
|
Concurrent Sessions Proceedings
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM Creating the future requires linking a university’s aspirations to the daily work of faculty and staff. It’s not only about models or process. It’s also about people and fostering a campus culture that makes integration possible. This session will outline a change process to create an institution-wide vision, an integrated budget model and comprehensive program and service review. It will outline a change toolkit and provide the opportunity for participants to discuss specific challenges with the presenters and session colleagues. Learning Outcomes: 1. Learn the 10 Commandments for culture change.2. Discover a toolbox of tactics for addressing campus culture issues. 3. Explore models for planning, budgeting and program review using a public, regional university that pursued integration in an accelerated, two-year timeframe. TAGS: Public Research, Integrated Planning, Budget, Change Management Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM The University of Oregon seeks broad user collaboration for all its projects, and works to engage building users in meaningful and jargon-free discussions about proposed design projects using a visioning approach known as “patterns”. For the recent College of Education project, the design team actively embraced the use of “patterns” AND developed a series of techniques designed to provide interactive tools, to help user participants describe their vision for the project. Attendees will be able to assess the effectiveness of this approach and will learn how to apply these simple techniques to their own projects. Learning Outcomes: 1. Assess the effective use of “patterns” to establish a set of jargon-free values that can guide the outcome of design projects. TAGS: Theory And Research, Learning Space Design Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM International projects showcase how new universities support national strategic goals. In Saudi Arabia, the new 40,000-student Riyadh University for Women will provide undergraduate education in 10 colleges, and graduate education in 5 areas of Health Sciences. In Singapore, a new 700,000 gsf National University of Singapore campus will be a global, multi-cultural, multi-disciplinary research magnet for NUS students as well as those of MIT and other universities. This presentation will describe these groundbreaking projects with ambitious academic and sustainability goals. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss how regional and global dynamics have influenced academic planning in Singapore and Saudi Arabia, and planning by universities in the US and other countries.2. Identify sustainable design strategies in very diverse climates. 3. Discuss research laboratory and health sciences educational facility design. TAGS: International, Sustainability, Master/Campus Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM With fund-raising becoming more difficult, it has become especially challenging for colleges and universities to engage in much needed building projects. Thus, institutions are seeking creative methods to beat the funding gap. This session illustrates how Keene State College, the City of Keene, the State of New Hampshire, and local businesses developed an innovative partnership and utilized creative financing mechanisms to plan a new “off-campus” multipurpose field house and ice arena for the college and the community. Learning Outcomes: 1. Form town-gown facility partnerships around shared goals.2. Identify multiple funding streams and ownership models. 3. Discover efficiencies when sharing common spaces. TAGS: Town/Gown, Small Public, Capital Financing, Recreational Facility Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM This session explores the master planning process that was used to focus the interdisciplinary vision of the WSU College of Engineering and Architecture, to transform its campus precinct and to prioritize land use and future capital expenditures. The resulting physical plan addresses the repurposing and replacement of existing structures, implementation and phasing, new connections between buildings, pedestrian and vehicular traffic separations, and open space linkages between the steeply sloping precinct and other parts of the campus and downtown. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover how collaborative master planning addressed academic vision, recruitment and retention, land use policy and capital expenditure priorities.2. Discuss forces transforming engineering education and research, and the impact of these changes on facilities and planning. 3. Demonstrate how loosely related buildings on a sloping site can be integrated into a coherent campus precinct that manifests an academic vision. TAGS: Large Public Research, Master Planning, Facility Type Architecture, Facility Type Engineering Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM This session explores ways to encourage bicycle transportation on campus and increase bicycle mode share as a safe and viable alternative. It draws on lessons learned from other US campuses, including leveraging grant money available for alternative transportation, physically planning for the current surge in campus bike traffic, measuring mode share shifts, creating multi-modal bike transportation plans and, especially, leading the way out of the car culture through non-orthodox methods such as bike-share, campus bike fleets and campus bike centers. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover how to leverage grant money available for alternative transportation.2. Identify how to physically plan for increased bike traffic and parking issues on campus. 3. Determine how to create a multi-model bike transportation plan (bikes on buses, bike share, etc). TAGS: Sustainability, Performance Measurement, Transportation Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM The 2008 SCUP award jury commended the Princeton Campus Plan’s infill strategy, which balanced development with the historic, park-like character of the campus. The seemingly paradoxical objectives were met in plan through ambitious redevelopment proposals. But were they met in practice? One year later, has the plan survived challenges of fiscal constraints, design changes, community concerns, and institutional practices? This session will explore the collaborative post-planning implementation strategies that have kept the initial vision alive despite the odds. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover how to anticipate the challenges of realizing a comprehensive campus plan and how to navigate the complex process of implementation.2. Discover how to maintain strategic long-range planning goals in the face of short term budget and design constraints. 3. Build collaborative efforts with a wide cross-section of the university community to ensure consensus around key ideas and foster change in longstanding practices; Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM All campuses require insight into the rapidly changing market conditions for student housing and the needs of students who seek a place to live. Measuring housing demand before campuses decide to build or renovate necessitates comprehensive student housing market analyses. This session demonstrates how such an analysis can integrate information on changes in student demographics, economics, and attitudes. By distilling the best methods from successful studies conducted at 40 universities, this session guides campuses in planning and forecasting their student housing future. Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify the many separate and identifiable student housing sub-markets that exist on your campus.2. Discuss how meeting the needs of each housing sub-market is necessary to maintain an effective and economically viable housing program and learning environment. 4. Conduct basic market analysis to inform renovation of existing housing or building of new facilities. TAGS: Trends, Demographics, Marketing, Facility Type Residence Halls Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM Small private colleges are particularly susceptible to their external forces due to their dependence on tuition revenue and their modest endowments. Many small private colleges are already facing operating deficits that require increased endowment spending or additional debt to balance the budget. This presentation will provide an example of an integrated planning approach that relies on budget, enrollment and residential models to assist small colleges in anticipating problems and making proactive planning decisions rather than reacting to external factors. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover a successful planning approach that can be applied to other institutions.2. Discuss how budget and planning tools can be incorporated into an institution’s decision-making process. 