My SCUP | Log In  | Join | Donate
CART (0)
start typing to search www.scup.org
  • About
  • Membership
  • Regions
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Annual Fund
  • Awards
  • Achieving Our Vision
  • Leadership
  • Perry Chapman Prize
  • Staff
  • Strategic Plan (PDF)
  • About Membership
  • Membership Directory
  • New Members
  • Join
  • Renew
  • SCUP Member News
  • Volunteering
  • Mid-Atlantic
  • North Atlantic
  • North Central
  • Pacific
  • Southern
  • SCUP 2013 Mid-Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Atlantic Symposium
  • SCUP 2014 North Atlantic Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 North Central Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Pacific Symposium | November 1
  • SCUP 2014 Pacific Regional Conference
  • SCUP 2013 Southern Regional Conference
  • Annual, International Conference
  • Calendar
  • Online Programs
  • Planning Institute
  • Regional Conferences
  • Books
  • Campus Facilities Inventory
  • Continuing Education Credits
  • Jobs
  • Mojo
  • Plans - Getty Higher Education
  • Plans - Higher Education Institutional
  • Planning for Higher Education Journal
  • RFPs and RFQs
  • Trends to Watch in Higher Education
Home Events SCUP's Annual, International Conference SCUP-45 SCUP-45 Conference Proceedings
  • SCUP's 45th Annual, International Conference & Idea Marketplace
    July 10-14, 2010

  • Conference Links
  • Conference Home

  • Educational Program
  • Final Program (PDF)
  • Final Program Addendum (PDF)
  • Conference Proceedings
  • New! Executive Summaries

  • SCUP–45 Supporters
  • Conference Committee
  • SCUP Culture Guidelines
  •  
  • Conference Corners
  • Attendees Corner
  • Exhibitors Corner
  • Presenters Corner
  • SCUP Home

Conference Proceedings

Conference proceedings are available to all members and conference attendees.


Plenary Sessions

Sunday, July 11, 2010, 5:30 PM–7:00 PM
(PL001) The New Color of Green - The Next Inconvenient Truth
Presented by: Jerome Ringo, Senior Executive for Global Strategies , Green Port

There are no proceedings for this session as there was no visual component.

Jerome Ringo became National President of the Apollo Alliance in 2005 as a dedicated champion of environmental justice and vocal advocate of clean energy. He has first hand experience of the challenges we face after working for more than 20 years in Louisiana’s petrochemical industry.His career include years in drilling and offshore production in the Gulf of Mexico, as well as process operations in the refining industry. More than half of that time was spent as an active union member working with his fellow members to secure a safe work environment and quality jobs. Louisiana’s petrochemical industry focuses on the production of gasoline, rocket fuel, and plastics – many of which contain cancer causing chemicals. As he began observing the negative impacts of the industry’s pollution on local communities – primarily poor, minority communities – Jerome began organizing community environmental justice groups.

Jerome’s experience organizing environmental and labor communities and his drive to further diversify the environmental movement bridges many of Apollo’s partners to create a broad based coalition to provide real solutions for our energy crisis. In 1996, Ringo was elected to serve on the National Wildlife Federation board of directors and, in 2005, Jerome became the chair of the board. In so doing, he also became the first African American to head a major conservation organization. Jerome was the United States’ only black delegate at the 1998 Global Warming Treaty Negotiations in Kyoto, Japan, and represented the National Wildlife Federation at the COP 15 talks in Copenhagan, Denmark. He also served as a representative at the United Nations’ conference on sustainable development in 1999. Jerome inspires audiences around the world to create a new clean energy economy.

Some of his most notable speaking appearances include: the Montreal Climate Summit in 2006, the United Nations African Climate Conference in Nairobi, Kenya in 2006, the Kyoto Plus Conference in Berlin Germany in 2007, and the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver Colorado.

In 2006, Jerome was a McCloskey Fellow and Associate Research Scholar at Yale University; in 2008, he was a Visiting Lecturer at the University of California, Santa Barbara’s Bren School of the Environment. Jerome is co-author of Diversity and the Future of the U.S. Environmental Movement (published in 2007) and The Green Festival Reader (published in 2008.)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the critical role of social justice in the creation of any sustainable initiative.
  2. Identify ways to engage and diversity the support base for environmental sustainability.
  3. Evaluate the strategies that infuse sustainability principles across a campus.
  4. Judge the efficacy of green building practices in the widest variety of facilities.

 

TAGS: Sustainability, Social Justice, Environmental Equality

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45P001)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 12, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:45 AM
(PL003) An Optimist's Education Agenda
Presented by: Mark David Milliron, Chancellor, Western Governors University

The US education trend data are not pretty. The challenges around college completion in particular are real and growing. However, an optimist might look at this opportunity and take heart in the rising embrace of innovative technologies, creative techniques, and transformative models and say there is hope on the horizon. In this presentation we’ll outline the challenges and explore the opportunities we’ll face together in the education world on the road ahead.

Mark David Milliron serves as the deputy director for postsecondary improvement with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, leading efforts to increase student success in the US postsecondary education sector. He is an award-winning leader, author, speaker, and consultant well known for exploring leadership development, future trends, learning strategies, and the human side of technology change.

Milliron founded and served as CEO for the private consulting and service group, Catalyze Learning International (CLI). In addition, he previously served as an Endowed Fellow, Senior Lecturer, and Director of the National Institute of Staff and Organizational Development in the College of Education at The University of Texas at Austin; Vice President for Education and Medical Practice with SAS, the world's largest private software company; and President and CEO of the League for Innovation in the Community College

While teaching at Arizona State, Milliron received the International Communication Association's Teaching Excellence Award. More recently, the University of Texas at Austin's College of Education honored him as a Distinguished Graduate for his service to the education field. In 2005, PBS named Milliron the recipient of its annual O'Banion Prize for transformational work in support of teaching and learning. And in 2007, the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC) presented Milliron with its National Leadership Award for his outstanding accomplishments, contributions, and leadership.

Follow the blog he authors and moderates: Catalytic Conversations Blog

Also, visit www.scup.org/page/annualconf/45/Plenary/Monday/Resources to explore the books and resources referenced in the presentation.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess the impact of the continued technological revolution on the ability of colleges and universities to meet the educational challenges of the 21st century.
  2. Evaluate the various efforts at transforming higher education now being undertaken in the US.
  3. Consider the changes necessary to increase the graduation rates of virtually all institutions if we are to maintain a globally competitive advantage.
  4. Indicate the effects that social media will have in creating future educational experiences on and off campuses.

 

TAGS: Information Technology, Innovation, Student Learning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45P003)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 11:00 AM–12:15 PM
(PL002) The Emerging Intelligent Campus
Presented by: Mark S. Valenti, President & CEO, The Sextant Group, Inc.

Proceedings for this session were not shared.

There is much ado today about social media and the changing landscape of human interaction brought on by the revolution in network-based communications. No doubt this revolution is powerful, far-reaching, and impacts our daily lives in direct and tangible ways. What is not so evident is the revolution quietly occurring in the way buildings are being conceived, a revolution that will impact the way we plan, design, implement, and manage the campus facilities portfolio forever. Technologies such as building information modeling, cloud computing, mesh networks, and digital media are being realized in new ways to optimize energy consumption, usage efficiencies, user comfort, security, and human communication. At what point do buildings become self-aware? When do they inter-operate? And how might we plan for the emerging intelligent campus? This presentation will take a look over the horizon of possibilities. Mark Valenti is an expert in digital media technologies, architectural acoustics, psychoacoustics, and market trends in the multimedia industry. He understands the engineering behind designing truly rich classroom learning environments, blended with the online tools that students and instructors love. 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the effects of technology on the future of sustainable facility construction and operations.
  2. Evaluate the ways in which such technologies as building information modeling, cloud computing, virtualization, and mesh networks will force increased flexibility in facility design and renovation.l
  3. Create scenarios that make full use of 'intelligent buildings' by linking them into a self-regulating campus.
  4. Consider the role of human behavior in the implementation of technology in the facilities of the future.

TAGS: Technology Trends, Technology In Facility Function, Sustainability, Building Information Modeling

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45P002)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Concurrent Sessions

Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN023) A Sustainable Campus? - Yeah, Right! More Hype and No Substance ?
Presented by: Bart D. Becker, Associate Vice President, Facilities & Operations, University of Alberta; Leonard Oliver Rodrigues, Senior Principal, Stantec Inc.

There are many planning studies and campus plans that claim sustainability as their underpinning. However, the meaning of "sustainable" can be quite widely interpreted. This session outlines a plan for a campus of 15,000 FTE seeking to be holistically green--in planning, infrastructure, buildings, and landscape. By setting the metrics of sustainable development in tangible economic, social, and technical terms, this plan shows what a truly sustainable campus might look like.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Analyze the constituent pieces of an integrated sustainable campus infrastructure, facilities, and operations.
  2. Identify metrics that are objectively measurable and not "Greenwashing."
  3. Address a "closed loop" approach to the site for energy, water, waste, and how they interact.
  4. Implement strategies for long-term sustainable development and operations - leveraging development opportunities to ensure concept execution.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Sustainability, International, Integrated Planning, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (45C023)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN119) Connecting Alumni to Campus Through Strategic Planning and Preservation
Presented by: Cara Hanson, Capital Project Manager, University of Vermont; Thomas M. Hotaling, Principal, Ann Beha Architects; Alan Ryea, Director, Alumni and Parent Programs, University of Vermont

The University of Vermont has embarked on an exciting initiative to restore, renovate, and expand a local landmark as an important new point of campus connection for visiting alumni. This creative design offers a home base for alumni activities, opportunities for revenue-generation, outreach to the surrounding city, and administrative space for development and alumni relations. This session will address the project's complex planning and design process, financial modeling, strategies for phased construction, neighborhood concerns, endowment opportunities, and sustainable strategies for historic structures.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of adaptive re-use versus new construction.
  2. Discover strategies for unique program requirements (including events spaces, public spaces for alumni use, and revenue-generating programs.)
  3. Explore sustainable design strategies for historic buildings.
  4. Review the business planning steps to be considered when creating revenue-generating spaces in academic settings, including the ever-present issue of campus parking.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Renovation, Town/Gown, Facility Design, Facility Type Alumni Center

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (45C119)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN146) Does Net Zero Design LEED to Zero Cost?
Presented by: Chris Buntine, Sustainability Engineer, GreenWorks Studio; Brent Miller, Principal, Education Studio Leadership, Harley Ellis Devereaux; David Umstot, Vice Chancellor, Facilities Management, San Diego Community College District

Limited resources are not a new reality for higher education, but how we design for these constraints can be. A focus on first cost, rather than on life-cycle cost, has defined a performance path with ever-increasing operational costs. This session illustrates how San Diego Community College District and other institutions are utilizing net zero approaches to design away operating costs, control capital costs, and push LEED certification to the highest levels.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify building candidates at the master plan level to optimize net zero design options.
  2. Define performance goals that drive design toward net zero.
  3. Educate building occupants, facilities maintenance, and administration to facilitate the shift to a net zero paradigm.
  4. Incorporate post-occupancy evaluations, measurement, verification, and recommissioning to ensure a successful outcome.

TAGS: Community College, Sustainability, Operational Planning, Facility Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (45C146)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN051) Integrated Planning in Community Colleges: Current Realities and Future Possibilities
Presented by: Valarie L. Avalone, Director of Institutional Planning, Monroe Community College; Robert Delprino, Department of Psychology, SUNY Buffalo State

This interactive presentation addresses implications of current trends and considers possible senarios  that community colleges must consider as part of their integrated planning process. Integrated planning at any institution is a challenging process; however, environmental, social, and political forces offer some unique factors for community colleges. These include mission (open door access), defining the college's role (assist remedial students, prep students for four-year colleges, economic development engine), the community's expectations (partnerships, respond to employers' workforce needs, course offerings), funding sources (state and county contributions), and institutional leadership (anticipated retirement of 75 percent of community college presidents by 2012).

 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess integrated planning models for community colleges based on a brief review of the current literature.
  2. Recognize the internal and external forces that are unique to community colleges and how they can drive the integrated planning process.
  3. Identify approaches and skills needed to position community colleges for the future.
  4. Develop tools (i.e., scenario building, gap analysis, etc) that can be used to identify and create future possibilities for community colleges.

TAGS: Community College, Planning Theory And Research, Trends, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C051)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN044) Interaction Between A Community's Healthcare Needs and Coppin University's Academic Program as a Catalyst for Campus Transformation
Presented by: Fred Marino, Principal, Design Collective, Inc.; Benjamin P. Morgan, Project Director, Barton Malow; Maqbool H. Patel, Associate Vice President, Administration and Finance, Coppin State University

A microcosm of our world today exists in the richness and diversity of the new Health and Human Services Building at Coppin State University. Challenges of integrating multiple academic departments consisting of nursing, applied psychology and rehabilitation center, sociology, criminal justice and an early childhood development center with a community health clinic and pharmacy can also be considered as providing great opportunities for collaborative learning that is reinforced through architecture and the use of technology rich environments.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss how incorporating the community public health clinic in the building increased student interaction and learning.
  2. Address the integration of academic and community-based program elements.
  3. Identify the benefits of day-to-day and longer-term integration among multiple academic departments and the clinic. 
  4. Recognize how this new facility and its location on the campus has invigorated the university and set the stage for the next step of their expansion.

