SCUP-43 logo

SCUP's Annual International Conference and Idea Marketplace
SCUP–43
Discover!
Global Perspectives, Local Strategies

Montréal Convention Center
(Palais des congrès de Montréal)
159, Saint-Antoine W
Montréal, Québec
H2Z 1H2

July 19–23, 2008   Montréal, QC (Canada)

 


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(INV07) Integrating Global Issues Into A New Curriculum
Presented by: Bill Berry, Provost-Elect, University of Dallas; Steve Roberson, Associate Dean, Butler University

In 2005, Butler University adopted a core predicated on the theme of “Self, Community, and World.” With the new core, responsibility for global education will expand from two courses delivered by a small cohort of faculty to one where internationalization is the responsibility of all faculty. In 2006, Butler was selected to be one of eighteen schools (ranging from community colleges to liberal arts schools to Research I universities) participating in AAC&U's Shared Futures: Global Learning and Personal Responsibility. This session will describe the process of core renewal, the lessons learned from Shared Futures, and the progress of Butler's project.

TAGS: Academic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(1152) Stimulating and Sustaining Regional Economies Through Workforce Development
Presented by: Peter Blake, Vice Chancellor, Workforce Development Services, Virginia Community College System; Marcia Harrington, Director, Institutional Research, Virginia Community College System

Today, we face changes in our economy and in our demography that challenge our conventional view of higher education. State and regional economies are struggling, industries are moving off shore, and the workforce is aging. Meanwhile the U.S. is falling behind other industrial nations in educational attainment. Higher education often is seen as the key to intellectual and economic progress. Workforce development, particularly in a community college setting, is a near-immediate response to these emerging trends. Learn more about what workforce development means, how it does its work, and how it stimulates change and improvement in regional economies.

Learning Outcomes:

Intended audience is anyone interested in sustaining higher educational attainment levels and those interested in countering economic decline. This session will benefit those who are interested in building workforce development programs and partnerships with area business and industry to meet educational needs.

Attendees will understand the interrelationships between national, state, and regional economies and higher education through shared research on enrollment and graduation trends, regional and state economies, and current literature discussing trends and implications including popular New York Times bestsellers like, The world is flat: A brief history of the U.S. (Friedman, 2005)and Collapse: How Societies choose to fail or Succeed (Diamond, 2005).

Attendees will understand what workforce development is, how it differs from traditional higher educational and continuing education models, the variety of partners to workforce development, how to set up programs, build partnerships, and how to enhance community development and economic development through workforce development.

Attendees will understand how workforce development is a non-traditional higher education format more immediately responsive to education needed to susain regional economies.



TAGS: Academic Planning, Partnerships, Town Gown, Community College

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(1002) Collaborative Facilities Strategies
Presented by: Bob MacKenzie, Manager/Plant Operations Support, State of Washington

Collaborative facilities management can be leveraged by public agencies and non-profit organizations on limited budgets to maximize scarce resources and to operate "champagne" facilities. Learn how public agencies, schools, colleges, utilities and municipalities are making great things happen in the northwest and Canada. Sharing and cooperation have been elevated to new heights, driven by fiscal constraints and the need to operate sustainable buildings. You'll learn how a core staff can facilitate, orchestrate, broker and respond to myriad requests for assistance from a "Consortium” of public facility managers. Discover how a general government agency has partnered with Washington State University to validate the concept of collaborative facilities management and saved its 125 members more than $31 million in the process!

Learning Outcomes:

1. Save dollars and labor by application of strategies discussed in session.
2. Learn how planners,facilities and construction managers can interact to create win-win solutions in varied environments.
3. Discover how a major university and a general government agency have partnered to accomplish previoslu unreachable objectives.

TAGS: Partnerships, Space Management, Collaboration, Capital Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(VS-06) Growing Enrollments in a Fixed Amount of Space
Presented by: Patricia Kraigher, Systems Development Coordinator, University of British Columbia; Tom Shaver, Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Ad Astra Information Systems

Efficient use of space and resources is a necessity in higher education operations. Innovative institutions have implemented data-driven academic scheduling policies and academic capacity management strategies to effectively manage space while growing enrollments. Join us to learn how colleges and universities have improved space management on campuses with a fixed or shrinking amount of classroom space.

TAGS: Space Management, Performance Measures

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(1025) Favorable Exchange: A Multidimensional Perspective for Human Capital Planning in a Global Academic World
Presented by: Steven D. Cunningham, Associate Vice President, Northern Illinois University; Vickie A. Gillio, University Counsel, Northern Illinois University

Diverse human capital is the hallmark of the global economy. Both the promise and complexity of this diverse landscape requires new perspectives for institutional planning. This presentation, intended for university administrators, will portray interrelated organizational practices and essential linkages between economic human and social capital theory, HR, legal compliance, and organizational effectiveness in the modern socioeconomic setting.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Presentation of an organized system integrating the legal and organizational performance dimensions of diversity.
2. Review of effective administrative and human resource management practices in relation to diversity and strategic planning.
3. Insight into the correlation between human capital theory, diversity, and the global economy.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Human Resources, Organizational Effectiveness, Research Focused Institution, Comprehensive/Doctoral

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(1011) Prioritizing Academic Programs--Can It Be Done?
Presented by: Mary Doyle, Vice Chancellor, Information Technology, University of California-Santa Cruz; Karen Schmid, Associate Vice President, Academic Affairs, Indiana State University

A familiar lament among colleges and universities is that it is nearly impossible to reduce or eliminate academic programs. If it's not the old standard "We've always done it that way," it's some other marginally defensible claim that it can't be done. Through the experiences of two public institutions, you will learn that it can and has been done.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Exploring ways to define criteria for inventing, maintaining, reducing or reorganizaing, and eliminating academic programs

2. Identifying appropriate metrics and data to apply to criteria, including pitfalls in using both institutional and national data bases

3. Including the right people in the process

4. Creating a process that is transparent and well understood

TAGS: Performance Measures, Academic Planning, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(1110) Identifying and Implementing Change in Research Administration Roles and Responsibilities at Northwestern University
Presented by: Dona M. Cordero, Director/Change Mgmt, Northwestern University; Sepideh Sepasi, Director/Change Management, Northwestern University

An enormous amount of extramural funding awarded to colleges and universities worldwide, and the institutional assignment of resources to steward that funding is critical. This presentation will highlight an initiative that was successfully undertaken at Northwestern University’s McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science. Attendees will learn a methodology for identifying and implementing research administration roles and responsibilities, an approach for determining appropriate research administration staffing locally at their institutions, and lessons from this innovative initiative.

Learning Outcomes:

  1. Methodology to assess research administration roles and responsibilities (the specific tasks and positions/job titles required to support research administration)
  2. Approach for determining staffing model(s)
  3. Application of staffing model(s) and responsibilities in a school/unit
  4. Measurements of effectiveness (quantitative and qualitative)
  5. Lessons learned

TAGS: Budget Planning, Research, Human Resources, Academic Planning, Research Focused Institution, Research I

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(1122) Is LEED Affordable?
Presented by: Bryna C. Dunn, Director/Environmental Planning & Research, Moseley Architects; Robert L. Fenning, Vice President/Administration and Finance, Old Dominion University; George C. Nasis, Managing Principal/Higher Education Studio, Moseley Architects

This data driven presentation is designed to provide university and college administrators and their consulting design team with a long term perspective when considering sustainable design strategies for future projects on their campuses. We will track the energy and operating cost performance of (6) LEED Certified education projects, including five (5) completed for higher education over the past 3 years, and compare these savings to the capital cost premiums, if any, resulting from LEED Certification.

Learning Outcomes:

The following three learning objectives will be realized by participants attending this session:

1). Compare the long term savings versus short term capital cost premiums when considering LEED Certification for future projects. There are ample data bases available to substantiate these savings to administrators and their constituents when seeking funding and support for sustainable design practices.

2). Certain LEED Certification strategies provide owners with the tools to monitor building energy performance and continually improve it over time, building the case for future high performance buildings on their campuses.

3). In addition to savings in energy and operating costs, high performance buildings also create healthier and more vibrant teaching and learning environments. These improved interior environments can be documented based on actual user feedback solicited via independently administered, web based surveys of the building occupants, building the case for the implementation of sustainable design strategies in the future.

TAGS: Sustainability, Performance Measures, Budget Planning, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(1139) Campus Placemaking
Presented by: Philip Myrick, Vice President, Project for Public Spaces

Placemaking, the art and science of creating public spaces where people want to gather, is a forgotten element in campus planning today. However, sense of place and vibrant community life are as important to a campus's appeal as famous professors, alumni and sports teams. It only takes a slight reorientation of strategy to incorporate placemaking ideas into any campus redevelopment plans -- and the pay off, in terms of image and livability, is incalculable. It's simply a matter of being intentional about creating great places as part of any project undertaken. Project for public spaces will present on their experience with several prestigious universities.

Learning Outcomes:

Participants can hear first hand how Placemaking has helped other campuses, such as Harvard Allston. They can ask questions to see how Placemaking might be applied to their own campuses, and they will learn what small things they can do to make immediate, short-term improvements to their campuses.

TAGS: Open Space, Master Planning, Student Recruitment

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(1027) Process and Techniques for Establishing Productive Linkages Among Global Institutions
Presented by: Charles A. Craig, Principal & Senior Master Planner, Einhorn Yaffee Prescott; Robert R. Gosende, Associate Vice Chancellor, International Programs, State University of New York System Administration; Steve Kleinrock, Creative Director, Einhorn Yaffee Prescott Architecture & Engineering P.C.; Galib Mammad, President, Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy Foundation

This session focuses on processes establishing a new diplomatic institution in Baku that reflect Azerbaijan's emergence on the global scene. Presenters will describe: the context and impetus for this international initiative; how the institution's mission, goals, and objectives inform facility requirements; and a design methodology linking the institutional mission to the realities of urban setting and site conditions, and strategies and operational structures connecting nascent curricula and programs to established university networks in the United States.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Techniques and strategies for addressing institutional purpose and mission in the facility programming process

2. Methods and techniques for manifesting mission and client goals and objectives in the site and building design process

3. Strategies and considerations for establishing curricular and program linkages that benefit all participants among international institutions of higher education

TAGS: International Planning Models, Integrated Planning, New Campus

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(1094) Learning Communities: A Model for Creating the Holistic Learning Environment
Presented by: Bev Wood, Senior Planner, URS Corporation

As colleges and universities engage more fully with their host communities to explore synergistic planning and development opportunities, the model for creating ‘learning communities’ must expand to include multi-generational, public/private, sustainable environments where learning occurs on and off campus, formally and informally, directly or tangentially. This model will focus on planning and designing vibrant, livable and sustainable communities that are enriched by, and infused with, learning opportunities. The discussion will focus on blending campus and community planning in support of the educational institutuion's mission to provide lifelong learning opportunities and the communities goal to create social, economic and environmental vibrancy.

Learning Outcomes:

The premise to this session’s discussion is a theory that the campus of the future may look less like a traditional campus with academic buildings and student service buildings at the core and more like an attractive, well planned neighborhood integrated with its host community’s comprehensive plan as a ‘learning precinct’ with special links to academic resources. This concept goes far beyond residential learning programs and community redevelopment projects. It is intended to integrate learning and community development using a new model of transparency, technology, holistic design and social dynamics.

The intent of this session is to challenge the notions of traditional campus planning and explore the idea of re-thinking the design of the campus as a ‘learning community’. Many campuses now have ventured into their surrounding neighborhoods to work cooperatively with local governments on redevelopment strategies. The proposed session will ‘push the envelope’ to explore the idea that the ‘learning community form of campus design’ may completely blur the boundaries between campus and community; embracing the idea that learning occurs as an integral part of belonging to a balanced, vibrant community. In this concept, the University is a property owner in the larger context with a particular focus on knowledge and learning. This session will explore the following questions:

1. In a model of ‘cradle to grave’ learning, how can a community be designed to support opportunities for continuous learning and what is the role of the University in this model?
2. What are the characteristics of the learning community of the future and how do they relate to campus design?
3. Is it time to change the college campus configuration to be externally oriented rather than internally centered? What would that mean for the University and the host community?

The conversation will stimulate new ideas about conceiving campus plans that are community based and holistically designed. The participants will be asked to share views, examples, challenges and successes in changing the campus cultures to be sensitive, responsive and pro-active in managing change related to campus and community development.

TAGS: Partnerships, Sustainability, Town Gown

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 21, 2008, 1:15 PM–2:15 PM
(1077) University of Washington Building Restoration Prioritization Study: A Consultant's Perspective
Presented by: Ira Fink, President, Ira Fink & Associates, Inc

Too valuable to remove, increasingly expensive to maintain, and difficult to upgrade on a piecemeal basis, 15 buildings in the heart of the University of Washington campus had reached a threshold where the University needed to decide whether to undertake major renovations of these facilities or demolish and construct new. This presentation is an analysis and description of how the University of Washington went about comprehensive and simultaneous evaluations of whether to demolish or renovate these buildings which totaled nearly one million square feet, housed over 40 academic programs, and served approximately 7,000 students and 3,500 faculty and staff.