3. Assess planning tools that can help institutions make difficult decisions prior to a crisis, so that planning is proactive rather than reactive. TAGS: Small Private Liberal Arts, Integrated Planning, Budget Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM BSU’s ILC represents a significant step in developing a hybrid learning environment for both 21st Century interactive education – part classroom building, part union, part technology center. Now running for over a year, the design team will present a post-occupancy evaluation focused on how successfully the facility is fulfilling its goal to bring together both formal and informal learning in a dynamic multilayered facility. Using on site and web-based user interviews coupled with in use video studies, the team will tell all that is and isn’t working. Learning Outcomes: 1. Recognize how strong planning and visioning sets the stage for each subsequent planning step.2. Recognize how a "hybrid" facility can contain key program elements mixing up what has traditional expectations for classroom buildings, libraries, computer labs, and student unions. 3. Use an analysis of web-based post-occupancy evaluation to see how the facility is living up to its goals. TAGS: Large Public Comprehensive, Learning Space Design, Theory And Research, Facility Type Learning Commons Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 10:00 AM–11:00 AM As our institutions plan for the future, we talk a lot about “vision.” But what impact do vision statements have on tangible measures of institutional success such as student achievement, academic leadership, and financial stability? MKThink analyzed the vision statements used by over 100 colleges and universities over the past fifty years and correlated attributes of these statements with measures of institutional performance. The results are intriguing. Institutional leaders will learn how to apply lessons learned to their institutions. Learning Outcomes: 1. Recognize the long-term impact and value of vision statements.2. Construct a truly influential vision statement and avoid the common errors that result in low-impact visions. 3. Integrate an historic perspective to your overall planning efforts. TAGS: Theory And Research, Performance Measurement, Vision Statements Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM This presentation explores a ten year process to optimize UBC's learning environments. The Classroom Services unit, charged with the administration and development of learning space on campus, worked with Facilities & Capital Planning to plan an integrated, collaborative process in which the definition of learning environments and 'where learning happens' was explored and significantly expanded. An integrated planning strategy, involving many learning space components and their attendant required funding plans, was developed. The achievements, challenges and evolution of this ongoing process will be presented from a ten year perspective. Learning Outcomes: 1. Examine an integrated, collaborative model by which learning environments can be continuously improved in an ongoing way.2. Discuss the challenges and pitfalls overcome in developing and implementing this integrated, collaborative model. 3. Assess financial strategies combined with implementation strategies to improve and sustain campus learning environments. TAGS: Integrated Planning, Large Public Research, Renovation, Learning Space Design Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM In the next several years most institutions will begin replacing core IT systems and functions with outside services. “Cloud computing” is the new buzzword that describes this trend. A number of schools have begun by shifting support for e-mail to outside vendors. Far more -- including core administrative systems -- is on the way. This presentation will be based on my article “Painting the Clouds,” part of a cover story series in the November/December issue of Educause Review, which describes this phenomena and the impact it will have on higher education computing. Learning Outcomes: 1. Assess the benefits of cloud computing, outsourcing, and software-as-a-service (SaaS).2. Predict how these trends will impact campus computing. 3. Consider the importance of institution-wide project governance in order to benefit most from this new approach to computing. TAGS: Technology, Trends, Cloud Computing Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM Planning for change is a campus constant, and master plans should be living documents that respond to change. But what happens when a leadership change occurs in parallel with a master plan update, and the process questions projects already poised for implementation? Campus and facilities planners will learn how South Puget Sound Community College faced these issues in a master plan update intended to encompass basic updates to its growing main campus, as well as planning a new sister campus. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover tools to evaluate when new planning ideas are important/relevant - not just new.2. Identify ways to bridge administration changes. 3. Explore tools on consensus building, and creating ownership from campus stakeholders and partners. Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM In design and construction projects, institutional clients struggle to find the tipping point between great facilities and budget challenges. In our ongoing research effort to develop reliable cost control methodologies, we have found that establishing granular cost controls coincident with programming and conceptual design is paramount to managing cost. Without this proactive approach value engineering is reactive; always one cycle behind in the iterative design process. Through case studies, we will share comparative cost analysis and estimating approaches, and discuss their impact on quality of facilities and design process. Learning Outcomes: 1. Develop criteria to evaluate the tipping point between cost controls and facility needs.2. Discover how to achieve cost management through a proactive, systemic, granular estimating approach. 3. Learn to integrate cost controls with conceptual design, programming, and master planning. TAGS: Theory And Research, Cost Analysis, Budget, Facilities Design Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM A look at the informal sustainability planning approach being used at Syracuse University. While sustainability staff work to prepare a formal, "top-down" carbon neutrality plan for campus, that same staff works with members of other departments to identify and implement "bottom-up" efforts to save energy, reduce emissions, and save money. Suitable for anyone concerned about campus environmental or economic sustainability. Attendees will learn how (and why) the guerrilla approach works, and how to do something similar on their own campuses. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover how to identify and empower sustainability guerrillas across campus, so that they can identify targets of opportunity.2. Describe ways to disable roadblocks to sustainability improvement. 3. Build the momentum that makes green guerrilla action easier over time. TAGS: Integrated Sustainability Planning, Large Private Research Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM Despite fiscal constraints and enrollment challenges, John Carroll University has managed to foster a climate of academic innovation leading to the development of sustainable academic initiatives. This presentation will include a summary and analysis of how this institution has used existing funding streams to create and sustain innovative mission-based academic programming. Session participants will engage in interspersed tasks and small group discussions focused on planning and implementation strategies designed to leverage existing institutional assets to effect curricular change. Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify existing institutional assets needed to create and sustain academic initiatives.2. Develop a planning process for the cultivation, development and implementation of mission-based academic initiatives. 3. Examine strategies for collaboration across divisions, and link emerging academic initiatives with institutional mission, vision and values. TAGS: Integrated Planning, Private Comprehensive, Academic Planning, Theory And Research Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM Integrated planning—the linkage of academic, capital and financial planning is vital to any post-secondary institution if it is to be strategic in its decision making and effective in its resource utilization. Factor in a global economic crisis and the need for integrated planning becomes absolutely essential. This session will provide a high level overview of integrated planning and will address the organizational fundamentals of implementing an integrated planning framework. It will then offer specific examples of how the framework can be used to assist an institution in not only responding to rapidly changing economic conditions, but to emerge even stronger and better positioned in terms of academic priorities, capital planning, and financial sustainability. Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify the fundamentals of integrated planning. Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM Sixty percent of college-bound students report visual environment as the most important factor in choosing a college. That’s why a first impression is so critical for visiting students and their families. This session explores results of a study applying urban design principles to college campuses to measure their comfort elements. The four necessities are: people, balance, convenience, and interaction; without one of the four, a space will never feel comfortable. Learning Outcomes: 1. Apply urban design concepts from the text City Comforts, How to Build an Urban Village, by David Sucher (2003) to college campus planning.2. Discover how to include the four necessities for comfort (people, balance, convenience and interaction) into your campus planning or improvements. 