TAGS: Facility Type Health, Facility Design, Town/Gown, Public Comprehensive

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C044)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN243) Measuring the Impact of Enterprise Asset Management Programs
Presented by: Roger Reich, Associate Vice President, ISES Corporation

Can you maintain your assets with less dollars and fewer personnel? Can technologies such as CMMS/SCADA/GIS help you bridge the budget/responsibility gap? We will analyze how technologies being used by colleges and universities are either helping with or not contributing to the institutional performance. Learn how to apply lessons learned to your institution. 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the impact of less maintenance dollars for your institution.
  2. Identify how various technologies are helping bridge the responsibility gap to manage your assets.
  3. Evaluate what processes and policies must be changed to use technologies to support your maintenance.
  4. Measure institutional performance with technologies on long-term enterprise asset management.

TAGS: Information Technology, Performance Measures, Budget/Resource Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C243)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN024) New School Fogelman Library—Urban Case Study of the New Library Experience
Presented by: Roger F. Duffy, Partner, Skidmore, Owings + Merrill; Lia Gartner, Vice President of Design, Construction, & Facilities Management, The New School; Chris McCready, Director of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Education Lab, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP; Ed Scarcelle, University Librarian, The New School

The Fogelman Library project realized a new paradigm for the university’s library and an innovative model for others, integrating technology, print media, food service and informal study opportunities within an intensely-used existing academic building known as the Arnhold Knowledge Center. Throughout the building, spaces were clarified, connected and revitalized, creating a dispersed yet cohesive library, with access to specialized media technology already present in the building, thereby multiplying and enriching both the new and old learning resources.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Articulate principles for creating a highly interactive library, with diverse learning modes in an existing university building.
  2. Program a series of flexible space types to reinforce the relationship between instruction and independent study.
  3. Activate a multistory library building by offering a broad range of resources that support an increased density of activity.
  4. Create a new prototype for communal student spaces at a time of change within the academic culture.

TAGS: Facility Type Library, Information Technology, Student Learning, Facility Design, Renovation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (45C024)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN092) Planning for Athletics and Recreation—Making Every Yard Count
Presented by: David Dymecki, Principal, Perkins+Will; William A. Massey, Principal, Sasaki Associates; Carol Moyles, Senior Associate/Landscape Architect, Sasaki Associates

Athletic and recreation buildings are some of the largest, most energy-intensive buildings on a campus. Factor in fields and outdoor venues and the impact becomes even more significant. With increasing demand for intramural and club sports and expectations for ever more sophisticated facilities for athletics, team sports and human performance research, institutions are working harder than ever to plan appropriately for the future. This session will look at planning strategies that maximize space and land area with a sustainable, long-term focus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Respond to trends in athletics and recreation within a rapidly changing and unpredictable economic landscape.
  2. Minimize the environmental impact of traditionally large, energy intensive buildings.
  3. Apply rules of thumb for meeting NCAA Regulations and basic planning guidelines for Division 1, 2 and 3 Institutions.
  4. Establish priorities by looking at student surveys, aligning growth with an institution's academic mission, evaluating trends in Athletics and Recreation, and more.

TAGS: Facility Type Athletics, Trends, Sustainability, Open Space, Master Planning, Student Life

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C092)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN251) Presentation by the 2010 SCUP Founders (Casey) Award Recipient -- Engaged and Engaging Learners: Goals for Planning Undergraduate Learning Spaces
Presented by: Jeanne L. Narum, Principal, Learning Spaces Collaboratory

Understanding what students should know and be able to do as a result of their experiences in learning spaces is a critical starting point for planning such spaces. Findings from cognitive science research, expectations of learning outcomes from academic, disciplinary and societal communities, and explorations of how and where today’s students learn, inform the work of those responsible for the quality and character of 21st century learning spaces. In this interactive session the focus will be on how to use engaging learners as a planning tool and goal.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover research on how people learn and how contemporary pedagogical practices reflect those findings.
  2. Investigate what kind of spaces work—and why—in the service of learning outcomes from the diverse community of stakeholders.
  3. Identify practices that place the engaged learner as a central driver for integrated planning.
  4. Explore metrics from ‘from audit to assessment’ to determine the impact of space on learning.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Student Learning, Performance Measurement, Demographics, Research On Learning/Pedagogy

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C251)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN258) The Knowledge Economy Has Arrived: Now What Do We Do?
Presented by: Paul E. Lingenfelter, President, State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO)

The knowledge economy predicted by Peter Drucker in 1968 has arrived. Paul Lingenfelter will reflect on its implications for higher education, and more broadly, for the sustainability and quality of human life. He will consider: the re-alignment of national economies, the imperative for mass higher education, and the challenges posed by global competition for quality assurance and the delivery of higher education. A fourth topic is the implications of resource scarcity on the business model of higher education – Can we, and should we move from a model that competes not just on quality, but also on productivity? 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Acquire an understanding of global economic trends and their implications for international competition for knowledge and skill
  2. Identify the interrelationships between socio-economic status and academic capacity in postsecondary attainment;
  3. Recognize the changing business model of higher education driven by greater demand for knowledge and the obsolescence of quality assurance mechanisms based on inputs; and
  4. Define the factors associated with public support for postsecondary education. 

TAGS: Environmental Scanning, Economics, Global Education, Resource Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 12, 2010, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM
(CN261) Transformation: A Tale of Successful Planning and Prioritizing
Presented by: Douglas D. Baker, Provost and Executive Vice President, University of Idaho

The University of Idaho undertook a Program Prioritization Process in the 2009-2010 academic year. The outcome of that process was the elimination or reorganization of 49 degree programs and the structural elimination of seven academic departments. In parallel with this effort was a Strategic Innovation Initiative process that asked the faculty and staff to offer new ways to rethink the structure and functioning of the university. These processes were built on a foundation of three years of strategic plan implementation and involved broad collaborations with faculty, staff, and students. In this talk, the process, timelines, metrics, and culture for these transformations will be discussed.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover a method for establishing a program prioritization process and successfully implementing it.
  2. Identify linkages between university-level planning and program prioritization processes that can effectively lead to program reductions and/or reorganization.
  3. Recognize how program reduction processes can be effectively combined with forward looking innovation processes to reshape academic institutions.
  4. Discuss how the planning processes undertaken at the University of Idaho can be adapted for use at other colleges and universities. 

TAGS: Academic Program Prioritization, Change Management, Collaboration Faculty Staff Student, Integrated Planning, Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN220) "Free" Property—Look That Gift Horse in the Mouth
Presented by: Sarah K. Hempstead, Principal, Schmidt Associates; Kevin Shelley, Principal/Project Manager, Schmidt Associates; Richard B. Tully, Assistant Vice President, Facilities Planning, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

A gift of adjacent land and a building seemed like good news to rapidly growing Ivy Tech Community College. The easy solution would be to demolish the building and start over, but the building became important to historic preservation enthusiasts. Meanwhile, legislative priorities and a roller coaster economy constantly altered the realities for this project. This session explores two years of community consensus building to find an educationally sound and creative solution the community loves.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Apply consensus building strategies to resolve the disparate goals of constituents to produce a solution that is not "us vs. them," but is instead a solution that works for everyone.
  2. Formulate a new game plan as external circumstances change to adjust to the new economic and political realities.
  3. Use the art of negotiation to appraise what your organization is willing to give up (and when) and what is non negotiable as you allow outside stakeholders to have a role in your organization's future.
  4. Employ the right communication strategies to sell your plan to all constituencies.

TAGS: Community College, Town/Gown, Historic Preservation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C220)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN200) Academic Resource Management System: Introducing Centralized Strategic Resource Planning to Independent-Minded Faculties
Presented by: Peter Rowley, Director of Applications and Integration, York University; Andrea Torre, Executive Officer, York University

York University is a large comprehensive university with over 50,000 students located in northwest Toronto. Each of York's ten faculties is steeped in rich individual tradition and enjoys a high degree of autonomy. However, the financial pressures of recent economic turmoil have forced the university to dramatically step up its efforts to control costs while still providing a high-quality education and these efforts have involved harmonizing processes between faculties. Learn how a combination of organizational realignment, process changes, and custom software integrated with enterprise systems radically improved the university's planning, budgeting, and resource cost tracking capabilities.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover ways to entice, engage, and even excite independent faculties when rolling out university-wide processes and applications.
  2. Discuss the risks and rewards of building new applications in periods of process change and organizational realignment.
  3. Analyze "agile" software development practices and their pros and cons in a consensus-oriented academic environment.
  4. Assess the strategic planning advantages of a unified academic resource management solution.

TAGS: Large Public Research, International, Information Technology, Performance Measures, Change Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN151) Access Mis-Management: "We've Met the Enemy and He is Us"
Presented by: Barbara J. Chance, President and Chief Executive Officer, CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc; Robert Furniss, Senior Operations Consultant, CHANCE Management Advisors, Inc; Alexandria Roe, Associate Vice President, Capital Planning & Budget, University of Wisconsin-System Administration

After struggling with pedestrian/vehicular conflicts, ruined landscape, and a desire to remove vehicles from the campus core, the University of Connecticut decided that it needed an access management plan. Learn about the university's decision process leading to its request for an access management consulting study, the particulars of data collection and plan preparation, the reaction from campus departments and vendors, the issues involved in plan implementation and buy-in, and the benefits realized.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize how a comprehensive access management plan can increase pedestrian safety, reduce fuel consumption and vehicle emissions, preserve landscape, and beautify a campus.
  2. Review strategies for improving the management of campus service and delivery access needs.
  3. Assess how access management strategies can be applied to the participants own campus.
  4. Identify the institutional obstacles facing the implementation of a campus access management plan as well as the strategies to overcome them.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Transportation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (45C151)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN017) An Incremental Approach to Creating Technology-Enhanced Learning Spaces
Presented by: Noah Pitzer, Technology Manager, K-20 Project, University of Washington-Seattle Campus; Pamela K. Stewart, Executive Director, Planning, Facilities, & Data Centers, University of Washington-Seattle Campus; Karalee A. Woody, Director, Operations, Learning & Scholarly Technologies, University of Washington-Seattle Campus

Several years ago, the University of Washington invested in a centralized, experimental technology-enhanced conferencing space to provide faculty and staff opportunities to collaborate over long distances. The experience gained was leveraged towards the design of two additional, larger facilities. As a result of the curtailment of travel, two additional facilities are being planned. This presentation will provide a brief overview of the form and function of these facilities, describe usage experiences, and address the on-going challenges of support, maintenance, and renewal.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Distinguish among several types of technology-enhanced facilities.
  2. Compare user experiences and usage patterns in different facilities to identify required adjustments and determine best practices for future projects.
  3. Assess the costs of support, maintenance, and renewal of technology-enhanced facilities for comprehensive budgeting purposes.
  4. Identify and apply lessons learned in order to effectively leverage resources in future projects.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Information Technology, Facility Type Distance Conferencing

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C017)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN074) Bodies in Motion—Brains in Motion
Presented by: Dieter Breithecker, Head of the Federal Working Group on Posture and Exercise, Federal Working Group on the Development of Posture and Exercise

Adequate movement, even while seated, promotes both physical health and academic progress. Students forced to remain still in a physically static environment become more uncomfortable, more tired, and less productive. In fact, the number of students who develop sitting-related musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders continues to increase. Research has shown that giving students increased opportunities to move while seated triggers increased levels of attention and concentration during test taking. This presentation will show how this can be achieved.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Design facilities that promote ergonomic health of the students.
  2. Evaluate the importance of ergonomics in educational environments and its impact on students' academics and well-being.
  3. Promote health by accepting the body's intrinsic need for movement.
  4. Identify basic problems with physically static learning environments.

TAGS: Student Learning, Theory And Research

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN181) Culture Shock: Managing Change in the Land of Academia
Presented by: Terry M. Brown, Provost & Vice President for Academic Affairs, SUNY at Fredonia; Kristen Hendrickson, Director, Planning, Research & Policy Analysis, Illinois State University; Lisa Wheeler, Vice President, Student Affairs, Normandale Community College

It has been said that "Culture eats strategy for lunch." Well-designed and well-intentioned strategic plans are gobbled up and spit out by a university culture that has no appetite for change. Organizational culture can facilitate as well as impede the ability to pursue strategic actions. An understanding of the foundational concepts of organizational culture, especially the culture of the university, can guide successful change. Using the University of Wisconsin-River Falls as a case study, this session will illustrate intentional strategies for managing institutional change within the confines of academic culture.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Analyze the role of organizational culture in facilitating or impeding strategic action and change.
  2. Understand the challenges intrinsic to changing organizational culture.
  3. Explore the iterative nature of implementation of new strategies and changes in organizational culture.
  4. Discover applications of concepts relevant to specific institutional contexts.

