Scup-logo-80-90 Society for College and University Planning

Thursday, April, 21, 2011

Academically Adrift

Monday, July 25, 2011, 8:30 AM–9:45 AM

Monday Plenary Session

Presented by: Richard Arum, Professor, Sociology and Education, New York University; Josipa Roksa, Assistant Professor, Sociology, University of Virginia

Co-Authors, Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses

Richard Arum (New York University) and Josipa Roksa (University of Virginia) are co-authors of Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses (University of Chicago Press). Academically Adrift examines how individual experiences and institutional contexts are related to students’ development of critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writing skills during the first two years of college. According to the findings they documented in their book, a significant number of university students in America failed to develop “core” skills, (critical thinking, reasoning, and writing skills) after four years of college education.


Read more about the authors, below the following embedded document. Always find the latest about their session at SCUP's conference here. The document, below, links to a constantly interesting daily "newspaper" about the book and the controversy surrounding it. Let us know if you enjoy it: terry.calhoun@scup.org.


 

The authors studied 2,322 freshmen students between 2005 and 2009 who were enrolled at over 24 American institutions reflecting a “geographically and institutionally representative” cross-section of America’s institutions, ranging from large public universities, liberal arts colleges, and historically black and Hispanic-serving institutions. The book provokes necessary conversation about teaching and learning in higher education. Their key findings include:
  • 45% of the students included in the study “did not demonstrate any significant improvement in learning” during their first two years of college.
  • 36% of students “did not demonstrate any significant improvement in learning” after four years of college.
  • Students who study alone gain more knowledge, while those who spend more time studying in groups “see diminishing gains.”
  • Liberal arts students see “significantly higher gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and written skills” compared to other students.
  • A third of students were not taking courses, which required them to read more than 40 pages per week.
  • Students who were enrolled in classes, which required them to read more than 40 pages a week and more than 20 pages of writing a semester gained more than other students.

The research project that led to the book was organized by the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) as part of its collaborative partnership with the Pathways to College Network and is supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Ford, Lumina, and Teagle Foundations.

Continue the discussion! This plenary session will be followed by a concurrent session discussion panel addressing the topic of what constitutes educational quality, how do we assess it, and, most importantly, how do we improve it? 

Richard Arum
Professor of Sociology and Education
New York University

Richard Arum is professor in the Department of Sociology with a joint appointment in the Steinhardt School of Education at New York University. He is also director of the Education Research Program of the Social Science Research Council, where he oversaw the development of the Research Alliance for New York City Schools, a research consortium designed to conduct ongoing evaluation of the New York City public schools. He is the author of Judging School Discipline: The Crisis of Moral Authority in American Schools (Harvard University Press, 2003), and co-editor of a comparative study on expansion, differentiation and access to higher education in fifteen countries, Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study (Stanford University Press, 2007). Arum received a Masters of Education in Teaching and Curriculum from Harvard University, and a PhD in Sociology from the University of California, Berkeley.

Josipa Roksa
Assistant Professor of Sociology
University of Virginia

Josipa Roksa is assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Virginia (UVA), with a courtesy appointment in the Curry School of Education. She is also a Fellow of the National Forum on the Future of Liberal Education. Roksa’s primary research interests are in social stratification and higher education. Her research has been published inSocial Forces, Sociology of Education, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Review of Higher Education, Research in Higher Education, Teachers College Record, andSocial Science Research. She received her BA, summa cum laude, in Psychology from Mount Holyoke College, and PhD in Sociology from New York University (NYU).

For more information about Academically Adrift:

A perspective from The Chronicle of Higher Education

The Wall Street Journal Video Interview with Richard Arum

Excerpt from Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses(University of Chicago Press) in The Chronicle of Higher Education online.

Inside Higher Ed: Academically Adrift


 

 

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, December, 16, 2010

'It's as Good as the Other Stuff'

Serena Golden took an introductory economics class from StraighterLine in order to compare that really inexpensive, no-instructor, all on line class to more traditional offerings at more established institutions. She has written a three-part paper on the experience, with lots of interviews with experts and descriptions of her class experience. Her report might not shake you up, but will will make you think about academic planning and academic programs (and budgets).