Learning Outcomes:

The primary learning outcome of this presentation is how to balance the many competitive factors that come into play when looking comprehensively at buildings that have reached a threshold in their existence and where the university must decide whether to undertake major renovations or demolish and construct new facilities. Attendees will learn how the value of having one building available as surge space allowed a ten-year process of building renewal to begin to take place. They will learn how mathematics and model building came together to create a weighted criteria matrix that covered three major areas of concern: life safety, building condition, and building use. They will see how the schedule for renovation of these 15 buildings was merged into and became part of the University’s biennium request to the State for capital budget funding.

The problems facing the University of Washington with its aging building infrastructure is similar to the problems facing most U.S. campuses with large inventories of facilities built immediately prior to and following World War II.

Ten of the University of Washington buildings contained one-quarter of all the general assignment classrooms on the campus, and provided instructional space for over 29,000 students. These were historic and architecturally significant buildings that were becoming inadequate for the demands of modern teaching and research.

This presentation describes how the University of Washington, with consultant help, went about a thoughtful, methodical, and carefully constructed process to come to closure on what to do with these buildings, and when to do it. The project became known as “restoring the core.”

TAGS: Project Management, Master Planning, Decision Making, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(INV03) SCUP/AIA-CAE Excellence in Planning, Excellence in Landscape Architecture, and Excellence in Architecture Awards
Presented by: Mark Hough, Campus Landscape Architect, Duke University; Mark J. Maves, Associate Principal, Ayers/Saint/Gross; Lisa Rochon, Architecture Critic, The Globe and Mail; Stephen F. Troost, Campus Planner, Michigan State University

Awards programs are a way to not only recognize and applaud those individuals and organizations whose achievements exemplify excellence, but also to provide learning opportunities for everyone whose lives and passions involve higher education. Jurors from the 2008 SCUP/AIA-CAE Excellence in Planning, Excellence in Architecture and Excellence in Landscape Architecture awards program will present and discuss the trends, themes and excellence demonstrated in the winning entries.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(1072) Learning Spaces: Where People, Pedagogy, Environment, and Technology Meet
Presented by: Grace N. Chiang, Principal, HOLT Architects; Jerry Gabriel, Lecturer, Engineering Communications Program, Cornell University; Steven W. Hugo, Associate, HOLT Architects; Michelle Ponczek, Director, Space Planning Resources, State University of New York at Binghamton

Are your faculty and students at the mercy of their educational environment, or is the environment designed to enhance the teaching/learning process? This seminar will provide tools to assist planners and administrators in evaluating the effectiveness of existing learning environments, as well as in facilitating the creation of new ones. We will offer an overview of common pedagogies and will examine how technology and architecture can be integrated to complement teaching and learning styles. (Format includes instruction and group exercises)

Learning Outcomes:

1. Attendees will learn guidelines to assist in the creation of new academic learning environments. What are the right questions to ask when determining flexibility versus intended use of a space?
2. Attendees will learn to identify common teaching pedagogies, and with this knowledge, be able to diagnose/evaluate existing space to determine whether the environment is having a positive or negative effect on learning.
3. Attendees will be given examples of ideal prototypical learning environments where teaching/learning style is not a consequence of the architectural and technological environment, but rather, the architectural and technological environment enhances the teaching/ learning process.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Technology, Student Learning, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Production


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(1118) Planning for Change: University-School Partnerships
Presented by: Robert I. Donofrio, Assistant Vice President, Partnership Development & Enhancement Office of the Vice President for Education Partnerships, Arizona State University; Mehmet Dali Ozturk, Executive Director, Research, Evaluation & Development, Arizona State University; Larry Pieratt, Executive Director, Arizona State University

Education partnerships between universities and their local communities can be used to improve the quality of PreK-12 education and help ensure that all students reach the high level of academic achievement necessary to succeed in the global economy. This presentation illustrates how these partnerships can be effectively planned, sustained, and evaluated. In addition, this session introduces a paradigm that university leaders can follow to promote institutional change and examine how local strategies and innovations can be shared among learning communities. Audience participation is encouraged.

Learning Outcomes:

Participants will learn:

1. How a paradigm shift towards social responsibility can facilitate planning efforts in helping children learn the skills necessary to compete within a global economy.
2. How to overcome obstacles to improve the relationship between universities and their communities.
3. How innovations can be shared within a large educational community.
4. How to design effective evaluation plans that assess the efficacy of educational partnerships in promoting systemic change.
5. How to design and build centers of education innovation to improve public education.
6. The status of national STEM efforts and how a Southwestern state is approaching a remedy.

TAGS: Partnerships, Town Gown, Academic Planning, Performance Measures, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(1123) Creating a Campus for the 21st Century
Presented by: Stephanie Garcia-Vause, City of Henderson; Andy Hafen, City of Henderson; Steve Kirk, Councilman, City of Henderson; Barbara A. Maloney, Partner, BMS Design Group; Fred Maryanski, President, Nevada State College; Spencer Stewart, Associate Vice President of College Relations, Nevada State College

Building a new campus from scratch in the 21st century demands uncommon ways of tackling common problems. Learn how college, city and state officials are working together to establish a premier 600-acre learning-living campus environment that will serve as the region’s preeminent educational, cultural and social destination. Speakers will address the framework currently in use to develop an integrated community that seamlessly blends both a master-planned campus and college town with a wide range of commercial, residential, cultural and employment opportunities while maintaining sustainability in design.

Learning Outcomes:

Nevada, much like the rest of the world, is experiencing a tremendous increase in demand for higher education services. Named the fastest growing state in America by the 2000 U.S. Census, Nevada continues to astound observers with its incredible economic and structural growth spurt. Most of this growth is occurring in southern Nevada where the population is estimated at 1.9 million people. According to several studies, Nevada’s growth rate will continue to lead all other states well into the future; some studies indicate by as much as 25 years into the future.

Nevada, much like the rest of the world, is also experiencing a dramatic demographic shift within its college-attending population. The last fifteen years in Nevada have produced one of the most racially, ethnically and socioeconomically diverse populations in the country as the Hispanic and Asian sectors have grown at a triple-digit breakneck percentage. How Nevada, the Nevada System of Higher Education and Nevada State College begin to accommodate a uniquely new and burgeoning wave of students will not be dissimilar to how emerging and rapidly developing regions across the globe respond to this same phenomenon of increased demand for higher education.

As new campuses continue to spring up in the U.S. and abroad, key academic, business and civic leaders, given the realities of reduced funding from federal and state sources, must develop new frameworks of partnership in order to swiftly and competitively accommodate the educational needs of demographically changing and burgeoning college-bound populations.

Topics to be discussed include:

Understanding the changing landscape of higher education economics and entrepreneurialism;

Developing new frameworks for creating lasting public-public and public-private partnerships;

Diversifying campus revenue streams through nontraditional sources;

Optimizing campus and community land uses for maximum shared benefit, to achieve sustainability and smart growth goals, and to be a model for local, regional development.

TAGS: Partnerships, New Campus, Student Learning, Town Gown

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Marketing


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(1128) Critical Elements for Successful Strategic Enrollment Planning
Presented by: Brian Dalton, Vice President, Enrollment Management & Associate Academic Dean, Program Development, The College of St. Scholastica; Jim Mager, Associate Vice President, Noel Levitz
While often talked about, few institutions in higher education practice strategic enrollment planning. Regardless of public or private sponsorship, American higher education is increasingly pressured to manage its long range enrollment plans so as to remain true to mission, meet educational expectations, and maintain or achieve financial strength.
This session is ideal for leaders in higher education who seek the means by which to facillitate long range enrollment planning with an eye toward the fiscal reality of future anticipated investments and expenses. Specifically, this sessions will focus on the foundational elements of what constitutes successful strategic enrollment planning.

Learning Outcomes:

1. An understanding of the terminology of SEP - what it is and what it is not;

2. A tangible listing of critical metrics and data that are foundational to SEP

3. Best practices listing with "real life" references to SEP practitioners

TAGS: Budget Planning, Student Recruitment, Academic Planning, Small Private Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Finance


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(1156) What Do We Do Now? How to Respond to Your President's Climate Commitment
Presented by: Elaine Clark, Associate Vice President/Administration & Finance, University of Maine; Greg Havens, Senior Associate, Sasaki Associates, Inc; Robert C. Hicks, Senior Project Manager, Symmes Maini & McKee Associates; Laura A. Hyatt, Assistant Professor II, Biology Department, Rider University; Jason Kliwinski, Director, Sustainable Design, Spiezle Group, Inc; Alexandria Roe, Director, Planning & Program Development, Architectural & Engineering Services, University of Connecticut
The American College & University Presidents Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) is gaining momentum with over 475 signatories. What are the implications, and how do you implement this once your president signs the commitment? Presenters representing three institutions will share perspectives about their work through the cross disciplinary layers of design and implementation toward carbon neutrality and this new paradigm of greenhouse gas master planning. Conversations will include requirements of the ACUPCC, common sources/reduction strategies for greenhouse gas planning, integration with master planning, LEED(tm) correlation to ACUPCC goals, social/environmental/economic benefits, and opportunities to use this as a teaching tool.

The American College & University Presidents Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) is gaining momentum with over 475 signatories. What are the real implications of this for an institution, and how do you implement this once your president signs the commitment? Presenters representing three institutions will share perspectives from their work through the cross disciplinary layers of design and implementation toward carbon neutrality and this new paradigm of greenhouse gas master planning. Conversation includes requirements of the agreement, common sources/reduction strategies for greenhouse gas and integrating it with master planning, and opportunities to use this as a teaching tool.

Learning Outcomes:

1. What are the requirements of the President’s Climate
Commitment.
2. The process of implementing the requirements of the
commitment.
3. Understand green house gases and the common
sources/reduction strategies.
4. Review the opportunities for integrating the Presidents
Climate Commitment with the master planning process.
5. Understand LEED™ & its relationship to greenhouse gas
reduction strategies as well as how to integrate it in
projects
cost effectively.

TAGS: Sustainability, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(1148) Creating a New Academic Medical Center From Whole Cloth
Presented by: Richard Bowen, Associate Vice President/Administration and Finance, Northern Arizona University; David J. Duffy, Associate Principal, Ayers Saint Gross Architects & Planners; Adam A. Gross, Principal, Ayers/Saint/Gross Architects & Planners

Phoenix Arizona, one of the fastest growing cities in America, has everything a great metropolitan area has - except a great Academic Medical Center. To address this, 3 Institutions - Arizona State, Northern Arizona University and the University of Arizona - have pooled their intellectual and fiscal resources to plan a new Academic Medical Center in downtown Phoenix. This session will give global perspective to this local phenonemon as a lesson for others who may be facing similar challenges around the world.

Learning Outcomes:

- How to plan an interdisciplinary Academic Medical Center including the relationships of bench to bed, Clinical to research, etc.
- How to get 3 disparite Institutions (Arizona State, Northern Arizona University, University of Arizona) to work together for the common good
- How to work with a major metropolitan area and city and state governments to plan a new campus from scratch

TAGS: Partnerships, New Campus, Medical College

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Marketing


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(1129) Building a More Educated Georgia--The USG Strategic Capital Model
Presented by: Lewis C. Godwin, Director of Planning and Projects, Georgia Perimeter College; Mel Lockhart, Senior Consultant, Paulien & Associates Inc; Philip J. Parsons, Director, Sasaki Associates, Inc; Zvi Szafran, Vice President, Academic Affairs, Southern Polytechnic State University; Alan S. Travis, Director, Planning, University System of Georgia

Facing system-wide facility deficiencies and 100,000 additional students by 2020, the University System of Georgia forged the Strategic Capital Model, a long-term approach to capital programming and budgeting. The Model was designed to improve the consistency and impact of State investment, integrate privately financed projects, remove barriers, and optimize facility performance. The Model will be described in a formal presentation, then a panel comprised of campus representatives and planning consultants will discuss outcomes and lessons learned during the planning process.

Learning Outcomes:

This complex case study will serve as a vehicle for exploring a variety of public higher education facilities topics from the perspective of the system, campus and consultant. Both the theoretical underpinning of the USG-CIP Model and the implementation process itself will be of considerable interest to a wide range of SCUP conferees.

Specifically, attendees will

1) Develop a better understanding of the critical and under-appreciated linkages between institutional mission/strategy and capital planning and investment. Diagnostic examples will demonstrate the shortcomings of the typical institutional strategic plan as a basis for facilities planning and development.

2) Examine strategies for changing the approach from one of traditional needs-based planning (More is Better) to one that establishes priorities within realistic and limited budgets (How Much is Enough?). Attendees will see the potential pitfalls in translating guideline space needs into a sustainable program of capital investment, and the benefits of creating incentives for campuses to take a more active role in delineating and meeting their facilities needs.

3) Learn how institutions with profoundly different characteristics successfully met the challenges of a new process that is both individual and comparative. The 35 USG institutions range in size from less than 1,000 to over 30,000 students, with equally varied strategic, physical, and leadership, and demographic contexts. The System includes research universities, including a medical school and an engineering school, comprehensive universities, baccalaureate colleges, and two-year institutions.

TAGS: Budget Planning, Partnerships, Performance Measures, State System

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Finance


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(VS-01) Housing Trends of the 21 Century: Addressing Today's Student Expectations
Presented by: Christopher Hill, Principal, CBT/Childs Bertman Tseckares Inc.; Janet Stegman, Principal, Stegman + Associates

Today's students attend college and university with expectations for housing that differ from the living options institutions have offered over the past 40 years. This program focuses on residential design trends that respond to a new voice, contribute to retention, and enhance the college experience and mission. Learn why past housing models don't fit this generation of diverse students, 0 trends that respond to this sophisticated market, and see programming and design methods that address these new voices.