TAGS: Large Public Comprehensive, Change Management, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN244) Help! My Building Doesn't Have a Cavity: Re-cladding Solutions for Energy Inefficient Existing Buildings
Presented by: Katherine Bozoian, President, Bozoian Group Architects, LLC; Julia Oberheu Tritschler, Associate, Bozoian Group Architects, LLC; Keith Quick, Larson Engineering, Inc.

Colleges and universities have a large variety of building stock. Some were built at a time when there was little regard for energy consumption or knowledge of best practices for moisture control. Schools must provide desirable and healthy housing and academic facilities to attract students. When resources are tight and conservation is paramount, re-cladding can preserve the value of existing structures while overhauling their performance and aesthetics and extending their lives to the end of the century.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify performance problems in masonry buildings that were built without a cavity.
  2. Analyze benefits and pitfalls in designing re-cladding.
  3. Discuss benefits and pitfalls of materials available for re-cladding.
  4. Discover potential construction approaches for re-cladding.

TAGS: Sustainability, Student Retention, Renovation, Facility Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (45C244)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN007) Home, Classroom, Community: Creating a Comprehensive College House Residential Program
Presented by: Daniel Kelley, Partner, MGA Partners; Kent Trachte, Dean of the College, Franklin and Marshall College

In 2003, Franklin and Marshall College made a commitment to their liberal arts mission by adopting a comprehensive College House Residential Program for their 2000 undergraduate students. The purpose was to create an experience that would join life outside the classroom with the essential intellectual and community values that guide the two-hundred-year-old college. Learn about the process to initiate and develop the program, as well as the creation of a masterplan of renovations, additions, and new buildings to support it.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Define the primary components of a college house and how they can be integrated into a comprehensive residential program.
  2. Analyze existing residential facilities to determine their potential for renovating and adding spaces that support a college house program.
  3. Describe how a consistent architectural language can articulate a new institutional objective and reconcile historic campus character issues.
  4. Organize a phased transition of residential living that is coordinated with capital planning, donor opportunities, and institutional capabilities.

TAGS: Small Private Liberal Arts, Renovation, Student Learning, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C007)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN235) Integrating Academic, Facilities and Community Needs at BCTC's New Campus
Presented by: Augusta A. Julian, President, CEO, Bluegrass Community and Technical College; Krisan Osterby, Senior Campus Planner, Perkins+Will; Laurence A. Page, Senior Academic Planner, Perkins+Will

The Bluegrass Community and Technical College Master Plan consolidated programs from three existing campuses, while redeveloping the oldest continuing psychiatric hospital campus in America. Located in a distressed neighborhood, the project integrated academics, operations, sustainability, historic preservation, and community needs. Focusing on 48 acres adjacent to downtown Lexington, the planning team collaborated with KCTCS, Finance Cabinet, faculty, staff, city, and historical society representatives to create a mixed use campus vision for 10,000 students that links institutional and community priorities.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover the correlation between academics, facilities and community plans.
  2. Create a process to align academic goals with facilities.
  3. Integrate community heritage, community needs, and the campus vision.
  4. Develop a protocol for phasing a consolidated campus.

TAGS: Community College, Historic Preservation, Master Planning, Town/Gown, Sustainability

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C235)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Production


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN207) Managing Space as a Campus Resource
Presented by: Ira Fink, President, Ira Fink and Associates, Inc.

Space is a valuable campus resource. Too little space hampers the ability to accomplish a unit's objectives; too much space wastes institutional assets. Creating an equilibrium balance of space, between too little and too much, requires managing space on a campus. Explore new methods that campuses across the US are now using to project space needs, measure the amount, distribution, and use of space, and allocate space equitably among academic, administrative, and support units.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss the newest tools being used for campus space analysis and management.
  2. Identify key skills in space management including the ability to communicate, process information, synthesize, conclude, and pay attention to detail.
  3. Project space needs by measuring the amount, distribution, and use of space.
  4. Allocate space equitably among academic, administrative, and support units.

TAGS: Space Management, Space Utilization, Performance Measures

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C207)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 12, 2010, 2:00 PM–3:00 PM
(CN067) Revolutionizing Learning in the STEM Disciplines
Presented by: Geoffrey Lisle, Principal, BSA LifeStructures Inc.; Gabriela Weaver, Director Discovery Learning Center, Purdue University-Main Campus

At Purdue University's Discovery Learning Center, researchers are encouraged to collaboratively explore ways to not only meet students' changing needs, but also to help them thrive in academic environments. In this session, a post-occupancy evaluation of the Discovery Learning Center will focus on the facility's unique educational practices and innovative learning environments. Projects within the facility will explore novel technologies and pedagogies designed to enhance learning at all levels.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Analyze how flexibility and collaboration are being integrated into the built environment in order to promote the adaptability of students' education.
  2. Explore the research goals established at the Discovery Learning Research Center and how this has driven the intended outcomes of the facility.
  3. Examine the ongoing development of interactive learning technologies.
  4. Discuss how the Discovery Learning Research Center is fostering collaborations with other centers within the STEM disciplines (science, technology, engineering and math).

TAGS: Large Public Research, Learning Space Design, Student Learning, Facility Type Science

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (45C067)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN028) Cultural Competency for Educational Leaders
Presented by: Mun Wah Lee, Founder, StirFry Seminars & Consulting

As communities, schools, and workforces become increasingly diverse, cultural competency and the elimination of cultural and personal bias become correspondingly important issues. What are some of the new skills and perspectives needed to meet the challenges of a more diverse population? Through personal stories, group exercises, and films, participants will learn that cultural competency requires awareness of cultural differences, cross-cultural communication skills, community development expertise, and an understanding of social issues and contexts.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explore ways to create a sense of community when confronted by a diverse population.
  2. Master the communication and facilitation skills required to mediate conflicts that are cultural in nature.
  3. Acquire the ability to ask meaningful and intimate questions of individuals from diverse cultures.
  4. Recognize how to listen and respond to personal experiences from a cultural perspective.

TAGS: Diversity, Change Management, Student Retention, Faculty Recruitment, Faculty Retention, Student Recruitment

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN254) Friending Gr8 Ldrz: Leveraging Social Media on Campus
Presented by: Melissa Martyr-Wagner, Assistant Director, Academic Technology Services, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities; Kim Milford, Special Assistant to the CIO, Indiana University

Social networking presents new ways to enhance staff development and meet organizational goals. Social networking tools, already in widespread use, create virtual communities and link people and ideas across regions and time in an interactive, participative way. Tech-savvy organizations can reap the benefit of these collaborations without investing in significant infrastructure. What social networking trends exist? What challenges should be considered? We explore how leaders can thoughtfully leverage social networking to enhance collaborations, manage change, and lead organizations.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Express one's own understanding and definition of social media.
  2. Apply social media concepts to leadership development practices.
  3. After seeing examples, be able to identify tools that can be used in staff development, marketing, or other aspects of university and college operations.
  4. Discover new trends in social media and it's applications.

 

TAGS: Information Technology, Student Learning

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Communications


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN096) Hey! Where Do You Learn Best? (Student Video Contest Winners Share Their Stories!)
Presented by: Jeff A. Vredevoogd, Director, Herman Miller Education, Herman Miller, Inc.

Learning can take place anywhere. This session shares the result of a student video contest that was designed to give students a voice, inviting them to share with us their favorite learning space and explain why it makes a difference. The contest, titled "Where do you learn best?" encouraged students to document areas on or off campus that best support their learning. This session will focus on the top contest submissions, presented by the student winners.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover key factors driving learning space effectiveness, from the viewpoint of today's student.
  2. Recognize the influence that students can have on shaping effective learning spaces.
  3. Discover a process you can use to capture similar responses from your own campus.
  4. Discuss the rapidly changing needs of students and how higher education facilities can respond to those needs.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Student Learning, Student Recruitment, Student Retention

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C096)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Communications


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN246) Poly Canyon Village: Integrated Project Delivery Brings Sustainability Home
Presented by: F. Robert Hood, Senior Vice President, Clark Construction Group, LLC; Edwin Ray Kimsey, President, Niles Bolton Associates; Robert E. Kitamura, Staff Emeritus, Facilities Planning and Capital Projects, California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo

In 2005, California Polytechnic State University requested proposals for the state's largest student housing project. Originally developer-financed, the project was repositioned as design-build. Working together, the University and the Design/Build team, comprised of over 30 professional entities, creatively met the proposed budget while exceeding the proposal commitment of LEED certification, achieving LEED Gold. In 2009, Poly Canyon Village welcomed students to a 2,670 bed, 1.4 million gsf, sustainable, adaptable environment. Learn how the project team met current market expectations, maximized the budget, and brought the best green building practices to campus housing.

 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Utilize the diverse resources of the project team and the University to creatively solve the challenges of design/construction through design-build delivery.
  2. Discuss effective, flexible management tools for mega-projects.
  3. Define approaches and analyze the risk to multi-year, phased, construction projects.
  4. Utilize sustainability to enhance project environments and overcome severe environmental issues.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Student Residences, Sustainability, Facility Type Student Residences, Design/Build

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.5 units (45C246)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Production


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN038) Putting the Strategic Plan Into Action: The Operational Plan
Presented by: Jack P. Calareso, President, Anna Maria College; Andrew O. Klein, Vice President, Student Success | Dean of Rentention, Anna Maria College

Most institutions are able to develop a strategic plan. But the implementation of the strategic plan will only occur if it is operationalized through a clear identification of outcomes, accountabilities, financial implications, timelines, and assessment. At multiple institutions, the presenters have developed a process and a system to translate strategic plans into dynamic operational plans that drive performance objectives and assessment measures for the entire institution. The process and samples of operational planning will be shared in this case study.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe the connection between strategic and operational planning.
  2. Develop action steps which are connected to strategic goals and explicit for each constituency.
  3. Outline quantifiable and reportable assessment measures for each action step. 
  4. Create a clear, realistic timeline for implementation of each action step.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Strategic Implementation/Execution, Operational Planning, Performance Measures

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C038)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN043) Realizing The Impossible Dream: Developer-Led; Client Satisfaction; Architectural Excellence
Presented by: Alan Chimacoff, Principal, ikon.5 architects; Michael Coakley, Associate Vice President, Educational Outreach and Student Services (Retired), Arizona State University; Mark R. Dee, Executive Vice President, DWL Architects+Planners, Inc.; Mark Jacobs, Dean, Barrett Honors College, Arizona State University; Jason Wills, Senior Vice President, American Campus Communities

Developer-led and financed projects enable universities to achieve projects they otherwise could not afford--sometimes losing the intense client-architect interactions essential for architectural excellence. A process led and financed by the developer, American Campus Communities, equally involved Arizona State University's Barrett Honors College dean, administration, faculty, student leadership, ASU residential life, and associated architects. This unique partnership to create a seven-building, multi-courtyard campus met the college's academic and social mission, and achieved architectural excellence, all within a developer budget.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Identify and define the historically contradictory values and goals in a complex project with an   unconventional development process.
2.  Resolve divergent understandings, conflicts, and tensions through transparency and objective communication among stakeholders.
3.  Create an irreducible, "pre-value-engineered" cost model to ensure budget-worthiness.
4.  Develop a process, content, and cost roadmap for future similar efforts.
 

TAGS: Large Public Research, Partnerships, Student Learning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C043)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Finance


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN252) SCUP Excellence in Planning, SCUP Excellence in Landscape Architecture, and SCUP/AIA-CAE Excellence in Architecture Awards
Presented by: Carl Elefante, Principal & Director of Sustainability, Quinn Evans Architects; Thomas F. Fortier, Regional Director, Science + Technology, HOK; Jennifer Jones, Principal, Carol R. Johnson Associates Inc

Awards programs are a way to not only recognize and applaud those individuals and organizations whose achievements exemplify excellence, but also to provide learning opportunities for everyone whose lives and passions involve higher education. The 2010 jurors will talk about their observations and elements from this year's entries during the first 60 minutes. They will talk about the winning entries and hand out certificates during the last 30 minutes.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover how projects contribute to a sense of place on campus.
  2. Recognize innovations in planning, architecture, and landscape architecture.
  3. Discuss how the effective use of materials and aesthetic choices demonstrate the highest quality of design.
  4. Consider opportunities to apply new innovations on your own campus.

