)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN072) Academic Program Review—Development, Implementation, Assessment, and Resource Allocation
Presented by: Clover Hall, Vice President, Academic Planning & Institutional Research, St. John's University; Diane S. Hergenrother, Associate Provost, Academic Planning & Resource Management, St. John's University

The economic challenges facing higher eduction today make it even more critical for leaders to pursue academic excellence within the context of effective resource management. Academic program review is one strategy for accomplishing this goal. This session describes the development, implementation, and assessment of an academic program review process at a large private university.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Build program review instruments that link to your institution’s vision, mission, and academic priorities.
  2. Design a paperless, web-based program review process using electronic instruments and submission.
  3. Integrate into the program review each program’s effectiveness relative to identifying and achieving student learning outcomes.
  4. Build a resource model that links program review outcomes with resource allocation requirements.

TAGS: Large Private University, Academic Program Review, Resource Allocation, Budget Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN154) Does Building Consensus Compromise Creativity?
Presented by: Wendy Parker; W. Alan Simms, vue partners

Building consensus is the hallmark of university planning. But how do administrators manage to achieve goals efficiently when negotiations often lead to delays and mediocre results? As universities seek ways to be creative and distinctive, consensus can be counter-intuitive. Visually interesting case studies will illustrate how administrators at the University of Manitoba have succeeded—and failed—to achieve winning results through consensus-building.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Apply strategies to strategically build consensus that achieves positive results.
  2. Explain how consensus-building impacts long-term growth and campus planning.
  3. Protect creativity and innovation from compromise in a university planning setting.
  4. Judge whether universities should contract out creativity and innovation.

TAGS: Consensus, Project Management, Innovation, Campus Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C154)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN146) Faculty Enrichment: Integrated Planning for Full-Service Implementation
Presented by: Michael Bivens, Director, Corporate & Foundation Relations, Widener University-Main Campus; Brigitte Valesey, Assistant Provost, Teaching, Learning & Assessment, Widener University-Main Campus

Using integrated planning, Widener University enriched faculty work with a successful full-service teaching, learning, and assessment suite. Strategic goals for a strong academic environment, teaching innovation, and distinctive programs created a visionary road map which we will share, along with examples and assessment findings that highlight how integrated planning and institutional commitments result in academic excellence and innovation. We also will discuss conditions and criteria for successful implementation in other institutional contexts.

Proceedings Files
Download Prezi presentation here. Flash required to view.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize how the integration of institutional and academic planning contributed to a full-service model for enriching faculty work.
  2. Appraise the extent to which integrated planning and implementation activities at other institutions regularly include faculty enrichment.
  3. Analyze the impacts and benefits of an integrated suite of faculty enrichment services for faculty, students, and institution.
  4. Evaluate the extent to which this model is adaptable to other institutions.

TAGS: Technology Software, Academic Planning, Assessment, Mission/Vision/Identity

Continuing Education Credits:
NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Personnel/HR


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN234) How the University of Chicago is Addressing "Sustainability Now!" With its New Library Building
Presented by: B. Todd Hunter, Account Executive, Document Management, Dematic; James M. Vaughan, Assistant Director, Access & Facilities Services, University of Chicago

In 2011, the University of Chicago will open its new Mansueto Library. With its elliptical glass domed design, this architectural wonder makes extensive use of natural lighting. It also has uniquely incorporated an automated, ultra-high-density collection management system to reduce its carbon footprint by over 50%.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Utilize automation storage technology to reduce building carbon footprint.
  2. Review building design options for university libraries that free up available interior space for patrons' use.
  3. Identify key initiatives to consider in the planning stages for a new on-campus structure.
  4. Assess secure, on-site archival management alternatives.