3. Recognize how the “feel” of a campus contributes to that instant impression that influences the choice of a college. Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM In response to rapid changes in healthcare delivery, initiatives are underway both nationally and internationally to build new health science programs and facilities that will educate the next generation of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health professionals. This presentation explores the range of contemporary learning environments which support emerging curricula, technologies and pedagogies that emphasize team-based healthcare and hands-on learning. Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify how curricular changes in the health science education impact traditional learning spaces and foster new competency-based environments.2. Discuss how the need for student support spaces impact the character, quality, and space model for the health sciences education facilities. 3. Discuss how traditional and emerging learning spaces are organized to accommodate interdisciplinary practice and leverage space utilization. TAGS: Learning Space Design, Facility Design Science/Health Care, Student Learning Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM Join this special session for an address by the 2009 recipient of SCUP's Founder's Award. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss the various ways planning takes place in higher education. Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM Learning Outcomes: TAGS: Budget, Capital Projects, Integrated Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM Learning Outcomes: TAGS: Facility Design, Renovation Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM At first glance, the three colleges located in different parts of the country had little in common. During the planning process to develop and design new campus centers appropriate for their respective communities, the architects and colleges worked together to identify the institutions' visions and values for the projects. While their values were strikingly similar, the colleges' visions of what the buildings should be and do varied wildly. This session will explore the issues and decisions that drove each project in different directions. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss how the planning process translates educational values into meaningful, tangible objectives.2. Identify and balance the roles of participants involved in planning a new campus center, and how to decide what priorities take precedence. 3. Select the optimal program elements to include in the campus center for the institution's vision, campus community, and space, time and budget requirements. TAGS: Learning Space Design, Facility Type Campus Centers Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM Michigan State University’s innovative environmental stewardship program seeks to change campus culture at both the campus system level and individual level. A systems approach is being used to reduce the inputs to the campus as a whole, increase recycling/reuse and reduce the outputs from the campus. A research discipline was used to develop campus wide recommendations to reduce energy and material consumption across 579 buildings. Critical to the development and implementation of the recommendations was the use of collaborative teams of students, faculty, and staff. Learning Outcomes: 1. Utilize metrics to establish a defensible argument for developing an environmental stewardship program.2. Discuss the efforts and resources required to organize and manage an integrated environmental stewardship planning process that gets results. 3. Distinguish what data is important to analyze, and how to organize and communicate it for lasting impact through data driven decision making. TAGS: Integrated Sustainability, Planning, Large Public Research, Operations Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM Learning Outcomes: TAGS: State System, Leadership Development Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM What works well in learning environments? This session shares the results of collaborative research by experts in environmental design, education and industry. The measurable impact of several new learning environments including the Living Learning Lab at UCL in London, Oregon State University and San Jose University and other case studies from UK and US universities and colleges, will be described. Attendees will learn how to use existing evidence and performance measurements to create new environments that fully meet the ambitions of their institutions. Learning Outcomes: 1. Recognize the power of evidence in university planning and decision-making.2. Observe how other universities and colleges have discovered what works well and what could be improved in their projects. 3. Discover great new ideas for the design of learning environments. TAGS: Theory And Research, Performance Measurement, Learning Space Design Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM Following a two-year, highly inclusive strategic planning process, Widener University next faced multiple and potentially disparate imperatives: implementing the plan, embarking on re-accreditation, assessing all of our work, and preparing for a comprehensive fundraising campaign. This presentation describes Widener's "best practices" model for using the strategic planning process (from development to implementation, to revisions and re-implementation) as the vehicle for continuous process improvement and institutional momentum, all while saving time and resources. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss strategies for integrating and retaining the relevance of sustainable planning throughout the institution.2. Discuss strategies for engaging multiple audiences in conversations throughout the institution. 3. Assess mechanisms for gauging accountability through the planning process. TAGS: Inegrated Planning, Private Comprehensive, Theory And Research Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM The presentation explores how the currently emerging concept of the academic library as learning commons (first generation) can be enhanced through the incorporation of other programs and services which can employ the rich digital media environment of the learning commons to enhance student learning and success. A number of university libraries are renovating and constructing new facilities through significant transformations of non-stack areas into “learning commons” – facilities which bring together campus services in flexible, inviting space designed to facilitate student learning through exploration, collaboration, access to high level technology, and discussion. Recently, this initial concept has been expanded to include other student learning-focused programs and services. Learning Outcomes:
TAGS: Private Comprehensive, Learning Space Design, Technology, Facility Type Learning Commons Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM Learning Outcomes: TAGS: Campus/Master Planning, Facility Design, Open Space Design, Trends Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM Academic and administrative workplaces comprise 25-30% of most university’s space but utilization is poor and the traditional academic office does not support institutional priorities of increasing collaboration and interdisciplinary working or the working patterns of many staff or students. More effective and agile workplace models need to be developed. This presentation explores the findings of two major UK research projects into the academic workplace and describes five alternative workplace models to suit different work and research patterns. Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of academic and administrative workplaces.2. Predict the implications of alternative workplace models on key areas such as supporting individual concentrated work, collaboration and interaction, and staff-student access. 3. Explore five alternative workplace models and assess a workplace "toolbox" to help you select appropriate workplace models. TAGS: Academic Work Space, Theory And Research, Work Models Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM Sustainable planning, design and operations has become a high priority for many campuses, but until now it has typically been treated as a separate or parallel element to the campus physical master plan. As a consequence, the campus master plan has not addressed in a comprehensive and coordinated fashion ALL of the components of sustainability: energy, water, transportation, waste, carbon, landscape, materials, land use and site development, economy, food, etc. This session will present a new integrated system model for the campus master plan, with a recent example from Cal State East Bay in Hayward, California. Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify what the content of an integrated campus master plan should entail, from academic and enrollment planning to utilities plans.2. Explore state-of-the-art emerging technologies and concepts in sustainable planning and design. 