Universities as Developers
This piece in Land Line, a publication of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, is from 2001 but is worth the read as an exposition of the myriad of issues campuses face in development at or near the campus edge. Very thoughtful.
Even when universities succeed in securing new development sites, they have to balance many competing demands. For example, donors favor signature buildings; the city requires regulatory compliance; neighborhood activists call for input into the school's expansion plans, as well as benefits from that expansion; parents want a safe environment for their children; and students desire retail and entertainment options, as well as housing and security. Meeting all of these demands is difficult and none of the possible responses speaks directly to furthering the core educational mission of a university. ...
Because most universities will remain in their current locations indefinitely, their futures will continue to be intertwined with their surrounding neighborhoods. However, the inevitability of future change and persistent development pressure highlights the differences between universities and the private real estate sector. Profit and speed motivate private developers-two qualities not usually associated with universities, particularly public institutions. Furthermore, given the broader mission of a university, short-term, market-oriented thinking is not always suitable. It is clear that future prospects for university expansion remain a complex challenge, especially in urban areas where land available for development is limited and expensive.
Click on its title to access the original resource, Universities as Developers.
Labels: development, facilities planning, Campus Planning, town and gown, community development, community impact, Real Estate
Society for College and University Planning