TAGS: Facility Design Library, Compact Storage, Archival Management, Sustainability.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (SCUP46C234)AICP CM 1.0 unitGBCI CE 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN157) Living the Liberal Arts Mission Through Academic Service-Learning
Presented by: Jenice Marie Meyer, Director, Academic Service-Learning, University of Wisconsin-Superior

Academic Service-Learning (AS-L) is an effective pedagogy and a high-impact practice, but how does one promote, utilize, and sustain it on a campus? How are effective partnerships built to provide supportive off-campus learning environments for our students? And can this pedagogy really be a means to achieve the mission of an institution? Investigate and discuss these questions, then evaluate how you can utilize AS-L to achieve the mission at your college or university.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe how Academic Service-Learning (AS-L) can be organized, implemented, and sustained with an understanding of the benefits and possible implications associated with different methods.
  2. Discuss how AS-L can meet the needs of administration, faculty, students, and community partners.
  3. Compare implementation of AS-L on different campuses, including methods employed, plus administrative and faculty buy-in.
  4. Collect ideas from this session that can be utilized and reproduced on your campus.

TAGS: Student Learning, Academic Service Learning, Partnerships, Service Learning, Town/Gown, Mission/Identity

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C157)NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN009) Making the Strategic Plan a Reality: A Case Study
Presented by: Andrew O. Klein, Vice President, Student Success | Dean of Rentention, Anna Maria College

Most institutions can develop a strategic plan, but the real challenge is making the plan a reality in the day-to-day life of the institution. This session will describe how the strategic plan can be effectively operationalized and integrated into performance objectives for every area of the institution. This case study will provide examples of the successful implementation and delineation of outcomes, accountabilities, financial plans, timelines, and assessment models.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover a strategic planning model that illustrates the assessment of departmental goals as a function of the strategic plan.
  2. Demonstrate the strategies necessary to actualize a successful strategic plan.
  3. Discover how to translate the methodologies from the case study to your own institution.
  4. Identify key components from your strategic plan and implement them as annual goals on the departmental level.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Strategic Planning


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN006) Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is
Presented by: Jennifer K. Krieger, Director of Budgets, Kentucky Community and Technical College System; Jamie Williams, Director, Strategic Innovations, Kentucky Community and Technical College System

This case study from the Kentucky Community and Technical College System will address their process used for funding allocations based on the strategic vision of the system president. Gain their historical context and explore the effectiveness of their communication methods and tools utilized in the process. By viewing this institution's effective methods for allocating scarce resources, perhaps you will glean some portion of the methodology that may work at your institution.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify funding strategies that make the most of your existing resources and reach for the vision.
  2. Describe the economic culture of higher education and evaluate solutions to common budgeting problems.
  3. Relate the importance of leadership and support from the top-down.
  4. Communicate the leader's vision and buy-in from the bottom-up.

TAGS: Budget Planning, Change Management, Community College System, Community College, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C006)NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN127) Quinnipiac University: One Vision, One Architect, Three Campuses
Presented by: Patrick J. Healy, Senior Vice President, Finance, Quinnipiac University; Jefferson B. Riley, Partner, Centerbrook Architects and Planners; Joseph Rubertone, Associate Vice President, Facilities Administration, Quinnipiac University

Working as a team for over 20 years, one university administration and one architect implemented the vision of Quinnipiac University. The result? A cohesive and harmonious main campus that drives an institutional culture unique in North American academic history and which has, in part, fueled extraordinary growth, including two new campuses in the last five years.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Develop a model for how, working together, an institution and an architect can implement a framework that realizes an identifiable institutional vision.
  2. Classify various project delivery methods by their differences, strengths, and weaknesses, and identify how and when each should be employed to support institutional goals.
  3. Recognize how a cohesive planning and design team creates synergy between financial planning, strategic academic planning, and campus planning, and why cohesion is important to long-term institutional success.
  4. Apply consistent facilities planning and design principles to satellite campus expansion.

TAGS: Master Planning, New Campus

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C127)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN226) Rethinking the Academic Workplace—Opportunities of a Crisis
Presented by: Alexandra den Heijer, Associate Professor, Delft University of Technology

After a fire that completely destroyed Delft University of Technology's Faculty of Architecture building in May 2008, a team of academics and architects worked miracles and refurbished a cultural heritage building larger than 30,000 square feet, used by 3300 students and over 800 employees, within six months. While the team rethought every concept based on research and references, changing the academic workplace proved most provocative. This presentation will provide design guidelines for the changing academic workplace and strategic choices for the campus of the future.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the teamwork between policy makers, controllers, users, architects, and their representatives required for campus management.
  2. Illustrate evidence-based design guidelines for the changing academic workplace, from the traditional territorial, cellular office towards activity-related, non-territorial concepts.
  3. Discuss post-occupancy evaluations of new concepts for the academic workplace.
  4. List interrelated strategic choices for the campus of the future.