3. Explore a "rolling out" process and strategies for an integrated and comprehensive campus master plan of this type, its problems and successes, and lessons learned. TAGS: Sustainability, Campus/Master Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Monday, July 20, 2009, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM Despite tightening financial resources, colleges and universities are still under pressure to expand academic and student life programs, often at the expense of investment in existing facilities. After going through a period of level capital appropriations and significant cuts in facilities operations, the Oregon University system has been able to turn around the funding picture by using innovative tools developed by Sightlines LLC to measure and benchmark facilities performance at all seven campuses, ultimately making the case for additional resources. Learning Outcomes: 1. Assess performance measurement and benchmarking tools to help plan holistically regarding capital and facility operations.2. Discuss how performance measurement and benchmarking can be used by both system and campus level officials. 3. Determine how performance measurement and benchmarking tools can help make the case for additional resources. TAGS: Performance Measurement, Large Public Research, Space Management, Finance Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM Development of the Campus Heritage Plan at the University of Cincinnati came on the heels of construction projects that transformed 48 percent of the campus. The ambitious makeover put the campus on the map through the avant-garde of the design field. A plan to address preservation or change in the buildings/landscapes and processes for addressing the rehabilitation, restoration or demolition of the buildings and open spaces on campus was needed for current and future generations for thoughtful decisions about the signature works. Learning Outcomes: 1. Integrate a preservation plan as part of the campus master plan.2. Assess strategies for addressing the preservation of significant buildings and landscapes. 3. Analyze maintenance and use that begs the questions of alteration and repair or "how much latitude is conscionable in changing a building?" TAGS: Historic Preservation/Renovation, Campus Planning, Large Private Research Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM Numerous corporations in the private sector are realizing that re-visioning company culture and mission are critical to their success. Prior to instituting change, many companies initiate a "deep-dive" discovery process to review vision, goals and objectives. The collaborative discovery process examines culture and identity; work methods; workgroup interaction; and appropriate planning and design responses. This session is a case study of how Bellevue Community College successfully adapted this private sector process for use at an institution of higher learning. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover the techniques used in a model for a collaborative discovery process, particularly as it pertains to student services.2. Explore how this model can illuminate and evaluate existing conditions and processes at your institution. 3. Predict how this model can impact future change. TAGS: Community College, Integrated Planning, Theory And Research Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM One of the fundamental engines of quality higher education is creating knowledge, yet few institutions have built capacities to innovate outside of the bounds of traditional faculty research and scholarship. We propose that innovation is a business process that is critical for higher educational institutions to address. This session will provide lessons from a variety of industries that have successfully innovated. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss ideas for building sustainable capacities to innovate on your campus.2. Discover tools that will help you build your capacity to innovate. 3. Discuss innovation as a business process. 4. Analyze case studies of successful innovations from a variety of industries that offer lessons to leaders across the campus. TAGS: Innovation, Theory And Research Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM Well-endowed institutions typically use professional advice and tools when assessing the performance and effectiveness of facilities to establish a baseline for planning. But cash-strapped institutions often do not have that option. Recently, however, a host of online do-it-yourself tools have enabled college planners to take matters into their own hands. But not all tools are equal. Learn how to navigate the array of self-assessment tools, define the building blocks for a successful self-study, and leverage consultants in a cost-effective manner. Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify the available on-line measurement tools and understand their value and usefulness.2. Create a compliment of self-assessment tools that, when used together, provide meaningful information. 3. Recognize when to hire a consultant to supplement do-it-yourself tools. TAGS: Performance Measurement, Large Public Research, Technology, Analysis Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM The USM Gulf Park campus was nearly destroyed by Katrina on August 29, 2005. Within days, USM relocated its operations to a former hospital enabling students to complete the semester and graduate on time. Today, the Gulf Park campus has partially reopened and plans are underway for rehabilitating the historic, waterfront buildings. USM is also planning a new campus at Cross Creek, an inland site. This presentation explores the journey of USM from the aftermath of Katrina to the emerging vision for the future. Learning Outcomes: 1. Assess disaster preparation and recovery strategies from the first-hand experiences.2. Identify planning strategies and considerations about rebuilding on a historic site that is likely to experience future disasters. 3. Explore campus site selection issues and planning in response to sustainable design objectives, and requirements of the American College and University Presidents Climate Commitment. TAGS: Large Public Research, Disaster Recovery, Campus Planning, Historic Preservation Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM Next generation students have different expectations. The focus on student learning outcomes to determine student knowledge has set us on a path to fundamentally restructure planning in recruitment, admissions, curriculum design, supporting student services, and degree/certificate completion requirements. The presenters will discuss how expectations are affected by increasing and competing accountability demands as well as the impact on resource allocations, globalization, and the competition for student talent in the reshaping of indicators measuring performance and success. Learning Outcomes: 1. Predict how learning outcome measures can impact the supply side of student expectations and choices.2. Discuss issues on recruitment and retention of students and the impact for academic and student affairs personnel. 3. Identify strategies to provide offerings to meet future needs of next generation students. TAGS: Trends, Demography, Student Learning Outcomes, Performance Measurement, Integrated Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM USGBC's innovative new Portfolio Program encourages (and credits) campus-wide and broader systemic approaches to sustainability. The Program allows potential LEED projects to be credited with initiatives often best solved at the campus scale. It accelerates LEED certification, structures pre-approved credits, and simplifies future project submissions. The USGBC person who has guided the development will explain it and three people from universities that Piloted it will describe their hands-on experience, provide guidance, and share insight into the campus staffs' role in the core of the effort. Learning Outcomes: 1. Assess how the USGBC Portfolio Program will help accelerate the greening efforts on a campus.2. Recognize how the role of the campus staff may differ with this program in comparison to their experience with individual LEED building projects. 3. Determine the best ways of preparing for the Program. TAGS: Sustainability, Campus/Master Planning, Performance Measurement Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM Unique opportunities in the planning and design of joint-use facilities enable the partners to realize shared visions and objectives, capturing opportunities that offer more than the sum of the parts. Limitations in one entity or area of the project are overcome by a collective ownership, enabling a higher desired outcome. The inclusive stakeholder and community outreach strategic processes that culminated in the aligning of Values and Visions and a combined Operational Plan for two exemplary joint-use projects will be presented. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover strategies to overcome common joint-use obstacle, including diverse cultures, service models, and human resource issues.2. Discuss an approach to the development of a shared vision, common values, and a building program through strategic operational planning. 