TAGS: Facility Design, Student Residences, Innovation

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(1058) Digital Scholarship and the Evolving Library
Presented by: Shirley Dugdale, Director/Learning Environments, DEGW North America; Andrew Harrison, Director/Learning Environments, DEGW Plc; Chad Kainz, Senior Director, NSIT Academic Technologies, University of Chicago; Kelly Miller, Assistant to the Deputy University Librarian, University of Virginia

Electronic information is proliferating as information is born digital and materials created in traditional formats are rapidly digitised. New technologies facilitate the sharing, repurposing and creation of new digital material that has value in its own right. Next Gen researchers expect to have immediate access to content, contribute data, visualize and manipulate information. This session will explore international trends in digital scholarship and provide guidance for institutions rethinking library and research space strategies to maximise effectiveness for the 21st century.

Learning Outcomes:

Understand planning strategies for some of the world’s most advanced centers supporting digital scholarship, including the British Library’s proposed new Digital Centre in London, the University of Virginia’s proposed renovation of Alderman Library which has traditionally supported innovation in digital initiatives for the humanities and social sciences, and digital scholarship initiatives at the University of Chicago.

Understand evolving information technology trends and the implications of the proposed cyber-infrastructure for digital humanities that will support scholarship in the humanities and social sciences over the next decade.

Design principles for planning digital research centers, including the integration of digital and physical research spaces, social and informal learning spaces and the exploration of possible change management issues that should be addressed when creating digital research centers.

TAGS: Technology, Learning, Libraries, Resarch Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Computer Science


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(1045) Space Charging: Insights From the Universities of Cape Town, Michigan, and Stanford
Presented by: Geoffrey P. De Wet, Director, Physical Planning Unit, University of Cape Town; Margaret Dyer-Chamberlain, Senior Director/Capital Planning and Space Management, Stanford University; Phil Hanlon, Vice Provost, University of Michigan; Frances Mueller, Project Manager, Space Utilization Initiative, University of Michigan; Stephen Olson, Associate Director, Budget Planning, Stanford University

The University of Cape Town, the University of Michigan, and Stanford University are each developing space utilization tools and space charge systems. These strategies are designed to encourage efficient space use and to discourage the notion of space as a “free good." Tools developed by these universities (which span public, private and international), share similarities and differences. This “work in progress” presentation will compare and contrast the three university’s tools, applying concepts and ideas to a range of institutional settings.

Learning Outcomes:

In a general sense, the overall goal of the session is to “demystify” the complexity of developing space charge and utilization tools. The session will explain a range of different tools, from which participants can pick and choose for their own institution. These tools include:
Space guidelines
Normative headcount analyses
Space utilization studies
Space charging systems
After attending the session, participants will have the general framework for these tools, as well as links to more detailed explanations from the presenters.

TAGS: Space Management, Budget Planning, Research Focused Institution, Research I

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Monday, July 21, 2008, 2:30 PM–4:00 PM
(1055) Planning and Design in the Realm Between Campus and City
Presented by: Janne Corneil, Principal, Sasaki Associates; Kerstin Hoeger, Lecturer, ETH Zurich; Brian R. Sinclair, Presidential Advisor, Design & Sustainability & Professor, Architecture & Environmental Design, University of Calgary

Colleges and universities are leading the charge to improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of our cities. With the proliferation of partnerships and a commitment to sustainability, institutions are increasingly involved in planning beyond the academic core, exploring innovative design strategies for learning, living and work environments. Recent case studies from the U.S., Canada, and Europe will be discussed. Educators and planners interested in the expanding role of universities in the economic and cultural life of cities will participate interactively in a discussion about emerging trends in campus-city design from a global perspective.

Learning Outcomes:

(1) Learn about new planning and design initiatives from Canada, Europe and the U.S., illustrated through concrete examples.
(2) Consider how these strategies can enrich the built environment in their own cities and universities, and how the university can address the specific needs of their own community while acting as a partner in city development.

TAGS: Town Gown, International Planning, Partnerships

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(1097) A Curricular Approach to Strategic Plan Implementation: The Thomas Edison State College Experience
Presented by: Penelope S. Brouwer, Vice President/Planning & Research, Thomas Edison State College; Richard P. Keeling, Principal, Keeling & Associates; Marie R. Power-Barnes, Associate Vice President, Marketing, Thomas Edison State College

The implementation of a strategic vision plan (SVP) uniquely challenges the abilities of management and leadership. Thomas Edison State College supported leaders and managers in creating institution-wide organizational change through planned, sequential professional development activities using an innovative curricular approach. This workshop reports the genesis, evolution, and outcomes of the professional development program and, using two case studies, describes two significant initiatives: enrollment growth and renewal of the College Web site.

Learning Outcomes:

• Discuss the intention of adopting a strategic plan that reaffirms the mission, articulates a vision and adopts a shared values statement.

• Describe the steps of developing a professional development curriculum that supports the implementation of a strategic plan; list the benefits of engaging a professional development curriculum to provide institution-wide capacity building among those charged with implementing a strategic vision plan or other large-scale change effort.

• Describe the process of developing a shared leadership identity that supports staff acquisition of new competencies; discuss the impact of the professional development curriculum on senior leadership, including the opportunity to complement the curriculum with a leadership agenda.

TAGS: Change, Human Resources, Student Recruitment, Technology

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(INV01) How Prospective Students Form First Impressions: \nResearch Insights into the Decision-Making Process\n\n\n
Presented by: Ken Steele, Senior Vice President, Education Marketing, Academica Group Inc

Learn some key findings about factors that impact the selection of a prospective student’s first-choice institution. Drawing on more than a decade of quantitative data from the most comprehensive higher education consumer study in North America-the University and College Applicant Study (UCAS™), you will learn about the online evolution of student word-of-mouth, awareness and impact of media rankings like Maclean's, the shift from print to electronic sources of information, and some disturbing facts about campus visits.

TAGS: Performance Measures, Student Recruitment, Technology

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Marketing


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(1087) Dare to Discover, Deliver, and Become a Top 20 World University
Presented by: Doug Dawson, Executive Director, Ancillary Services, University of Alberta; Stephen M. Evans, Architect & Principal, Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + Company; Kenneth Hall, Architect & Associate Principal, Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + Co

The University of Alberta has challenged itself to become one of the top 20 Universities in the world. Their strategic and academic planning has established a framework, and now every aspect of the University must define its role in pursuing this vision. University representatives will review the strategic planning and residential benchmarking used to define the role of housing in moving toward this goal. Participants will assist in developing qualitative performance criteria that might be critical to goal achievement.

Learning Outcomes:

1. The presenters will share the “Top 20” benchmarking results, and the identified housing system performance criteria.
2. Participants will learn about the University of Alberta's "Dare to Discover" and "Dare to Deliver" Strategic and Academic plans, Participants will learn of the action steps that the University of Alberta’s Residence Services will be taking to assist the University in their Top 20 pursuit.
3. Participants will discover the power of a challenging strategic aspirational goal, and the unique conditions that permit U Alberta to make such a plan.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Performance Measures, Student Residences, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(1047) Flexible Work Programs: Thoughts From Case Western Reserve and Stanford Universities
Presented by: Margaret Dyer-Chamberlain, Senior Director/Capital Planning and Space Management, Stanford University; Noel Hirst, Director, Business Affairs, Budget & Facilities, Stanford University; Edel Keville, Principal Consultant, Sun Microsystems Inc; Lora Veselsky, Information Technology Services, Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve and Stanford are both piloting flexible work programs for their employees. Developed for different reasons and different contexts, each program worked with Sun Microsystems’ Open Work Practice and used the “Sun Open Work” program as a model. This presentation will provide a “lessons learned” approach to flexible work programs, which are common in business environments but rare in higher education. The session will include an interactive “institutional readiness” tool for you to test.

Learning Outcomes:

The overall goal of the session is to provide participants with general information about what flexible work programs are and what they can provide in a higher education environment. We will do this by:
Providing two clear examples of flexible work programs underway (Case Western and Stanford);
Describing the process used to develop these programs
Outlining “lessons learned” to date
Enabling participants to engage with an institutional readiness tool to begin to assess the feasibility of such a program for their setting.

Participants who have participated in the session will be able to return to their institutions with a clear sense of how and why they would pursue (or decide not to pursue) flexible work programs.

TAGS: Human Resources, Organizational Effectiveness, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(1143) Residential Liberal Arts Colleges--Paradigms for the World
Presented by: Adam A. Gross, Principal, Ayers/Saint/Gross Architects & Planners; Kevin King, Senior Associate, Ayers/Saint/Gross Architects & Planners; Daniel Konstalid, Vice President, Finance & Administration & Treasurer, Gettysburg College; Keith Oriss, Vice President, Administrative Services & External Affairs, Franklin & Marshall College; John A. Palmucci, Vice President/Finance & Treasurer, Loyola College in Maryland

As so many Universities contiue to become "super-sized", what are the defining factors that make the small Residential Liberal Arts College an integral part of the culture of America? What makes these types of Insitutions attractive to the faculty who teach there and the students who choose to go there? This session will look at the strategic planning issues which undergird a successful small College and will make the case that they represent powerful paradigms for Institutions of all types.

Learning Outcomes:

1. A clear definition of the elements which make for the best residential liberal arts colleges

2. Discussions of metrics (space per student / faculty student ratios / student amenities) which make for a succesful college.

3. A definition of the balance of academic support and residential life which makes these colleges thrive.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Academic Planning, Teaching Focused, Small Private

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(1108) 20/20: Programming for Design Excellence
Presented by: Frances Halsband, Partner, R.M.Kliment & Frances Halsband Architects; Michael J. McCormick, Assistant Vice President, Planning, Design & Construction, Brown University; Michael A. Nieminen, Partner, R.M.Kliment & Frances Halsband Architects

Programming is often seen as a necessary but somewhat unexciting first step in the design of academic facilities. Learn how to develop programming techniques that reverse that perception for both the designer and user and lead to design directions that create optimal responsive learning environments. By integrating it into the design process, programming can become a primary driver for design excellence.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Learn different strategies and interactive techniques for the programming of restoration, renovation and/or adaptive reuse of existing buildings; new buildings; and area studies and master plans.
2. Learn how to gain the type of user input that will lead to design directions that create optimal learning environments.
3. Learn how programming can generate multiple design alternatives that create meaningful consequences for users, administrators, and students.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(1043) The Commons: An Innovative First-Year Living/Learning Community
Presented by: Susan A. Barge, Associate Provost, College Halls, Vanderbilt University; Baird Dixon, Principal, Street Dixon Rick Architecture, PLC; Tony Fort, Architect/Planner, Vanderbilt University; Keith Loiseau, Architect/Planner, Vanderbilt University; Robert Simmons, Architect, Bruner/Cott & Associates Inc

Vanderbilt University is developing College Halls, a series of community-centered residential environments for undergraduates. Phase one of this long-term project is The Commons, a unique living/learning environment for all first-year students and selected faculty opening in the fall of 2008. You will learn the process through which Vanderbilt developed this concept in the context of a historic campus setting, the educational philosophy behind the planning, and how the completed project reflects the core mission of the university.

Learning Outcomes:

Participants will...

(1)Explore how one university created a new paradigm, based on historical models and its own unique mission, to create a true community of scholars.

(2)Learn what resources may be required to plan and nurture such a community on their own campuses.

(3)Gain practical insights into how to construct similar planning processes on their own campuses.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Preservation, Master Planning, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(1019) Creating Sustainable Innovation Capacities
Presented by: Robert J. Brodnick, Assistant Provost/Planning, Innovation and Institutional Assessment, University of the Pacific; Dean Hering, Chief Innovator, OVO

One of the fundamental engines of quality higher education is creating knowledge, yet few institutions have built capacities to innovate outside of the bounds of traditional faculty research and scholarship. We propose that innovation is a business process that is critical for higher educational institutions to address. This session will provide lessons from a variety of industries that have successfully innovated. You will take away tools and ideas for building sustainable capacities to innovate on your campus.

Learning Outcomes:

Through a dynamic and interactive session, participants will:
(1) understand what innovation across an organization means
(2) learn about the lessons on innovation from examples across a variety of industries in the past and present;
(3) experience the conditions necessary for innovation through hands on learning and group process;
(4) take away tools for creating sustainable processes at their institution to foster and create innovation.

TAGS: Change, Integrated Planning, Budget Planning, Teaching Focused Doctoral Comprehensive

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Production


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(VS-07) Etch-A-Sketch to Blackboard
Presented by: Terry Rapoch, President & Chief Executive Officer, daytaOhio - The Ohio Wright Center for Data; Chris E. Whitney, Vice President, Architecture, URS Corporation

Our presentation will focus on the changes in student learning patterns and how the spaces must evolve to respond and draw today's students to campus. Research will highlight trends in communication from Facebook and Second Life, and the changed learning patterns that affect building design. This presentation focuses on the trends in classrooms, residence ralls, and science buildings. Relevant examples include housing at Miami U, science at Purdue, and technology at Wright State and Case Western.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Technology, Student Residences

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(1106) Perfect Storm or Perfect Opportunity: State Cuts and New Plans
Presented by: Barry L. Brighton, Associate Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, University of West Florida; Barbara G. Lyman, Provost & Vice President, Academic Affairs, Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania

With revenues declining, Florida asked state universities to prepare 4% and 10% budget reduction plans leading to fewer positions, programs, and services. The state called for budget reductions while the University of West Florida was unveiling its 2007-2012 Strategic Plan Priorities and moving into Phase II: Action Plans. This presentation will show how the University addressed state cuts while adhering to its Strategic Priorities and developing/implementing Action Plans, with budget reductions strengthening rather than derailing plans.