TAGS: International, Renovation/Adaptation, Historic Preservation, Theory Into Practice, Facility Design Architecture

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C226)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(CN053) Sharing a Glass House: Reflections on Repurposing Corporate Space for the Academy
Presented by: Michelle J. Anderson, Dean and Professor of Law, City University of New York School of Law; Hana Kassem, Director, Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates; Iris Weinshall, Vice Chancellor, Facilities Planning, Construction & Management, City University of New York

Repurposing underutilized commercial properties offers real estate and scheduling advantages that are especially attractive in a difficult economy. It also creates challenges. The City University of New York (CUNY) purchased six floors of a glass office building from Citicorp as a new home for its law school. In the process, the school, planning firm, and university worked together in a transparent process to showcase diverse constituencies and the value of differing perspectives, and to overcome tensions between a large corporate brand and the school's public interest mission.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover how to leverage a bad economic climate into an academic opportunity.
  2. Propose ways to bridge the gap between corporate and academic cultures.
  3. Explore a transparent process to engage a wide range of stakeholders.
  4. Transform the vision into an architectural reality that reinforces identity.

TAGS: Cuny, Renovation, Adaptation, Facility Design Law School, Faculty Relations

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C053)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:00 AM
(CN218) Best Practices: Planning Effectively-Designed Learning Spaces
Presented by: Tom Erwin, Chief Information Officer, Butler Community College; Gene George, Executive Director, Research & Institutional Effectiveness, Butler County Community College; Homero Lopez, Higher Education Consultant, DesignLearningSpaces

How do we design learning spaces that enhance the environment for teaching and learning? Should learning spaces be designed to incorporate learner-centered pedagogies? Accommodate a wide range of teaching activities? Facilitate student engagement? Allow seamless integration of technology and media, and support formal and informal learning? Professional literature reveals a wealth of best practices for institutions to plan effectively designed learning spaces. Gain insight, find examples, share your experiences, and take away practical strategies for learning-space design.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize how learning spaces can enhance the environment for teaching and learning.
  2. Explain how best practice planning strategies are undertaken and their value to the intended project.
  3. Compare planning approaches and consider incorporating examples from peer institutions into your own planning processes.
  4. Develop insight of a wide range of approaches for learning space design.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Student Learning, Technology

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C218)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:00 AM
(CN041) Collaboration Through Design: A Platform for Curriculum Integration and Innovation
Presented by: Scott Gordon, Dean, University of Southern Indiana; Mohammed Khayum, Dean, University of Southern Indiana; Jeffrey Ryan, Vice President, HOK

The University of Southern Indiana decided to co-locate its College of Business and Department of Engineering in a new classroom/laboratory building. The two deans involved embraced this opportunity to distinguish their programs by promoting interdisciplinary curricula. In collaboration with their architects, a building was designed to promote interaction between the two programs. This case study reflects on the process and examines the results of this integrative approach after one year of occupancy.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Value the role of spatial design as an important vehicle for bridging disciplinary silos.
  2. Construct a collaborative design process to facilitate interdisciplinary programs and buildings.
  3. Examine a list of lessons learned from reviewing a year of occupancy.
  4. Discuss the concept of maintaining a balance between distinct academic identities and interdisciplinary synergy.

TAGS: Facility Design Science/Business, Academic Planning, Public University

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C041)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:00 AM
(CN170) Digital Assessment: Using Pictures for Change and Planning
Presented by: Michael W. Jackson, Director, Effectiveness and Accreditation, Vanderbilt University; Jacci L. Rodgers, Chair, Accounting & IT; Faculty Liaison for Assessment, Oklahoma City University

Quantitative research does not fully describe all elements of an institution. It also does not provide insight for the narrowly-defined and descriptive challenges of an institution. The use of photography allowed Oklahoma City University (OCU) to more fully identify and document its strengths and opportunities for improvement. OCU calls this evaluative technique "digital assessment." We will examine digital assessment, and offer methodology, implementation, and insight into how digital photography can provide good and bad descriptions of an institution.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate different techniques for programmatic- and institutional-based assessment purposes.
  2. Review "digital assessment," a new technique developed by the presenters.
  3. Specify ways to link assessment, planning, and budgeting through this technique.
  4. Replicate this program on your home campus.