TAGS: Facility Design, Open Spaces

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C252)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN250) Survival and Better - Resourcing and Marketing Your Strategies in Today's World
Presented by: Raymond M. Haas, Professor Emeritus, University of Virginia-Main Campus

Participants will discover solutions on this topic by comparing and combining their current experiences with both current and timeless literature. The facilitator will provide the literature in the form of a set of readings from a variety of disciplines and the participants (and the facilitator) will provide the experiences. There will be a brief presentation to set the stage, some leading questions, and the rest and vast majority will be a structured exchange of insights, ideas, and practical suggestions among experienced professionals. The goal is to provide an intellectual experience, but with an emphasis on the practical application of what's discussed. (For advanced planners and administrators with 3+ years of experience - first 50 people) 

 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify techniques employed by organizations to resource their strategies when facing adversity in their external environment.
  2. Identify techniques employed by organizations to market their strategies when facing adversity in their external environment.
  3. Compare and contrast experiences and current and timeless literature as it pertains to resourcing and marketing institutional strategies during difficult times.
  4. Discuss at least three resourcing strategies and/or marketing techniques that can be applied to your home institution. 

TAGS: Theory And Research In Planning, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C250)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN139) Sustainable Campus as Pedagogy: Opportunities For Enhancing the Curriculum
Presented by: Kathy Webb Achelpohl, Principal, BNIM Architects; Stephen A. McDowell, Principal, BNIM Architects; Daniel E. Sniff, Associate Vice President for Facilities Planning, University of Georgia; Steven Varelmann, College Architect, Oberlin College

The University of Georgia Odum School of Ecology and the Oberlin College Sustainable Arts District are two recent projects with high goals for environmental sustainability and energy use reduction. The design of these campuses and their built environments provide teaching and learning tools in both the sciences and arts. These two case studies demonstrate how to  extend the efficacy of construction funds by conceiving facilities that go beyond functionality to active engagement of the curriculum.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify the roles that physical plant can play in the curriculum.
  2. Maintain flexibility while creating specific learning opportunities.
  3. Link sustainable design with curriculum in the sciences and the arts.
  4. Debate the role that sustainable, teaching buildings might play in the larger campus and community context.

TAGS: Sustainability, Learning Space Design, Small Private Liberal Arts, Large Public Research, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.5 units (45C139)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Communications


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN098) The Power of Community and Place—Medical Education in West Michigan
Presented by: Eric DeLong, Deputy City Manager, City of Grand Rapids; Jeffrey W. Dwyer, Associate Dean for Research, Michigan State University; Michael C. Lauber, President, Ellenzweig; Elizabeth Lawrence, Assistant Dean Capital and Strategic Planning, Michigan State University; Richard J. Temple, Senior Project Advisor, Smith Group Inc.

In a state with the highest unemployment in the nation, with limited state funding support, Michigan State University created a new center for medical education and research. This is the multi-year story of building community, community partnerships, creativity, and project delivery that made this new center possible. The story will be told by a diverse group of panelists, from community leader to research dean, academic administrator to architect—each of whom was instrumental in creating and realizing the vision.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Analyze the role of long-term partnerships and investment in the delivery and funding of a new medical education center for a state university.
  2. Use a case study to observe theories of community put into practice.
  3. Identify the role of place as a catalyst, driving decisions that go beyond its walls.
  4. Explore the planning, design and delivery of a new medical school and the impact of research space requirements on its design.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Facility Type Health, Partnerships, Town/Gown, Resource/Budgeting

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C098)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 12, 2010, 3:15 PM–4:45 PM
(CN169) Vision, Beauty and Fun: The Success of Embracing Collaborative Planning
Presented by: Trina Mace Learned, Director, Operations for Facilities Management & Planning, Wellesley College; Barry Svigals, Managing Partner, Svigals + Partners, LLP

The vision and beauty of a plan is achieved through the joy of a collaborative process. This begins with the ability to respect what is, develop a shared understanding of the institution's vision and make decisions that serve both human activity and the human spirit leading to an embrace that everything is related in a campus "ecology." This mini-workshop explores plans that mirror these qualities, and teaches techniques that empower all levels of leadership to achieve joyful, fun and durable collaborative planning. Proceedings may be viewed here: http://prezi.com/oftl6cw6h9zp/scup-svigals-final-download-this-one/.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Develop a shared assessment of current environment(s) and challenges for institutional planning.
  2. Apply a flexible framework for assessing and understanding your own institutional blind spots.
  3. Use specific strategies to empower leadership at all organizational levels.
  4. Find the fun in planning and the joy in successful collaboration.

TAGS: Master Planning, Change, Open Space

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C169)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Communications


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN247) "Rapid Conceptualization" Path to Scientific Funding...
Presented by: Rockford Denny, Senior Planner, URS Corporation; Kenneth Dietz, Architect & Director, University of Louisville; Chris E. Whitney, Architect, RLF Architects

Responding to this years ARRA grant funding opportunity necessitated using every approach of "rapid conceptualization" available: defining, illustrating, and packaging applications for projects of significant complexity. Researchers, campus planners, architects and engineers worked in concert to complete applications within as little as eight weeks. We will present three stories from the aspect of the university architect, office of the Dean, and the architects/engineers. Each presenter will give their account of the roles and activities.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explore the use of "Rapid Conceptualization" to accelerate definition and consensus of core needs for grant application submittals.
  2. Identify six basic elements of the documentation of ideas.
  3. Balance facilities needs in renovation with grant expectations.
  4. Create jobs and discover other underlying untold requirements. 

 

TAGS: Large Public Research, Funding, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C247)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Production


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN249) Achieving Strategic Alignment
Presented by: Michael Bequette, Vice President, Teaching & Learning, Rochester Community and Technical College; Marilyn Hansmann, Vice President, Finance & Facilities, Rochester Community and Technical College; Dave Weber, Chief, Strategic Operations, Rochester Community and Technical College

The pressure to be accountable and demonstrate organizational performance and student success continues to increase. To meet this challenge, institutions need to develop new approaches that align strategies, resources, people, and measures with strategic goals. Learn how Rochester Community and Technical College (MN) has created an integrated planning and accountability system linking college, division, and academic and nonacademic dashboards to assess and track performance supporting continuous improvement and innovation.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover tips to align strategy, resources, people, and processes at the College, division, and departmental levels.
  2. Discover a planning tool to draw all stakeholders into change and continuous improvement efforts.
  3. Acquire new approaches to meet accountability requirements of internal and external stakeholders.
  4. Systematize planning, continuous improvement, innovation and change efforts. 

TAGS: Community College, Performance Measures, Change, Integrated Planning, Assessment

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C249)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN009) Campus Heritage Builders
Presented by: Richard Bumstead, Associate Director for Campus Environment, University of Chicago; Thomas G. Contos, University Architect, Washington and Lee University; Joan Goodrich, Vice President, Planning & Special Programs, Bennington College; Mark J. Maves, Principal, Learning & Discovery; Sal D. Rinella

This session will present SCUP's Getty Foundation-funded Campus Heritage project, its purpose, and its findings of value to campus planners. Presenters will showcase model projects from SCUP's campus heritage website. Drawing from grant recipients' experiences, the panel will include lessons learned from projects of various types, including landscape preservation planning, integration of heritage plans with master plans, documentation methodologies, policy, and maintenance manuals, and engaging the campus, its communities and decision-makers.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Integrate heritage planning with master planning.
  2. Unite operations and administration awareness with preservation objectives (maintenance manuals, policies and procedures).
  3. Engage campus communities, neighbors, and decision-makers as advocates.
  4. Identify expertise for assistance in heritage planning.

TAGS: Historic Preservation, Master Planning, Open Space Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C009)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN091) Integrated Project Delivery—A Catalyst for Collaboration/Planning
Presented by: George Austin, Project Manager, Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation; Peter J. Heaslett, Architectural Engineer, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Jeff Madden, General Manager, Mortenson Construction; Jeff Olson, Principal, Fentress Architects

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Virtual Design Construction (VDC) are the buzz of the A/E/C industry. This presentation will explore IPD including how it is implemented, contract structures, team arrangements, and processes. The UW-Madison Wisconsin Institute for Discovery | Morgridge Institute for Research (WID|MIR) and University of CO Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus Research II will serve as case studies for an exploration of the challenges and benefits of implementing IPD on projects. In addition, the role of VDC in facilitating the IPD process will be presented in detail.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Define Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) including the various contract options available, and compare IPD to traditional delivery methods.
  2. Identify the benefits and challenges of IPD implementation. 
  3. Discuss the role of Virtual Design & Construction (VDC) in IPD.
  4. Evaluate how different delivery methods fit different projects.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Facility Type Science, Facility Type Research, Theory And Research, Project Management, Facility Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C091)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN084) Multi-Faith Religious Space: The Solution to Diverse Campus Religious Pressures
Presented by: K.P. Hong, Assistant Director for Religious and Spiritual Life and Protestant Chaplain, Macalester College; Karla S. Johnson, Principal, Johnson Roberts Associates Inc.; Peter Laurence, Executive Director, The Education and Transformation Project, Wellesley College; Robert Randolph, Chaplain to the Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Roger Wakeman, Director, Facilities, Phillips Exeter Academy

Has your campus had to face the question of how to provide space or facilities for diverse religious groups such as Muslims, Buddhists, Christians, Jews, etc.? This presentation will identify the space needs and illustrate how five institutions have provided for these diverse needs. Topics will include the juxtaposition of spaces for religions that have histories of conflict, the lack of comprehensive guidelines, the difficulties of finding appropriate plumbing fixtures for different cultural ablution requirements, and the benefits/drawbacks of shared space.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify differences and similarities in the facilities and spaces needed for different religious groups, including cultural differences that exist within the same religions. 
  2. Design appropriate locations and spaces that are a good "fit" for specific religious rituals and practices.
  3. Analyze the trade-offs between "one space fits all" and separate spaces for each religion.
  4. Discuss approaches, trends, and strategies being used to integrate religious facilities into campus life.

TAGS: Facility Type Religious Spaces, Diversity

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C084)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN138) Places for Collaboration: Art Buildings as Models for Collaborative Spaces
Presented by: Jeffrey Mandyck, Associate , Cuningham Group Architecture, Inc.; Steve Richardson, Director of the Arts, Carleton College; Garth Rockcastle, Founding Principal and Profesor of Architecture, MS&R, Ltd

Carleton's academic vision for its proposed Arts Union is "to relocate the arts physically and intellectually in the curriculum... by creating an environment that fosters creativity, critical thinking, collaborative working skills, and cross cultural exploration." The site for this ambitious vision is an off-campus accreted middle school complex dating from 1910, 1934, and 1954. This session will illustrate how nontraditional, unlikely, messy spaces can be an ideal place for creative, cross-disciplinary, and collaborative learning.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Repurpose non collegiate and seemingly unpromising spaces into desirable, creative, and collaborative learning places, as well as exploring the potential and limits of cross-disciplinary building organization.
  2. Examine the sustainable and environmental advantages (and cautions) of reusing nontraditional buildings.
  3. Revise project budgets, schedules, and designs in response to recession.
  4. Discuss the advantages of letting the building shape the program - as opposed to the more typical reverse.

TAGS: Small Private Liberal Arts, Facility Type Arts, Learning Space Design, Preservation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.5 units (45C138)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN202) Planning the Next Generation Library: User-Driven, Technology-Rich, and Resource-Savvy
Presented by: Carolyn Axtman, Associate Director, Architecture, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; H. Clymer Cease, Principal, Pearce Brinkley Cease + Lee Architecture; Craig Dykers, Principal, SNØHETTA; Elliot Felix, Director, brightspot strategy; Susan K. Nutter, Vice Provost and Director of Libraries, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

How can a library sustain growing engineering programs, connect disparate buildings and groups on an emerging campus, house 50% of the university's books and journals, and support a diverse user base in a signature building? To answer this question, NC State worked with Snøhetta, PBC+L, and DEGW in an innovative planning process that resulted in a network of spaces to foster learning, discovery, and interaction; strategies for sharing spaces across groups; and a space-saving Automated Retrieval System (ARS).

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Engage library users and staff in library planning and design.
  2. Balance library user space needs with the storage/retrieval space needs of the physical library collection.
  3. Create and sustain consensus and synergy across groups so that resources can go further as space, technology, and equipment are shared.
  4. Imagine libraries, and indeed campuses, holistically, as networks of spaces that must work together to support learning, discovery, and interaction as a "Learning Landscape."

TAGS: Large Public Comprehensive, Facility Type Library, Facility Type Engineering, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN061) Smart Change: Tools for Strategic Planning and Adaptive Change
Presented by: Linda L. Baer, Senior Consultant, I4Solutions; Judith A. Ramaley, President, Winona State University

As universities and colleges face ever-increasing expectations and demands from many constituencies, it is imperative to find new ways to organize and manage the change process and to promote broad application of "smart" or transformational change principles throughout our institutions. This session will examine how a set of common system-wide strategic directions can articulate effectively and productively with the institutional challenges, priorities and identities of the campuses that make up the Minnesota State College and University System (MnSCU).

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explore the principles of smart change that support a transformative change agenda.
  2. Align system-level strategic directions with direction goals and targets at the campus level.
  3. Assess the president's annual workplan through a dashboard template.
  4. Develop self-organizing and self-sustaining collaborative models that create the capacity for continuous improvement.