Learning Outcomes:

Participants will
1. Discover multiple reasons why budget reduction planning bolstered rather than undermined the institution’s new Strategic Priorities and Action Plans
2. Analyze elements that fostered progress on plan implementation despite budget cuts
3. Review approaches to integrating planning, assessment, and resource allocation
4. Consider applicability of strategies to similar settings, master’s level public institutions

TAGS: Budget Planning, Decision Making, Integrated Planning, Teaching Focused, Comprehensive Doctoral

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(1080) Fragile Projects: Strategically Reinforcing Interdisciplinary Planning
Presented by: Ned A. Collier, Principal, Perry Dean Rogers | Partners; Mark Freeman, Associate, Perry Dean Rogers Partners Architects; Richard M. Jones, Associate, Perry Dean Rogers | Partners

Interdisciplinary studies have crashed through traditional higher education boundaries predicated on disciplinary typologies. One challenge is consensus-building across a varied user base. Interdisciplinary projects are inherently fragile. Without a single champion, but rather with broad constituencies with multiple perspectives, these projects can suffer from diffuse support. It is paramount to knit interdisciplinary projects into the campus fabric at multiple levels to insure integration and success. This session will outline strategies that planners can implement to bolster interdisciplinary learning communities.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Building consensus across traditional institutional boundaries (departmental, funding, faculty/administrative, students, etc) in the interest of advancing student-centered learning environments that address today’s interdisciplinary learning needs.

2. Sustainable design strategies: What are current trends? How can these strategies be considered integral to the programming of buildings and campuses? How does sustainable design bolster interdisciplinary planning?

3. Emerging Building Typologies:
(a)The New Classroom Building: Interdisciplinary studies, technology, and pedagogical shifts have birthed new classroom typologies. How do these fit into traditional campuses structured around discipline-based precincts and buildings?
(b)The New Library/Information Commons: Students today study differently than in the past. Their study habits today are formed around four typologies: individual or solitary study, pair or mentoring study, group collaborative study, and group social study. The latter three types could be said to support interdisciplinary planning. How does the academic library need to change in order to support these emerging needs?
(c)Strategic Building Reuse: Although it may be easier to level that 1950’s dinosaur that lumbers along beside the main campus quad, it may not be the most sustainable decision. More importantly, it may not be the best thing for the campus contextual fabric. How can mid-century architecture be re-energized or re-envisioned in support of interdisciplinary planning?

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Academic Planning, Decision Making

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:30 AM–10:00 AM
(1112) Creating Universities Abroad--Case Study of Education City, Doha
Presented by: Jason Fournier, Associate Principal, DMJM Design | AECOM; Katherine Kilpatrick, Director, Budget, Planning & Analysis, Virginia Commonwealth University; Dottie Milligan Lewis, Director, Finance, Adminstration & Human Resources, George Mason University - Ras Al Khaimah; Alice G. Wiewel, Director/Facilities Planning & Associate University Architect, Georgetown University

This session will provide a perspective on the growth and role of American universities abroad and the opportunities they face in creating overseas branches, specifically in Qatar’s Education City. Education City, spearheaded by the Qatar ruling family through the Qatar Foundation, aims to create an integrated educational environment and community. The complex of higher education facilities serving 11,500 students includes Carnegie Mellon, Cornell, Texas A&M, Virginia Commonwealth, Georgetown and Northwestern University operating a range of educational programs.

Learning Outcomes:

1. The balancing of demands and expectations of the home campus, faculty and administration with those of a different culture and governing structure while negotiating the nature of programs, services and facilities and how they have affected curriculum, the types of students and services, staffing patterns and hiring practices, financial arrangements, and the physical campus and its buildings.
2. The examination of internal and external organizational structures and processes for decision-making and how these decisions manifest in the planning and design for the university facilities.
3. Lessons learned from Georgetown University and Carnegie Mellon University about successful approaches to negotiations and resulting compromises between the universities and the host country.

TAGS: International Planning Models, Integrated Planning, Partnerships, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.5 unitsNASBA CPA CPE 1.5 units; Field of study: Marketing


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(1081) Students in My Backyard
Presented by: Barry Bosley, Associate Vice President/Administration, Franklin & Marshall College; John Martin, Vice President, Elkus Manfredi Architects ; Steven Nason, Director, Residential Real Estate, Harvard University

Students in My Backyard is a case study of three schools’ strategies for housing growing enrollments at the edges of their campuses and integrating them into sensitive neighborhoods. Analyzing recently completed student residences at Harvard, Franklin & Marshall, and Ohio State, this session will illustrate how differing planning processes, external relations, and design affected student communities and the neighborhoods surrounding these institutions. We will provide several quantitative and qualitative metrics to evaluate planning, delivery, cost, and impact of each project.

Learning Outcomes:

Learning Outcomes

This case study will provide planners with benchmark information about three different approaches to design and development of student residences.

1. University created non-profit entity to build and manage apartments in a mixed-use campus edge project.
2. University housing department established a partnership with a private development manager for permitting and construction of the institution’s program in a historic neighborhood abutting the campus.
3. College’s planning office created a ground lease scenario with a private equity developer to provide student residences in a mixed-use development with third-party retail adjacent to campus.

Useful benchmarks will include project and construction cost and rental analysis, unit types and sizes, and project timelines. Post occupancy interviews with both students and university management personnel will provide lessons learned.

Relevance

As student bodies become more internationally diverse, most colleges and universities realize the importance of creating residential facilities that assimilate students into an active campus and community life. As on-campus housing costs continue to escalate and campus sites become increasingly scarce, more schools are turning to the edges of their campuses as an attractive place to build student residences. They are pursuing a variety of delivery methods, ranging from engaging private developers to building through non-profit entities created specifically to work with politically sensitive neighborhoods. This session will look at a large public university, a large private university, and a small private college who pursued three different solutions to the challenge of providing the most interactive and enriching student living experiences for the least cost across three primary criteria: time, money and neighborhood impact.

Importance to Planners

This session will illustrate different methods for providing undergraduate and graduate student housing “off balance sheet” to the school, without having to surrender design control to third-party entities. It will also illustrate how integrating student housing into neighborhoods at the edge of campuses can benefit both the students and the community. Finally, we will explore opportunities to use the residences as learning environments in themselves, as students learn from one another by living together.

TAGS: Town Gown, Performance Measures, Master Planning, Student Residences

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(VS-04) Speed, LEED, and Greed (Revenue Generation)
Presented by: Christopher R. Haupt, Architect, L. Robert Kimball & Associates
Medlar Field at Lubrano Park is a new 5,500 seat, 130,000 square-foot, baseball park on Penn State University's Campus in State College, Pennsylvania. The facility is shared by the Penn State University baseball team and The State College Spikes, a Minor-League team from the New York-Penn League.

Medlar Field at Lubrano Park is the world's first LEED Certified Baseball Park. By establishing sustainable design goals early in the project with all stakeholders, and through a commitment to the program by the CM and a Commissioning Agent, the certification was possible. Some of the sustainable strategies employed included waterless urinals, transportation credits, permeable paving, green power, 87% recycled construction waste, 27% of materials with recycled content, and more.

TAGS: Partnerships, Town Gown, Sustainability

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(1005) Learning by Doing: The Use of Simulation Technology in High-Risk/High-Cost Learning Environments
Presented by: Roger Jaeckel, Director, Facilities Planning, California Maritime Academy; Steve Kreta, Academic Dean, The California Maritime Academy; Mark Nickerson, Vice President/Administration & Finance, California Maritime Academy

Simulation technology has achieved a level of sophistication that enables educational institutions to develop learning laboratories that were impossible to create until recently. The California Maritime Academy (CMA) conceived, designed, built and opened a Simulation Center this past year that allows its students to operate a variety of vessels, under virtually any condition, with a degree of realism that is startling. They are able to monitor simulated oil spills and manage multi-faceted crisis management scenarios as well. You will receive a brief history of the uses of simulation technology; the opportunities and challenges encountered in creating this world-class facility; and a virtual tour of the building and its labs.

Learning Outcomes:

Attendees will develop an increased understanding how theory can be integrated with practice in simulated environments that would otherwise involve limited and/or cost-prohibitive resources. By creating mission-critical, potentially dangerous or high performance learning situations faculty can evaluate students skills under conditions otherwise impossible to replicate. The session will also highlight the integration of complex instructional needs with building design and construction, despite limited capital resources.

TAGS: Student Learning, Sustainability, Crisis Management, Learning Space Design, Teaching Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(1054) Learning Studios: Engaging Millennial Students In a New Classroom Environment
Presented by: Linda L. Garcia, Doctoral Candidate, The University of Texas at Austin; Homero Lopez, Retired President, Estrella Mountain Community College

Today's millennials are part of a generational wave of young students likely to be more "disengaged" in traditional learning environments. Discover how a new generation of learning classrooms can increase the millennial students’ engagement at your college, and learn about the faculty's perceptions on this new environment.

Learning Outcomes:

Participants will…
1.Understand the characteristics of the new emerging student population, the Millennials, enrolling in their college and university campus.

2.Learn the challenges colleges and universities will encounter when servicing a younger generation in an old generation of learning environment.

3.Engage in discussion with Millennial students regarding their perceptions of the Learning Studios.

4.Learn how to create Learning Studios at college and university campuses.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Students, Faculty, Teaching Focused

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(INV02) Planning Inspirations: Past Present and Future - Presentation by Perry Chapman, the 2008 SCUP Founders (Casey) Award Winner
Presented by: Perry Chapman, Principal, Sasaki Associates, Inc

During the first half of the session, the presenter will pay homage to past Founders' Award recipients who directly influenced his philosophy and approach to campus planning. Those early influences, amplified by his 40 years of experience and research as a practitioner, have led him to promulgate a set of principles for 21st century campus design that he calls An Ethic of Place. Lisa Rochon, architecture critic for Canada's Globe and Mail national newspaper will "interview" the presenter on-stage during the second half of the session.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(1030) Next Generation Academic Toolsets for Enrollment, Revenue, and Student Outcomes
Presented by: Sheri Austin, Director University Budgets, University of Florida; Marie E. Zeglen, Assistant Provost & Director/Institutional Planning & Research, University of Florida

Higher education institutions are facing resource challenges as markets become globally competitive and accountability standards grow more intense. In successful institutions, academic administrators must be able to quickly adjust strategy, deploy new programs, and promote student learning and graduation. Often, existing toolsets fall short in identifying problems or trends in time for effective change. This presentation will demonstrate and engage the audience in using “next generation” toolsets for nimble tracking of enrollments, revenue and student success.

Learning Outcomes:

Outcome 1: The audience will understand how the “Next Generation” toolsets are used to address short and long term performance goals. Learning Method: Simulation/Examples/Discussion

Outcome 2: The audience will be able to identify specific design features and components for inclusion in their own local toolset environments. Learning Method: Demonstration/Self Assessment Checklist/Two week access to test web site to explore systems demonstrated

TAGS: Performance Measures, Institutional Research, Budget Planning, Students

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(1051) The Politics of Changing the Class Scheduling Process
Presented by: Susan Day, Chair, Department of Sociology, Texas State University-San Marcos; Michael R. Heintze, Associate Vice President/Enrollment Management and Marketing, Texas State University-San Marcos; Nancy K. Nusbaum, Associate Vice President/Finance & Support Services Planning, Texas State University-San Marcos

This presentation reports on the change to a primarily four-day a week class schedule at a major university. It focuses on the process and problems involved in implementing major changes in the scheduling of courses at Texas State University-San Marcos and the adoption of a uniform class time scheduling policy. Previous practice and consultation with stakeholders to identify the need for change will be shared. The consequences one year out, positive and negative, will conclude the presentation.

Learning Outcomes:

The Provost appointed a Uniform Class Time Scheduling Task Force to: Optimize student access to courses required by the university, its college, schools, and majors, ensure students reasonable opportunities to explore elective courses to enrich their educational experience, provide adequate opportunity in scheduling for faculty to remain current and active in their research pursuits, and to ensure efficient utilitization of classroom space on campus from Monday through Sunday. The presentation will present the new Uniform Class Time Scheduling model adopted by the campus and the process followed to achieve consensus for the model. Learning outcomes include: How to achieve major innovative change on a campus. How to respond to today's college student regarding their class schedule. How to provide more opportunities for faculty research.

TAGS: Change, Student Learning, Space Mangement

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(1071) Attracting and Creating Global Scientific Excellence Through Flexible Design Planning
Presented by: Carrie E. Byles, Managing Director, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP; Tamara Dinsmore, Associate Director, Interior Design, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP; Sharalee M. Field, Senior Planner for the Science, Harvard University

Fundamental for universities is the competition for world-class scientists. Research is increasingly multi-discipline, collaborative and evolving rapidly. SOM worked with Harvard to design the Northwest Science Building using a flexible core and shell and a “kit of parts” for design and delivery of the interiors. The building provides researchers with space that can be delivered within schedule, on budget without losing quality or flexibility. The building design also reduces the most expensive real estate cost; down time during renovations.