3. Design appropriate processes to lead to successful joint-use agreements. TAGS: Community College, Town/Gown, Facility Design, Facility Type Library Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM Those born between 1981 and 2000 have grown up immersed with the internet, email, texting, “I-Pods”, “MySpace”, and “YouTube”. As such, highly stimulated “Generation Y” students are more peer-oriented, less book-oriented, and have higher expectations with regard to career satisfaction than previous generations. An educational facilities planner, learning technology specialist, university director of planning and design, and university senior vice president/associate provost will engage the audience in a lively discussion that explores how to create optimal and meaningful learning environments for today’s Generations “Y” and “Z” and tomorrow’s “Millenniums”. Learning Outcomes: 1. Explore multiple perspectives of what learning environments of the future are going to look like.2. Discuss and decide what learning environments of the future will resemble. 3. Determine how to plan, design, and construct learning environments of the future. TAGS: Trends, Demographics, Learning Space Design, Large Private Research, Technology Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM The cornerstone of the Learning Landscape Approach to campus planning is that learning happens everywhere today, as campuses become networks of physical and virtual settings for learning. This session introduces this approach, shares current research drawn from nearly multiple institutions in the US and UK, describes tools for analysis and planning, and discusses initiatives for transforming governance and facilities strategy in higher education to enhance the Learning Landscape. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover why the Learning Landscape Approach is a necessity for planning 21st century learning environments.2. Consider international experience and research on the application of analytical tools and techniques through case studies and lessons learned. 3. Identify strategies for assessment, planning and implementation of a Learning Landscape Approach in governance and management of higher education institutions. TAGS: Research And Theory, Learning Space Design, Analysis, Performance Measurement Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM The author’s of APPA’s “Managing the Future: A New Strategy for Managing Higher Education Capital Assets" describe the book’s concepts and methodology for identifying all facilities needs within the context of comprehensive strategic facilities planning. Learn of the development of the guiding principles and details of successful application of methodology and tools applicable to public and private institutions of all enrollment sizes. The intended audience includes university presidents, senior administrative leadership, chief finance and chief facilities officers, and campus personnel directly involved in preparing long-range capital improvement plans. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover the background and formulation of a successful comprehensive strategic capital development process.2. Weigh the importance of stressing integration of strategic capital development with strategic planning to generate a transparent, consensus-based long-term capital development plan. 3. Evaluate tools that apply to public and private institutions of all enrollment sizes. TAGS: Theory And Research, Master Planning, Finance, Private, Public Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM The success of the plan is highly dependent on the implementation process. Drawing from experience at the University of Saskatchewan over two planning cycles, this presentation will compare and contrast implementation methods and describe how collaborative implementation, strategic communications and the principles of project management improved campus engagement and the effectiveness of the execution of the University's Second Integrated Plan. Learning Outcomes: 1. Differentiate the successes and challenges of design and implementation of two university-level integrated plans.2. Discover how principles of project management, strategic communications, and collaborative implementation can be applied to the execution of integrated plans. 3. Translate vision into action. TAGS: Integrated Planning, Large Public Research, Communications Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM Learning Outcomes: TAGS: Budget Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM How do campuses effectively accommodate a multitude of users in a building? What makes the development of interdisciplinary facilities more difficult and complex than single use buildings? Consensus-based facility programming for integrated and interdisciplinary facilities requires balancing the competing factors of individual and group space needs, building quality, and project budgets. Learn how two universities defined space needs, reached consensus, and identified a programming process as a foundations for the successful completion of interdisciplinary science and technology buildings on their campuses. Learning Outcomes:
TAGS: Large Public Research, Large Private Research, Facility Type Interdisciplinary Science Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM Learning Outcomes: Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM Learning Outcomes: TAGS: Large Private Comprehensive, Student Learning Outcomes Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM Learning Outcomes: TAGS: Integrated Planning, Innovation Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM Strategic planning, a vital management tool, requires ongoing measurement and adjustment to successfully achieve an institution's vision. Implementation of Emory University’s 10-year strategic plan, "Where Courageous Inquiry Leads," is well underway, with the plan hitting its mid-point in 2010. Emory has begun to evaluate progress and will likely adjust specific strategies outlined in it. This session will provide a case study on how Emory has managed the moving parts involved in formulating, implementing, and evaluating its strategic plan. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss major pitfalls to avoid in a university-wide strategic planning process.2. Identify budgetary and other mechanisms to assist in plan implementation. 3. Assess strategic plan evaluation methods. TAGS: Large Private Research, Strategic Planning, Evaluating Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM The LEED Gold OSU Kelley Engineering Center, completed in late 2005, utilizes extensive daylighting and natural ventilation to reduce energy use over 40% under code compliant design. The $45 million building has had an extensive post-occupancy evaluation as the cornerstone facility for the University's quest to become a Top 25 Engineering Program nationally. The building's energy performance and other sustainable design features will be presented by the OSU/Design Team representatives responsible for the facility design and post-occupancy evaluation. Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify strategies to achieve LEED gold certification for an engineering research facility.2. Compare design phase building performance modeling to actual built facility performance. 3. Identify synergies between sustainable design features and user perceptions of a facility's environmental quality and effectiveness as a learning environment. TAGS: Sustainability, Leed, Facility Design, Facility Type Science/Engineering Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM To achieve aggressive sustainability goals on campuses such as the 2030 Challenge, we will have to move beyond the requirements of today’s LEED® green building rating system. The Living Building Challenge (LBC) raises the bar by requiring nontoxic construction, net zero energy and water use. This talk profiles several projects attempting the LBC, and describes efforts at one campus to integrate separate buildings into a building ecology—the living campus—with the goal of eliminating carbon emissions without offsets. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss how the LBC builds on the LEED® rating system and why attempting it may be valuable.2. Assess how a campus-wide analysis of energy and water flows identifies opportunities for synergies -- where one building’s “waste” becomes another building’s “food”. 3. Analyze a path to achieve a carbon-neutral campus by 2030 without relying on the purchase of carbon offsets. TAGS: Sustainability, Facility Design, Integrated Planning, Aucpcc Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM Young Harris College is transforming itself from a two-year school of 600 students to a four-year one of 1,200 undergraduates. In only eight months, the campus and planners defined needs, articulated visions and goals, developed and evaluated options, and came to consensus on a master plan vision, which calls for a set of ambitious projects over the next 20 years. Learn how the planning process was guided by the vision of campus leadership and the values of the liberal arts tradition. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover lessons learned about a rapid planning process.2. Discuss how efforts outside of the planning process (such as the President lining up Trustee support) contributed to success. 