 

TAGS: Large Public Research, Higher Education System, Change Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C061)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN037) Stalled, Squeezed, Shelved: Finding Project Momentum in a Wobbly World
Presented by: Pamela Palmer Delphenich, Director, Campus Planning & Design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; David W. Frassinelli, Associate Vice President for Facilities, Fairfield University; Francis X. Hayes, Vice President, Shawmut Design and Construction; Jon C. Jackson, Principal, Bohlin Cywinski Jackson

As a panel of experts who represent a cross-section of planning, design and construction team members, we will present three scenarios that get to the heart of the economic reality of declining resources. Topics will include  declining staff, reduction in pre-established project budgets, and indefinite suspension of projects. Through role playing, attendees will participate as trustees, planners, architects, builders, or facilities managers to solve one of three case studies profiling these and similar current issues.   

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Maintain project momentum through analysis of the forces that jeopardize project execution.
  2. Identify funding sources and new partnerships to ensure construction of needed facilities.
  3. Recognize the patterns of decision making among the members of a team.
  4. Distill data to determine major priorities within a project, thus finding ways to do more with less.

TAGS: Trends, Scenario Planning, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C037)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN242) Survival and Better - Strategy Formulation During Difficult Times
Presented by: Raymond M. Haas, Consultant in Private Practice & Professor Emeritus, University of Virginia

Participants will discover solutions on this topic by comparing and combining their current experiences with both current and timeless literature. The facilitator will provide the literature in the form of a set of readings from a variety of disciplines and the participants (and the facilitator) will provide the experiences. There will be a brief presentation to set the stage, some leading questions, and the rest and vast majority will be a structured exchange of insights, ideas, and practical suggestions among experienced professionals. The goal is to provide an intellectual experience, but with an emphasis on the practical application of what's discussed. (For advanced planners and administrators with 3+ years of experience - first 50 people) 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify strategies that organizations have employed to survive, and perhaps improve, when facing adversity in their external environment.
  2. Identify planning activities that can increase the probability that a planning process will gain organizational support and acceptance during periods of adversity.
  3. Compare and contrast experiences and current and timeless literature as it pertains to institutional strategy formulation during difficult times.
  4. Discuss at least three strategies and/or strategy formulation techniques that can be applied to your home institution.

TAGS: Theory And Research In Planning, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45C242)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(CN006) The Business of Being Boldly Sustainable
Presented by: Peter W. Bardaglio, Senior Fellow, Second Nature

Sustainability isn’t just about doing the right thing; it’s about doing the smart thing. And doing the smart thing as a planner means treating sustainability as a strategic imperative that’s woven throughout your short and long-term plans, rather than as a separate priority. Peter Bardaglio, co-author of Boldly Sustainable: Hope and Opportunity for Higher Education in the Age of Climate Change and former provost at Ithaca College, will explain how such an approach can improve organizational effectiveness, making your institution more resilient and competitive. He will then facilitate a series of exercises you can bring back to your campus to help your colleagues understand what it means to make sustainability central to strategic planning rather than just an afterthought.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Infuse sustainability as a strategic imperative throughout your campus planning process.
  2. Use sustainability to make your institution more resilient and competitive.
  3. Discuss practical methods to integrate sustainability with your campus strategic planning.
  4. Reflect on the opportunities and barriers to making your campus more sustainable.

TAGS: Sustainability, American College And University Presidents Climate Commitment, Acupcc, Stars

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 units (45COO6)AICP CM 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN048) A New Vision for the Core Campus at Clemson University
Presented by: Joe Atkins, Associate Principal, VMDO Architects; David Oakland, Principal, VMDO Architects; Gerald A. Van Der Mey, Director, University Planning & Design, Clemson University

Clemson has set out to fundamentally redevelop its campus core. The presentation focuses on this ambitious transformation. It explores innovative mixed-use planning approaches; assesses bold, but careful, proposals for increased density; reflects campus design principles for social and intellectual interaction, respect for campus culture and history, and commitment to sustainability; and describes how housing, academic, dining, and student life programs can be combined into a dynamic center of campus life for a public school poised to break into the top-twenty.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss the challenges and opportunities encountered when a campus redevelopment is charged with embodying and expressing the values and identity of the campus as a whole.
  2. Discover how planning concepts that place the “landscape first” can establish an effective campus order and provide a range of outdoor spaces to promote interaction on a variety of scales.
  3. Assess unique problems in large, multi-phased projects relative to funding and implementation.
  4. Identify issues related to mixed-use development—including strategic overlaps of traditionally separate campus operations (e.g. housing, academic, dining, and student life).

TAGS: Public Research, Sustainability, Facility Type Student Center, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C048)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN013) Assessing the Internal and External Variables That Contribute to Institutional Risk in Support of a "Risk Scorecard."
Presented by: Robert A. Sevier, Senior Vice President, Strategy, STAMATS Inc

Drawing on literature and client work, we will outline the internal and external variables that contribute to institutional risk in support of the creation of a weighted “Risk Scorecard” as part of a comprehensive situation analysis. In building the scorecard, we will examine such internal variables as leadership, visioning and strategic planning, governance, finance, and discount rate. We will then look at level of competition, differentiation, demography, student recruiting, state support, and donor support. These datasets will be arrayed in a Risk Scorecard.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss understandings of institutional risk.
  2. Identify internal and external risk variables.
  3. Use identified variables to create a Risk Scorecard for your institution.
  4. Develop a Risk Profile as a critical component of overall situation analysis.

TAGS: Risk Management, Budget/Resource Planning, Performance Measures, Organizational Effectiveness

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C013)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN245) BIM's Value in Pre-Design: Use of Information From Programming Through Occupation
Presented by: Bhargav Goswami, Principal, WHR Architects; Gaurav Khadse, Associate, WHR Architects; Susan Lipka, Associate Vice President, Capital Planning & Management, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

BIM (Building Information Modeling) is commonly used to coordinate and document virtual building models, but greater potential exists for carrying information generated during programming and planning through facility management, incorporating information gathered such as strategic decisions, area drivers for space, lease durations, adjacency/spatial relations and user preferences for layout, which benefits facility owners. We will illustrate this innovative application of BIM in the early phases of a project through a nearly complete case-study.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify key information owners and users could incorporate into the BIM model, which would be valuable to manage spaces in multiple campus buildings.
  2. Examine how a dynamic design process with constant changes in space allocations can be managed within a BIM model.
  3. Dissect use of BIM platforms for programming, gaming and stacking.
  4. Describe how initiating BIM in early stages of design can preserve intellectual capital through occupancy and beyond.

TAGS: Building Information Modeling, Performance Measures, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C245)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN257) Campuses That Heal
Presented by: Kristin Raab, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

How can campuses be shaped to positively influence human health, and specifically alleviate stress? Clearly the environment plays an important role in well-being. We often visit special places or landscapes to recharge or get away from our daily troubles. Research supports the idea that certain environments can aid in our recovery from stress and mental exhaustion. Stress not only impacts a student's physical and psychological well-being, it may hurt academic achievement and grades. In a 2007 University of Minnesota Boynton Health survey, 70% of students reported being stressed, and of those who were stressed, 33% said that stress was impacting their academic performance. SCUP Past President Clint Hewitt's former landscape architecture student explores research on healing/mental restoration and the environment and its application to campus design.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Assess the importance of healing environments on campuses.
  2. Discuss theories of how healing environments work.
  3. Identify qualities of healing environments.
  4. Demonstrate the application of healing qualities to a campus site. 

TAGS: Campus Open Space And Health, Campus Design And Health, Student Retention

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (45C275)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN182) Creating a Community College for the District of Columbia
Presented by: Jonathan Gueverra, Chief Executive Officer, University of the District of Columbia; John M. Hart, Principal, Director of Planning, The Onyx Group; Daniel K. Paulien, President, Paulien & Associates, Inc.

The University of the District of Columbia has provided both two year and four year programs. A new UDC administration decided to create a separate community college within the UDC system. The new community college CEO will describe the planning taking place to create the two year college. The architectural and planning consultants to UDC and CCDC will describe the very accelerated process that is being undertaken to quantify the districtwide needs and evaluate the first CCDC site location.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Identify issues affecting academic mix for a new community college.
  2. Determine faculty and administrative staffing needs for a new institution.
  3. Organize macro space needs by major space category.
  4. Resolve issues impacting conversion of an abandoned school site to a community college headquarters.

TAGS: Community College, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C182)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Production


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN011) Hardwiring Flexibility into a Strategic Plan’s Implementation: Strategies, Risks, and Rewards
Presented by: Jo Allen, President, Meredith College; Joseph J. Baker, Senior Vice President, Administration & Finance, Widener University-Main Campus

A university's strategic plan sets the direction of the institution in accordance with its mission and vision, provided the people, culture, and processes attend to its directives. The reality, however, is that institutions and plans need some flexibility due to unknowable obstacles, just as much as they need structure and continuity to advance the implementation and reassure stakeholders. We'll describe Widener University's use of well-planned transitional phases that have allowed us to engage different stakeholders, adjust expectations, recommit to our ultimate goals, and celebrate our successes in our 10-year strategic plan.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Use plan flexibility to create participant buy-in. 
  2. Preserve plan structure and accountability, even in the face of the plan's transitions. 
  3. Use specific mechanisms to design transitions in plan content, people involved, timelines, accountability, and resources needed.
  4. Explore alternative and adaptive strategies for managing transitions, flexibility, and accountability.

TAGS: Private University, Strategic Planning, Organizational Effectiveness

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN179) Legacy System to Integrated Information System in Record Time!
Presented by: Michael F. McGoff, Senior Vice Provost, SUNY at Binghamton; James R. Van Voorst, Vice President, Administration, SUNY at Binghamton

There are many reasons to replace a legacy computer system with an integrated student information system, but the hurdles can be substantial. Resistance from IT staff invested in the legacy system they built, in addition to resistance from faculty and other staff who do not want to change from the familiar to the unfamiliar can present obstacles which are difficult to surmount. Learn how one university focused hundreds of stakeholders to move from a 45-year-old legacy system to a modern, integrated student information system through a clear vision, open and frank communication, and a strong commitment to temporarily forego some bells and whistles in favor of a working enterprise-wide solution in a relatively short period of time.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover how a fully operational student information system can become accepted university-wide as an attainable objective.
  2. Explore how a clear vision with open and frank communication from the highest levels reduces resistance to change, and builds focus toward a common goal.
  3. Discover how appropriately prepared user-groups can turn a department into a mini-institutional research office and make it more self-sufficient.
  4. Observe that mistakes can eventually be overcome by empowering the functional designers to solve issues collectively.

TAGS: Large Public Comprehensive, Information Technology, Change Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN191) Maximizing Land Utilization Through Creative Campus Planning and Development
Presented by: Patrick Brawley, Site Designer, SmithGroupJJR; Wayne Magdziarz, Vice President, Capital Planning & Chief of Staff, Loyola University Chicago; Paul J. Wiese, Vice President, SmithGroupJJR

Funding for campus enhancement will continue to be a challenge in this economy. Discover how creative real estate and campus planning can unlock resources to maximize the campus experience when addressing operational, infrastructure, and capital initiatives. Best management practices will be identified to assist institutions in identifying and implementing sustainable enhancement opportunities on their own campuses.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover best management practices for identifying existing resources on campus.
  2. Examine the concept of vertical campus enhancements that utilize less land and resources than horizontal development.
  3. Discuss town gown partnerships as a means to enriching the campus experience.
  4. Unlock real estate values in order to make unproductive assets contribute to your core business.

TAGS: Town/Gown, Real Estate, Resource Planning, Partnerships, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C191)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN056) Multidisciplinary Learning, Sustainable Environments and Architectural Design = Positive Educational Experience
Presented by: Joseph Coriaty, Partner, Frederick Fisher & Partners; Peter Schroder, Professor, Computer Science and Applied & Computational Mathematics, California Institute of Technology; John Zinner, Principal, Zinner Consultants

Perspectives from education, sustainability, and design will demonstrate ways in which multidisciplinary learning and domestically-formatted learning environments may deinstitutionalize the educational process and promote sharing amongst faculty members and their associated research groups. Incorporating sustainable classroom environments and pursuing an open and interactive design process for new classroom buildings promotes a creative, operationally-efficient, and more positive learning/teaching experience. The merit of these methods as implemented on recent projects will be presented and analyzed.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Demonstrate how multi-disciplinary learning and deinstitutionalized learning environments improve the educational process.
  2. Illustrate how specific sustainable features such as abundant daylight, view corridors, creature comforts, and acoustics can improve the classroom experience.
  3. Evaluate the promotion of educational transparency through the collaborative educational experience from the perspective of curriculum, environment and facility.
  4. Identify the current needs of multi-use learning environments in order to control operational flexibility and efficiency.