TAGS: Space Assessment, Planning Systems, Digital Photography, Student Assessment

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C170)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:00 AM
(CN034) Integrated Planning: Can It Really Be Achieved?
Presented by: Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning, Monroe Community College; Robert Delprino, Associate Professor, Psychology, Buffalo State College

Integrated planning has gained popularity as a concept. A comprehensive, collaborative approach, integrated planning includes strategic, facilities, academic, and personnel planning that promotes institutional viability. While this is the desired outcome, real attainment is often more elusive. In practice, integrated planning often falls short due to deficiencies in the planning process. Factors that hinder the integration of planning include: placement of planners in the organizational structure, skill set of planners, and appreciation of an institution’s past, present, and future.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Investigate the current state and potential growth of integrated planning in higher education.
  2. Identify the skill set a planner needs to effectively develop and manage an integrated planning process in higher education.
  3. Support the importance of proper alignment in the organizational structure of those responsible for integrated planning.
  4. Determine the factors that limit the effectiveness and realization of integrated planning.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Community College, Public College, Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C034)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:00 AM
(CN130) On the Edge: Why Off-Campus Development Is a Smart Move
Presented by: Edmund Klimek, Partner, KSS Architects LLP; Robert J. Rittenhouse, Partner, Aegis Property Group; John K. Ziegler, Director, Real Estate Development, Princeton University

As institutions strive to accommodate burgeoning enrollment figures and infrastructure needs in an environment of physical, financial, staffing, and schedule constraints, off-campus development can provide an ideal solution. Moving administration personnel and support services, such as storage, to off-campus facilities helped Princeton University preserve campus land for programming that directly supports its core mission while still aligning with its guiding principles. When executed with the right team, off-campus development can also provide greater flexibility in design and financing.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify campus programming that can be better served in off-campus spaces by evaluating their needs, functionality, and space requirements.
  2. Determine the viability for partnership opportunities by forming relationships with developers, property managers, design professionals, and other institutions.
  3. Recognize and evaluate the positive and negative attributes of off-campus sites and properties.
  4. Create and help develop a change management process to relocate institutional staff on- or off-campus.

TAGS: Research University Private, Town/Gown, Campus Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (SCUP46C130)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 9:00 AM–10:00 AM
(CN044) The Experiential Environment: A New Paradigm in Campus Design
Presented by: Marjorie A. Chan, Professor, Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah; John D. Diamond, Principal, Diamond Phillips; John C. McNary, Director, Campus Design & Construction, University of Utah

Creating campus buildings that engage, inspire, and teach students can be accomplished with visually-exciting design that integrates academic branding, showcases teaching and research activity, recognizes donors, and provides wayfinding. When included in the building's core architectural program, this design approach influences the character of the building and the experience of those who use it. Presenters will illustrate concepts that integrate comprehensive design to dramatically change the campus, make inviting destinations, increase interactions, and create a dynamic platform for learning.

Extra proceedings files:
Download the Prezi presentation here.
Download a movie clip from the presentation here.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the potential of buildings to engage students and the broader community in the academic and research enterprise of our institutions.
  2. Recognize the need to go beyond traditional iconic architecture to design an engaging academic and community resource.
  3. Discover techniques to integrate academic branding, academic and research showcasing, donor recognition, and wayfinding into the architectural environment of a building.
  4. Examine three case studies (geology and geophysics/earth science building, a pharmacy institute building, and a business school building) and compare/contrast integrated design for different disciplines.

TAGS: Facility Design Science, Facility Design Pharmaceutical School, Facility Design Business, Design Process

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW 1.0 unit (SCUP46C044)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Skill Sessions

Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 8:15 AM–8:45 AM
(SK011) (Almost) Do-It-Yourself Large Scale Space Auditing
Presented by: Mary-Lynn Cummings, Director of Space Planning, Division of Planning & Budget, Cornell University; Ann K. Newman, Director of Campus Planning, Rhode Island School of Design

Space audits can run into many obstacles to success—logistics, politics, communication, etc. How can you best organize and prepare your campus for an audit? We will answer that question with lessons learned from a major space audit at Cornell University and other institutions.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Strategize a successful space audit on your campus.