3. Describe ways effective strategic planning can help with overall institutional effectiveness (educational outcomes and administrative outcomes). TAGS: Small Private Liberal Arts, Campus Planning, Transition To Four Year Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM Any effective IT strategy and plan must reflect the academic priorities of the institution. This session will share the case study of UC Santa Cruz in building an IT plan that really is based on supporting the instituitonal vision and mission and goals of the academic divisions. This session will share our experience from engaging the senior management of the campus at the front end of the process to the broad involvement in producing a meaningful plan that encompasses technology for teaching and learning, scholarship and research, administration, and student life. Learning Outcomes: 1. Explore ideas for engaging senior leadership in meaningful conversation on the strategic importance of information technology (IT).2. Discuss lessons learned while engaging a campus in building an IT plan. 3. Assess IT facilities needs in the light of long-term trends. TAGS: Technology, Large Public Research, Integrated Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM Endowment earnings have plummeted, unemployment has skyrocketed, family incomes are falling, and state support for universities is dropping faster than at any time in living memory. At the same time, demand for enrollment at America’s colleges and universities is rising rapidly as citizens seek a safe haven in education as they prepare for their next opportunity—whenever it comes. State legislatures and Congress, hearing from cash-strapped constituents, are demanding that colleges control costs (and prices) and increase efficiency and productivity. Discuss what universities are doing to meet these challenges. Are they hunkering down to wait for the storm to pass and the sun to shine again? Are they wailing and running circles and hoping to attract sympathy? Are they engaging faculty, staff, students, community partners, business leaders to reinvent themselves and how they do their business in order to improve student learning, increase degree production, re-focus research and innovation, and reduce cost? How can they make sure they do not waste a perfectly good crisis?” Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss the economic crisis and the opportunities this affords for institutional change.2. Discover the strategies that universities are taking now. 3. Acquire new ideas to re-focus your own institution during this crisis. TAGS: Change Management, Integrated Planning, Budget, Trends Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM Long-term college and university planning typically involves multiple components. Led by a strategic plan, the academic plan, residential plan, campus master plan, athletics plan, financial plan, and others define goals, strategies, and tactics required for success. In many cases, however, these plans follow different timelines, are based on competing priorities, and result in an inconsistent institutional identity. In this session, we will share the basics of an integrated planning process with all types of university leaders and planners. Learning Outcomes: 1. Explore a big picture perspective about campus master planning without losing sight of important details.2. Discover how to reduce the time, money, and rework cycles spent on campus planning activities. 3. Discover how outside facilitation can be key to successful integrated planning efforts. TAGS: Integrated Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM Statistically significant results of two behavioral post-occupancy research studies identify the spatial and program elements in academic buildings that successfully connect students and faculty to their campus and their academic programs. (1) Classroom format (case-study vs. flat classroom) influences both course-specific and more long-term aspects of student experience and commitment. (2) Non-classroom learning spaces programmed into a new engineering classroom building increased student participation and faculty interdisciplinary research collaboration. The architect/researcher/university team presents a model for authentic and replicable evidence-based design. Learning Outcomes: 1. Re-examine FTE-based and other planning formulas that frequently drive building schematic design-sometimes in the wrong direction.2. Identify specific design components for spaces that intensify learning potential, increased student commitment, and student retention. 3. Recognize how well-designed behavioral post-occupancy research is the genuine basis for "evidence-based design", and will generate the lessons each project has to teach. TAGS: Theory And Research, Learning Space Design, Student Learning Outcomes Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM At the University of Pennsylvania, a strong commitment to preservation and enhancement of the historic pedestrian core is combined with a continuous drive for innovation and growth. The University balances these often divergent goals by planning wisely, employing a rigorous design review process, and engaging multiple stakeholders. This session presents the Music Building Renovation and Addition, located in the heart of Penn’s campus, and describes how the University was able to advance their academic mission while preserving an historic resource. Learning Outcomes: 1. Develop a design and review process which respects buildings of historical significance.2. Recognize how to use this process to modernize and expand facilities while preserving the campus' historic resources. 3. Discover how to build consensus and achieve broad support though the design and review process. TAGS: Large Private Research, Historic Preservation/Renovation, Campus Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM Have you ever participated in a programming process that felt more like a high stakes poker game? For both owners and design professionals, envisioning the different programming components and techniques for complex university buildings is essential whether “Programming Light” to justify needs or “Full Programming” is required. What is the difference? What are the varying approaches? RFD will define these Programming Issues with an emphasis on laboratory related concerns so you can walk away with a winning hand! Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover how to communicate your vision in the context of a facility programming process. 2. Discover how to right size programming in terms of consultant scope. 3. Discover different types of programming approaches per science/engineering discipline. TAGS: Facility Design, Facility Type Science/Engineering, Building Programming Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM University of Botswana (UB) development is funded through seven year National Development Plans. UB developed a concurrent 2009-2016 Strategic Plan and the 2009 Gaborone Campus Master Plan in a multi-disciplinary, intercultural collaboration between the University and consultant planning team. The plans project a 25% enrollment growth with extensive campus development focused on creating a sustainable, living/learning, distinctly-Botswanan campus. The presentation will focus on the synergies and opportunities integrated planning can achieve in a case study format. Learning Outcomes: 1. Observe the collaborative planning process which integrated faculty, administrators and planners in an intercultural setting to complete the campus master plan in alignment with the University’s strategic plan.2. Discover an approach and tools for successful overseas collaboration. 3. Discover the details of how the UB strategic plan and how strategic goals were integrated with physical development initiatives and concepts. TAGS: International, Integrated Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM St. John’s Vincentian Institute for Social Action (VISA) was created to provide the University’s diverse student population with a more meaningful academic experience tied to service. Students and professors across all disciplines work towards finding pragmatic solutions to systemic poverty through service and scholarly research. The primary purpose for the creation of VISA is to harness the unique intellectual, social and religious synergies of a major institution to solving issues of global poverty and social injustice. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss challenges and obstacles to creating a cross-disciplinary inter-departmental Institute.2. Assess the benefits of aligning disperse service initiatives to achieve meaningful impact in a community. 3. Use structured and progressive involvement in community service, academic service learning, and community-based research to foster civic engagement. TAGS: Theory And Research, Small Private Liberal Arts, Academic Planning, Student Learning Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM In the quest for internationalization, it is not enough to place an institution in the Middle East and assume the students will then become global citizens. VCU Qatar is in its eleventh year while GMU Ras Al Khaimah is in its fourth. A major challenge is dealing with cultural differences: students, faculty, staff, community, teaching and learning styles. The presentation will discuss how these differences have been addressed and provide an update of the successes that have made the projects extremely rewarding. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss how to plan for successful cultural diversity rather than assuming it will happen.2. Explore how to deal with differences and use them as an opportunity to achieve the goal of educating students to be global citizens. 3. Explore why US institutions embark on projects overseas, the vision of the benefits to the home institution, to the host country, and what the future might hold. TAGS: Large Private Research, Large Public Research, International, Overseas Campuses Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:00 PM–2:30 PM Why is genuinely strategic planning so difficult at colleges and universities? In this session, we will discuss some of the systemic and attitudinal barriers to change. Drawing on insights from behavioral economics, organizational learning theory, and the participants' experience on their campuses, we will explore the causes of resistance to chance, and develop strategies for unlocking the mindset of faculty and administrators toward change and improvement. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss the causes of faculty and staff resistance to organizational change and defensiveness about improvement-related strategies.2. Formulate new ways of framing conversations about change and organizational improvement that will lead to more productive campus conversations. 3. Discover how information flow and feedback affect the assumptions of faculty and staff about what they can say and what they can do in the organizational setting. 4. Re-examine and reconsider the roles of leaders and planners in shaping and designing the forums, rituals, and occasions for planning and strategic decision making. TAGS: Student Learning, Academic Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM Campus Planning involves the upgrade of existing buildings and infrastructure. Moreover, the sustainable plan includes the development of new, efficient facilities. A goal of a sustainable master plan is allowing a campus to grow without adding to it’s environmental footprint. To achieve your desired results, our presentation will show you how you can utilize synergies between environment, architecture, site planning and human well being. Sustainability needs to be planned into the campus master plan and a macro view must be taken to reduce lost opportunity and fully utilize economize of scale. Learning Outcomes: 1. Acquire knowledge to minimize the environmental impact of development.2. Explore how to take a present campus and make it fully sustainable. 3. Discuss how various site, environmental, and architectural considerations affect overall campus decisions. TAGS: Sustainability, Campus/Master Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM How do campus planners identify which historic resources important for guiding future campus improvements? The use of significant historic resources is integral to sustainable planning and design. This landscape heritage plan for Mills College, funded by the Getty Foundation, identifies the values of the College founders and how these were expressed by nationally recognized landscape architects and architects over 150 years. The result is a campus environment that expresses the unique identity of the institution. Learning Outcomes: 1. Explore common issues, trends, and motivations institutions face regarding their cultural landscapes, their values, sense of place, and identity.2. Discuss a planning process that uses landscape heritage studies to guide sustainable future development in balance with historic preservation. 3. Discover how to integrate the planning process into the curricula and public realm through student studies and public lectures. TAGS: Small Private Liberal Arts, Campus Planning, Landscaping Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM Tomorrow's campus leaders will require a fresh combination of perspectives and skills in strategic, integrated, and aligned planning. This session will describe how to successfully lead and plan for change in the globalized higher education environment of 2020. It will describe how to thrive in the face of global competition and plan for international campus locations. These principles draw on the authors' successful international planning experiences and on their new SCUP publication A Guide to Planning for Change. Learning Outcomes: 1. Recognize fresh principles of strategic, integrated, and aligned planning needed to thrive in globalized higher education.2. Explore new perspectives, skills, tools, and practices needed by leaders and planners in globalized higher education. 3. Discuss the impact of globalization on planning for existing campus settings and on establishing campuses in international settings TAGS: Integrated Planning, Performance Measurement, Change Management Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify strategies for identifying areas of high risk to success. TAGS: Facility Design, Budget, Building Programming Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM This presentation examines the processes involved in public-private partnership in strategic planning and implementation at Tennessee State University and the challenges of managing organizational culture change. Working with Deloitte Consulting, IBM, and the Executive Leadership Council (all pro bono), the university developed Key Performance Indicators as part of its Business Intelligence initiative. This initiative informed the development of the University’s 2010-2015 strategic plan, and incorporates other planning efforts. BI dashboards created through this integrative planning process provide effective means for evidence-based decision-making, resource allocation, and evaluation. Learning Outcomes: 1. Examine a model to collaboratively develop key performance indicators from institutional strategic planning, and produces BI dashboards to use for data-driven decision-making,2. Assess strategies for integrating complex university planning initiatives, and generating metrics for monitoring the planning process at each level. 3. Discover effective ways to involve the campus community, alumni, and community in the planning process. TAGS: Large Public Comprehensive, Performance Measurement, Integrated Planning, Dashboard, Budget Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM In challenging fiscal times, universities often need to make difficult, immediate, decisions to maintain programs through creative financing in the belief that the problematic budgetary situation will improve. When the situation does not improve, however, those decisions may place the organization at risk. This presentation will focus on the process followed by one university to address such a situation without resorting to rash broad-based reductions. Through collaboration and trust a plan was established which resulted in more efficient and effective operations. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover a model for addressing critical cross-organizational issues that face the campus.2. Assess a budgetary methodology that can be used to address fiscal downturns and budgetary shortfalls. 3. Explore how collaboration that uses a fiscal issue can improve the university’s efficiency and effectiveness. TAGS: Budget, Finance, Large Public Research Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM Colleges and Universities have been building new residence halls to keep up with the perceived needs of the Millennials. Existing buildings have then become less desirable in housing lotteries. The future lies in green renovations of existing housing stock. The first LEED renovation on the Harvard Business School campus will be examined with Owner, Architect and Engineer explaining how sustainability can be achieved in existing buildings. The session will be interactive and cost-to-benefit and performance data will be shared. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discover how to manage LEED certification in residential renovation.2. Identify effective MEP systems and controls for residential renovation. 3. Predict initial costs and long term operating costs/savings in residential renovation. TAGS: Sustainability, Renovation, Facility Design, Budget, Performance Measurement Continuing Education Credits:
Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM University of Alberta’s Edmonton Clinic North project team has created a fundamentally new inter-disciplinary environment for dynamic, integrated health education and research. Created through the partnership of the University and the Capital Health Region, this new facility aims to serve as the catalyst for collaboration between all of the health sciences faculties and health regions in Northern Alberta. This ground breaking project illustrates how one of Canada's leading research universities is changing education and practice in health care. Learning Outcomes: 1. Recognize how an integrated facility planning approach, which includes non-traditional participants and sectors, can evolve the organizational structure of its functional program.2. Assess a new model for a health science center. 3. Discuss emerging and future teaching and research technologies, and the integrated, translational and transformative learning/research environments that will support them. TAGS: Large Public Research, Town/Gown, Facility Design Science/Health Care Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM For several years, many institutions have used a privatized financing model for the development and construction of much-needed student housing on campus. Only recently has this model been expanded to other types of projects. Institutions have developed plans for research facilities, parking decks, recreation centers, conference centers, as well as new apartment and suite-style housing. In today's economic climate, focused management of public-private projects is more critical than ever. Examples will include a research facility, a parking structure, and three phases of on-campus apartment-style housing. Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify how to select and manage a team to provide financing, design and construction for a privatized capital project.2. Discuss the step-by-step of the process from initial Board and agency approvals to construction, occupancy and management. 3. Discuss the organization, decision-making, and leadership requirements needed to make the project successful. Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM Second Life is an immersive user created virtual world. Today, more than 200 colleges and universities have developed a presence in Second Life to conduct teaching and learning, collaborate and do research, and focus on student development -- especially effective when distance or different cultures and languages are at play. This presentation will show a new campus build and discuss issues related to bringing up a virtual campus. The presentation includes significant time live in Second Life. Learning Outcomes: 1. Recognize the value of a higher educational presence in Second Life.2. Explore how to navigate the issues with establishing a presence. 3. Experience architecture, design, applications, and in-world tools. TAGS: Technology, Trends, Virtual Learning, Student Development Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM Learning Outcomes: TAGS: Sustainability, Aucpcc Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM Learn the results of a major survey on the key factors driving learning spaces. What do students think is the most valuable consideration in physical learning spaces, and if learning can happen anywhere-what would the most valuable aspect of campus learning spaces be? The survey takes a qualitative approach to give insight into these and other questions to inform your planning initiatives. Learning Outcomes: 1. Analyze student responses to a major learning-spaces factor survey2. Measure planning initiatives qualitatively 3. Discuss the most valuable aspects of campus learning spaces. 4. Identify the key factors driving the design of learning spaces. Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM The “Learning Studio” is a design solution for obstacles inherent in traditional “space-challenged” classrooms that impact pedagogy, fixed roles, engagement, and flexibility. Millennial students are often “out of sync” with traditional learning spaces and tend to disengage from learning. Learning Studio design features reframe the relationship between teacher and student to greatly increase engagement, active and collaborative learning, interaction, and supportive learning environments. Four colleges committed to reinventing learning spaces and classroom research will be featured. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss the characteristics of Millennials, and the challenges of educating a younger generation in an older generation learning environment.2. Assess design features of the Learning Studio model, how they can be incorporated into new/remodeled facilities, and how success can be measured. 3. Understand strategies for institutional change for a new era of learning spaces in higher education. TAGS: Learning Space Design, Teaching Focused Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM Strategic planning clarifies institutional purpose and direction by creating goals and strategies. How these goals and strategies are developed and implemented can take a variety of approaches. It can either be instigated by the “top,” or be influenced from the “bottom.” The intent of this presentation is to describe these approaches, provide four case studies at research universities as examples, and discuss the implications on how the two approaches of strategic planning affect the development, implementation, resource management and evaluation. Learning Outcomes: 1. Assess two philosophies toward strategic planning and how they impact the development, implementation and evaluation of the strategic plan.2. Explore the positive and negative aspects of the models. 3. Discuss strategies that could work effectively within your own strategic planning processes. TAGS: Large Public Research, Strategic Planning, Integrated Planning Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM This session will focus on the ways architects and university planners can leverage design strategies to enhance, respect and restore architecturally significant modernist buildings of the 1960’s and 1970’s while transforming them into effective contemporary academic and support facilities. Architect and owner perspectives will be explored through two case studies-Harvard University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences’ offices in the landmark building designed by Jose Luis Sert, and the Student Center repositioning at Walter Netsch's University of Illinois at Chicago. Learning Outcomes: 1. Determine how to manage the goals of historic preservation with renovation projects that adapt modernist historic structures to contemporary campus needs.2. Discuss the in's and out's of transforming brutalist architecture into comfortable and effective campus facilities. 3. Clarify priorities for renovation/restoration projects on historically significant campuses. TAGS: Historic Preservation/Renovation Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM The new presidential administration has presented us with three priorities that will impact education. The three directives are based in energy, education, and infrastructure. It is clear that things will never return to business as usual. Consequently, we are being provided with the opportunity to be more innovative and are being challenged to build smarter. Learn how to employ an integrated process which layers the finest of architecture, planning, engineering, interior design, and landscape for verifiable performance improvements, purpose-built learning spaces, and a timeless design from inherent sustainability. Learning Outcomes: 1. Apply the latest sustainable integrated design methods to add project value without adding cost.2. Derive inspiration for an environmentally holistic design from sustainable project criteria. 3. Explore beyond an intuitive decision making process to an informed process of integrated design. TAGS: Sustainability, Facility Design Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM This presentation explores an evolution of an integrated approach to institutional strategic planning and accreditation-driven self-evaluation. The presenters demonstrate the benefits of moving from discrete to parallel to integrated frameworks using Northern Arizona University’s strategic planning process and its recent North Central Association self-study. Special attention is paid to the notion of continuous institutional assessment, goal re-alignment, and communication as a contrast to the more traditional, recurrent, but less frequent strategic planning and self-study initiatives and processes. Learning Outcomes: 1. Discuss the benefits of integrating self-study and strategic planning processes into one system of institutional assessment, strategy realignment, and communication.2. Assess successful tactics for organizing participation in both processes, and a model for incorporating ongoing assessment into strategic planning. 3. Apply practical tips to infuse the culture of strategic planning and assessment deeper into an organization. TAGS: Large Public Research, Integrated Planning, Performance Measurement, Accreditation, Communication Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM Learning Outcomes: TAGS: Sustainability, Community College, Budget, Partnerships Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM Learning Outcomes: TAGS: Large Public Research, Historic Preservation/Renovation, Town/Gown Continuing Education Credits:
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM Current practice reveals that universities who employ dashboards/scorecards utilize performance indicators which, while indicative of overall performance, may not be best suited for on-going, frequent progress reviews. In addition, because of differences inbetween measure inputs, processes and outcomes, school and unit dashboard rarely link to university overall indicators. The alignment challenge is even greater for universities and medical centers. Emory University is developing school and unit dashboards/scorecards and would like to provide participants an opportunity to learn from its experience. Learning Outcomes: 1. Recognize the ideal structure of university/school/unit scorecard/dashboards.2. Discover a dashboard/scorecard design process. 3. Discuss common missteps. TAGS: Large Private Research, Performance Measurement, Dashboards Continuing Education Credits: |
This printed page contains links to other web pages. Each link has a numerical indicator which corresponds to one of the URLs below.