TAGS: Private Research, Facility Type Science, Learning Space Design, Research Space Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (45C056)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN253) Presentation by the 2010 Excellence in Institutional Innovation and Integration Award Recipient - The Nanaimo Campus Master Plan: Planning a Sustainable Campus Through Integrated Strategies
Presented by: Albert T Bicol, Partner, Cobalt Engineering Ltd; Ric Kelm, Executive Director, Infrastructure & Ancillary Services, Vancouver Island University; Mark Mehrer, Principal, Resource Planning Group Inc; Roger du Toit, Partner, DTAH

The Nanaimo Campus Master Plan is guiding Vancouver Island University in its successful emergence as a national leader in education, community development and environmental practices. Crafting a superior teaching and learning environment through holistic campus development is the result of a multifaceted consultative process that has its roots in deliberate and thorough pre-planning. How this planning can ensure the development of a functionally synergistic and operationally efficient campus will be discussed.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Analyze how the integrated planning process addresses the quadruple bottom line -- cultural, economic, environmental, and social factors.
  2. Demonstrate how a well-defined framework facilitates the process of multiple, overlapping consultation with local and regional constituents.
  3. Explore emerging social, demographic, technological and environmental conditions and trends in order to create a flexible, open-ended plan.
  4. Recognize the positive impact of encouraging and promoting constructive discussion between constituents in order to create a responsive, proactive institution.
  5. Understand how strategy-driven campus organization can transform a relatively disjointed campus layout into one which encourages interdisciplinary connection, sustainable plant and a valued sense of place.

 

TAGS: Innovation, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C253)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(CN184) Res Life Must Go On
Presented by: Ted Curtis, Vice President for Capital Planning and Management, University of Akron Main Campus; Judith Harvey, Senior Vice President, George K. Baum & Company; Douglas Hyde, Director, College & University Design, Douglas Hyde Design; Jeffrey Schimmel, President, Mantra. LLP

Given the current economic climate and steady increase in student enrollment, how can colleges and universities keep pace with the demands of their residential life programs? What creative financial models, trends and partnerships are emerging? How can institutions use these models to ensure they respond appropriately and make the most of endowment dollars? What are the risks and benefits to a new construct in residence life planning and how can institutions respond quickly to the pressing needs of their constituents?

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss current challenges being experienced by colleges and universities, and their Residential Life programs.
  2. Identify inventive and creative architect/client/developer initiatives that are emerging.
  3. Use creative processes and partnerships to apply these new initiatives and financial models on your campus.
  4. Finance and build student housing that will support the academic and financial missions of the institution.

TAGS: Public Research, Student Residences, Budget/Finance, Student Services

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C184)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN233) Blurring the Boundaries: University High School of Science and Engineering
Presented by: Alan Hadad, Associate Vice President and Dean of Magnet Schools, University of Hartford; James E. LaPosta, Principal, Chief Architectural Officer, JCJ Architecture
The development of the University High School of Science and Engineering will be traced from its planning grant in 2003 through the opening of its permanent facility in 2009 on the main campus of the University of Hartford. This session will explore the challenges, opportunities and benefits of developing a public magnet high school in partnership with a private university, urban and suburban school districts, state agencies and a private foundation.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explore the process of joint school district / university planning.
  2. Investigate the ways that university objectives were preserved through the varied phases of concept and program development, design, value management, and implementation.
  3. Examine the methods used to supplement a STEM high school curriculum with college faculty and resources.
  4. Identify the various funding strategies used to develop this project.

TAGS: Private 4 Year, Town/Gown, Facility Type Science/Engineering, Partnerships

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C233)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Production


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN128) Creating a 180-degree Turnaround In User Satisfaction With Home-Grown Software
Presented by: Michael H. Hites, Senior Associate Vice President of AITS and CIO, The University of Illinois

Participating in large IT projects is similar to participating in large capital projects, and their success directly impacts an organization's goals. From designing the software to “going live” with a new system, the organization is invested in the outcome. The University of Illinois created a new web-based front end for HR, processing 15,000 transactions monthly using hundreds of complex business rules with unprecedented user satisfaction. This intense, challenging, and often provoking multi-campus collaboration is a model for effectively changing business processes.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Differentiate between good and bad IT implementation processes and know when to intervene with a project that is failing to make progress.
  2. Determine the metrics and measures that make a successful IT project.
  3. Ensure active participation in producing software and services that meet the organization's needs.
  4. Compare techniques for widespread collaboration that still results in effective decision-making and progress.

TAGS: Higher Education System, Information Technology, Administrative Systems, Performance Measures

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN101) Embracing Continuity and Change: Penn State Brandywine's Planning Approach
Presented by: Sophia T. Wisniewska, Chancellor, Pennsylvania State University-Brandywine; Lisa Yerges, Director, Business Services, Pennsylvania State University-Brandywine

The key to thriving as a campus - to survival and success - depends on finding the appropriate mix of continuity and change, of tradition and innovation. Penn State Brandywine has created a unified vision for both short and long-term goals, with scenarios that allow for unforeseen environmental changes. This planning approach takes into account a broad base of internal and external stakeholders, tests existing assumptions, produces cohesive themes and implementation strategies, and monitors ongoing activity in support of identified goals.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Energize planning, community support, and even fundraising by bringing a wide array of stakeholders into your strategic planning process. 
  2. Develop and implement a holistic planning approach to create a unified vision, set goals, aid financial support, and gain a competitive edge.
  3. Use planning tools and exercises, such as learning journeys, assumption testing, and global mind mapping to develop a shared vision and key goals.
  4. Identify the challenges of planning in times of uncertainty and discover how to introduce scenario forecasting into the planning process.

TAGS: Large Public Comprehensive, Integrated Planning, Scenario Planning, Change Management, Academic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C101)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN154) Funding Higher Education Facility Preservation: A Streamlined Comparative Condition Framework for All State Facilities
Presented by: Karen Barrett, Senior Policy & Information Technology Consultant, Washington Department of Information Services; Eric G. Meng, Principal Architect, MENG Analysis

This session presents a streamlined method for analyzing and comparing the conditions of all state higher education facilities in order to prioritize funding for facility preservation and renewal. The legislature desired a better picture of the state's large facility inventory, but could not afford a condition study that relied on traditional survey methods. Instead, they developed a streamlined method that gathers the condition data from the various institutions then translates it to a common, comparative, qualitative-rating, and then statistically projects the backlog of maintenance and repair project costs. Since its development in 2002, the state has renewed this comparative framework database four times, using the information for budget decisions at both the state and the institutional levels. This session will describe the unique methodology for the collecting and projecting of facility needs at a fraction of the cost of traditional methods. It will also discuss how the legislature, the govenor's budget process, and the institutions have since been able to use this information for planning and funding capitol projects.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover an alternative, more efficient method to gather and analyze statewide facility condition information.
  2. Identify national standards and methods for evaluating facility conditions.
  3. Prepare budget projections based on streamlined comparative statistical information.
  4. Save costs and time in gathering facility information for large inventories at either the institutional or statewide level.

TAGS: State System, Performance Measures, Operational Planning, Preservation, Finance/Funding

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C154)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN136) Funding the Future: Making the Most of Federal Grants
Presented by: Mark C. Wells, Assistant Dean, Facilities, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Lean economic times require aggressive pursuit of federal funding. The initial phase of the $500 million Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research project, an interdisciplinary, medical science facility, was supported by federal grants of $17 million. With a focus on grant writing and administration, this session offers inside perspectives on the challenges and opportunities of bringing together interdisciplinary research and federal funds at a major university, and integrating leadership across corporate, state, academic, and administrative lines.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Organize and lead a successful federal facilities grant application team.
  2. Analyze sample data from successful federal facilities grant awards.
  3. Identify opportunities available through the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009."
  4. Discuss strategies and pitfalls for successful awards.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Facility Type Research, Partnerships, Finance/Funding, Capital Projects

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C136)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN240) How Do Smart Meters Make a University More Intelligent
Presented by: James Morrison, Director, Strategic Planning & Campus Sustainability, University of Mississippi; Darren Raybourn, Vice President, Sales, SmartSynch, Inc.; Larry Sparks, Vice Chancellor, Administration & Finance, University of Mississippi

The University of Mississippi's (UM) enhanced energy management plan and recent deployment of smart grid technology has enabled the university to monitor energy consumption real-time, track building power performance over time, and archive data for future analysis and planning. Additionally, UM is utilizing social networking tools to engage students, staff, and faculty in a collective effort to reduce the campus' power consumption levels. Obtain the details on the overall energy management project, including the technology selection and implementation process, early success stories, challenges, and long-term goals and expectations.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss the efforts and resources required to integrate smart meter technology into a campus energy management program.
  2. Distinguish what energy usage data and benchmarks are important to analyze to support financial resource allocation decisions.
  3. Improve your institution's ability to identify opportunities for increased operational efficiencies using real-time energy usage data.
  4. Examine how incentive programs and social networking tools such as Facebook, Twitter, and RSS feed to engage a university community in lower its carbon footprint.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Sustainability, Information Technology, Change

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (45C240)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN068) Implementing Academic Analytics: Promise and Performance
Presented by: Dean E. Carlson, Capital Planner, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities; J.P. Hagerty, Assistant to the Vice President, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities; Robert B. Kvavik, Professor, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

Academic analytics connect strategic management, metrics and measurement, business processes, quality improvement, and decision support using business intelligence methodologies and tools for collection, integration, and analysis of information. The session describes steps taken to implement academic analytics at the University of Minnesota, challenges to their acceptance and use, and recommendations for successful implementation.  

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Advance planning and decision support by using Academic Analytics.
  2. Discuss the barriers and challenges to implementing Academic Analytics.
  3. Discover the steps that must be taken for a successful implementation of Academic Analytics.
  4. Identify the key resources - tools, people, financing - that are needed for Academic Analytics to be successful.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Performance Measures, Academic Planning, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN215) Master Planning for a Sustainable Marine Science Campus at UCSC
Presented by: Damon Adlao, Project Manager, Assistant Planner, University of California-Santa Cruz; Ken J Pirie, Associate, Walker Macy; Richard W. Whealan, Principal, The Miller|Hull Partnership

The Marine Science Campus at UC Santa Cruz is engaged in critically important research activity for the understanding and protection of coastal and marine habitat across the globe, especially adjacent to the site in Monterey Bay. Learn about the recent campus area plan that will guide specific development for the 98-acre site, inspired by its natural setting and aiming for a careful integration of the coastal ecosystem with new energy-efficient academic facilities and programs and alternative transportation.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Investigate pragmatic ways to plan new development on sensitive sites, maximizing energy and transportation efficiency, and reducing traditional infrastructure. 
  2. Explore how to become more self-sufficient through use of a combination of site amenities, including solar energy, wind energy, geothermal energy, and micro-hydro generation.
  3. Observe the plan's consistent alignment of new buildings for optimal solar orientation and  progressive standards for alternative modes of transportation.
  4. Appraise an innovative response to storm water treatment, based on subsurface flows on a sensitive site.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Sustainability, Master Planning, Open Space

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (45C215)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN248) Notre Dame's Investment in the Future of Engineering
Presented by: Terry D. Brown, Laboratory Consultant, Research Facilities Design; Mike Daly, Senior Project Manager, University of Notre Dame; Geoffrey Lisle, Principal, BSA LifeStructures Inc.

After expanding beyond the capabilities of their engineering research facility, the University of Notre Dame invested in a new teaching and research building. Learn how the team tackled the challenge of utilizing the latest advancements in technology, while maximizing space in an academic engineering facility. Hear the capital planning and departmental perspectives, and gain insight into how Notre Dame created a highly technical engineering building within a demanding architectural style.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discover how sustainability can inform the design of a cutting edge engineering research facility.
  2. Observe how benchmarking metrics validate information from stakeholders.
  3. Observe how an academic clean room differs from the industry clean room and how sustainability issues are addressed.
  4. Discover how the cost of this interdisciplinary engineering facility's design was influenced by benchmarking as a tool to represent future unknowns.

TAGS: Large Private Research, Facility Type Engineering, Capital Projects, Learning Space Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (45C248)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN160) Planning for an Uncertain Future
Presented by: Jeffrey S. Fenimore, Principal | Architect | Higher Education National Leader, DLR Group; Lisa K. Johnson, Architect, Principal , DLR Group; Michael P. Seymour, Chief Operating Officer for Administration, Anoka-Ramsey Community College

Revenue reductions, combined with increasing student FTEs are forcing institutions to restructure their strategic planning and implementation to increase alignment between academic goals and finances. This impacts everything from academic planning to facilities. Learn how two different campuses, one on the west coast and one in the Midwest, used highly interactive, collaborative master planning and long-range goal setting to effectively develop projects that were financially feasible while maintaining continuity and focus, reducing waste and reinforcing campus identity.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Develop a process for long range strategic planning that enables incremental project phasing while maintaining a holistic vision for the campus and facility.
  2. Implement a collaborative planning process on your own campus.
  3. Address some of the unique challenges of large group facilitation and goal setting.
  4. Retain the necessary institutional background to enable successfully managing multi-phased projects.