Learning Outcomes:

How to design a research facility with a high level of quality and flexibility to ensure the attraction and creation of world-class scientists, while still optimizing capital budgets and delivery schedule:

1. Participants will walk away with strategies to successfully achieve the research design flexibility found in the Harvard Northwest Science building and how this unique process can allow for future research modifications through the life of the facility.

2. Participants will learn organizational methods which will aide in developing multi-disciplinary, multi-departmental collaborative lab facility spaces that can function for a variety of users, while at the same time, provide for specific individual needs.

3. Participants will learn how using the above techniques they can create better current and future cost-control, allow for faster tenant improvements, and maximum their real estate investment.

TAGS: Facility Design, Project Management, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(1012) Partners Separated by a Common Language
Presented by: William J. Flynn, Managing Director, National Council for Continuing Education & Training; Jeff Vredevoogd, Manager/Education Solutions Channel, Herman Miller

When developing new or renovated facilities, do college leaders effectively articulate their vision, specifications and requirements? Do architects and designers really hear and understand their clients? What goes wrong? Why does this process often prove unsatisfactory to all parties? This session will present the collective wisdom and experiences of college and university planners and leaders in implementing effective learning spaces. You'll participate in the problem solving exercises, and receive recources for facilities development and planning.

Learning Outcomes:

Attendees will gain a greater understanding of the complex interactions that take place between client and design team, develop problem solving skills in minimizing miscommunication, and appreciate the relative strengths that each member of a project team can bring to a new or renovated facility.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(1120) Beyond a Campus: Prospering in the New World
Presented by: Wayne B. Beran, Vice President/Administration & Finance, University of Houston - Victoria; Richard D. Phillips, Vice President, University of Houston-Victoria & Associate Vice Chancellor-University of Houston Sugar Land, University of Houston-Victoria; Don N. Smith, Professor & Provost Ereritus, Humanities and English, University of Houston - Victoria

Abstract: The need for conveniently delivered instruction, learning support, and student services increasingly dominates the market for higher education. By taking education to the students, off campus and on line (wherever, whenever, and however they need it), and by collaborating internally and externally, University of Houston-Victoria has evolved beyond place to become a productive delivery system. It has increased enrollment by 150% in 10 years, while containing facilities and staffing costs. We offer transferable lessons in strategic positioning and the benefits of “co-opetition.”

Learning Outcomes:

Learning outcomes:Attendees will learn how faculty can be motivated to develop and deliver courses on line, as well as to distant off-campus centers; how recruiting and marketing efforts can be effectively decentralized within an institution; how information technology can be oriented to serve the strategic goals of the institution; how thoughtful collaboration can spare costs of facilities and other support, while maintaining the quality of programs delivered; and how responding to student needs should be the driving force behind all strategic planning.
A panel presentation will be conducted the first 45 minutes with a question and discussion session following the presentation. The question and discussion session gives the participants the ability to explore further the learning outcomes.
Learning outcomes:Attendees will learn how faculty can be motivated to develop and deliver courses on line, as well as to distant off-campus centers; how recruiting and marketing efforts can be effectively decentralized within an institution; how information technology can be oriented to serve the strategic goals of the institution; how thoughtful collaboration can spare costs of facilities and other support, while maintaining the quality of programs delivered; and how responding to student needs should be the driving force behind all strategic

TAGS: Technology, Student Learning, Student Recruitment, Teaching Focused Institution, Comprehensive Doctoral

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 10:30 AM–11:30 AM
(1149) Creating a Global Educational Hub: The University of Southeast Asia
Presented by: Maya Dang, President, US Southern Corporation; John A. MacPhillimy, Principal, Morris Architects; Dan Searight, Senior Designer, Morris Architects

As competition increases for workers, access to higher education becomes a significant advantage in the global marketplace. Forward-thinking entities in developing countries understand that expanding access to and elevating academic standards for their universities leverages the opportunity to individuals for benefit of the entire country. The master plan for the University of Southeast Asia, seeks to fulfill this vision by capturing the spirit of great Western-style universities while supporting the needs of a nation in transition to a market economy.

Learning Outcomes:

Learning outcomes resulting from the session:
Using as a model the recently completed master plan for a new 60 – building 25,000 student campus for the University of Southeast Asia, this session provides:

• Framework for conducting visioning sessions that establish institutional mission and goals.
• Methods for translating institutional goals into planning and design directives.
• Model for public/private implementation of Western-style post-secondary education within the context of an emerging economy.
• Methods to maximize in-country resources, while leveraging the best of U.S. practice in planning and design.
• Issues addressed to integrate a ground-up university within a new town development.
• Communications strategies to: partner with international universities for exchange programs; to recruit faculty and senior administrative staff; to draw in and recruit students.

TAGS: Academic Planning, International Planning Models

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1037) Right Down to the Last Drop of Infrastructure--University of Calgary
Presented by: Scott D. Phillips, P.Eng., LEED (AP) Senior Principal, Stantec Consulting Ltd.; Jim Sawers, Director, Campus Engineering, University of Calgary

Oil, black gold, has made the Alberta marketplace the hottest construction market in North America today, causing a significant impact on university planning. With facility expansion programs in the billions of dollars, how to manage the supporting infrastructure is a key issue. This session will look at how a collaborative partnership arrangement between the University of Calgary and their consultants has significantly eased the stress on the existing infrastructure systems, which were never designed for such sudden growth in facilities.

Learning Outcomes:

1. The session will attempt to give guidance for a holistic view of campus planning to ensure that as decisions are made regarding increases in usable space, infrastructure needs are not lost.

2. The session will show how early intervention at an infrastructure level can assist in making long term decisions.

3. This intervention with a sustainable design focus can lessen the impact of campus expansion programs.

TAGS: International Planning Models

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1013) US and Middle East: A Case Study of Two Successful Alliances
Presented by: Kathy Kilpatrick, Director/Budget, Planning & Analysis, Virginia Commonwealth University; Dottie Milligan Lewis, Director, Finance, Adminstration & Human Resources, George Mason University - Ras Al Khaimah

Virginia Commonwealth University is celebrating its tenth year in Qatar; Texas A&M is celebrating its fifth. The progress of these institutions in a unique US-Middle East higher education endeavor will be presented. A case study will describe the planning process utilized in launching branch campuses in the Middle East. We compare and examine issues of organizational identity, faculty and personnel adaptability, customization of curricula respecting cultural and regional needs, adapting of administrative practices, and the ability to meet the mission.

Learning Outcomes:

(1) Learn, by the example of two universities, how to plan for, open, operate and succeed as a branch campus overseas.
(2) Appreciate and understand the unique and sometimes challenging aspects of operating a branch campus overseas with regard to issues related to different cultures, funding sources, two lines of reporting, channels of communication, and relevancy of curricula.
(3) By example, examine lessons learned and consider strategies to overcome pitfalls, absorb road bumps, and navigate roundabouts.

TAGS: International Planning Models, Integrated Planning, New Campus, Teaching Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1031) Sustainable Design Interventions in Historic Environments: Learning the Hard Way
Presented by: Gerald A. Vander Mey, Director/Campus Planning, Clemson University; J. Frano Violich, Principal, Kennedy & Violich Architecture, Ltd

Conceived as an exemplar of contemporary design in a historic setting, the Clemson Architecture Center project in Charleston, South Carolina, initiated a superheated debate about time, place and community. In combination with an international design competition, the project set very high goals of community involvement, participation, and dialogue that opened the door for what would be dramatic interaction at both the local and global scale, and an outcome that no one could have anticipated.

Learning Outcomes:

This session will provide insight into the inner workings of a project from its planning stages as an international competition to the handling of controversy stemming from public hearings. Attendees will learn from an extreme condition where well-intended university planners, architects, and government agencies negotiated with preservationists and the community to build consensus around a modest architectural project with high ambitions for sustainable design, academic enrichment, and civic presence. The authors include a university planner, and the project architect, and will provide useful insight in ways to avoid conflict and share important principles that will help future efforts gain acceptance.

TAGS: Preservation, Partnerships, Student Recruitment, Facility Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Communications


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1113) “SEED Certification©”--A New Tool for Optimizing Collaboration in Research Buildings
Presented by: Gwendolyn Drury, Planning Analyst, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Jeffrey S. French, Principal, Ballinger; Craig S. Spangler, Principal, Ballinger

As collaborative interaction spanning academic disciplines has emerged as an imperative in science teaching and research, the facility design community has primarily applied intuition in creating researcher interaction features. This talk explores a new construct called “Socially Ergonomic Environmental Design©, or “SEED”©. Modeled after the user-friendly LEED sustainable design checklist, “SEED Certification©” is a means of more systematically cataloguing, prioritizing, and ultimately evaluating the success of design efforts to sustain human interaction in the physical science environment.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Establish a mechanism by which one can understand “socially ergonomic” design and its likely impact on meaningful interaction in an academic research facility, and the industry as a whole.
2. Utilize a checklist, similar to the familiar LEED version, which will assign points and, thus, a rating to a building design based on its likely ability to foster interaction.
3. Generate a more grounded understanding of spatial characteristics that may enhance collaborative research.

TAGS: Facility Design, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1121) Beyond the Books: Creating Sustainable Mixed-Use College Campuses
Presented by: Susan Campbell, Associate Vice President, University of Chicago; Steve J. Maun, President, Leyland Alliance, LLC; Paul Ostergaard, Senior Vice President, Urban Design Associates; Max Reim, Partner & Principal, Live Work Learn Play LLP
LWLP, in collaboration with LeylandAlliance, Urban Design Associates, and the University of Chicago, will discuss how leading college campuses are attracting a host of great talent (i.e. students, professors, alumni, and community residents) by offering a mixed-use experience on their campuses and in their surrounding neighborhoods. These colleges integrate social, commercial, educational, cultural, recreational, and inter-generational experiences "beyond the books" that become a differentiating factor for their campuses.

The intended audience includes:
- University stakeholders (planners, developers, community members, investors)
- Urban planners, urban designers, and architects
- Public/private developers
- City and government officials

Learning Outcomes:

1.The session will demonstrate that a higher level quality of life, education, and institutional success can be achieved through mixed-use campus development and planning. By creating well-organized mixed-use environments that are connected to public and private facilities, college campuses can be viable and sustainable over the long term, helping to attract top-tier students, faculty, and community residents.

2.Demographic and sociological trends of the college campus “end users†will be highlighted, including students, faculty & professors, alumni, and community residents. Strategic planning principles will illustrate how a college campus can reach a higher level by offering a rich array of experiences beyond the classroom (i.e. residential, commercial, arts & culture, recreation & leisure, health care, learning, etc.)

3.The concept of “integration vs. segregation†will explore the ways that college campuses can create physical, experiential, and economic linkages between a college and their town/city communities. The strategies outlined will demonstrate how to achieve this integration−leading to the creation of a sustainable “college town†ecosystem that fully integrates a college within the larger community.

TAGS: Town Gown, Master Planning, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1092) Keys to a Collaborative Process
Presented by: Janet S. Baum, Principal, Health, Education & Research Associates, Inc; Linda Daniel, Project Leader, Health Education Research Association; Malcolm P. Frisbie, Professor, Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University; Eric Zabilka, Principal, Omni Architects
Given the dynamic nature of academic environments today, every project phase requires careful communication. Experience teaches that design of academic science facilities works best when the team uses a collaborative process from the earliest project phase.

Eastern Kentucky University’s project shepherd and design team will present a case study of the new, multidisciplinary Science Facility. During an interactive session, participants will learn first hand how a collaborative process can work for their project.

Learning Outcomes:

Organization of a collaborative team and benefits of this approach
How to make collaborative decisions
Advantages of a Project Shepherd

TAGS: Facility Design, Research, Decision Making, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1048) Space Utilization--Not Just for Classrooms Anymore
Presented by: Robert Boes, Senior Systems Planner, Campus Planning & Design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Ann K. Newman, Senior Associate, Shepley Bulfinch Richardson and Abbott

When the pressure is on to increase space utilization, what part of the campus has the most potential for improvement? Classrooms are typically only three percent to five percent of campus space, whereas labs and offices comprise thenty-five percent to thirty-five percent of the campus and provide the most leverage to planners trying to meet space demand. This talk will provide a framework for analysis of existing occupancy conditions (including politics) and discuss various tools and remedies for any problems you may discover.

Learning Outcomes:

How to leverage space utilization on their campus.
How to think about space utilization for offices and research space.

TAGS: Space Management, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1057) Balanced Scorecard Deployment for Integrated Planning in Higher Education
Presented by: Rod Bally, University Planner, University of Fort Hare

The balanced scorecard was developed as a corporate strategic management tool and has been adapted for other sectors. Although also applied in higher education, this has usually been piecemeal, championed by a few units within the organization. Few institutions have applied the scorecard on a system-wide basis. After surviving near-closure, the University of Fort Hare took the system-wide approach. Learn how this medium-sized, resource-poor university applies the scorecard and how it experiences the benefits and challenges of 360 degree vision.

Learning Outcomes:

The process needed to implement the scorecard throughout a system.