TAGS: Space Audit, Space Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 8:15 AM–8:45 AM
(SK020) How to Submit a Session Proposal for SCUP–47
Presented by: Jake Julia, Associate Vice President for Change Management, Associate Provost for Academic Initiatives, Northwestern University; Eugene J. Mackey, Principal, Mackey Mitchell Architects; Cameron K. Martin, Vice President, University Relations, Utah Valley University; Michael F. McGoff, Senior Vice Provost, SUNY at Binghamton; Mary Jo Olenick, Principal, The S/L/A/M Collaborative; Richard J. Straka, Vice President, Finance & Administration, Minnesota State University-Mankato; Jennifer Swann, Professor, Biological Sciences, Lehigh University

Have you thought about submitting a proposal to the international conference? Discover some of the things that Academy members look for in the proposals they review. Having a well-written proposal (submitted on time) is the first step. Get your questions answered, and meet the Academy Conveners who oversee the proposal review process. 

PS: The SCUP–47 proposal submission deadline is Saturday, October 1, 2011, 11:59 PM eastern.

Note: No proceedings available for this session.

 

Learning Outcomes:

1.  Gain tips to prepare a concise, meaty proposal for SCUP-47 (Chicago!) that gets the attention of Academy members.

TAGS: Proposal Writing


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 8:15 AM–8:45 AM
(SK021) How To Write Student Learning Objectives
Presented by: Nicholas R. Santilli, Vice President, Academic & Student Affairs | Professor of Psychology, Notre Dame College

The assessment of student learning is an essential component of the teaching/learning process in higher education. Effective assessment practice hinges on student learning outcomes statements that clearly articulate the knowledge, dispositions, and skills students are expected to acquire during the educational experience. Participants will learn the basics of crafting outcomes statements for assessment of student learning at the course, program, and institutional level.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Write specific, measureable, concise learning objectives for course, program, or institution-level assessment of student learning.

TAGS: Assessment, Outcomes Based Assessment, Student Learning


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 8:15 AM–8:45 AM
(SK004) Piecing It Together: Academic, Fiscal, and Facilities Into Strategic Planning
Presented by: J. Thomas Bowen, Principal Partner, Comprehensive Facilities Planning, Inc.

Often institutions conduct strategic planning exercises without connecting the dots. This session will describe the relationship between academic, fiscal, and facilities planning and how each fits into the broader perspective of strategic planning. Other ubiquitous factors such as technology, marketing, and regional accreditation also will be explored.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the key ingredients of comprehensive strategic planning and understand how each function relates to another.

TAGS: Strategic Planning, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 8:15 AM–8:45 AM
(SK015) Six Competencies of Effective Integrated Planning
Presented by: Phyllis T. H. Grummon, Consultant, Higher Education Planning

Effective integrated planning processes are based on six core competencies—people, language, planning process, the plan, context, and the creative use of resources. The SCUP Planning Institute hones the skills of planners in these areas. Come learn more about the competencies and leave with a tool that helps break down communication barriers on campuses.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Link diverse campus groups with communication techniques grounded in the six core competencies of effective integrated planning.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Planning Skills

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 8:15 AM–8:45 AM
(SK001) The Science of Understanding Building Life
Presented by: Julian A. J. Anderson, President, Rider Levett Bucknall

Owners can ensure the most effective use of capital resources by utilizing an innovative mathematical methodology to determine whether it is more beneficial to construct a new facility or to extend the life of an existing building—and if so, for how long. This session will demonstrate in simple terms the methodology, how it works, and why it's so valuable.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Analyze how to most effectively use capital resources in construction projects.

TAGS: Applied Research, Decision Making, Facility Renovation, Facility Life

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 8:15 AM–8:45 AM
(SK005) Writing Outcomes-Based Assessment Plan for an Administrative Unit
Presented by: Ann M. Boudinot-Amin, Executive Director, American University in Cairo

This session will provide a snapshot of how to write an outcomes-based assessment plan for an administrative or academic support unit. Participants will learn how to write outcomes statements, identify effective assessment measures, set benchmarks, and put it all together into a coherent plan.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Write an effective outcomes-based assessment plan for administrative and academic support units.