SCUP-46


One interviewee whose name you will know is Carol Twigg of the National Center for Academic Transrormation (NCAT). Golden finishes her third and final report with a summation from Twigg about StraighterLine's product:

“Within the universe of institutions,” Twigg said, “there are high-quality courses and mediocre courses and really lousy courses…. [StraighterLine] is well within the sort of mediocre and above, because of the oversight that’s gone into it.”

“I think it’s certainly a viable option within the panoply of higher education offerings,” she concluded. “How’s that for a lukewarm endorsement?” She paused, laughing.

“It’s as good as the other stuff.”

The "other stuff," of course, is what our institutions do now for lots more money.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, November, 11, 2010

Moving from Anecdotes to Data With Freeman Hrabowski

The Chronicle of Higher Education's "Tech Therapy" section interviews Freeman Hrabowski, president of the University of Maryland Baltimore County, about the value of analytics for higher education leaders. (We recommend moving the slider over and beginning to listen to the podcast at 15 minutes in unless you want to hear a couple of ads and some talk about iPads.)

The first story Hrabowski tells is about a discussion with a senior faculty member in engineering who, anecdotal information, was firm in his belief that everyone who started after a PhD in that program got one. Hrabowski notes that he had hard data that it was more like 50 percent, and was able to get data-informed decisions made. Why did the professor think everyone finished? Perhaps because the students who did not finish were not very visible to him as they slipped through the cracks. With the data, the school was able to better address retention issues.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, September, 12, 2010

Trustees & Assessing Student Learning

The Association of Governing Boards of Colleges and Universities (AGB) has published the results of a study about governing boards and student learning assessment. The following quote is from a Chronicle article about the survey results. You can download the entire report from the AGB: How Boards Oversee Educational Quality. As well, AGB offers the book Making the Grade: How Boards Can Ensure Academic Quality, by Peter Ewell.

The report, "How Boards Oversee Educational Quality: A Report on a Survey on Boards and the Assessment of Student Learning," is based on a survey conducted in November 2009 that asked 1,300 chief academic officers and chairs of board committees on academic affairs how boards oversee academic quality. The response rate was 38 percent, with 28 percent of trustees and 58 percent of chief academic officers participating. Almost one-quarter of the respondents were from public institutions, and three-quarters were from private institutions.

Results of the survey were mixed, Ms. Johnston said. While slightly more than half of respondents said boards spend more time discussing student-learning outcomes now than they did five years ago, 61.5 percent said boards do not spend sufficient time in meetings on the issue. A smaller proportion—38.5 percent—said enough time was spent on the subject in board meetings.

"There is plenty of room for improvement," Ms. Johnston said

 

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, May, 13, 2010

Changes to Recognition of Accrediting Organizations?

Don't miss out on joining nearly 1,500 of your colleagues and peers at higher education's premier planning event of 2010, SCUP–45. The Society for College and University Planning's 45th annual, international conference and idea marketplace is July 10–14 in Minneapolis!



Here's your SCUP Link on Changes to Recognition of Accrediting Organizations!

The process by which CHEA, the Council for Higher Education Accreditation, recognizes accrediting organizations is being changes. If you have an opinion on those changes, you have until May 31 to respond via an online form.

The proposed revisions are an effort to assure that CHEA recognition plays a meaningful role as part of a strong and vibrant accreditation enterprise, reflecting the best of self-regulation and peer/professional review in serving the public interest. The revisions address the challenges of expanded international activity, degree mills and maintaining accreditation independence and transparency. They also address the recognition process, interim reporting on major changes and the time periods associated with denial of CHEA recognition or official withdrawal of consideration for CHEA recognition.

Labels: , , , ,

1330 Eisenhower Place | Ann Arbor, MI 48108 | phone: 734.669.3270 | fax: 734.661.0157 | email: info@scup.org

Copyright © Society for College and University Planning
All Rights Reserved

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Site Map