The benefits obtained from a system-wide approach

The cahallenges, notably the substantial reporting and information demands, of a system-wide application

TAGS: Performance Measures, Change, Integrated Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1105) Effective Integration of Technology for Generation NeXt in the Learning Environment
Presented by: Lawrence C. Bacher, Vice President, Higher Education, Gilbane Building Company; John Cook, Principal, The Sextant Group; Gerald Starsia, Associate Dean, Administration, University of Virginia

There are many conversations ongoing about the effective use of technology to connect with the generation now populating our universities, who are the first generation to be termed “digital natives”. This session will explore technologies that can promote effective learning for these students, illustrate the ways in which technology has changed the way we plan and design learning environments through recent projects, and provide guidelines for the cost of implementing these technologies in common academic spaces for planners and facility professionals.

Learning Outcomes:

Participants will. . .

1. Explore the expectations and needs of Generation NeXt students, along with the ways that technology can provide tools to enhance learning.
2. Understand the planning and design requirements for effective deployment of learning and collaboration technologies.
3. Come away with cost guidelines to assist strategic and capital planning decisions where technology is a potentially beneficial tool.

TAGS: Technology, Student Learning, Academic Planning, Learning Space Design

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Computer Science


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(VS-03) Microbial Science at the University of Wisconsin: Solution's for Global Challenges
Presented by: Peter J. Heaslett, Architectural Engineer, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Rodney Welch, Professor & Chair, University of Wisconsin-Madison; L. Paul Zajfen, Principal, CO Architects

The University of Wisconsin, Madison has just built the largest scientific research facility on campus; this 330,000 gsf, $120M Microbial Science Building is an informative case study of how new university and government initiatives to promote advanced scientific research, fosters new global connections and acts as a catalyst for research and teaching. Scientists will outline the global reach, breadth of research and relationships between the academic research community and regional industry and national and international research organizations.

TAGS: Facility Design, Research, Academic Planning, Partnerships

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1136) Get a Life--Student Life at Delaware State University
Presented by: Amado Fernandez, Hughes Group Architects; Matt Fortune, Director, Intramural Sports Recreation, Delaware State University; Douglas Moss, Partner, Holzman Moss Architecture

An enriching, vibrant campus life is vital to any institution's well-being. Delaware State University recognized that the campus’ lack of student life facilities led to the drain of students on weekends. The challenge lay in the creation of a nexus for student activities that will attract students to remain on campus, aid the forging of closer bonds between classmates, and enhance their ties to DSU. This session analyses the challenges of creating dynamic architecture that energizes a campus while handling complex phasing needs, budget and schedule requirements.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Learn about the benefits of having a dynamic on-campus student life environment

2. Learn about the challenges of designing for a campus without strong precedents for student life

3. Learn strategies for improving student body relations focusing on the types of spaces that encourage get-togethers

TAGS: Facility Design, Project Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:00 PM–2:00 PM
(1068) "Non-Profit" Does NOT Mean "Lose Money"
Presented by: Clint Ewell, Executive Director/ Planning, Budget & Institutional Research, Central New Mexico Community College; Kate Moore, Financial Officer, Provost & Academic Affairs, University of New Mexico
UNMG and CNM have performed Profit/ Subsidy analyses by college, by program, by class, and by instructor. By connecting revenue generation to expenditures, these analyses have improved decision-making. Understanding that some programs are profitable while some require subsidy, the presenters advocate making conscious subsidy (investment) choices that are in alignment with the institution's Mission, Vision and Strategic Plan.

Specific applications of this Profit/ Subsidy model include: resource reallocation, class cancellation, new program expansion, scheduling, staffing, non-capital equipment purchases, and lobbying.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Profit/ Loss Modeling: The presenters will explain how they used Excel to model which Departments/ Classes/ Instructors made money and which were subsidized.
2. Implications for Institutional Planning & Financial Decision Making: The presenters will clarify the implications of Profit/ Loss vs Budget Variance analyses.

TAGS: Budget Planning, Performance Measures, Integrated Planning, Institutional Research, Research And Teaching Focused Institutions

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(1144) Transformative Initiatives: Positive Approaches to Working With Your Community
Presented by: Arthur J. Lidsky, President, Dober, Lidsky, Craig and Associates
One of the first recorded conflicts between a college and a community was 1209 at Oxford College. Another was the three-day battle on St. Scholastica Day in 1357, also at Oxford. No wonder that the campus was designed to separate the townsfolk from the students.

This session will explore transformative town/gown initiatives at more than 10 different institutions: public, private, college and university. We will also explore the impact of Town/Gown Associations being created in many cities and states.

Learning Outcomes:

For each institution, we will identify which initiatives are specific to their campus and their community – and which initiatives are generic and can be applied by other colleges and universities to their own situation. Furthermore, we will spend time in participant interaction to explore what might work for a particular issue or problem on campus.

Participants will leave with an understanding of the wide diversity of approaches that institutions and communities have developed and whether they might be applicable to their own campus and community. We will discuss and identify “best practices” and the barriers to “best practices”.

TAGS: Town Gown

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(1107) Integrating Mission and Classroom Design
Presented by: Dixon B. Hanna, Associate Provost, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Charles J. Kirby, Principal & Board Member, Einhorn Yaffee Prescott Architecture & Engineering P.C.

Providing effective, well-designed classrooms that support current learning modes and instructional methods is one of the primary missions of colleges and universities. To accomplish this, many institutions must constantly upgrade their general assignment classrooms to keep up with new teaching methods and technologies. This session will explore the vision and deliberate planning process that Virginia Tech undertook in the development and implementation of its classroom master plan, as well as several similar projects currently being developed on other campuses.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Review fundamental principles for effective classroom design.

2. Understand how taking a creative and strategic approach to classroom redesign can positively impact a campus in the short and long term. Best practices, lessons learned and suggestions for measuring results will be presented.

3.Investigate trends that are having an impact on teaching/learning methods and environments.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Master Planning, Technology

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(1126) Applying Global Modern Methods of Construction to College Planning
Presented by: Michael H. Brewer, Director/Plant Operations, Muhlenberg College; Mike Pitt, Managing Director, The Design Buro; Avi Telyas, CEO, Kullman Buildings Corp

This presentation educates college planners, architects, construction managers and those involved in the planning process on global modern methods of construction. It will enable you to take advantage of the knowledge, techniques and innovation utilized in worldwide building design and construction. Also, student housing is high on student's agenda when choosing a school. Learn how to apply cutting-edge design and construction strategies to your institutions planning process to broaden your horizons and attract students globally.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Learn how campuses internationally are dealing with ever changing student population needs.

2. Learn about the trend that colleges and universities are using for lean construction methods to shorten construction schedules, minimize site disruption on campus and in surrounding neighborhoods, and reduce total costs of construction projects.

3. How architects' designs work with off-site modular steel and concrete construction to achieve the clients desired results. See examples of how utilizing 3-D and 4-D design and construction tools can benefit your project planning, schedule and Building Information Modeling. View how students from Poland, Syria and China attending The University of Alberta played an integral part in the technology for Muhlenberg College's new Student Housing buildings and in other industrialized construction.

4. Participants will learn multiple methods of how the procurement process is structured to work with off-Site, modular construction and their institution, construction management and general contracting firms while enduring competitive participation.


TAGS: Student Recruitment, Facility Design, Student Residences

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(1102) A New Grounds Plan for UVA: A GIS Based Plan
Presented by: Julia Monteith, Senior Land Use Planner, University of Virginia; David J. Neuman, Architect for the University, University of Virginia

For the first time, the University has completed a comprehensive assessment of its lands in terms of infrastructure, transportation, circulation, biohabitat and natural systems to develop the new Grounds Plan; providing guidance in land-use decision making for the next twenty years. Using state-of-the-art geographic information systems(GIS) technology, it can be simply updated to allow strategic assessments of physical planning alternatives in the future; resulting in the University's ability to predict the consequences of its growth.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Learn about state-of-the-art master planning practices being incorporated at a seminal American university.
2. Discuss the benefits of a university leading their own master planning effort while integrating the expertise of specialized consultants when needed.
3. Understand the integration of sustainability practices into comprehensive land use planning and related activities.

Campuses of the future will need to look beyond traditional master planning practicies to adequately account for growth and related impacts on their physical, natural and cultural environments. Integrating such diverse realms as conservation planning, preservation planning, transportation demand management, multi-disciplinary curriculum development, adjusted program growth, and sustainable development, the new Grounds Plan provides an efficient and flexible model for the University that is adaptable to changing external circumstances and internal priorities through the University planning staff and their capabilities.

TAGS: Sustainability, Open Space, Geographic Information Systems, Simulations, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Production


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(VS-02) A Walk in the Park (ing): Lessons in Parking Structure Sustainable Design
Presented by: Di Botejue, Project Manager, International Parking Design (IPD); Don Marks, Principal, International Parking Design (IPD); Clifford E. Smith, President, International Parking Design (IPD)

Learn how easy it is to apply sustainable design features into your next parking structure project as presenters highlight green initiatives in parking structure design. Integrated green features will be presented as well as explanations of how and why such features affect buildings.

TAGS: Sustainability, Parking

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(INV06) The Bologna Process - Vision or Nightmare for the Internationalization of Higher Education?
Presented by: Britta Baron, Vice Provost & Associate Vice President International, University of Alberta

The intent of the Bologna Process is to create a European higher education area by making academic degree standards and quality assurance standards more comparable and compatible throughout Europe. Gain an overview on the key components and the context from which the Bologna process arose, the progress achieved so far, and a few major problems. The impact of the Bologna Process on the broader international environment in general and on Canada in particular will be analyzed. The presentation will identify implications for international student recruitment, international curriculum development (joint and dual degree programs), graduate admissions and undergraduate study abroad.

TAGS: International Planning Models

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(1021) From Strategic to Operational Planning: A Case Study
Presented by: Jack P. Calareso, President, Anna Maria College; Andrew O. Klein, Dean, Student Affairs & Retention, Anna Maria College

Most institutions are able to develop a strategic plan. But the implementation of the plan will only occur if an operational plan is developed with a clear identification of outcomes, accountabilities, financial implications, timelines and an assessment plan. At multiple institutions, the presenters have developed a process and a system to translate the strategic plan into a dynamic operational plan that drives performance objectives and assessment measures for the entire institution. The process and samples from the operational plan will be shared in this case study.

Learning Outcomes:

Learning objectives include:

1) The connection between strategic and operational planning;

2) A specific process to develop and implement an Operational Plan; and,

3) The experience of a case study of these methodologies and processes in action.

TAGS: Performance Measures, Operational Planning, Integrated Planning, Teaching Focused, Community College

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(1093) How the Need for Collaboration Is Transforming the Culture of Space
Presented by: Douglas Disbrow, Principal, The S/L/A/M Collaborative; Mary Jo Olenick, Principal, The S/L/A/M Collaborative; P. D. Surbey, Associate Dean, Emory University
The solutions to today’s global challenges require a collaborative approach to learning and research – demanding that we build new kinds of spaces that enable people to learn and work together in innovative ways.

The field of public health faces an especially complex global reality and the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University is embarking on an organizational transformation to meet these emerging challenges. This interactive workshop will demonstrate how an intensive planning and design process is not only enabling the institution to double its square footage - but more importantly to impact the future of global health.

Learning Outcomes:

- The importance of a client-centric planning and design process and the tools to implement one
- How an integrated planning and design process can help an institution to visualize its future
- How to build consensus and come up with NEW answers to a complex problems
-Developing a post occupancy monitoring process that measures the impact of architecture on organizational transformation

TAGS: Facility Design, Partnerships, Decision Making, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(1114) The Laboratory as Workplace: More Space Is Not Always the Answer
Presented by: June Hanley, Principal & Senior Planner, CUH2A; Robin Morris, Vice President, Research & Regents Professor, Psychology, Georgia State University

This session will offer practical advice on how university administrators and facilities officers can assess their science facilities. Additional square footage does not solve all space-related issues. This presentation will examine space in terms of capacity, and how to determine whether it is underutilized, at optimal capacity, or truly overcrowded. A comparison of space standards at various universities will offer a practical perspective on trends in science education and how these trends are translated into the physical workplace for both teachers and students.

Learning Outcomes:

Focusing on teaching and research laboratory space, this session will provide metrics on how facility officers and administrators can ascertain whether research and teaching space is being effectively used, ways they can evaluate space resources among different buildings with different structural grids, floor-to-floor heights, design capacity and space ratios on a comparable basis. Understanding their own laboratory facilities as resources will enable them to plan proactively, understand when groups truly do need new space, and determine the effects of moving a group from one space to the other.

TAGS: Space Management, Research, Performance Measures, Facility Design, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(1124) Reconciling a Sustainability Failure: Green Planning But No Green Building
Presented by: Mark J. O'Gorman, Associate Professor - Political Science & Environmental Studies, Maryville College

Sustainability success stories abound, but what can be learned from a sustainability failure? In East Tennessee, USA, one college with a positive history of environmental initiatives initiated a major campus renovation and new construction project. Sustainability advocates tried, unsuccessfully, to convince the institution to commit to green-certified construction. This retrospective of the failed fight (to date) of institutionalizing campus physical plant sustainability provides lessons on the obstacles found, and partial successes achieved, when ecology, campus politics and capital campaigns collide.