TAGS: Community College, Master Planning, Academic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C160)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(CN126) Sustainable Residence Life "Flexible Living Unit" Design
Presented by: John H. Russell, Director of Project Administration, Texas Tech University System Administration; Randall B. Scott, President & Chief Executive Officer, Randall Scott Architects, Inc.

Residence halls can be designed to provide for freshmen, upper-division and graduate student needs through this unique "Flex-Unit" concept. These sustainable residence life facilities can quickly adapt to all types of students and demographics over a 50-75 year life cycle thereby reducing the number of residence hall types needed on a campus and future landfill requirements. This unique "Flex-Unit" allows residence life staff to provide 18 distinct living unit arrangements within a 1,200 SF module. Multiple "Flex Units" can easily be arranged to develop communities of varying sizes within a residence hall and tracked through BIM software.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Provide a sustainable residence hall with significantly lower life-cycle costs than traditional residence halls.
  2. Accommodate all types of students' housing needs within one residence hall.
  3. Increase student satisfaction by allowing them to select their own unit type resulting in increased revenues
  4. Create various sized units, communities and cohorts within a given residence hall in conjunction with BIM (Building Information Modeling)

TAGS: Public Comprehensive, Student Residences, Learning Space Design, Sustainability

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C126)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN039) Delivering on a Big Vision: Implementing a 75-acre Campus Expansion
Presented by: Richard Johnson, Director, Biomedical Facilities Program, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities; Monique Mackenzie, Campus Planner, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities; Brian Swanson, Budget & Finance Officer, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

In 2005 the University of Minnesota undertook a 75-acre campus redevelopment and expansion effort in conjunction with the construction of a new 50,000 seat football stadium. This session explores the iterative planning, design and construction process used to implement Phase I which included more than $400 million worth of capital improvements. Planning for Phase II, a $292 million Biomedical Discovery District, followed shortly after. Lessons learned in the course of implementing Phase I while simultaneously planning for Phase II will be shared.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss the value of an iterative and adaptive planning process regardless of campus size.
  2. Outline the critical steps in developing and implementing a major campus plan.
  3. Evaluate the role of vision and executive leadership in driving overall program success.
  4. Apply key lessons from this experience to other projects of different magnitudes.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Master Planning, Capital Projects, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C039)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN255) Designing Sustainable, Affordable and Livable Student Housing
Presented by: Don Mills, Professor of Higher Education, Texas Christian University; David W. Short, Principal, KSQ Architects, PC

In the 1990's Texas Christian University decided it would change the way it housed students. A Housing Master Plan was developed and a road map to change was created. Over the past nine years TCU has renovated five of their existing residence halls and over 1,000 beds and added another five halls with nearly 1,000 new student beds. This program will highlight the aggressive transformation of the student housing facilities at TCU. We will share the lessons learned as we take you on our journey creating an affordable, sustainable and livable campus.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Design affordable, sustainable and attractive student housing using urban planning principles. 
  2. Develop partnerships with designers and builders in new construction and renovation projects.
  3. Discuss the lessons TCU learned after nine years of both new construction and renovation of more than 2,000 beds and 9 halls.
  4. Analyze the factors that help create long-term successful client/architect relationships.

TAGS: Student Residences, Successful Client/Architect Relationships

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Production


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN073) Integration of Healthcare Education Across Disciplines and Departments
Presented by: Colleen Grochowski, Associate Dean, Curricular Affairs, Duke University; Mary Jo Olenick, Principal, The S/L/A/M Collaborative; Robert F. Pulito, Architect & Principal, The S/L/A/M Collaborative

Are health education programs really preparing students for the future? There is very little programmatic integration of health disciplines on an educational basis. Education in each health discipline is highly specialized and focused in order to implant as much raw knowledge as possible. Real integration of health disciplines happens during practice (internships, residencies). How can the health care industry move towards "patient-centered integrated care" if academic medical institutions continue to maintain their separate academic programs, research, buildings, and identity?

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss projected needs in various health care disciplines and how allied health institutions are responding.
  2. Identify current benchmarks regarding SF/student and cost/SF for integrated education facilities vs. ones dedicated to medical education, nursing, pharmacy, and public health.
  3. Develop a useful matrix to demonstrate which areas benefit most from integration and which ones may not be well-suited to integrated delivery of education.
  4. Quantify the benefits of increased integration of the health science education and realize   those benefits in a facility design.

TAGS: Facility Type Health Care, Learning Space Design, Student Learning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C073)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN158) Inventing the Next Century of Living-Learning Environments
Presented by: Susan J.D. Gott, University Planner, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor; Loren John Rullman, Associate Vice President, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

New technologies are emerging and evolving almost faster than academic institutions can incorporate them into the built environment. Students demand new configurations and interrelationships for living and learning spaces and programs. The University of Michigan's North Quadrangle Residential and Academic Complex is an incubator and laboratory for how to flexibly plan a living-learning environment that fosters bold new synergies between technology, academic programs, living space, and the students who inhabit it, all taking place within a timeless and traditional exterior.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Plan flexibly to incorporate cutting-edge technology into the built campus environment and allow unknown future technologies to evolve within the facility.
  2. Foster synergies between programs united for the first time within a facility.
  3. Encourage adaptive space configurations in living and learning facilities.
  4. Create dynamic and evolving spaces within a traditional exterior shell.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Student Residences, Learning Space Design, Student Learning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C158)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN147) Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Campus Solar and LEED/Sustainable Projects
Presented by: Nils Blomquist, Preconstruction Manager, DPR Construction; Nick Ertmer, Project Manager, DPR Construction; Christopher Madden, Technical Services Assistant, Butte-Glenn Community College District

This session will provide real-world techniques and examples of feasibility and lifecycle cost analysis based on Butte College's 2-Megawatt solar power farm (the largest college campus solar project in California) and new 77,000 sq. ft. Instructional Arts project, which is pending LEED Gold certification and won the California Community College Chancellor's Office Energy Efficiency Partnership Program Best Practice Award in HVAC. Attendees will also see firsthand the process implemented for sustainability analysis during preconstruction.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss possible approaches to funding campus solar power projects.
  2. Analyze the feasibility of campus solar power projects.
  3. Evaluate return on investment (ROI) for LEED/sustainable projects based on a lifecycle cost approach.
  4. Quantify the impact of campus power generation projects on the sustainability of campus construction projects.

TAGS: Sustainability, Life Cycle Cost Analysis, Solar Power, Leed, Community College

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (45C147)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN236) Location Location Location: An Unlikely Approach to Sustainable Growth
Presented by: Leo Lejeune, Architect, Senior Associate, Stantec Inc.; Stuart MacLean, Executive Director, Facilities, Grant MacEwan University

Grant MacEwan University believes that it can best meet the needs of future generations by consolidating all of its existing four campuses onto its one downtown site. This new single sustainable campus project seeks to bring all of MacEwan's services back into one location, while growing its student population, improving the student experience, and tripling its existing square footage in the process. We will reveal an innovative strategy for sustainable growth in a very dense urban context.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explore how sustainability is changing the way students want to learn, and impacting technology, libraries, teaching spaces, and social spaces.
  2. Create a thorough business case analysis when approaching governments for funding.
  3. Design a campus plan that not only exceeds sustainability goals, but also aids in transforming the surrounding urban environment.
  4. Identify the benefits of selling off existing campuses.

TAGS: International, Public Comprehensive, Master Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (45C236)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN003) Making Your Strategic Plan a Bestseller on Campus
Presented by: Joseph Offermann, Director, Institutional Research & Effectiveness, Joliet Junior College; Ryan L. Smith, Vice President, Advancement & Research, Joliet Junior College

Research indicates that traditional forms of planning can be ineffective in today's environment because they focus on rationality, linear processes, quantification, and assume that fun, creativity, and qualitative approaches lack substance. New forms of planning should focus on employee engagement, integration of multiple planning strategies, organizational culture, creativity, fun, and serendipity. This presentation will highlight Joliet Junior College's evolution in shifting from a traditional, rigid planning focus to one that is more open, fun, and centered on employee engagement.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Propose a new model of planning that recognizes the organizational culture of higher education.
  2. Formulate strategies for employee engagement with planning.
  3. Summarize an integrated approach to planning that incorporates governance and organizational culture.
  4. Compare traditional planning models with newer planning models.

TAGS: Community College, Change Management, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C003)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN031) Planning a Balanced Scorecard Approach at a NJ State College
Presented by: Claudine Keenan, Dean School of Education, The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey; Harvey Kesselman, Provost & Executive Vice President, The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey

This session will focus on the internal constraints and opportunities that members of a small steering committee of faculty, staff and administrators faced during their first year of setting up a balanced scorecard approach to planning. The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey solicited input to its balanced scorecard planning process from its senior leadership, from two of its labor unions, and from all of its organizational divisions.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Describe the basic components of a Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach.
  2. Discuss the opportunities and constraints of a BSC approach at a state college.
  3. Apply the components of a BSC approach to different institutional settings.
  4. Brainstorm solutions to problems inherent in the BSC approach at a higher education institution.

TAGS: Public Comprehensive, Performance Measures, Operational Planning, Strategic Planning, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C031)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN176) Repurposing a Building—Morrill Hall, Sustainable in 1890
Presented by: Scott C. Allen, Partner, RDG Planning & Design; Michael Andresen, Associate, RDG Planning & Design; Kerry Dixon-Fox, Project Manager, Iowa State University

The session is a case study of the rehabilitation and adaptive re-use of a building on the national register of historic places. Examine the campus factors that lead to the abandonment of the facility and also review the design and construction decisions that provided the basis for a successful repurposing and rehabilitation project resulting in Iowa State University's first LEED® silver project. We will cover strategies, building performance and other possible funding criteria on similar buildings.  

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Summarize the evolution of design and construction over the last 100 years.
  2. Identify the issues surrounding restoration and rehabilitation of a historic structure.
  3. Develop goals for sustainable concepts and strategies within a restoration project.
  4. Review the requirements of the LEED Documentation and Certification Process.

TAGS: Historic Preservation, Sustainability, Large Public Research

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (45C176)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN062) Successful Public/Private Partnerships—A Case Study for Capital Funding & Development
Presented by: Jennifer Friedman, Director, Public & Private Partnerships, CUNY System Office; Scott Newman, Partner, Cooper, Robertson & Partners; Iris Weinshall, Vice Chancellor, Facilities Planning, Construction & Management, CUNY Central Office

With public funds for capital projects being scarce, The City University of New York (CUNY) created an innovative partnership with a private developer to help finance and build a new facility for CUNY's Hunter College School of Social Work and Public Health in Harlem. This project will be used as a case study to illustrate the key elements required to ensure a successful partnership, and the collaborative process necessary to achieve a successful outcome to the design and construction.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Develop successful new models for monetizing university real estate assets to fund new projects.
  2. Identify keys to a successful public/private partnership.
  3. Develop collaborative processes for managing the programming, design and construction with a private development partner.
  4. Evaluate private development opportunities as a potential way to access new sources of funding.

TAGS: Large Public Research, Partnerships, Facility Type Graduate Education

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C062)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(CN057) The Young and the Agile
Presented by: Wm. Gregory Sawyer, Vice President/Student Affairs, California State University-Channel Islands; Deborah Wylie, Associate Vice President, Capital Resources Management, University of California System Administration Central Office

With funding in higher education at a critical low and fiscal and human resources being depleted with lay-offs, furloughs, and mass budget cuts it is apparent that collaborative campus planning and shared resources is a must. Learn how CSU Channel Islands planned and implemented campus-wide strategic goals in a highly dynamic, flexible, and collaborative environment at one of America's newest emerging academic institutions. Discover the complexities and intricacies of planning, budgeting and implementing programs and facilities in the adaptive re-use and conversion of an eighty year old state hospital facility. Walk away with information on how to collaborate on successful planning outcomes while working with multiple campus constituencies.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Foster collaborative planning with multiple campus constituencies.
  2. Discuss strategies for making the best of limited resources.
  3. Merge old and the new in physical planning while implementing innovative curricular and co-curricular programs.
  4. Identify techniques to keep your planning flexible and adaptive.

TAGS: Preservation, Integrated Planning, Adaptive Re Use, Renovation

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN106) Benchmarking Benefits for Energy/Water Use—54 College Campuses in Minnesota
Presented by: Rick Carter, Senior Vice President, LHB, Inc; Sally Grans-Korsh, Director, Facilities Management & Environmental Policy , National Association of College and University Business Officers ; Tom McDougall, President, The Weidt Group

Energy Benchmarking at 54 campuses was done throughout Minnesota by campus staff. Benchmark data resulted in clear, concise reports for overall energy/water use. Learn how to gather data, determine Energy Use Intensity (EUI) in kBtu/sf/year and water usage in gals/occupant/day. Data is critical to determine best use of capital expenditures to maximize energy efficiency. Examples from both high and low performers will be shared, with suggestions on how to improve campus energy consumption. 