TAGS: Assessment, Outcomes Based Assessment, Academic Support Unit Assessment

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 10:15 AM–10:45 AM
(SK013) Calculating the Environmental Benefits of Campus Trees
Presented by: David Zeitlin, Manager, Davey Resource Group

When planning a site expansion, most campuses remove mature trees during the project, then plant new trees after. But mature trees provide significant environmental benefits. How can we illustrate these benefits and provide justification for the expense and inconvenience of preserving mature trees? Using a data sample, we will calculate how mature trees affect stormwater interception, carbon sequestration, and energy savings, then compare results with a similar-sized data set from newly planted trees.

Note: No proceedings available for this session.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Argue the value of a site's existing trees using benefits calculated from site data.

TAGS: Tree Value, Landscape, Sustainability

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 10:15 AM–10:45 AM
(SK018) Google Documents: Free, Online, Collaborative Work Tools
Presented by: Terry Calhoun, Director, Media Relations & Publications, Society for College and University Planning

Create and work with online, collaborative word processing documents, spreadsheets, forms and surveys, and more. Google Documents has evolved from an interesting oddity to an essential working tool, especially for people like planners, who need to work collaboratively with many others in a flexible and quick way.

Note: No proceedings available for this session.

Learning Outcomes:

1.  Learn to upload, create, organize, share, and publish in the (free) collaborative environment of Google Documents.

TAGS: Collaboration, Technology Tools, Google

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 10:15 AM–10:45 AM
(SK012) Reach for the Clouds and Stay There: Strategic Plans and Live Office
Presented by: Mary Lou D'Allegro, Senior Director, Planning, Research, & Assessment, Pennsylvania State University-Penn State Berks

Strategic planning requires much in terms of document creation and editing, report sharing, and dissemination to stakeholders. Microsoft Office Live lessens the burden of strategic planning by streamlining some of the logistics and operations required for successful implementation. This session demonstrates Microsoft Office Live, focusing on its capabilities and its success with the strategic planning taskforce at a public four-year college.

Note: No proceedings available for this session.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Apply cloud computing technology to strategic planning operations with a thorough understanding of the concept and capabilities of cloud computing.

TAGS: Technology Use In Planning, Online Planning, Microsoft Office Live

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 10:15 AM–10:45 AM
(SK003) Space Planning: Tips and Tricks for Academic Offices
Presented by: Victoria Fong, Project Development Director, University of California-San Francisco

What happens when you get an initial request for space planning and programming and there's no one around to guide you? What steps can you follow early in the process to meet with users and campus stakeholders to move toward execution and decision making? Explore an innovative and reliable approach to meet efficiency and economic goals while preserving natural light and views.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assemble new tools and innovative techniques to create efficient academic spaces that preserve natural light and views while adhering to planning standards.

TAGS: Sustainability, Natural Light, Classroom Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 10:15 AM–10:45 AM
(SK016) The Right Question—A Key Facilitation Skill
Presented by: Phyllis T. H. Grummon, Consultant, Higher Education Planning

Whenever a group must make a decision or offer advice on an issue, the starting question can make the difference. A key facilitation skill, one that anyone can improve, is identifying the question that will move the group forward to resolution. This session will provide tips, techniques, sample questions, and practice on asking the right question.
 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify and communicate the appropriate question to facilitate group resolution.

TAGS: Decision Making

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 10:15 AM–10:45 AM
(SK017) Using IPEDS Data for Benchmarking Performance: The Data Feedback Report
Presented by: Tammy A. Silva, Director, Institutional Research, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth

The Data Feedback Report is an annual report provided by the National Center on Education Statistics (NCES) on key variables derived from IPEDS data comparing an institution's performance with that of a selected comparison group. This session will show you how to access the report, the contents of the report, and how to create a customized data feedback report.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Gain the ability to access and customize your college’s Data Feedback Report for benchmarking performance.

TAGS: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, Ipeds, Institutional Research

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 0.5 unit


Document Links

This printed page contains links to other web pages. Each link has a numerical indicator which corresponds to one of the URLs below.