Learning Outcomes:

1) How to positively discuss sustainability to new audiences using financial, planning and curricular languages familiar to those actors.
2) To explain how cultural and institutional barriers to sustainability projects can be as important to understand and overcome as resource constraints.
3) What environmental programming successes can be identified and measured, however indirect or incomplete, in order to maintain momentum towards a more sustainable organization.

TAGS: Sustainability, Change

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(1142) UIC--Implementing Transformation at an Idealized Mid-Century Modern Campus
Presented by: Boyd E. Black, Director/Project Management Services, University of Illinois; Louis J. Raia, Independent Consultant

Faced with a significant but aging mid-century modern campus the University of Illinois at Chicago initiated a process in the 1980’s to transform itself through steps over a period of time. A short history on the transformation will be followed by a presentatin of the planning and outcome of the adaptive reuse of an existing classroom building as a global focused language center and a prototype for the future renovation of eight other existing classroom buildings. Specific lessons learned and how they are being applied to renovation of the next two classroom buildings will be presented. For Campus Design and construction staff, Campus Administrators, Planners and Architects.

Learning Outcomes:

Groundwork strategies to implement campus wide change on an existing campus.

Leveraging an individual building renovation project to develop a prototype to transform all of the typical classroom buildings on campus within the campus framework.

Strategies for creating a global focused language and culture center on a 21st century American campus through technology and facility design that promote interaction.

TAGS: Student Learning, Facility Design, Renovation, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15 PM–3:15 PM
(1133) We Made It Smaller and Better: It’s a Green Success
Presented by: Karen A. Cribbins-Kuklin, Associate Principal, Perkins + Will; Leta Stagnaro, Associate Vice President, Ohlone College; Douglas Treadway, President/Superintendent, Ohlone College

The Ohlone College Newark Center for Health Sciences and Technology presented its vision to be a “College of the Future” at SCUP-40. The completed “Green” campus (LEED Gold, maybe Platinum) is a California community college designed to teach its academic focus as well as environmental stewardship through example, demonstration and inspiration. This Session presents the exciting outcomes to an ambitious vision and how collaboration between the College and its consulting team created an innovative outcome.

Learning Outcomes:

- Process Innovations —- for achieving Green Design for a campus and building
- Design Strategies —- for achieving flexible classroom and lab designs that accommodate new and emerging teaching methodologies
- Communication Techniques —- for assisting contractors to better understand challenges they face as they try to construct new energy saving systems including Enthalpy Wheels and Ground Coupled Heat Pumps

TAGS: Sustainability, Academic Planning, Facility Design, Teaching Focused Institution, Community College

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(1053) BIM--Discover Enhanced Planning With Building Information Modeling
Presented by: Stuart A. Adler, Senior Project Manager, Emory University; Chirag Mistry, Lab Planner, HOK; Andrew C. Yantis, Senior Vice President, Holder Construction Company

This session will provide an overview of how Building Information Modeling (BIM) is being used to transform the way we collaborate to develop budgets, programs, planning, design and construction scenarios. Presenters will highlight the benefits from the BIM model created for the new Emory Psychology building. You'll see examples in 3D, 4D and 5D. The result is a new integrated process for planning, designing and building buildings: one that reshapes how we work together, integrates teams, and adds intelligence.

Learning Outcomes:

Participants will:
-Take home innovative technology and team best practices for BIM
-Experience real life project benefits and case studies
-Learn about state of the art tools, technologies and BIM processes

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Space Management, Facility Design, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(1115) Reacting to the Past or Planning for the Future
Presented by: Harvey H. Kaiser, President, Harvey H. Kaiser Associates, Inc; Peter D. Zuraw, Assistant Vice President/Management & Planning, Wellesley College
The academic institution's long struggle with inadequate resources and deferral of investment in its capital infrastructure is well documented. The efforts to assess existing conditions, keep pace with academic program change, pinpoint capital costs, struggle to finance them, and create tools to sustain the effort going forward are familiar topics if not activities. This is the story of an innovative facilities (not master) planning project partnership at Wellesley College in 2006 and 2007 and the lessons learned…so far. Of particular focus will be the role of he institution in leading any process, the importance of conceiving of this work as a process and not a task to be implemented, and some new thining on linking deferral/conditions/needs assessment thinking with the critical areas of modernization and program growth/change.

It is hoped that during this presentation most time will be spent in conversation between the presenters themselves and with the audience in open discussion.

Learning Outcomes:

The participants will hear about and discuss the pitfalls in keeping a process moving forward with an eye on toward remaining focused on legitimate outcomes. Additionally there will be emphasis on the nature of assessment historically and an innovative way of thinking about moving beyond the current challenges that outmoded facilities or deferred maintenance bring to our planning lives without necessarily leaping toward master planning which often leaves behind the reality of today.

TAGS: Budget Planning, Facility Design, Partnerships, Decision Making, Small Private

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Finance


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(1003) Developing an Integrated Global Masterplan on Campus
Presented by: Ronald B. Kull, Senior Planner, GBBN Architects; Mitch Leventhal, Vice Provost for International Affairs, University of Cincinnati; Dale L. McGirr, Senior Planner, GBBN Architects

This session will review the components of an emerging global masterplan at the University of Cincinnati. The plan addresses the experience of students (both incoming and outgoing) in all its dimensions: curricular internationalization, distributed educational program sites, enrollment management, marketing, institutional affiliations, faculty needs and activities, organizational leadership, data sources to guide planning, and the nurturing of global cultural development on campus. It will then explore the physical and programmatic planning issues involved with making the home campus function as a working global community with a strong international culture.

Learning Outcomes:

Planners attending this session will be able to compare their own institution to the experiences of the University of Cincinnati in the following areas:

Data Sources for a Global Masterplan
1. System to gather internal information about international activities.
Demonstration of COSMIC – “Cincinnati Online System for Managing International Collaboration”;
2. Use of information gained by participating in The International Student Barometer (ISB) benchmarking survey;
3. Use of information gained by participating as a pilot institution for the testing of new Standards of Best Practice for Education Abroad;

Global Management Issues
1. Foreign student recruiting using commercial agencies working for compensation;
2. Expanding program offerings to foreign locations;
3. Focusing foreign research alliances on key strengths and at a scale that can be effective;
4. Organizational strategy for the placement of a comprehensive global affairs management staff;
5. The dilemma of corporate or government sponsorship, and other innovative funding sources;

Global Culture On Campus Issues
1. Just Community activities that involve a campus-wide discussion of selected readings designed to stimulate conversation and involvement with current global issues, both in and out of the classroom setting;
2. Student affairs programming in the global environment;
3. Creating the space program for a center for global activities and/or a multi-cultural center;
4. Student quality of life planning (housing, food, social and recreational spaces) and strategies that can support an effective global culture.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Academic Planning, Internationalization Of A Campus, Research Focused Institutions

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(1138) Steps to Successful Partnerships for Performing Arts Centers
Presented by: Douglas Moss, Partner, Holzman Moss Architecture; William F. Reeder, Dean, George Mason Universitiy; Rhonda J. Smith, Chair, Department of Contemporary Art & Theater & Coordinator, BFA Printmaking Program, Shepherd University

Academic institutions are realizing the importance of creating performing arts facilities, as they compete for new students, ensure alumni loyalty, and reach out to their surrounding communities by offering a wider range of cultural amenities. Increasingly, they seek partnering opportunities with surrounding communities and non-profit arts groups to finance these facili-ties. This session explores the variables that contribute to a successful collaborative relation-ship and outline the steps leading to a winning partnership.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Learn about why partnerships work well for performing arts facilities and the different types of partnerships.

2. Learn how to structure an effective partnership, the steps to undertake and the indicators to look out for during a project’s development.

3. Learn through case studies about clarifying the key differences, opportuni-ties, and challenges of partnerships between Universities or Colleges and other community institutions. The case studies will illustrate how the partnerships have exceeded all expectations.

TAGS: Town Gown, Facility Design, Art, Small Private

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(1134) Re-aligning the Business of Higher Education With Local/State Economies
Presented by: Sally A. Katz, Director, Trinity College; Lenell Kittlitz, Director/Facilities Planning & Board of Trustees , Connecticut Community Colleges; Pamela J. Loeffelman, Principal, Perkins Eastman; Alexandria Roe, Director, Planning & Program Development, Architectural & Engineering Services, University of Connecticut

External factors are rapidly driving change in higher education: globalization, shifting demographics, environmental awareness and technology are all common place topics. Initiating change at the local level is the first step. Hear how three institutions in Connecticut are crafting unique responses: through alignments of leadership, industry alliances, and infrastructure adjustments to attract students, ensure that they graduate, and to keep them engaged as both productive citizens of Connecticut and part of an innovative global economy.

Learning Outcomes:

1)Tools to manage leadership shifts which foster changing attitudes while also maintaining continuity of resources through data driven resources.
2)Strategies to align student and workforce data with both industry performance and national (and international) trends in order to develop and deliver customized curriculum development and workforce training that maximizes the socio-economic outcomes for the local/regional economy.
3)An understanding of how to prioritize infrastructure choices so as to maximize outcomes in sustainable educational delivery that is personalized, varied, and less isolated.

TAGS: Partnerships, Student Learning, Student Recruitment, Research Focused Institution, Teaching Focused Institution, Small Private Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(1153) From Data, to Information, to Knowledge: Connecting Institutional and Space Data for Integrated Strategic Planning
Presented by: Jennifer L. Dam, Campus Planner, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; William J. Nunez, Director/Institutional Research, Planning & Space Management, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Ronald Roeber, Associate Vice Chancellor, Academic Affairs, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
This session reviews the many sources of institutional information available to decision makers and explains how information rarely evolves into usable knowledge. This is due in part to a lack of commonality and linkages between transactional and reporting systems.

The presenters will review an existing institutional data hierarchy that ties together student, financial, staffing, space, and other sources and will explain how this linkage enhanced a university operational Strategic Plan, particularly in the area of space management.

Learning Outcomes:

Participants of this session will be exposed to numerous topics of major importance to higher education decision makers including: Use of an information hierarchy, integrated database design and connectivity, techniques for the integration of source data and useable outputs, and major components of strategic planning (and how our institution successfully used strategic planning for a "Special Emphasis" accreditation process). Last, participants will view a demonstration of a new on-line space management system using the information hierarchy.

TAGS: Institutional Research, Integrated Planning, Space Management, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(1082) Academic Schedule Planning to Meet Student Needs
Presented by: Keith Murray, Director, Space Management & Academic Scheduling, Purdue University Main Campus

This session will introduce an integrated approach to planning and scheduling classes at colleges and universities that can better meet student course needs and adapt to changing curricular requirements. This approach is based on many years of practical experience planning course needs at a major US university and collaborative research efforts on timetabling and student scheduling with several European universities. The session also seeks to explain some of the fundamental ways in which scheduling can influence both academic outcomes and the efficient use of instructional resources. Practical tools that have resulted from recent research in this area will be used to illustrate this process.

Learning Outcomes:

Enable better planning to meet student academic course needs/demand
and make progress toward degree objectives
Understand reasons for good or poor utilization of instructional resources
(space, instructors) and funding to support them
Increase knowledge of recent developments in timetabling and scheduling
Remaining competitive with universities globally (UK study, trends in
Europe, Asia)
Raise awareness of alternatives to business as usual

TAGS: International Planning, Students, Space Management, Space Utilization

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(VS-05) Master Planning and Accountability Through CollegeNET's X25
Presented by: Julia Noonan, Associate Vice President, Sales, CollegeNET, Inc

During this session participants will discover an accurate, yet thorough method of collecting data for their college's master planning process. CollegeNET, Inc. has developed a tool designed to work with Resource 25 that provides accurate reporting of building utilization, space needs of the campus and programmatic needs related to space. Using X25, learn how to provide accurate forecasting of space needs by program, by building and by campus.

TAGS: Performance Measurement, Space Management

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(1100) Developing Sustainable Master Plans: Hints, Heartaches, and Home Cures
Presented by: Robert Kennedy, Director of Energy Services, Einhorn Yaffee Prescott; Thomas J. Martin, Director, Design & Construction, Harvard Business School; Heather Taylor, Prinicpal, Project Executive, Einhorn Yaffee Prescott Architecture & Engineering P.C.

Global warming has become headline news as governments, businesses and consumers embrace sustainability. Higher education institutions and planners have the opportunity to lead this charge through the development of sustainable master plans. Presenters will discuss the elements of a sustainable master plan, including the benefits of incorporating an energy master plan. They will also address the challenges and solutions associated with implementation. The results of a survey of sustainable planning efforts currently underway on campuses will be presented.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Strategies for integrating sustainable elements into the master planning process.
2. Strategies and considerations for incorporating an energy master plan into your campus planning effort
3. An update on sustainable planning trends on college and university campuses across the country.

TAGS: Sustainability, Master Planning, Performance Measures

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 3:30 PM–4:30 PM
(1140) The Recreational Union
Presented by: John Drinkwater, Senior Director, Campus Life & Student Facility Development, Central Washington University; James Poulson, Associate, Design Director, Ellerbe Becket, Inc.

The session will describe the development of a combined student union and campus recreation facility at Central Washington University. The focus will be on planning, design, operations, and economic advantages of such a facility and how each component enhances the whole. While some attention will be paid to the market analysis employed to determine the optimum program, this presentation will discuss, in detail, the interrelationship between union activities, campus dining, student recreation, increased enrollment and the revitalization of a campus.