 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explore the basics about energy use intensity, how energy can be converted to a common unit (kBtu), normalized by area (square foot) and time (year), and how to calculate this information for a building and campus.
  2. Determine how to efficiently collect information from accounting and facility staff.
  3. Determine how to calculate the best benchmark, compare the data, and develop a case study for use in making recommendations going forward.
  4. Apply the data collected, and communicate performance benchmarks to facility managers and users to influence behaviors and reduce consumption.

 

TAGS: Higher Education System, Sustainability, Performance Measures

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (45C106)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN012) Creating New Collaborative Learning Environments
Presented by: Kenn Fisher, Education Partner, Woods Bagot Architects; Jeffrey Holmes, Principal, Woods Bagot Architects

Learning is about discovery and change. As schools and universities look to the future they must provide environments which will facilitate collaborative learning and act as points for interaction and social activity. We will examine design initiatives that support adaptive and varied learning spaces and respond to new methods of curriculum delivery and will detail the transformation of an existing space.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate how curricular changes in engineering education will impact traditional learning spaces and foster new competency-based environments.
  2. Discuss how emerging learning environments are organized to broaden collaborative skills, forge a sense of community and increase space utilization.
  3. Demonstate how information technologies enable blended teaching and learning models that expand learning outcomes.
  4. Explore strategies for designing innovative and affordable renovations that make the most of your existing resources.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Student Learning, Pedagogy, Facility Type Student Laboratories, International, Large Public Research

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unit (45C012)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN122) Creative Project Funding When Your State Is Strapped for Cash
Presented by: Ann A. Jurgens, Principal, THA Architecture; Ysabel D. Trinidad, Vice President, Finance & Administration, California State University-Channel Islands

In 2007, the University of Washington Tacoma Campus began planning Phase 3 of its expansion, anticipating $60M in state funding. Three projects were identified to accommodate 600 additional students, and the designs were well underway when the state's budget crisis resulted in a reduction in funding allocations for the project. We'll review how the campus and design team analyzed the priorities for the expansion plans, and the creative methods UWT implemented to restore project funding.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Account for your campus' physical resources.
  2. Identify techniques for keeping your campus planning nimble.
  3. Analyze priorities for expansion plans when your capital planning budget takes a big hit.
  4. Explore out-of-the-box funding sources for your building projects.

TAGS: Public Comprehensive, Master Planning, Funding, Capital Projects

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C122)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN256) Educated Spaces... Embracing Change
Presented by: Pat Gill, NA Representative, DIRTT Environmental Solutions; William O'Neill, Regional Representative, DIRTT Environmental Solutions

For most higher education institutions, it shouldn't be about forecasting or predicting the future: there are way too many uncertainties and unknowns. The only real certainty is that there will be change, so it should be more about creating a culture in the organization to identify and respond to these changes. Yet few organizations understand how to adapt to change; their strategies for continued stability and success are constantly undermined by the unrelenting pressure and the pace of change . . . space and technology. 

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Attract technology-savvy students with technology-savvy classrooms.
  2. Discuss how smart classrooms allow students to perform at their best.
  3. Plan for facility change beyond conventional construction.
  4. Adapt classrooms and administrative spaces to evolving space and technology needs. 

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Technology And Teaching, Student Recruitment, Facility Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C256)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN143) Future Ready: How to Integrate Strategic Direction and Campus Planning
Presented by: Alexander Carroll, Master Planner & Senior Associate, EYP; Charles A. Craig, Campus & Facility Planner; Lisa Fears, Vice President, Planning, Plant & Technology, Franklin College

Franklin College's campus planning case study will present a process model for linking 21st-century strategic objectives to an institutionally and contextually appropriate and sustainable plan. Franklin, a small, residential, liberal arts institution, has a long history of active engagement and innovation. The college's recent campus plan sustains the campus’ unique character and heritage by means of a disciplined study and interdisciplinary process.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Using discipline and a process model, link the strategic planning process and initiatives to campus planning.
  2. Compare communications procedures for ensuring success in the planning process.
  3. Incorporate institutional history, mission, and goals in the campus design process.
  4. Explore strategies and proposals for establishing interdisciplinary opportunities and linkages for curricular and co-curricular programs.

TAGS: Small Private Liberal Arts, Sustainability, Preservation, Master Planning, Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C143)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN010) Tools to Assess the Marketability of Your Academic Programs
Presented by: Robert A. Sevier, Senior Vice President, Strategy, STAMATS Inc

Discover a set of tools for assessing a college's array of academic programs in two dimensions: quality and marketing demand. Instead of institutional definitions of quality, we will examine such indicators as student satisfaction within the major, student evaluations, and job/graduate school placement. Marketplace demand indicators include student interest, job trends, and whether similar majors are offered by competitors. The data will be compiled into a quality/demand grid to help colleges do a better job predicting near-term enrollment.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the impact of quality and demand on near-term enrollment.
  2. Analyze the influence of academic majors on college choice.
  3. Isolate student-based quality issues within majors.
  4. Assess academic programs in the light of marketplace demand criteria.

TAGS: Environmental Scanning, Performance Measures, Marketing, Demographics

Continuing Education Credits:
AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(CN178) Utilizing Technology and Data in Strategic Planning
Presented by: Nicola C. Richmond, Executive Director, Planning & Institutional Research, Pima Community College

With the current challenges facing colleges and universities, it is increasingly important to fully utilize technology and data in planning activities. Pima Community College, the eighth-largest multi-campus college in the US, has developed leadership-defined "Decision Support Data." These data have been established by utilizing new technology and they feed directly into the College's multi-year planning process. The presentation will provide an interactive overview of the data, the software used, and how the information has been seamlessly integrated into the planning process.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Evaluate the importance of disaggregating data and how it supports planning.
  2. Discover how to effectively communicate complex data with senior leadership and other populations who guide planning.
  3. Utilize technology to maximize the ability to analyze and report diverse data.
  4. Identify research programs that support planning and day-to-day college operations.

TAGS: Community College, Performance Measures, Strategic Planning, Institutional Research

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C178)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN263) Are We Wasting a Perfectly Good Crisis?
Presented by: George Pernsteiner, Chancellor, Oregon University System

A year ago, we faced a crisis. Endowment earnings had plummeted, unemployment had skyrocketed, family incomes were falling, and state support for universities was dropping faster than at any time in living memory. A year later, despite some recovery in the value of endowments (now again under attack by a volatile equity market), the litany of the terrible continues. Yet a lot has changed. Enrollment at many universities and virtually all community colleges grew rapidly last year and promises to keep going up—and many of these students are from lower income families and are students of color, the very students whose success will drive the future of the American economy. Calls for accountability and demonstrated learning outcomes have continued despite financial problems for colleges and universities. What are colleges, universities, and states doing to prepare for a decade of deficits combined with a surfeit of students? What choices can be made that could lead to stronger institutions and better educated Americans? The perfectly good crisis continues—and might even become the “new normal.” What can and what should we do?”

Learning Outcomes:

1. Discuss the economic crisis and the opportunities this affords for institutional change.
2. Discover the strategies that universities are taking now.
3. Acquire new ideas to re-focus your own institution during this crisis.
4. Discuss how colleges and universities are reinventing themselves in order to improve student learning, increase degree production, and reduce cost.


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN262) Campus Architecture & Occupancy Quality; Does the User Really Matter?
Presented by: Wesley Chapman, Architectural Group, Orfield Laboratories, Inc.; William D. Hickey, Principal, Collaborative Design Group; Steven Orfield, President, Orfield Laboratories, Inc.

Facility design in higher education is often caught in the cross fire between meeting a user’s functional program needs, and meeting the demands or desires of philanthropists and fundraising entities. The outcome is often a building designed for fundraising rather than occupancy quality or campus culture. In the absence of a rigorous process, this outcome in not unusual. Yet the ultimate success of the building is measured by the response of its users, who are only peripherally involved in the design process. Explore an evidence based design approach that allows both validation of building performance (perceptual comfort) and design quality (aesthetic meaning) from the user perspective, before the building is constructed. This process can dramatically improve the process of developing new facilities.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Discuss the typical design process, and its customers and priorities, and the influence of philanthropic or fundraising activities as it relates to facility design.
  2. Explore how you might incorporate new definitional and research benchmarks into your own design process.
  3. Identify the benefits of user centered and high perceptual comfort buildings.
  4. Identify the comparison between the costs of this process and the costs of the traditional process.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C262)NASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN086) Carbon, Energy, and Water: Sustainable Planning Strategies for Indiana University
Presented by: William M. Brown, Director, Sustainability, Indiana University-Bloomington; Mary Jukuri, Principal, SmithGroupJJR; Russell Perry, Vice President, SmithGroupJJR

Indiana University is re-aligning its physical resources for a sustainable future. Explore the integrated master plan for the Bloomington campus through the lens of energy and water resources. Learn how the university can accommodate a projected 25 percent facility growth while reducing its overall environmental footprint. We will discuss achieving this goal using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies for an innovative Stormwater and Hydrology Plan and an unprecedented campus-wide Energy and Water Use Plan.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Explore ways to implement campus sustainable design initiatives from six vantage points: energy, land use, resource use, transportation, built environment, and food.
  2. Evaluate the cumulative effect of multiple planning strategies including watershed analysis, riparian restoration, habitat corridors and increased tree cover on managing campus stormwater run-off quality and quantity.
  3. Using the IU Energy and Water Use Plan, estimate greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption for campus facilities, predict future energy and water use for new development, and apply techniques to reduce energy use, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions for a campus.
  4. Discuss sustainable design leadership and its integration into the university's administrative and academic mission and functions.

TAGS: Sustainability, Large Public Research, Performance Measures, Master Planning, Operational Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/HSW/SD 1.0 unit (45C086)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Business Management and Organization


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN141) Following Through on Strategic Plans: From Words to Deeds
Presented by: Donna L. Kidd, Retiree-Previously Associate Vice President, Budget & Planning, George Mason University; Peter Stearns, Provost & Executive Vice President, Academic Affairs, George Mason University; Cathy M. Wolfe, Director, Campus Planning, George Mason University

This session looks at George Mason University's approach, successes, and failures in linking an overall strategic planning process with a strategic implementation process. You will see how significant follow-up mechanisms can spur individual units to relevant planning and provide assessment tools. Through candid exposition of the pluses and minuses of the Mason effort, the session will promote wider discussion of the development and implementation of strategic planning efforts.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Develop a university strategic plan and follow-up with individual unit planning.
  2. Integrate strategic plans, resource planning, assessments and evaluations, and accreditation.
  3. Identify the challenges and opportunities for development of and tracking of annual metrics for assessing strategic goals.
  4. Discuss the importance of flexible planning in uncertain times.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Strategic Planning, Plan Implementation, Academic Planning, Performance Measures

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C141)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN019) Positioning for the Future During Uncertain Times
Presented by: Maria Krupin, Associate Vice President, Budget & Finance, Ramapo College of New Jersey; Dorothy Echols Tobe, Chief Planning Officer, Ramapo College of New Jersey; Babette Varano, Assistant Vice President, Institutional Effectiveness & Planning, Ramapo College of New Jersey

With higher education funding becoming more uncertain, it has become daunting for colleges and universities to position themselves for the future. This session reveals the processes Ramapo College implemented to achieve higher levels of excellence with scarcer resources.  Using Resources Allocation Mapping developed by KPMG Prager, Sealy and Co. in conjunction with the Robert Dickenson model, Ramapo will present how they implemented these models in order to invest limited resources to achieve strategic goals and connect the planning and budgeting process.   

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Analyze the significance of appropriate development, execution and assessment of strategic plans.
  2. Construct an integrated planning, budgeting and assessment model.
  3. Implement Resource Allocation Mapping process from theory to application.
  4. Use Resource Allocation Mapping process evaluate programs in relation to mission.

TAGS: Public Comprehensive, Budget/Resource Planning, Integrated Planning, Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C019)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(CN110) Simulation Centers—A New Model for Integrated Learning
Presented by: Todd Bloch, Architect, NBBJ Architects; David Bryant, Project Manager, Flad Architects; David P. Lenox, University Architect and Director, Campus Planning, Stanford University; Andy Wasklewicz, Technology Architect, Stanford University

Simulation as a learning process is the next “must have” technology/methodology for campuses across the world. This shift in learning is changing teaching methods and the student experience, resulting in a new way of designing for and delivering education. Recent case studies from Stanford's new School of Medicine Li Ka Shing Center for Learning and Knowledge and California Maritime Academy's Simulation Center will illustrate the different opportunities and technical and programmatic needs of simulated learning facilities.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Recognize the needs and requirements that make simulation learning centers unique.
  2. Examine how simulation is effecting traditional instructional methods.
  3. Discuss the range and types of simulation environments (immersive learning, virtual reality, robots, etc.)
  4. Create synergies between universities and professional practice through simulation learning centers.

TAGS: Facility Type Simulation Laboratories, Student Learning, Learning Space Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unit (45C110)AICP CM 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Document Links

This printed page contains links to other web pages. Each link has a numerical indicator which corresponds to one of the URLs below.