Learning Outcomes:

· Understand how proper planning informs the selection of an optimum site and how to deal with existing site constraints.

· Understand the programmatic adjacencies employed to create visual excitement and increase patron flow.

· Understand strategies for shaping a consensus-based process to develop, deliver and operate an integrated student-life facility, engaging such diverse constituents as students, faculty, administration, President’s Cabinet, Board of Trustees and the local community.

TAGS: Student Recruitment, Facility Design, Comprehensive Doctoral

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(1016) Learning Space Factors Report, 2008
Presented by: Jeff Vredevoogd, Manager/Education Solutions Channel, Herman Miller

Learn the results of a major survey on the key factors driving learning spaces. What do students think is the most valuable consideration in physical learning spaces, and if learning can happen anywhere-what would the most valuable aspect of campus learning spaces be? The survey takes a qualitative approach to give insight into these and other questions to inform your planning initiatives.

Learning Outcomes:

By sharing results of the survey, guests will learn about key factors driving change on campus. Discussion time will also help provide ideas on how to respond to these factors.

TAGS: Learning Space Design, Students

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(1004) Creating Global-Ready Places: New Forms of Campus/Community Synergy
Presented by: Perry Chapman, Principal, Sasaki Associates Inc

The session describes how globalization is reshaping American campuses and their relationship to their host communities. Institutions, cities, and enterprises are creating learning environments responsive to international competition, growth in world demands on postsecondary education, demographic change, and technological forces affecting academia and communities alike. This session, aimed at campus and urban planners, strategists and policymakers, describes how place-based campuses have been and will continue to be at the nexus of global change for their cities and regions.

Learning Outcomes:

- Understanding the structural trends in academic globalization to be considered in creating the productive campus/community learning environment of the future.
- Re-imagining how campus/community settings might change to serve the global-wise/global ready learning society we must cultivate.
- Examining collaborative strategies that colleges and communities are undertaking to effectuate such change.

TAGS: Partnerships, Student Recruitment, Master Planning, Town Gown

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(1089) Leveraging Athletics to Create a Competitive Edge at Community Colleges
Presented by: Valarie Avalone, Director/Planning, Monroe Community College; Raymond L. Rudolph, Partner, Clough, Harbour & Associates LLP

Leveraging athletics and quality of campus life as a recruiting tool is a challenge faced by community colleges competing for students. This presentation explores how community colleges can enhance their recruiting efforts by constructing progressive athletic facilities that are capable of attracting students and athletes internationally. Specifically, the presenters will discuss the funding and construction of Monroe Community College’s new PAC Center, a 53,000 square foot recreational/athletic training complex that features top-grade athletic amenities rarely found at community colleges.

Learning Outcomes:

Participants will:
(1) Understand the importance of integrating the progressive needs of today’s amateur athletes into community college campus planning and facility design
(2) Learn how similar projects can be funded using a public-private partnership model, particularly when the project is integrated into a campus master plan
(3) Discover how integrating a facility like the MCC PAC Center into a community college campus master plan can enrich the student experience, provide benefits to the surrounding community, attract athletes from across the US and internationally, and ultimately enhance a school’s reputation.

TAGS: Student Recruitment, Facility Design, Teaching Focused Institution, Community College

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Management Advisory Services


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(1158) The Global Green Tsunami: Green Building Trends
Presented by: Kevin R. Hydes, Vice President, Buildings Engineering, Stantec Inc

The world has seen a dramatic shift in the past year relative to the planning and design of green buildings. Every country and community is responding to the global tsunami in different ways. Hear about what leading institutions are doing to green their campuses, focusing on zero energy or carbon neutral strategies. Get a green design global update, and share your own initiatives and planned targets in our interactive discussion.

TAGS: Sustainability, Tactical And Strategic Planning For Carbon Reductions

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Production


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(1160) Action Analytics, Alignment, and Planning
Presented by: Linda L. Baer, Senior Vice Chancellor, Academic & Student Affairs, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities; Donald M. Norris, President, Strategic Initiatives Inc

Institutions are moving beyond a culture of evidence to a culture of improving performance. Action analytics leverage open-architecture technologies to optimize institutional data, information, and analytics capabilities. They combine dashboards, drill downs, modeling, and active interventions. This enhances the capacity of organizations and individuals to drive decisions, improve processes, and elevate success. This session reviews the use of action analytics in a wide range of institutions, including Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, where it has become a priority initiative. The session concludes by demonstrating the potential of leveraging analytics, alignment, and planning.

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(INV05) Integrating Academic, Financial, and Capital Planning: Six Years of Lessons
Presented by: Philip G. Stack, Associate Vice President, Risk Management Services, University of Alberta

Today's highly competitive and challenging post-secondary environment make it essential that institutions have planning processes that support the development of an academic plan and the linkage of resource allocation decisions to that plan. Learn how the University of Alberta approaches integrated planning and budgeting. The University's integrated planning model, lessons learned, areas of improvement, and highlights that impact the planning and budget process will provide ideas as you build or strengthen your own integrated planning process.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Academic Planning, Budget Planning, International Planning Models

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 8:30 AM–9:30 AM
(1157) Strategies for Regional Economic Engagement--Institutions as Leaders for Innovation, Human Capital, and New Knowledge Community Campuses
Presented by: Eva Klein, President, Eva Klein & Associates, Ltd.; Aaron B. Schwarz, Principal & Director, Perkins Eastman
Never in human history have institutions been more critical resources in sustaining prosperous regions and healthy communities than now-in the Innovation / Knowledge Economy. As society's institution, higher education now must abandon its Ivory Tower culture in favor of engagement with businesses, communities, and governments-to create the advantages required for global competitiveness.

This session begins with future challenges and proposed characteristics of 21st century institutions. It provides concepts and examples of engagement strategies, including programs to support innovation; new ways to sustain human capital (workforce) resources; and the concepts and designs of new places-from university research parks to mixed-use university campuses.

Learning Outcomes:

1) Understanding of key issues colleges and universities face in creating effective strategies for engagement with their communities and regions, or for knowledge-based economic development
2) Appreciation for how vitally important it is to integrate programmatic strategies with campus and "place" development strategies
3) Convincing case made about the need for colleges and universities to be leaders of and members in strong, working regional alliances that include public agencies and the private sector, as well as multiple institutions-and the special planning challenges involved in multi-partner initiatives.
4) Physical design considerations, components, global benchmarks, and success factors related to creating a world class new knowledge community or mixed-use university campus.

TAGS: Partnerships, Town/Gown, Economic Development

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(1042) Fighting a Pandemic Through A Partnership: Keys to Success for Global Collaborations
Presented by: Donald B. Altemeyer, Principal, Vice Chair & Founding Partner, BSA LifeStructures; Robert M. Einterz, Associate Dean, International Programs & Professor of Clinical Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine; Kalevi Huotilainen, Principal, BSA LifeStructures

The academic model for the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS is a partnership between Indiana University and Moi University in Kenya. The conceptual design of its clinic bolstered fundraising efforts and resulted in Kenya’s only building dedicated to HIV patient care, helping achieve AMPATH’s mission of providing care for thousands of patients and training hundreds of providers. University leaders will learn how to apply lessons from the partnership to their planning and programming efforts, global programs and collaborations.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Keys to successful partnerships that benefit universities and communities
2. Strategies to support global education programs and relationships
3. Programming, planning and conceptual design approaches and processes to meet specialized and international requirements

TAGS: Partnerships, International Planning Models, Medical Schools

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(1033) You Can Go Anywhere From Here: Transforming Spaces for International and Cultural Studies
Presented by: Diane Birckbichler, Director, Foreign Language Center & Chair, Department of French & Italian, The Ohio State University; Raymond B. Farrow, Executive Director, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Jane Weinzapfel, Principal, Leers Weinzapfel Associates

In 2008, we face the challenge of preparing students for a world that requires learning environments that support international education, global exploration, and foreign culture. Two new educational centers, the new Global Education Center at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and the new World Media and Culture Center at The Ohio State University, serve as case study examples of how design and technology enhance international and foreign language study by brining the world to students on their local campus.

Learning Outcomes:

This session will be of interest to planners, educators, and administrators who are interested in or facing the challenges of brining international study to their campus or enhancing existing international study programs.
1 How to create environments which assist international study programs promote global learning, understanding, research, and awareness such as video-conference based classrooms, international media centered gathering spaces, language laboratories, and lecture, event, and seminar spaces for international scholars.
2 Explore methods of design and technology that will enhance existing international study programs.

TAGS: Technology, Student Learning, Facility Design, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(1159) Strategic Planning for Higher Education in Developing Countries: Some Implications for American Universities\n
Presented by: Fred M. Hayward, Independent Higher Education Consultant
This presentation reviews institutional strategic planning in a number of universities in Africa and Asia to assess implications of these efforts for higher education in the United States and Canada. They include: 1) consequences for the US & Canada of weak higher education institutions and failure to develop; 2) the desire of these universities to collaborate and cooperate with foreign institutions; and 3) a potential role in helping reverse a growing hostility to, and negative images of, the West. It builds on the presenter's work in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Ghana, Madagascar, Mauritius, Malawi, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, South Africa, and The Gambia.
This presentation expands on the presenter's article in Planning for Higher Education, April, 2008.

TAGS: Strategic Planning

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(1064) How Green Is It? EMERGY Analysis and Campus Planning
Presented by: Robin Hoffman, Associate Professor, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry; Timothy R. Toland, Assistant Professor, State University of New York

SUNY Environmental Science and Forestry has developed a master plan that envisions converting a typical 1960’s campus into a holistically designed sustainable environment. To evaluate how successful the plan met these goals, an EMERGY analysis is used to convert the dissimilar energy inputs required for each initiative into a comparable index. The results will be useful for assessing improved sustainability as measured against existing conditions, developing phasing plans, and prioritizing improvements. This presentation presents a case study for university planners.

Learning Outcomes:

1) Introduction to EMERGY as an analysis tool for assessing sustainability initiatives
2) Case study review of a systems basis for sustainability planning in a campus environment

TAGS: Sustainability, Performance Measures, Integrated Planning, Research Focused Institution

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU/SD 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(1061) Visualizing Change and Risk
Presented by: John R. Curry, Managing Director, Higher Education and Healthcare Practice, Huron Consulting Group; William F. Massy, President, Jackson Hole Higher Education Group

The presenters will describe the state of the art in visualizing the quantitative implications of strategic planning scenarios, and engage participants in an interactive planning exercise using their new Excel-based simulation platform. Topics will include modeling the resource requirements and financial consequences of alternative scenarios, building risk into the models, and visualizing and interpreting results. The emphasis on practice will be informed by the presenters’ extensive experience as senior university planners as well as model builders.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Improved knowledge of good practice in modeling the resource requirements and financial consequences of strategic planning scenarios, and of how to work with finance-staff colleagues to integrate these models into the institution’s core financial planning regimen.
2. Understanding of how to build risk into planning models, how to visualize and interpret the results, and how the failure to consider risk can be misleading and dangerous.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Simulation, Budget Planning, Institutional Research

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(1036) Less Than a Semester: A High-Speed Planning Process
Presented by: Shawna Arroyo, Project Specialist, New Mexico State University; Randey Bamford, Director, Senior Administration, New Mexico State University; Michael Hites, Associate Vice President, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
This presentation/discussion explores how New Mexico State University developed its strategic planning process in only one semester. This session provides an overview of NMSU’s process, including:
- Choosing the planning process taskforce
- Why university deans were intentionally excluded from the creation of the process (but included in the final approval process)
- The creation of an initial workbook that was not only a process development tool but a sales tool
- Tricks for getting involvement from stakeholders

Learning Outcomes:

Attendees will learn about potential obstacles to the fast-track creation of a strategic plan. In addition, attendees will learn how to bring stakeholders (students/faculty/staff) together in an environment that is conducive to the open expression of opinion.

TAGS: Integrated Planning, Academic Planning, Collaboration

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(1059) Next Generation Learning Environments: Does One Size Fit All?
Presented by: David L. Damon, Associate Principal, Perkins + Will; Janice M. Deakin, Dean, Graduate Studies & Research, Queen's University

The evolution of higher education has never been faced with today’s global impacts and issues. This session will address pedagogies that are evolving on campus, new learning environments that are being created, and conflicts that arise between administration, faculty, and designers. We will also discuss the impact of the constant development of technology and communication media on today's student. The discussion will present current examples on campuses in both Canada and the United States.

Learning Outcomes:

1. Participants will have a clear idea of the current platforms available for instructional and interactive learning.
2. Participants will have an understanding of how media and technology influence the design of learning environments.
3. Participants will have tangible decision-making strategies that anticipate and evaluate all user needs.

TAGS: Students Learning, Technology, Change

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Marketing


Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 9:45 AM–10:45 AM
(INV04) Campus Image and Identity in the 21st Century
Presented by: Richard P. Dober, Senior Consultant, Dober, Lidsky, Craig and Associates

Drawing from thousands of slides of campuses all over the world, the presenters will outline an adaptable approach to strengthening a campus's image and identity in the 21st century, and the reasons and benefits for doing so.

TAGS: Image And Identity

Continuing Education Credits:
AIA LU 1.0 unitNASBA CPA CPE 1.0 unit; Field of study: Social Environment of Business